Topic: What's your opinion of gun control? - page 36. (Read 450482 times)
Guns should be prohibited for everyone, it's too much dangerous for people. I think just using spears and swords are better.
control of weapons is very in need of each country has its own regulation
Different countries and different regions have different needs. In Texas where the distance between settlements is high you need something to defend. But in New York where people are close by the need of guns is not that important.
Gun control is better, to avoid the crimes and to make a crimes. Because more of us have their own gun. But not at all are registered or have a permit to carry. So i like the gun control. To avoid some incidents in their community. I think that only those who are in need of it just like the police should have access to it.
Give me an example who DON'T need to have a weapon (to protect himself). I think you can't! 
Guns should be regulated very well as they have the capability of harming others, especially when it is abused and not used as it is intended.
If you don't allow your guns to be regulated by regulators with guns, you will be harmed by these regulators, by being shot by them, unless...
... you are a stronger regulator with your guns, and shoot them when they try to take your gun freedom away.
A 250 pound muscleman can easily overpower and kill a 90 pound granny. But if Granny has a gun, she has a chance.
Imagine if cannibals had guns!
These cannibals will be shot immediately!And then they will be eaten by the cannibals who shot them.
I personally believe that every country should have a more strict law governing the regulation of guns and firearms. I think that only those who are in need of it just like the police should have access to it.
Guns should be regulated very well as they have the capability of harming others, especially when it is abused and not used as it is intended.
Imagine if cannibals had guns!
These cannibals will be shot immediately! It is very possible for a government to have a 'monopolization on the use of force' because the citizenry trusts them to use the use of force appropriately. This is the ideal situation, and this is effectively what we have in the United States at this time.
US govt knows that many citizens have weapons, therefore imposing rampant tyranny is difficult there. I am very staunchly in support of ensuring that the government maintains their use-of-force monopoly by doing what the citizenry feels to be an adequate job, and has options should the government fail in their mandate.
The world is not limited to US, Canada & Western Europe. Even in these high-developed countries governments have gained much more power during last decades and resistance grows (cryptocurrencies and TOR are good examples). Actually gun itself is not bad. The main purpose of this is to defened one's life. But there are so many people abuse the used of guns on their own intentions
Imagine if cannibals had guns!
Actually gun itself is not bad. The main purpose of this is to defened one's life. But there are so many people abuse the used of guns on their own intentions
Anyone must have weapons not only to protect himself from criminals, but which is more importantly, protect himself and society he lives in from a tyrannical government.
Government have monopoly on violence only because people don't have weapons. Any monopoly leads to degradation!
One of the internationally oriented definitions associated with 'failed state' is associated with the monopolization by the government of the use of force. I'll comment on that.
It is very possible for a government to have a 'monopolization on the use of force' because the citizenry trusts them to use the use of force appropriately. This is the ideal situation, and this is effectively what we have in the United States at this time.
It is a very different thing for a government to have a 'monopolization on the use of force' because no matter what their actions and failures, the citizenry has no realistic option but to rely on them.
I am very staunchly in support of ensuring that the government maintains their use-of-force monopoly by doing what the citizenry feels to be an adequate job, and has options should the government fail in their mandate.
From the fact that the whole country is armed, there is less crime. According to statistics, just these children, who are going to defend, find this weapon, shoot at themselves, in their peers or even in their parents
Anyone must have weapons not only to protect himself from criminals, but which is more importantly, protect himself and society he lives in from a tyrannical government.
Government have monopoly on violence only because people don't have weapons. Any monopoly leads to degradation!
Government have monopoly on violence only because people don't have weapons. Any monopoly leads to degradation!
My Alessi Bodyguard shoulder holster for my Walther PPK finally arrived. Now I can conceal properly while wearing my Armani suits.
[mg]http://oi36.tinypic.com/153tkz6.jpg[/img]
[mg]http://oi36.tinypic.com/153tkz6.jpg[/img]
Image didn't load so I had to look it up on-line. Looks nice! I might have to have one, but I'm in the process of picking out a more ideal CC weapon at this point.
As for style, my tastes are different. I've not fitted an easy-rider rifle rack to my pickup truck. Nor have I removed the door in order to make the ideal top-of-the-line ride. Here's my inspiration:
From:
http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_211057-Ford-F-3-1951.html
My Alessi Bodyguard shoulder holster for my Walther PPK finally arrived. Now I can conceal properly while wearing my Armani suits.
Myt opinion is that gun is not create to kill people,It should only be a protection from your enemy.
See? It's just like I have been saying now and again.
Get rid of the guns so that people don't hurt other people with guns.
Then, get rid of the swords so people don't hurt other people with swords.
Then get rid of the wooden tables and chairs so that people don't pull a leg off one of them and club other people.
Then take away everything that people might use to hurt other people.
And since people can use their bodies - like fists and feet - to hurt other people, do the following:
Develop AI robots to the point that they can do everything for people. Then, put all the people in strait-jackets, and let the robots take care of them. And never let the people ever come close to controlling any of the robots.
I mean, how stupid ^^^.
A 250 pound muscleman can easily overcome a 90 pound granny and kill her. But if Granny has a gun, she has a chance.
Get rid of the guns so that people don't hurt other people with guns.
Then, get rid of the swords so people don't hurt other people with swords.
Then get rid of the wooden tables and chairs so that people don't pull a leg off one of them and club other people.
Then take away everything that people might use to hurt other people.
And since people can use their bodies - like fists and feet - to hurt other people, do the following:
Develop AI robots to the point that they can do everything for people. Then, put all the people in strait-jackets, and let the robots take care of them. And never let the people ever come close to controlling any of the robots.
I mean, how stupid ^^^.
A 250 pound muscleman can easily overcome a 90 pound granny and kill her. But if Granny has a gun, she has a chance.
With the guns spread all over the globe. I cannot imagine how a gunless society will start. Someone has to own one. This is how some people few about guns since they have to protect themwselves from different kinds of threat.
Jump to: