What's your opinion of gun control? - page 47.

robbylove

member

Activity: 434

Merit: 31

minds.com/Wilikon

Quote from: Kompodd on October 08, 2017, 11:02:30 AM

I believe that the mass distribution of weapons should not be tolerated, because we see the consequences of the availability of weapons every day when people commit hard murders.

"I believe only the police forces I adore, only the military I love, only politicians I admire, only The taxman I want my daughter to marry, should have the exclusive rights to own an infinite amount of weapons. No one else."

Roll Eyes

Kompodd

full member

Activity: 336

Merit: 100

I believe that the mass distribution of weapons should not be tolerated, because we see the consequences of the availability of weapons every day when people commit hard murders.

tvbcof

legendary

Activity: 4690

Merit: 1276

Quote from: robbylove on October 08, 2017, 08:51:55 AM

...
In Europe millions and millions of people died because all they had to fight back was butter knives.

And The Darwin Award goes to...

A troll, but a good one. (Snoops is actually a useful resource in some corner-case instances.) It would be great if such a stupid idea really did go, and maybe it will induce some idiot to create a real effort along these lines; a guy could make some money setting up a web-cam pointing at a neighbor's house and catching a 'real crime in progress' on vid.

Being able to induce drug addled losers to one's house at 2am could also foster a competition for the most gory shotgun-to-the-face pics. It could help develop the most effective shotgun loads for meth-heads. Kinda like they did back in the day to develop 'Rhodesian Jungle' loads and so forth.

choirunn

newbie

Activity: 35

Merit: 0

i think who have a gun need a rule for safety no criminal

robbylove

member

Activity: 434

Merit: 31

minds.com/Wilikon

Quote from: sweetbet on October 08, 2017, 03:51:55 AM

I understand why some people might need a gun for protection, but why would anyone need one or more military assault rifles?

The right to keep and bear arms in the United States is a fundamental right protected by the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution, part of the Bill of Rights, and by the constitutions of most U.S. states. The Second Amendment declares:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

In the United States, which has an English common law tradition, the concept of a right to keep and bear arms was recognized prior to the creation of a written national constitution. When colonists in the Thirteen Colonies rebelled against British control during the American Revolution they cited the 1689 English Bill of Rights as an example.

In Europe millions and millions of people died because all they had to fight back was butter knives.

And The Darwin Award goes to...

sweetbet

full member

Activity: 961

Merit: 110

SweetBet.com

I understand why some people might need a gun for protection, but why would anyone need one or more military assault rifles?

squog

full member

Activity: 462

Merit: 100

ANONYMOUS MOBILE PAYMENTS

Aside from police and soldiers, no one should have or allowed to carry any guns. If you see guns as tools greatn but if you are a child who sees a gun as a very cool toy, well then we will have a problem

Elcapsono

sr. member

Activity: 434

Merit: 250

Quote from: mizumi26 on October 06, 2017, 04:41:54 AM

The tragedy in Las Vegas. Deep condolence to all who suffered there.
What opinions on this tragedy may be other than ban on selling weapons???

Yes, this tragedy shows that the mass availability of weapons will lead to even worse consequences. In a fit of anger, not everyone can resist the temptation to use weapons.

mizumi26

newbie

Activity: 44

Merit: 0

The tragedy in Las Vegas. Deep condolence to all who suffered there.
What opinions on this tragedy may be other than ban on selling weapons???

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Quote from: zaq130 on October 05, 2017, 09:34:49 PM

In my country holding a gun is strictly restricted. Thanks to that we have no mass shootings.

I believe that gun is tooooo strong for self defense.
As the shooting in Vegas shows, gun can take people lives too many too easily.
Knife, baseball bat and some others can be a weapon as well, but even you use them for killing the causalities will not be more than 10. If you want to kill more, you have to be a specialist. 　

The world with strong gun control is far better than the world you can have gun to protect yourself from someone who has a gun.

The only way to remove guns from people is to take their freedom away as well.

A 250 pound bully can easily harm or kill a 90 pound granny. But if granny has a gun, she has a chance.

Arm the people with two things:
1. freedom;
2. guns.

Cool

zaq130

full member

Activity: 280

Merit: 128

In my country holding a gun is strictly restricted. Thanks to that we have no mass shootings.

I believe that gun is tooooo strong for self defense.
As the shooting in Vegas shows, gun can take people lives too many too easily.
Knife, baseball bat and some others can be a weapon as well, but even you use them for killing the causalities will not be more than 10. If you want to kill more, you have to be a specialist. 　

The world with strong gun control is far better than the world you can have gun to protect yourself from someone who has a gun.

boniii

newbie

Activity: 32

Merit: 0

1st of all, just thing why we need guns? are you really sure what you gonna do from these? as some 1 said no need guns for mankind these are created for personal agendas to control others!!!!

Esdanit

newbie

Activity: 52

Merit: 0

Quote from: bryant.coleman on June 19, 2015, 03:36:13 AM

IMO, people should be given the choice whether whey want to own a fire-arm or not. In places like Texas, where home invasions are very common, the possession of a fire-arm can save many lives. However, the government should make it impossible for people with a criminal record, and those with mental issues from obtaining fire-arms.

Gun control is a serious decision to make and it should be enforced so that anyone can't just have guns if they like to. Gun is invented for self protection and it is not invented to just kill anyone you like to. Before you can have a gun you should undergo first a proper training on how to use it in a good way and have a license or permit to carry such firearm.

Crankautist

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

Quote from: kekmaster on October 04, 2017, 12:23:10 AM

Since I am not from the us, I am only able to contribute a small part.
In Germany we have stricter gun laws than in America. Also you can't buy automatic weapons.
Can't see the point of automatic weapons.
But if anyone tries to invade America, there would be a gun behind every straw.
(Last one is a quote, but I don't know from whom)

Edit: we also have a lower percentage of gunshot victims in Germany. Maybe there is a relation between that.

You people have more rapes.

And the only one doing killings here are usually blacks.

Btw i want my beer and guns. No licence bullcrap.

Nijntje-pluis

newbie

Activity: 3

Merit: 0

Mankind does not need a gun.
But the bad guys will not let go of the guns and as long as the bad guys have guns, other people will also need guns. Embarrassed

hyunee

full member

Activity: 476

Merit: 100

There should just be a certain people who will use guns. There should be restrictions. They should limit the productions and granting guns to people like they do. They should be more vigilant.

kekmaster

newbie

Activity: 56

Merit: 0

Since I am not from the us, I am only able to contribute a small part.
In Germany we have stricter gun laws than in America. Also you can't buy automatic weapons.
Can't see the point of automatic weapons.
But if anyone tries to invade America, there would be a gun behind every straw.
(Last one is a quote, but I don't know from whom)

Edit: we also have a lower percentage of gunshot victims in Germany. Maybe there is a relation between that.

Zsytem_Pedro

newbie

Activity: 11

Merit: 0

The weapon would be a tool with high potential for accidents and deaths. Although there may be laws that guarantee 100% restriction of use only to people without mental disorders, balanced and without passages by the police, there would still be high rates of firearm mortalities. The human being is always unpredictable. No one is 100% balanced. Every person will always go through moments of hatred, imbalance and impulsion; and it is precisely at that moment that a weapon in the hand will create paths with no return.

thenameisjay

full member

Activity: 462

Merit: 100

I think it shouldn't be banned but be given a stricter control. Shipments and smuggling of guns must also be controlled to limit the supply of guns within the state. If, however, you are in need of one, a person must go through a series of tests first including a proper psych test and of course the firing range test. If you now have the lisence to carry, you must have the permit to carry it everyday for safe measure. The government must know you're carrying one today so in-case of a massive shoot-out, gour identity is known and you are tracked.

Sithara007

legendary

Activity: 3346

Merit: 1352

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: congresowoman on October 02, 2017, 10:38:32 PM

Guns should be banned. Period! We don't need no guns to protect ourselves. This is what we should do pass a law that prevents people from having a gun. Only provide guns for military personnel only (with verification). Set up a checkpoint and anyone caught in posession of a gun will he jailed.

The reason why people are allowed to have guns is due to the fact that guns can't be banned. Even in countries such as Japan and Singapore, where the gun rules are extremely strict, the criminal gangs find some way to get hold of illegal firearms. And the dark markets have made it extremely easy for individuals to purchase illegal weapons.

Topic: What's your opinion of gun control? - page 47. (Read 450482 times)