Author

Topic: What's your opinion of gun control? - page 116. (Read 450482 times)

legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1072
Crypto is the separation of Power and State.
June 16, 2016, 05:31:31 PM
Hell yeah!

JPFO4LIFE

GOA4LIFE

SAF4LIFE



"Come and take them." - King Leonidis I, Thermopylae, 480 BC
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
June 16, 2016, 05:21:53 PM
Why Everyone MUST Learn How To Shoot!




9th Edition Gran’pa Jack Booklet Released (by Arnorsson and Korwin)
Contact: Felicity Bower, 602-996-4020, [email protected]

BLOOMFIELD PRESS • GunLaws.com
4848 E. Cactus #505-440 • Scottsdale, AZ 85254 • 1-800-707-4020 Orders • 602-996-4020 • [email protected]

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE -- June 15, 2016


The just-released booklet, Why Jews MUST Learn How to Shoot, provides the answer to the global jihad, which just touched America in Orlando, Fla., killing scores of people in a gay nightclub.

Gay “infidels” are a primary target of radicalized muslims terrorizing the world. JPFO, Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership, a supporter of the LGBT community’s right to arms, has published the controversial monograph.

Gran’pa Jack, the main character in the illustrated booklet (the 9th in a series started by JPFO founder Aaron Zelman), advises his grandkids that everyone, not just Jews, must learn how to shoot because of all the evil in the world. As fate would have it, he specifically mentions you must know how to shoot armed jihadis, as well as other outlaws, using guns to stop them when they harm innocent people.

The booklet is written so a child can understand it, but covers topics adults may not get if they rely on so-called mainstream sources for their news and information. Guns serve invaluable roles in American society, but are only portrayed in uniformly negative ways in the old media.

Gran’pa Jack and his grandkids and friends have an educational time going to the range, learning how and why guns are useful and historic traditions for most Americans. Guns save lives, protect people and robust private firearm ownership is why America is still free. “Why don’t they teach us any of this in school?” Jack’s granddaughter asks. Gran’pa takes an honest look at the lack of education taking place in so many schools today and the role of educators as suppressors.

Jack’s black chum Leon adds candid commentary on the state of affairs in the black community, broadening the appeal, making it clear all Americans are potentially targets of attack. Bible passages are mentioned only to illustrate that the Book recognized evil exists and resisting it with force, even lethal force when absolutely necessary, is reasonable behavior, justifiable and required to preserve the precious gift of life.

Gran’pa Jack and JPFO propose the only course of action that is proven effective to thwart the jihadis and mass murderers—who always arm themselves illegally when seeking to prematurely end our lives. “YOU must learn to shoot.” As the jihad intensifies, you may come around to this view. A rogues gallery of other modern-day villains is included.

This booklet expresses JPFO’s resistance to the anti-freedom approach to safety of some public figures campaigning to diminish the public’s right to arms. Reducing your access to the quality firearms and ammo our police and military prefer, as some misguided politicians are demanding, only makes matters worse, since we face the same adversaries—as the Orlando murders showed. “The correct response to a mass murderer is not to restrict the public, but to empower the public and give us every advantage possible over potential criminals.” –JPFO Policy.

Bloomfield Press believes candidates and politicians who do not support an uninfringed right to keep and bear arms for decent regular citizens are not worthy of holding office and should be removed.

Get and read Gran’pa Jack #9, then give it to someone you love. Buy a dozen for only $20 bucks and do some good with them.


Read more at http://www.gunlaws.com/Gran%27pa%20Jack%20PR1.htm.


Cool
legendary
Activity: 4760
Merit: 1283
June 16, 2016, 05:12:31 PM



9th Circuit: Americans Have No Right To Concealed Carry A Gun Outside Home



The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is ruling in favor of California’s “good cause” requirement, saying the Second Amendment does not protect a right to carry a concealed gun in public.

On February 13 2014 Breibart News reported that a panel of judges from the Ninth Circuit struck down California’s “good cause” requirement. Thereafter–under pressure from State Attorney Kamala Harris–the court announced that it would rehear the case en banc. Today that en banc ruling resulted in the “good cause” requirement being upheld and Americans being told they have not right to carry a concealed gun in public.

The case–PERUTA V. CTY. OF SAN DIEGO–was filed by concealed permit applicants who think the “good cause” requirement infringed their Second Amendment rights in San Diego and Yolo Counties. On February 13, 2014, the Ninth Circuit panel sided with the Plaintiffs, ruling that the right to keep and bear arms is, in and of itself, a sufficient cause for bearing arms for self-defense. Moreover, that it is a sufficient cause both inside and outside of one’s domicile.

The San Francisco Chronicle quoted from Judge Diarmuid O’Scannlain’s majority opinion, in which he emphasized that “the right to bear arms includes the right to carry an operable arm outside the home for the lawful purpose of self-defense.”

But the en banc ruling went in the opposite direction, upholding the “good cause” requirement and unequivocally stating that Americans have no right to carry a concealed gun outside the home for self-defense. Writing in the majority opinion, Judge Williams Fletcher said, “We hold that the Second Amendment does not preserve or protect a right of a member of the general public to carry concealed firearms in public.”


http://www.breitbart.com/california/2016/06/09/9th-circuit/

How many individuals who have a license for their firearm have intentionally shot innocent people? The shootings are by individuals usually who obtain firearms illegally. Restrictive laws will only disarm the law abiding citizens, making us more likely to become victims of a crime.

Yes. They know.


'They' also know that at $15/hr a couple hundred 'protesters' can be called to beat up opposition supporters on the street.  For about the price of a cheap car a significant amount of terrorism can be purchased.  Now a law abiding citizen has a right to self defense and the 'protests', particularly in California, seem to be getting genuinely life threatening.  Furthermore the police seem to take very little interest in supporting victims who are being assaulted leaving self defense as the only option (aside from just staying home as I'm sure that some wish for.)

If the 'protesters' needed to worry about suffering injury as they try to dish it out it seems likely that even the more desperate of the hires would want more than $15/hr in compensation.  This would make 'protest' operations much more expensive for those who fund them.

legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
June 16, 2016, 04:42:04 PM
I don't really get where your going with this,  i mean fires are not  that rare so fire extinguishers are kind of needed,  also flat tyres,  again pretty common really so Always handy to have a spare.

Having to defend yourself against gun wielding robbers in the uk???  Not so common.

The point is to rubbish your gutless arms-length statistical approach to calculating the utility of kinetic mechanical advantage in emergency situations, and ridicule your utilitarian approach to considering the existence/desirability of the human right of armed self-defense.

Let me be clear.

Real Americans #ShootBack.
That's why our ruggedly self-reliant citizens are no longer the property of the Crown and Throne.

English Pinkos #DieCoweringAndWhimpering.
That's why they remain the helplessly infantalized property of the Crown and Throne, as their children shall also be, as since time immemorial have been their fathers, mothers, and grandparents.

This isn't about the likelihood of gun wielding robbers; if you are not free to bear arms you are a slave.

Lol,  you make me laugh, being free to bear arms isn't what makes you free from being a slave,  your American,  you should know better.




 The murder rate in England and Wales has risen sharply for the first time in a decade at a time when police have diverted detectives to investigate historic sex abuse and allegations against tabloid newspapers.

New figures show that the number of murders and manslaughter deaths increased by 14 per cent last year bringing the annual total to 574, or 11 deaths a week.

Officials at the Office for National Statistics (ONS) said the surge was concentrated in London and the South East and described it as “peculiar”.

However, police sources said contributory factors may have been the re-deployment of detectives in London – where a fifth of the additional murders took place – as well as growing violence among migrants, including organised gangs.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/12112024/Violent-crime-jumps-27-in-new-figures.html











Ok,  i cant help but notice a complete lack of guns in those crimes,  do you think it would be better if the criminals have easier access to guns?  Because atm criminals don't really use guns in robberies,  the cases where guns arr  used is gang on gang violence.  If your everyday civilian has guns then the bad guys will arm up too.


So... Everyday civilians should be butchered by bad guys because it is in their nature, and they only use knives... got it.




What  I'm saying is that criminals in the uk  know they could be caught and carrying a gun carries a minimum sentence of 5 years so the majority don't take the risk to get a gun,  the ones that are intent to do damage use knives,  this lowers the risk factor significantly.

They've obviously come up with a tactic that persuades criminals to use knives instead of guns.  That's an improvement.



A significant rise in criminality (11 deaths per week average) in the UK is an improvement? Yes?


legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1072
Crypto is the separation of Power and State.
June 16, 2016, 04:38:06 PM
So... Everyday civilians should be butchered by bad guys because it is in their nature, and they only use knives... got it.

Yes, you got it.

Single mothers protecting their children from bad guys with knives should only be allowed to use knives (and upper-body strength) in self-defense.

It wouldn't be fair to give them an advantage over their assailants in the form of a gun.

A single mother has no right to effectively resist initiation of violence with overwhelming retaliatory violence, only the right to bleed out as she sees and hears the bad guys doing whatever they like to her child.

/(former) MP Jo Cox logic

 Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice
June 16, 2016, 04:29:25 PM
I don't really get where your going with this,  i mean fires are not  that rare so fire extinguishers are kind of needed,  also flat tyres,  again pretty common really so Always handy to have a spare.

Having to defend yourself against gun wielding robbers in the uk???  Not so common.

The point is to rubbish your gutless arms-length statistical approach to calculating the utility of kinetic mechanical advantage in emergency situations, and ridicule your utilitarian approach to considering the existence/desirability of the human right of armed self-defense.

Let me be clear.

Real Americans #ShootBack.
That's why our ruggedly self-reliant citizens are no longer the property of the Crown and Throne.

English Pinkos #DieCoweringAndWhimpering.
That's why they remain the helplessly infantalized property of the Crown and Throne, as their children shall also be, as since time immemorial have been their fathers, mothers, and grandparents.

This isn't about the likelihood of gun wielding robbers; if you are not free to bear arms you are a slave.

Lol,  you make me laugh, being free to bear arms isn't what makes you free from being a slave,  your American,  you should know better.




 The murder rate in England and Wales has risen sharply for the first time in a decade at a time when police have diverted detectives to investigate historic sex abuse and allegations against tabloid newspapers.

New figures show that the number of murders and manslaughter deaths increased by 14 per cent last year bringing the annual total to 574, or 11 deaths a week.

Officials at the Office for National Statistics (ONS) said the surge was concentrated in London and the South East and described it as “peculiar”.

However, police sources said contributory factors may have been the re-deployment of detectives in London – where a fifth of the additional murders took place – as well as growing violence among migrants, including organised gangs.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/12112024/Violent-crime-jumps-27-in-new-figures.html











Ok,  i cant help but notice a complete lack of guns in those crimes,  do you think it would be better if the criminals have easier access to guns?  Because atm criminals don't really use guns in robberies,  the cases where guns arr  used is gang on gang violence.  If your everyday civilian has guns then the bad guys will arm up too.


So... Everyday civilians should be butchered by bad guys because it is in their nature, and they only use knives... got it.




What  I'm saying is that criminals in the uk  know they could be caught and carrying a gun carries a minimum sentence of 5 years so the majority don't take the risk to get a gun,  the ones that are intent to do damage use knives,  this lowers the risk factor significantly.

They've obviously come up with a tactic that persuades criminals to use knives instead of guns.  That's an improvement.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
June 16, 2016, 03:51:34 PM



 The murder rate in England and Wales has risen sharply for the first time in a decade at a time when police have diverted detectives to investigate historic sex abuse and allegations against tabloid newspapers.

New figures show that the number of murders and manslaughter deaths increased by 14 per cent last year bringing the annual total to 574, or 11 deaths a week.

Officials at the Office for National Statistics (ONS) said the surge was concentrated in London and the South East and described it as “peculiar”.

However, police sources said contributory factors may have been the re-deployment of detectives in London – where a fifth of the additional murders took place – as well as growing violence among migrants, including organised gangs.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/12112024/Violent-crime-jumps-27-in-new-figures.html











Ok,  i cant help but notice a complete lack of guns in those crimes,  do you think it would be better if the criminals have easier access to guns?  Because atm criminals don't really use guns in robberies,  the cases where guns arr  used is gang on gang violence.  If your everyday civilian has guns then the bad guys will arm up too.


So... Everyday civilians should be butchered by bad guys because it is in their nature, and they only use knives... got it.


legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1072
Crypto is the separation of Power and State.
June 16, 2016, 03:49:54 PM
I don't really get where your going with this,  i mean fires are not  that rare so fire extinguishers are kind of needed,  also flat tyres,  again pretty common really so Always handy to have a spare.

Having to defend yourself against gun wielding robbers in the uk???  Not so common.

The point is to rubbish your gutless arms-length statistical approach to calculating the utility of kinetic mechanical advantage in emergency situations, and ridicule your utilitarian approach to considering the existence/desirability of the human right of armed self-defense.

Let me be clear.

Real Americans #ShootBack.
That's why our ruggedly self-reliant citizens are no longer the property of the Crown and Throne.

English Pinkos #DieCoweringAndWhimpering.
That's why they remain the helplessly infantalized property of the Crown and Throne, as their children shall also be, as since time immemorial have been their fathers, mothers, and grandparents.

This isn't about the likelihood of gun wielding robbers; if you are not free to bear arms you are a slave.
legendary
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice
June 16, 2016, 03:48:09 PM



 The murder rate in England and Wales has risen sharply for the first time in a decade at a time when police have diverted detectives to investigate historic sex abuse and allegations against tabloid newspapers.

New figures show that the number of murders and manslaughter deaths increased by 14 per cent last year bringing the annual total to 574, or 11 deaths a week.

Officials at the Office for National Statistics (ONS) said the surge was concentrated in London and the South East and described it as “peculiar”.

However, police sources said contributory factors may have been the re-deployment of detectives in London – where a fifth of the additional murders took place – as well as growing violence among migrants, including organised gangs.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/12112024/Violent-crime-jumps-27-in-new-figures.html











Ok,  i cant help but notice a complete lack of guns in those crimes,  do you think it would be better if the criminals have easier access to guns?  Because atm criminals don't really use guns in robberies,  the cases where guns arr  used is gang on gang violence.  If your everyday civilian has guns then the bad guys will arm up too.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
June 16, 2016, 03:38:34 PM



 The murder rate in England and Wales has risen sharply for the first time in a decade at a time when police have diverted detectives to investigate historic sex abuse and allegations against tabloid newspapers.

New figures show that the number of murders and manslaughter deaths increased by 14 per cent last year bringing the annual total to 574, or 11 deaths a week.

Officials at the Office for National Statistics (ONS) said the surge was concentrated in London and the South East and described it as “peculiar”.

However, police sources said contributory factors may have been the re-deployment of detectives in London – where a fifth of the additional murders took place – as well as growing violence among migrants, including organised gangs.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/12112024/Violent-crime-jumps-27-in-new-figures.html









legendary
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice
June 16, 2016, 03:27:12 PM
To be fair,  the uk has some of the least gun crime in the world.  Obviously its very difficult to reduce gun crime down to 0.  America obviously has no chance to do anything about gun crime due to so many gun toting citizens.

Armed Americans *DO* have the chance to "do anything about gun crime."

We #ShootBack.

https://duckduckgo.com/?t=palemoon&q=armed+single+mother+defends+home&ia=web

How did that galactically obvious, robustly illustrated point so effortlessly fly right over your helpless peasant head?

And that's not even getting into the fact that absent "so many gun toting citizens" the USA would still be part of the UK (its citizens remaining chattel property of the Crown and Throne).


Well that woman had a gun and protected herself because everyone in america has a gun.  Its not like you need a gun to protect yourself in the uk since armed Robberies are pretty rare occurrences.

Also did you just seriously use america declaring independence from the uk as a reason why you should have guns nowadays? 

I think you may have misunderstood me,  i agree that yous should be allowed guns,  there's so many guns in america that your all screwed,  it's too late for gun control for you.

Oh sure, and it's not like you need a fire extinguisher, since arson is a pretty rare occurrence.

And you don't need a spare tire, since flats are rare.

And you don't need life insurance, since you only die once (unless Jon Snow).

I bet that filthy pinko MP wishes someone with a gun was around to stop her from getting stabbed, kicked, and shot in the face until dead.

I bet her now-motherless children and widowered husband also wish that.

Since I'm already here, I'll leave you with a fucking clue.  It may be the first you've ever encountered!

http://quoteinvestigator.com/2011/11/07/rough-men/

tl;dr: Not all Brits are helpless neutered plebs.

Quote from: Rudyard Kipling
I went into a public-‘ouse to get a pint o’beer,
The publican ‘e up an’ sez, “We serve no red-coats here.”
The girls be’ind the bar they laughed an’ giggled fit to die,

O makin’ mock o’ uniforms that guard you while you sleep
Is cheaper than them uniforms, an’ they’re starvation cheap;
An’ hustlin’ drunken sodgers when they’re goin’ large a bit
Is five times better business than paradin’ in full kit.

Be careful.  If you look down your nose at armed Americans any harder, you might get eye strain.   Wink

I don't really get where your going with this,  i mean fires are not  that rare so fire extinguishers are kind of needed,  also flat tyres,  again pretty common really so Always handy to have a spare.

Having to defend yourself against gun wielding robbers in the uk???  Not so common.
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1072
Crypto is the separation of Power and State.
June 16, 2016, 03:14:15 PM
To be fair,  the uk has some of the least gun crime in the world.  Obviously its very difficult to reduce gun crime down to 0.  America obviously has no chance to do anything about gun crime due to so many gun toting citizens.

Armed Americans *DO* have the chance to "do anything about gun crime."

We #ShootBack.

https://duckduckgo.com/?t=palemoon&q=armed+single+mother+defends+home&ia=web

How did that galactically obvious, robustly illustrated point so effortlessly fly right over your helpless peasant head?

And that's not even getting into the fact that absent "so many gun toting citizens" the USA would still be part of the UK (its citizens remaining chattel property of the Crown and Throne).


Well that woman had a gun and protected herself because everyone in america has a gun.  Its not like you need a gun to protect yourself in the uk since armed Robberies are pretty rare occurrences.

Also did you just seriously use america declaring independence from the uk as a reason why you should have guns nowadays? 

I think you may have misunderstood me,  i agree that yous should be allowed guns,  there's so many guns in america that your all screwed,  it's too late for gun control for you.

Oh sure, and it's not like you need a fire extinguisher, since arson is a pretty rare occurrence.

And you don't need a spare tire, since flats are rare.

And you don't need life insurance, since you only die once (unless Jon Snow).

I bet that filthy pinko MP wishes someone with a gun was around to stop her from getting stabbed, kicked, and shot in the face until dead.

I bet her now-motherless children and widowered husband also wish that.

Since I'm already here, I'll leave you with a fucking clue.  It may be the first you've ever encountered!

http://quoteinvestigator.com/2011/11/07/rough-men/

tl;dr: Not all Brits are helpless neutered plebs.

Quote from: Rudyard Kipling
I went into a public-‘ouse to get a pint o’beer,
The publican ‘e up an’ sez, “We serve no red-coats here.”
The girls be’ind the bar they laughed an’ giggled fit to die,

O makin’ mock o’ uniforms that guard you while you sleep
Is cheaper than them uniforms, an’ they’re starvation cheap;
An’ hustlin’ drunken sodgers when they’re goin’ large a bit
Is five times better business than paradin’ in full kit.

Be careful.  If you look down your nose at armed Americans any harder, you might get eye strain.   Wink
legendary
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1032
RIP Mommy
June 16, 2016, 03:06:30 PM
Taking away the rights of an average citizen to obtain and use a gun doesn't prevent criminals and psychopaths from getting guns. It just means that regular people won't be able to defend themselves.

In the United States, illegal guns are used in almost 90% of the gun-related crimes. With Mexican drug cartels such as the Los Zetas, Barrio Azteca and Los Mazatlecos expanding their operations to the Southern United States, it is only a matter of time before states such as Texas going to get swamped from illegal firearms. And if you take the guns away from the American citizens in these states, it will make them sitting ducks against the drug peddlers.

Where do illegal guns come from? Self made at home wit anvil, hammer and fire? Lol


The same way killers used illegals full autos at the bataclan in Paris.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FinRqCocwGE
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
June 16, 2016, 02:52:05 PM
To be fair,  the uk has some of the least gun crime in the world.  Obviously its very difficult to reduce gun crime down to 0.  America obviously has no chance to do anything about gun crime due to so many gun toting citizens.

Armed Americans *DO* have the chance to "do anything about gun crime."

We #ShootBack.

https://duckduckgo.com/?t=palemoon&q=armed+single+mother+defends+home&ia=web

How did that galactically obvious, robustly illustrated point so effortlessly fly right over your helpless peasant head?

And that's not even getting into the fact that absent "so many gun toting citizens" the USA would still be part of the UK (its citizens remaining chattel property of the Crown and Throne).


Well that woman had a gun and protected herself because everyone in america has a gun.  Its not like you need a gun to protect yourself in the uk since armed Robberies are pretty rare occurrences.

Also did you just seriously use america declaring independence from the uk as a reason why you should have guns nowadays? 

I think you may have misunderstood me,  i agree that yous should be allowed guns,  there's so many guns in america that your all screwed,  it's too late for gun control for you.


To be fair, knifing people on the scale the UK does it is pretty rare in the US... She was not only gunned down but also stabbed... Was this some kind of a... tradition?




legendary
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice
June 16, 2016, 02:47:20 PM
To be fair,  the uk has some of the least gun crime in the world.  Obviously its very difficult to reduce gun crime down to 0.  America obviously has no chance to do anything about gun crime due to so many gun toting citizens.

Armed Americans *DO* have the chance to "do anything about gun crime."

We #ShootBack.

https://duckduckgo.com/?t=palemoon&q=armed+single+mother+defends+home&ia=web

How did that galactically obvious, robustly illustrated point so effortlessly fly right over your helpless peasant head?

And that's not even getting into the fact that absent "so many gun toting citizens" the USA would still be part of the UK (its citizens remaining chattel property of the Crown and Throne).


Well that woman had a gun and protected herself because everyone in america has a gun.  Its not like you need a gun to protect yourself in the uk since armed Robberies are pretty rare occurrences.

Also did you just seriously use america declaring independence from the uk as a reason why you should have guns nowadays? 

I think you may have misunderstood me,  i agree that yous should be allowed guns,  there's so many guns in america that your all screwed,  it's too late for gun control for you.
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1072
Crypto is the separation of Power and State.
June 16, 2016, 02:34:04 PM
To be fair,  the uk has some of the least gun crime in the world.  Obviously its very difficult to reduce gun crime down to 0.  America obviously has no chance to do anything about gun crime due to so many gun toting citizens.

Armed Americans *DO* have the chance to "do anything about gun crime."

We #ShootBack.

https://duckduckgo.com/?t=palemoon&q=armed+single+mother+defends+home&ia=web

How did that galactically obvious, robustly illustrated point so effortlessly fly right over your helpless peasant head?

And that's not even getting into the fact that absent "so many gun toting citizens" the USA would still be part of the UK (its citizens remaining chattel property of the Crown and Throne).
legendary
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice
June 16, 2016, 02:23:29 PM
Damn, beat me by two seconds!

I wonder why this isn't at the top of Imgur?



Also, a gun-grabbing socialist MP was just shot dead in the UK.

Irony.  Don't bring the Fabian Manifesto to a gun fight!  LOL


Proof that gun-control works.






To be fair,  the uk has some of the least gun crime in the world.  Obviously its very difficult to reduce gun crime down to 0.  America obviously has no chance to do anything about gun crime due to so many gun toting citizens.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
June 16, 2016, 11:43:54 AM
Damn, beat me by two seconds!

I wonder why this isn't at the top of Imgur?



Also, a gun-grabbing socialist MP was just shot dead in the UK.

Irony.  Don't bring the Fabian Manifesto to a gun fight!  LOL


Proof that gun-control works.




legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1072
Crypto is the separation of Power and State.
June 16, 2016, 11:40:20 AM
Damn, beat me by two seconds!

I wonder why this isn't at the top of Imgur?



Also, a gun-grabbing socialist MP was just shot dead in the UK.

Irony.  Don't bring the Fabian Manifesto to a gun fight!  LOL
Jump to: