Topic: What do you want to see in casino reviews? - page 25. (Read 4849 times)

In my opinion, reading online casino reviews can be a good and valuable source of information for us before getting involved and we also have to know the site's rating, but we also have to be smart and careful in assessing existing reviews. Because not all recommendations and reviews can be trusted and relied upon, and of course not all reviews are true, some are dishonest, and some are just made up and don't match the facts, are biased or fake.
However, reading it is also important, we also have to filter it and do research for consideration so that we don't get trapped in reviews that don't match reality. And all of this aims to find an online casino that suits our wishes and is also safe and comfortable overall.

I believe that there doesn't exist a platform like that but I believe we may have such platforms if a few gamblers get support via donations from casinos or other investors to test out any casino of our own choice.

The gamblers then should be allowed to get some money for the reviews but no one should tell them the platform that they want to choose and when they choose a casino then they will get some deposit from those donated funds and the gamblers may use the funds to gamble on the casino of his/her choice.

The gambler must need to review the casino afterwards and in that way I believe a gambler would more like write a review without getting paid from the casino that he/she tested. That's the best way to have such reviews and I guess so far no such platform exist that does that.

Such requirements are quite difficult to implement in terms of information reliability. Both in journalism in general and in casino/gambling reviews in particular, the authority of the reviewer primarily plays a role. No small independent reviewer can compare with a large publication; their reviews will not inspire commensurate credibility. In addition, the same can be said based on private negative reviews from gamblers - we do not know them and cannot fully trust the information received from them. Someone can whitewash one casino, and someone can denigrate its reputation.

I'm really interested in the negative points, problems that occurred and how they were handled, any misuse of player information, ToS abuse... Most reviews don't mention that and it's actually the most important thing these days. I want to know if people were being forced to go through stupid KYC requirements, like having all their documents translated to English.
I want to know what their withdrawal times are for small and large requests, if they're trying to delay this process.
I want to know how many complaints were there in the recent months and if the team was previously involved in any other casino project, especially a project that failed or scammed people.

Unfortunately most reviews are shallow and focus on the amount of games available, bonuses and all that, while it's more important to know that they charge you additional fees on withdrawal. I don't care that for every $100 staked I'll get $1 from them.

I want to read actual reviews and experiences from actual people/admins working in the review website. Post about real user experiences, and update them to compare from past reviews if the casino improved its service/UX, or if it has gotten worse since last review.

Plus the people have currently become smarter. I suggest avoid using generic reviews that make it obvious that the "reviewer" didn't spend some time in the casino that he/she is reviewing.

Why won't any sane gambler find casino reviews interesting?.. look, it's not even about your interest mostimes,..why? Cus there's every tendency that you agree to try out a casino that you don't like, just for them bonuses and an unusual liberation.... E.g; some casino's withdrawal fees could possibly hit hard on the nerves and gamblers would still trade that comfortably for the fame and reliability of the casino...alot of peeps would still use Thier route comfortably, as long as Thier funds are safe..

---

Them reviews are basically about thier modus operandi, T/C's, serenity and odds too.

Sandra 🧑‍🦰

Not very often, but once reading reviews for a particular casino, usually I read casino reviews that talk too much about bonuses and earnings, just wanting to prove the negatives and positives about people's experiences.

useful, but only certain parts are useful.
For example:
Games, bonuses and negative and positive casino actions.

as in general, licenses and so on related to casinos.

Sure, not right now, maybe another time.

Next time, if there is free time and opportunity, I will show it.

When we are making review and want it to be the honest one, we must talk about both the good and the bad side of what we have observed from the casino, they are paying for the review in other to make the reviewer make an honest review for them regardless of what they may see, as long as it concerns the feedback expected for them to work on and improve the quality of their service to gamblers.

All right, for user active in bitcointalk forum and have been popular with many kinds of gambling site not really need to see casino review because many of them have experienced playing with several casino, less for beginner and new comer in bitcointalk forum need to read all review although waste time depend read term of service only with casino want to create account. Little difficult how to find honest review because some casino not support with play store application if available there we can read all honest review under application available on play store.
Actually read with term of service and see how long casino gambling operation likely enough to know trusted casino or not, read all reviewer about casino waste our time.

Your mindset is good though, but you also have to know that sometime, it necessary to checkout some extra infos, about a casino, although signature campaign may not be a true reflection because there is a different between the company and the signature campaign participants, because those wearing signature may not be directly representing the casino, but just promoting the site by wearing the signature.
But if it review campaign,  that one is different from from signature campaign entirely.

I think that is due to the strong competition right now, so many have became desperate doing what they can, only to stand out. Fortunately there are people who notice this and wants to go against with it. One of it might be the OP because he didn't rush on creating his casino review site, but he wants to make sure first that people are going to love it.

The suggestions you gave there are too common and almost all casino review sites has it. However again, it only boils down to how accurate they are on providing those information. But, I also like it if they allow real-time gamblers to post their own feedback on the casinos that are listed on their platform.

Reviews consist of lies and truth, and the crazy part is that some casinos have their ways of getting rid of those truth reviews if it's really going to affect their reputation.

I would rather not look into a reviews much, and I can only find out if it's a scam casino or not, everything else is left for me to find out by experimenting the casino myself.

Forget reviews, if you have to do it make sure you use this forum, there are good casinos on here, enough to fill your gambling fantasy for you, there is no room for scam casinos on this forum, this is why it's the right place to find them.

Reviews on the forum are also more true, because review on other platforms are mostly two types: 1) negative review when a gambler had an issue (even waiting 10 minutes instead of 5 is an issue and reason to write a negative review) 2) positive review made by team or someone who won a tiny amount (persons makes a registration, gets a bonus, wins, withdraws $1. what kind of positive review can that be?).

Forums is different. People share here not only few sentences, but add pictures and their reviews are more full (review platforms usually limit reviews with number of words or review size). I love reading large posts and reviews on the forum. I usually skip 1-2 liners, but a wall of text for me shows that review or post was written from heart.

I'm not sure about casino reviews unless I play there in person. The ones I often play at are usually casinos with a long lifespan, they are much more trustworthy than new casinos. Please bring a little money to a new casino just to try or get the event. When I first entered the casino, I was always fooled by lots of fake reviews. Finally, I was convinced by my own reviews by jumping straight in. I know this is a risk, but I don't want to continue being exposed to unfair casinos.

First, these days, you should be careful of where to derive your information from, otherwise, you will be misinformed by many sources that have collected money to dissipate the information to people. This is why you do not go to review sites that wlll not allow people to share their opinions freely. If you go to the review sites that will allow people to share their opinions, you should be further sensitive about it to know whether or not the reviewing site is genuine or if they just make what you see up. You can start by researching about the review site itself to have more knowledge about them. You can also post your review and know how they act on it to further test them. There was a review issue I posted about a company years back, could you believe the review site never posted it? It was about options trading to show you how review sites could connive with some companies.

Now, if I have attested to the sincerity of the site, I then move further to only unbiased reviews. The reason is that it is all reviews that are worth reading but it is not all reviews that are worth believing. Some allegations are baseless while some reviewers might even be paid by rival companies. So, I stay alert while reading reviews and disregard many of them based on my final verdicts. However, what I love to read mostly in reviews of casinos are the customer care service, security, the withdrawal experience and the stability/reliability of the betting platform. Others are secondary and might be a peculiar issue (if exist at all) to others, so I don't give them much thoughts.

Do you read casino reviews? No I do read casino review sometime but usually I just go and I do usually find new casino from signature campaign too hehe
What should a casino review contain to make you read it? I don't know since Im rarely read the review I Just go direct to the website and test the water with small deposit maybe 10$ or try their free game first. Review from my friend is actually a good rather than read someone review.

I am expected with honest reviewed and casino platform not hidden yet when any reviewer talk the true about their gambling or casino platform, most important I want to know with review in some casino is the several list points below

• required KYC or not
• need raise limit turn over or not when withdrawing fund
• withdrawing and deposit are instant or not
• how many coins support for deposit or withdraw, some casino allowed with bitcoin only
• Fee cost withdrawal fund

Its some important points I want to see in the review, most important about KYC required or not because when winning huge amount not face suspend account later when trying to withdraw.

Yes I do read casino reviews mostly on trustpilot and ever since I became a member of this forum I’ve had better understanding of reviews and I think reviews are always very essential for marketing of any service even for casinos and I must say that I always reviews but on play stores and AppStore’s before installing any app but casino apps.

Yeah I find every review about a brand I want to use very useful but good and bad and I think I pay more attention to the negative reviews because that’s were the major truth lies

A well attractive tittle and I think it will interest me more if the review is written sincerely as most times I try to be in the writers mood while reading and most times, negative reviews are more catchy to the eyes as I would want to know why a negative review

Reputation is the most important element and it is possibly the most difficult to "review". Think of the crypto "ICO" fever  few years ago, there is a problem with proving legitimacy and it was tried over and over - verifying the team, escrow for funds, limits to max and min funding, projects analysed in depth... and still quite a few slipped through the cracks with easy.

Well ofcourse genuine and honest reviews, however it has a tendency to be manipulated and tampered by the gambling site itself if it is literally site reviews. Best way is to check if there is a community particularly for that gambling site or to directly ask players in game for their insighys however some won't be that vocal about it 'coz majority are often unresponsive when  asked. Last option is to check and see it for yourself.
I think you are referring to pictures and other things to proof the legitimacu of reviews but again some of it won't be a legitimate review from your fellow gambler. So maybe, it is the quantity which would also be a factor to consider.
Well, this forum could also be a platform to check feedbacks and opinion about a gambling site especially if it is a web 3.0 casino or gambling site. Others are with reddit, telegram chanels, and more but yes it won't be easy especially if the gambling platform you are checking is not yet that popular. Engaging to reputable ones would still be an option.