Shaw and Tomljanovic made a very slight error in one of their papers. I don't recall the exact details. I think they shifted an age cohort without a proper explanation. I don't remember if it was this paper, but from 'our side' it is best to avoid use of their work when possible. There is a growing mass of information from others who've not made such a mistake.
The thing is that the pro-vax side can use the most basic and crude forms of fraud and their work will be lauded. More importantly, the 'better' the fraud the more funding they can expect going forward. Same as with global climate change fraudsters.
'Our side' doesn't have this luxury. Quite the opposite. The one thing 'we' have on our side is truth, and good science will almost always reward that...after a few decades... The power of 'the truth' is the basis for the attack on real science by the likes of Big Pharma and the Greenie crowd. But 'we' have to be extra super careful to do everything perfectly. Even then we'll be smeared, but the smear can be wiped clean and eventually the other side sustains a hit for it. Clever people on the truth side can bait the fraud side into attacks which will backfire on them because, in point of fact, the fraudster side 'scientists' are sell-outs and often because they are simply not very smart. Cannot make it doing real science.
The fraudsters have the government and the entire mainstream media behind them (since the same group of people own both) so even when 'the truth' wins, most people don't know it. But then again, most people are fairly useless sheeple class and what they think they know doesn't really have much of an impact on the real world. When it comes to vaccines, the sheeple class will damage their kids upon demand by corp/gov, and their kids will end up as stupid as they are. It's sad and it will have a negative impact on society, but it's not probably the best battle to fight right now.