Topic: What's your opinion of gun control? - page 44. (Read 450482 times)

In my opinion I gladly accept the law that submits on the gun control here in the Philippines where many people are being killed by extrajudicial killings because of the implemented drug against war . We need more law thats regarding how to control the gun trade because some of the criminals are commonly using it without a license.

Then when government agents come to take guns away from gun holders, the gun holders will shoot them dead. Why won't the government agents shoot back? No guns. Gun control.

the government should make the strong rules against the gun holders and then hardly punished those people who go against those rules. otherwise to control the guns are impossible.

I think gun control is a very difficult thing to do because the United States is one of the longest-running states of gun use, so many presidents have talked about gun control but most do not work. Actually, they can only make laws to control the use of guns, and increasing gun taxes, but I think anyone who has a license to use a gun can use a gun. so what's for when there are no results.

Gun control is good for those people who do not deserve and can not be responsible for holding guns, It is very dangerous if we simply trust a person to bring or own a gun.

correct. Gun control have a lot of advantages like rduces suice rates, easy access to guns lead to more violent crimes and restrictive gun control laws reduce homicide rates as well as it can less crimes in the street that can involve millinials.

More gun control can reduce gun deaths. We need to banned this because they too often turn murder into mass murder. One of the benefit of gun control is to protect women from domestic abusers and stalkers.

25 years in jail for carrying a gun..
Why are you walking around with a gun ?     because it's designed to kill.. BANG your dead..

Now to the USA if you want guns banned because it doesn't take a genius to know the more guns and easy access to them the more die FACT..

As soon as any confrontation comes a long your draw without realising    BANG they die or you die..
It's a reaction to a problem that most humans without the gun would of avoided ..

Now how many have killed with the gun and realised they made a mistake ..

Oh me and my friend was having a drink and started arguing who was the best NFL player
then he confronted me and it got out of hand and BANG he dead ..
Would of had a punch up and next day forgot about..

NOT WITH A GUN..

Now to the USA if you want guns banned do you know how you do it ?..

TELL THE POLICE not to have guns..

Just think if a police officer goes on the beat without his guns then maybe they will get more respect from the community they serve ..

YOU POLICE will show them how you trust them with your lives by not brandishing guns if they do wrong..
You will see gun deaths go right down ..

Try it in a few states to see if it works ..
Like Milwaukee..

If the police trust the community then the community will trust the police ..
So the police need to stop going on the beat with guns..

Theft will go up with no guns around but gun deaths will be way lower ..

SO your choice is lower deaths or lower crime..You can have only one..

Oh with a UNIVERSAL INCOME deaths will be way way lower and crime will be way way lower..

Guns possession must be under control. Only people in critical situation can own gun to feel safe. Otherwise, It will be a huge disorder in society 

the misuse of firearms is caused by various factors such as the weakness of regulation, control and supervision on the circulation of firearms, the lack of professionalism of the apparatus, and the weakness of law enforcement for the perpetrators of the misuse of firearms. Without a clear firearm setting it is difficult to create peace in society.

Guns must be legally held, otherwise the society will be unstable

Why in the world should the government increase taxes because guns are dangerous? Those are two totally different topics.

i think gun control law can help a lot, or we could hope the government would ban the use of guns because of its dangers, or raise taxes higher than the cost of guns.

It would be beneficial if gun control will be implemented to everyone. For the government to be able to monitor all gun owner on the use of guns.  It will be also helpful on tracing whoever illegally used them.  It can also lessen crime. 

And the biggest irony is that the prevalence of illegal guns are more in countries where the gun rules are strict. For example, in India it is extremely difficult for an individual to own a legal firearm. But at the same time, almost everyone among the criminals own an illegal gun, which can range from crude home made pistols to imported semi-automatic rifles.

The reason we have guns is to keep other people and their selfish motives from regulating us.

I think we should regulate the possession of guns and other things that could harm and jeopardize other people. In my opinion, only those responsible to keep peace and order should have access to guns as studies show that if a family keeps firearms at home then there is a very high rate (about 80% or more) that the person that will be shot by that gun is part of the same family keeping it.

My stance on Gun control is simple and short, as long as criminals have access to guns why should we the law abiding citizens be denied the chance to protect themselves in the first place. Taking away the guns fro citizens is stupid unless they are prepared to hire a police man to protect each person.

A 250 pound muscleman can easily overpower a 90 pound granny. If Granny has a gun, she has a chance.

Gun control is useless as long as there are many manufacturers even if they are legal or not. Guns are made to protect people but if it fall in the wrong hands, it is used to kill the innocents. Making of guns should be stopped.