Topic: What's your opinion of gun control? - page 175. (Read 450482 times)

I agree but gun control isnt the answer imho.

Yer but you cannot walk in a school and kill everyone with a pencil or a knife

I agree, guns dont kill people. People kill people.  If there was a mass string of pencil stabbings should we ban pencils? No. I think that criminals will always have guns period. Does a criminal care about abiding by the law?

What is wrong with crying if your a man..plus use a baseball bat a nice kitchen knife keep beside your bed
Plus here in the UK not many rape your wife DNA will catch them .Does this happen a lot in America
you get robbed and then they rape your wife.
you will get some cases every so often but very rare in the uk ..I mean does this happen every day or week in america..Because if it does i am glad i live in the UK..I suppose i would carry a gun if this is the case..

Why, just follow the sage advice of the NEW YORK TIMES on being a MODERN MAN.

I quote only 3 of their bits of wisdom(not).  Of course these are synergistically inter related trueisms, interacting with cause and effect.

16. The modern man lies on the side of the bed closer to the door. If an intruder gets in, he will try to fight him off, so that his wife has a chance to get away.

....

25. The modern man has no use for a gun. He doesn’t own one, and he never will.

26. The modern man cries. He cries often.

Your right about criminals doing more crime ..
But also you need to give 25 years for carrying a gun..and you never get out of jail if you shoot someone never ever get out..See how many will carry guns now..You will always get some but not many tho..
See if you never had a gun in your life it wont mean anything not having one ..Its designed to kill..
Plus MMH i thought you believed in the bible ..THO SHALL NOT KILL..

It's not time to give up our rights to protect ourselves from our governments.

It's time for people to realize that if someone had a gun on that gun-free zone, they could have stopped the killer from killing more people. Criminals will still get guns and people who obey the law will be the ones in danger.

Its time to give your guns up.
To many kids getting hold of guns.You sell them on every street corner shop and market stalls..
the more guns that float around the more shootings will happen..
OREGON seems every so many months this sort of thing will happen.
At any time in life a human can go mental..It can happen to anyone because of all sorts of reasons.
So when someone gets the idea to kill others they can do a lot of damage with a gun

Plus if you give up your guns crime will go up..But deaths will go down..
So this is your choice AMERICA ..MORE CRIME..or LESS DEATHS its all up to you..
My choice less deaths.
Also no point saying its because the government might attack us ..
If the government attacked you what would your guns do they could blow the shit out of you all with
planes tanks and helicopters..

See the constitution says you have the right to bare arms to protect yourself from a rouge government.
It was written 1787..
So they never knew about planes tanks and helicopters ..
So if the government wanted to attack you they just blow you up with a drone
What will your gun do against a drone..

So now it all comes down to protect yourself and your belongings..
But you will find more people get killed by someone they know..nothing to do with crime as in theft.
More people shoot there family than what get robbed with a gun
SO ITS TIME TO GIVE THEM UP..
plus maybe one day your police force will not carry guns only special squads.
Not your every day police officer ..Less guns less people getting trigger happy..

Naw. That's bullet control.    

Then I would use natural black powder instead of chemically processed smokeless powder for my ammo. Would that be OK to you?

 

yes chemical one should be forbidden but natural ones should be restricted to be used in homes or places just are used for this.and it should also be forbidden to go in common places after using drugs.

You would decide?

some should be ,and some should be restricted to certain places..

Should drugs be forbidden?

You're trying to solve it the wrong way. People who want to harm people will harm people.

The problem is that people are taking prescription drugs, recreational drugs, are mentally unstable. But, I don't believe the government can classify people as "mentally stable" because they will go overboard, as they've already started to try to take guns from people on disability insurance. A lot of the mass shooters have been know to be on drugs of some sort. People should try to get off of them if they can, there's way too much reliance on them instead of making healthy choices.

having a gun freely or illegally isnt the matter im pointing.yes criminals will easily find but the teenagers wont if prohibited.i wanted to tell that schools , hospitals etc mustnt be places that anyone with a gun can easily enter.

Why would it be forbidden ? To avoid crimes ? A criminal that want to have a weapons, 10 weapons, 100 weapons, 1000 weapons can have it really easily. So this only to make that people don't rebelate, because a people that doesn't have weapons is an easy-manipulated people. Police should be able to kill something who is described as a criminal without worrying aabout anything !

This will not stop the criminals from getting guns.

it must be  prohibited.i want to say guns must be used only by police but in u.s. there must be prohibition for police too.

I'm pretty sure that if they know I have little problems with coloured people, they will refuse me the "B category license"   ! They will maybe even delete my hunting license because leftists don't like when you say something that is against immigration, Israel, etc. and can punite you for "racial hate incitation" or "racial hate words" and thus ban you from having guns because they think you are more dangerous than Black drug dealers with illegal AK-47s !