Topic: What's your opinion of gun control? - page 111. (Read 450471 times)

Killary's SS men hate her Bible-and-ashtray flinging guts.  One even wrote a book about it.

Imagine being an elite SS LEO, and having to not only watch but protect and thereby enable a giant crook like her.

I wouldn't be too shocked if a couple get fed up and give her the Indira Gandhi treatment....

Darling Hillary has had round the clock armed guards (Secret Service) at her disposal, paid for by the taxpayers, for the past 25 years.  This will continue for the rest of her life whether she is elected President or not.   Being an entitled elite, she deserves to keep her guns.  The rest of us are too stupid and dangerous to be trusted with ours. 

Fucking democrats... being protected by people with guns and OWNING them themselves but they go ahead and try to take the right away from their constituents from owning a gun / making it so hard they people give up.

Avoiding an argument by mocking a grammar mistake. You seem like someone incredibly bright. Sorry I sometimes make a mistake in a none native language...

The arrogance of some people ><

No I does not.

Does you even understand that gun control doesn't mean guns will be forbidden?  That maybe it just means for forbiding shotguns for example (which are a well known self defense weapons of course xD)

I like how you talk about "We The People" like you actually represent anyone but you xD

Guns are like vaccines.


You don't need them.


Unless you need them.


And when you need them, it's too late to go get them.

Especially since those like Rangel who represent the International Criminals Union at the absolute expense of public safety/We The People have zero legitimate fear about their sole beneficiaries committing any violence whatsoever against them, nor We The People suddenly becoming We The Criminals Unionists.

Ok that's your opinion. That means no longer protection for any of your government member why not. That's a concept, that would oblige USA to some decent international policies so you don't get your president killed every two weeks xD

Absolutely not.

Nope. But it doesn't matter. It's still important to underline that it is not an argument.
And anyway, what he says is true. You don't think the representant of the state actually deserve to be protected more than normal citizens?
Why all the means put for POTUS and VP protection then?

You obviously don't know Rangel.

Wahou... Let's take an information from Fox News (very reliable) about a quote out its context (very professional) of a hasty answer of ONE guy and let us transform this in a broadwide argument... 

House Democrats’ Gun-Control Sit-In Turns Into Chaotic Showdown With Republicans


WASHINGTON — A Democratic protest demanding votes on gun-control legislation led to pandemonium in the House chamber that did not end until early Thursday, when Speaker Paul D. Ryan and his fellow Republicans reclaimed control long enough to force through a major spending bill. They then abruptly adjourned and left the Capitol.

Furious Democrats remained on the House floor, where they huddled around their leader, Representative Nancy Pelosi of California, who praised their stand as a “discussion heard around the world.”

Ms. Pelosi expressed bewilderment at the Republican position. “What could they be thinking?” she asked. “Whatever it is, they don’t want to tell anybody about it. That’s why they left in the dead of night.”

The standoff, which began with a Democratic sit-in on the House floor just before noon on Wednesday, did not end until about 3 a.m. Thursday when Mr. Ryan — barreling over Democrats’ objections — took the rare and provocative step of calling a vote on a major appropriations bill in the wee hours and without any debate. He then adjourned the House, with no legislative votes scheduled until July 5.

The House approved the bill, which includes $1.1 billion in emergency financing to fight the mosquito-borne Zika virus — and more than $80 billion in other government spending — by a vote of 239 to 171 shortly after 3 a.m.

Republicans dashed from the chamber into the sticky heat gripping Washington and were met by protesters who jeered, with some shouting, “Do your job!”

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/23/us/politics/house-democrats-stage-sit-in-to-push-for-action-on-gun-control.html

It doesn't matter, it's too late. The day they announce a law preventing citizens to buy ak47 whenever they want, criminal organisation will just buy thousands of weapons for after...

Too many weapons are already on the ground, it's too late...

Almost nobody goes to court in the UK at Queens Bench. If you did this, you could have your guns in the UK, along with almost no regulation. See http://www.unkommonlaw.co.uk/.

UK Column Karl Lentz meets Brian Gerrish December 17 2013

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VgfBszEKsfw