Author

Topic: What's your opinion of gun control? - page 109. (Read 450471 times)

legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1145
July 02, 2016, 06:38:09 PM
At my opinion gun control is okay, cause it's prevent many accidents, many people have trouble with emotions and head, they should not own guns at my opinion.

this is common sense to most people, allow those who have reason and can be trusted to have guns, those that have anger issues/criminal records/mental conditions shouldn't be allowed to own guns for obvious reasons. Its simple, if you can stop the bad guys getting guns then do it.

This is called Gun Control  Grin
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
July 02, 2016, 06:10:01 PM
<>

yes it is a fact that USA has a decent income from gun bargaining. and that is the reason they always try to produce violance in the world. so if USA is supporting gun trafficking then how can think to control it.  

This is the exact problem with good people. They look at bad people and say, "Its the USA, or Britain, or Russia, or China, etc." They seldom realize that people in all these governments are acting independently of government, on their own, except that they often use their governmental office to pull strings that they wouldn't be able to pull otherwise.

This isn't always the complete truth. Sometimes their boss has them do governmental things, officially. But this really serves to open up many more private opportunities for them when the real government job is done.

Cool
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
July 02, 2016, 05:23:56 PM


Guns are made for one purpose, and that purpose is to kill.
I believe that guns are not weapons, they are tools. How they are used is up to the person holding it.
Guns are especially dangerous in the hands of people who don't know how to use them (i.e., kids and teenagers) as well as those who are mentally ill and/or have a temper problem.
Gun control will not stop violence because a violent person doesn’t need a gun to be violent.
After the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, support for gun control increased dramatically.

Generally in America, the support for gun control has outweighed the support for gun rights.
Are gun control laws constitutional?
What would be your ideal set of laws regarding firearms?



but for your kind information i want to tell you that USA is the major gun supplier country. they are almost suppling weapons to all over the world. and they have a good income from that trading side. so how can you say that they are the  the supporter of gun control programe?
yes it is a fact that USA has a decent income from gun bargaining. and that is the reason they always try to produce violance in the world. so if USA is supporting gun trafficking then how can think to control it. 
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
July 01, 2016, 12:24:35 PM
At my opinion gun control is okay, cause it's prevent many accidents, many people have trouble with emotions and head, they should not own guns at my opinion.

this is common sense to most people, allow those who have reason and can be trusted to have guns, those that have anger issues/criminal records/mental conditions shouldn't be allowed to own guns for obvious reasons. Its simple, if you can stop the bad guys getting guns then do it.

This would keep the police from having guns.    Cool
legendary
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice
July 01, 2016, 11:22:25 AM
At my opinion gun control is okay, cause it's prevent many accidents, many people have trouble with emotions and head, they should not own guns at my opinion.

this is common sense to most people, allow those who have reason and can be trusted to have guns, those that have anger issues/criminal records/mental conditions shouldn't be allowed to own guns for obvious reasons. Its simple, if you can stop the bad guys getting guns then do it.
hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 500
July 01, 2016, 11:15:13 AM
At my opinion gun control is okay, cause it's prevent many accidents, many people have trouble with emotions and head, they should not own guns at my opinion.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
July 01, 2016, 10:08:03 AM
Media Silent as Concealed Carrier
Stops Mass Shooting in Progress
at a South Carolina Nightclub






Lyman, SC – A remarkable incident is being largely ignored by corporate mainstream media – as it doesn't fit their "guns are bad" narrative. A man with a concealed carry license stopped a mass shooting in progress outside a South Carolina nightclub in the early morning hours on Sunday after an assailant opened fire in a crowd of people, striking and injuring three people.

Jody Ray Thompson, 32, faces multiple attempted murder charges stemming from the incident, according to Spartanburg County deputies. None of the victims' injuries were life-threatening, according to police.

"His rounds struck 3 victims, and almost struck a fourth victim, who in self-defense, pulled his own weapon and fired, striking Thompson in the leg," Lt. Kevin Bobo said.

Police said that after getting into an altercation with another man, Thompson pulled out a firearm and began firing into a crowd of people that had gathered near the front of the club around 3:30 a.m., according to WISTV-10.

As Thompson was firing at the crowd of people, one of his would-be victims, with a concealed carry permit, was able to return fire, striking Thompson in the leg and ending the mass shooting in progress.

...

Had this legal concealed carrier not been present when this gunman began opening fire, this incident would have likely had much more deadly consequences. The reality is that a legal concealed carrier at ground zero of an attack can stop the carnage sooner.

When good people carry firearms it saves lives, not that the media will tell you that.


Read more at http://www.dcclothesline.com/2016/07/01/media-silent-as-concealed-carrier-stops-mass-shooting-in-progress-at-a-south-carolina-nightclub/.


Cool
newbie
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
July 01, 2016, 08:28:34 AM
We need guns that do not kill, that's all.
Hoping in technology to bring a social change soon. everyone should be able to protect themself, yes. but the way it is right now makes killing too easy. imho even the police should use paralizers and not guns, at this point. this would give to the people the time at least to see if the person was guilty or not. it's not just about the person (even if I do believe life matters a lot), it's about who has the gun: you may regret too much what you did (maybe you were actually wrong even if the situation was insane) and no one should live with the guilt of 'I killed someone but I was just trying to be safe' when there are so many other options. the actual sistem is incredibly old-world, western-situation.
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1386
June 30, 2016, 08:17:56 PM


Guns are made for one purpose, and that purpose is to kill.
I believe that guns are not weapons, they are tools. How they are used is up to the person holding it.
Guns are especially dangerous in the hands of people who don't know how to use them (i.e., kids and teenagers) as well as those who are mentally ill and/or have a temper problem.
Gun control will not stop violence because a violent person doesn’t need a gun to be violent.
After the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, support for gun control increased dramatically.

Generally in America, the support for gun control has outweighed the support for gun rights.
Are gun control laws constitutional?
What would be your ideal set of laws regarding firearms?



but for your kind information i want to tell you that USA is the major gun supplier country. they are almost suppling weapons to all over the world. and they have a good income from that trading side. so how can you say that they are the  the supporter of gun control programe?
What you want to tell people and what is true may differ.

https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2012/06/big-six-arms-exporters/
legendary
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1032
RIP Mommy
June 30, 2016, 05:44:45 PM
but for your kind information i want to tell you that USA is the major gun supplier country. they are almost suppling weapons to all over the world. and they have a good income from that trading side. so how can you say that they are the  the supporter of gun control programe?

The US government needs to give guns to violent criminals so it can "justify" "gun control". See "Operation Fast & Furious".
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
June 30, 2016, 12:26:03 PM


Guns are made for one purpose, and that purpose is to kill.
I believe that guns are not weapons, they are tools. How they are used is up to the person holding it.
Guns are especially dangerous in the hands of people who don't know how to use them (i.e., kids and teenagers) as well as those who are mentally ill and/or have a temper problem.
Gun control will not stop violence because a violent person doesn’t need a gun to be violent.
After the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, support for gun control increased dramatically.

Generally in America, the support for gun control has outweighed the support for gun rights.
Are gun control laws constitutional?
What would be your ideal set of laws regarding firearms?



but for your kind information i want to tell you that USA is the major gun supplier country. they are almost suppling weapons to all over the world. and they have a good income from that trading side. so how can you say that they are the  the supporter of gun control programe?
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
June 30, 2016, 06:15:51 AM
No one needs guns personally. Just the army needs to for war. Otherwise unless your a hunter there is no reason to have a gun personally.

Having guns personally makes some people to feel saved especially if they live in areas with high level of criminal. How else to protect themselves if government can't do that?
hero member
Activity: 672
Merit: 508
LOTEO
June 30, 2016, 05:44:19 AM
No one needs guns personally. Just the army needs to for war. Otherwise unless your a hunter there is no reason to have a gun personally.

Alternative: Everyone needs guns and is part of the Army (like Swiss)
legendary
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice
June 30, 2016, 05:10:22 AM
No one needs guns personally. Just the army needs to for war. Otherwise unless your a hunter there is no reason to have a gun personally.


All the people of the States are the militia of the States. The militia needs guns to be effective these days... like for hunting Muslims... https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/rape-waves-by-foreigners-progress-in-the-united-states-of-america-1520524.

Cool

Its a pitty you weren't there or  any of your militia.    You could have simply shot and killed all3 of the perpetrators ,  the 8 year old, 10 year old and 13 year old.Maybe that's too  good for them though?  or if only the little girl  had a  gun and she could have shot them all.     
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
June 30, 2016, 03:49:45 AM
No one needs guns personally. Just the army needs to for war. Otherwise unless your a hunter there is no reason to have a gun personally.


All the people of the States are the militia of the States. The militia needs guns to be effective these days... like for hunting Muslims... https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/rape-waves-by-foreigners-progress-in-the-united-states-of-america-1520524.

Cool
legendary
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice
June 30, 2016, 02:03:39 AM
No one needs guns personally. Just the army needs to for war. Otherwise unless your a hunter there is no reason to have a gun personally.


Yes, only the army and hunters need guns to hunt disarmed humans with and commit genocide against us.

Until the perp comes back as a zombie, there's no need to discuss whether a jury would need to guarantee he will never possess any deadly weapon again. Which no jury as we know it could, as everything can be a deadly weapon, so the safest place to put a living or undead attempted or successful murderer is prison, where he will only be able to murder other murderers, and people who volunteer to guard murderers.

Has the jury reached a verdict?

Yes we have, Your Honor.

Will the Undead please rise?

LMFAO

I don't know what  country your from but is this something you worry about where you come from?  I  can only assume you live in some war torn third world country because   anywhere else i  wouldn't expect anything like this to happe.  I  assumed when we  are talking about gun control we were talking about first world country'. 
legendary
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1032
RIP Mommy
June 30, 2016, 12:59:23 AM
No one needs guns personally. Just the army needs to for war. Otherwise unless your a hunter there is no reason to have a gun personally.


Yes, only the army and hunters need guns to hunt disarmed humans with and commit genocide against us.

Until the perp comes back as a zombie, there's no need to discuss whether a jury would need to guarantee he will never possess any deadly weapon again. Which no jury as we know it could, as everything can be a deadly weapon, so the safest place to put a living or undead attempted or successful murderer is prison, where he will only be able to murder other murderers, and people who volunteer to guard murderers.

Has the jury reached a verdict?

Yes we have, Your Honor.

Will the Undead please rise?

LMFAO
full member
Activity: 181
Merit: 101
June 29, 2016, 11:57:19 PM
No one needs guns personally. Just the army needs to for war. Otherwise unless your a hunter there is no reason to have a gun personally.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
June 29, 2016, 11:55:41 PM
All you people who are against gun control seem to be under the impression that once you have gun control you have to give up your guns, Thats not the case. Gun control is simply putting in stricter checks or disallowing certain people for instance mentally insane or convicted criminals from having guns. Gun control is a must in any civilised country.



Law Enforcement Sources: Gun Used in Paris Terrorist Attacks Came from Phoenix



One of the guns used in the November 13, 2015 Paris terrorist attacks came from Phoenix, Arizona where the Obama administration allowed criminals to buy thousands of weapons illegally in a deadly and futile “gun-walking” operation known as “Fast and Furious.”

A Report of Investigation (ROI) filed by a case agent in the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco Firearms and Explosives (ATF) tracked the gun used in the Paris attacks to a Phoenix gun owner who sold it illegally, “off book,” Judicial Watch’s law enforcement sources confirm. Federal agents tracing the firearm also found the Phoenix gun owner to be in possession of an unregistered fully automatic weapon, according to law enforcement officials with firsthand knowledge of the investigation.

The investigative follow up of the Paris weapon consisted of tracking a paper trail using a 4473 form, which documents a gun’s ownership history by, among other things, using serial numbers. The Phoenix gun owner that the weapon was traced back to was found to have at least two federal firearms violations—for selling one weapon illegally and possessing an unregistered automatic—but no enforcement or prosecutorial action was taken against the individual. Instead, ATF leaders went out of their way to keep the information under the radar and ensure that the gun owner’s identity was “kept quiet,” according to law enforcement sources involved with the case. “Agents were told, in the process of taking the fully auto, not to anger the seller to prevent him from going public,” a veteran law enforcement official told Judicial Watch.

It’s not clear if the agency, which is responsible for cracking down on the illegal use and trafficking of firearms, did this because the individual was involved in the Fast and Furious gun-running scheme. An ATF spokesman, Corey Ray, at the agency’s Washington D.C. headquarters told Judicial Watch that “no firearms used in the Paris attacks have been traced” by the agency. When asked about the ROI report linking the weapon used in Paris to Phoenix, Ray said “I’m not familiar with the report you’re referencing.” Judicial Watch also tried contacting the Phoenix ATF office, but multiple calls were not returned.

The ATF ran the Fast and Furious experiment and actually allowed criminals, “straw purchasers,” working for Mexican drug cartels to buy weapons at federally licensed firearms dealers in Phoenix and allowed the guns to be “walked”—possessed without any knowledge of their whereabouts. The government lost track of most of the weapons and many have been used to murder hundreds of innocent people as well as a U.S. Border Patrol agent, Brian Terry, in Arizona. A mainstream newspaper reported that a Muslim terrorist who planned to murder attendees of a Muhammad cartoon contest in Garland, Texas last year bought a 9-millimeter pistol at a Phoenix gun shop that participated in the ATF’s Fast and Furious program despite drug and assault charges that should have raised red flags. Judicial Watch has thoroughly investigated Fast and Furious and has sued the Obama administration for information about the once-secret operation.



http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2016/06/law-enforcement-sources-gun-used-paris-terrorist-attacks-came-phoenix/



--------------------------------------
You want insane people (Operation Fast & Furious) to be in charge of gun control?

Why?


legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1386
June 29, 2016, 10:06:00 PM
The flaw in your thinking is twofold at least:
1. The perp used a hatchet. This means he was not using a gun in the first place. So, he was not as bad of a crook as he could have been.

False premise. A deadly weapon is a deadly weapon. Use any deadly weapon to attempt or successfully commit murder, and you are equally as bad of a crook as any other crook who uses any other deadly weapon to attempt or successfully commit murder.

I missed that the only legitimate death penalty, the instant death penalty in lawful self-defense, was administered by the Good Samaritan. Until the perp comes back as a zombie, there's no need to discuss whether a jury would need to guarantee he will never possess any deadly weapon again. Which no jury as we know it could, as everything can be a deadly weapon, so the safest place to put a living or undead attempted or successful murderer is prison, where he will only be able to murder other murderers, and people who volunteer to guard murderers.

Has the jury reached a verdict?

Yes we have, Your Honor.

Will the Undead please rise?



Jump to: