Its so sad when we have been made to believe its bounty hunters who dump their bounty tokens immediately after ICO and so devalue the coins on the market. Because of this notion, project managers these days try to delay bounty rewards while some even go ahead to give small rewards so that the actions of bounty hunters will not affect the price of their coins. Now I participated in this bounty and we were paid late as usual. We went to the market and realized the price was already down, even below the ICO price. So who caused it ? I think we should have a second look at this issue. Don't you think its the investors who get bonuses during the ICO who try to dump their bonuses for profit and not the bounty hunters as we have been made to believe?. Let me hear your opinions guys
Investors have larger percentage of the token issued during an ico, investors dump token more then bounty hunters, likewise some greedy team as well dump token value sometimes especially teams with no intension of developing the project for a long time. 
Topic: Who dump coins early; Bounty hunters or ICO investors? (Read 2756 times)
I think both of them, the thing is if a project is listed on exchange and it exceed the ico price that's when the investors start dumping theirs and it results to the worst of the dump because they have enough to dump, and if it is the other way around that's when you find the bounty hunters doing their thing as far it pays for their efforts.
Especially for the early investors just like those have participated in the pre-sale that acquired a huge bonus and then they cna dump it even the price of coin or token was getting the ico price. That should be considered as the first party which started to dump their money.
As it seems to me, neither bounty hunters nor investors benefit from the coins they received that dropped in value, so I think these people can be excluded!
I think both of them, the thing is if a project is listed on exchange and it exceed the ico price that's when the investors start dumping theirs and it results to the worst of the dump because they have enough to dump, and if it is the other way around that's when you find the bounty hunters doing their thing as far it pays for their efforts.
Everyone that sees the opportunity to dump dumps it first. If the investors grts their tokens first which is the normal thing they sell. There ain't nothing like dumping you sell to get your investment back ot cut loss.
ICO investors are the last sellers who want to dump the price of their ICO investment. Bounty hunters are the first sellers who do not care about the price because they earned tokens for "free".
It happens on most cases but if the bounty distribution is delay based on what OP said and you see a price dumping on the coin then it means that some of the ICO investors want a quick profit or maybe the dumping came from what they called "tokenswap" these are the holders who have a big amount of tokens that get via partnership of the project.
I do not think that only Bounty hunters are to blame for the collapse of the coins, since they receive coins much later than investors. During this time, most coins are already trading below ICO prices. The first to bring down the price of investors, and Bounty hunters in the end completely finish off this altcoin.
Its so sad when we have been made to believe its bounty hunters who dump their bounty tokens immediately after ICO and so devalue the coins on the market. Because of this notion, project managers these days try to delay bounty rewards while some even go ahead to give small rewards so that the actions of bounty hunters will not affect the price of their coins. Now I participated in this bounty and we were paid late as usual. We went to the market and realized the price was already down, even below the ICO price. So who caused it ? I think we should have a second look at this issue. Don't you think its the investors who get bonuses during the ICO who try to dump their bonuses for profit and not the bounty hunters as we have been made to believe?. Let me hear your opinions guys
I have still not sold my bounty rewards from Everex and few others , I have made good profit if I had sold on boom but I didn't as I believe in long-term , ya i do feel sad that due to low price my work during bounty get devalued but I am not here to quick bucks or not do bounty to just get some coins , I believe if I am helping some good project in long term I will be in more good position. Instead what I do ICO investors should do because bounties are small but ICO investors invest huge money ,it's sad that they dump just for quick profit but we can't do anything ,very less smart money in crypto market ,90% are here for greed and profit rather than innovation and future ,we can't do anything
I think only the bounty hunters start dump their coins as soon as possible to cash out money. The ICO investors always hold their coins bought on ICO period and most of them will sell the coins only when they make profit.
ICO investors are the last sellers who want to dump the price of their ICO investment. Bounty hunters are the first sellers who do not care about the price because they earned tokens for "free".
There is a time that investors are also dumpers. But bounty hunters they doing that everytime. But for me the real dumpers are those people who greed and have no patience. They always think that they loss huge money if they don't sell early. So basically the greedy people for me who drop or dump coins earlier.
These days it is not easy to determine who dump most between bounty hunters and investors, because so many investors dump their bonuses making the market o drop.
It is pretty easy actually if you look at our current sentiment right now. You should have known that we are in extreme bear market, literally only a few investors took a part in the sales. Most of them right now is waiting for a moment for the trend to change, what is the point seeling their bonuses if the price is below for more than 90% from its ICO price?
while bounty hunter does not need to spend any money to get the token.
These days it is not easy to determine who dump most between bounty hunters and investors, because so many investors dump their bonuses making the market o drop.
Dumping of Coins is dependent on individuals and their priority and also on the worth of the coin. But mostly I can say that bounty hunters dump more
Developers and many believe its bounty hunters that dump coins early but I will say investors also dump coins early in the form of day trading, by that they get back their capital and some profit and don't care if the price increases or remains stagnant. Now, most times the blame is on bounty hunters, no doubt bounty hunters dump because they didn't invest in the project with money but just time invested.... Regardless of that, there are still many bounty hunters that hold and don't dump until price is worth it.
I think the decline in the price of ICO projects is very much related to the project side. After the end of crowdfunding, there is no up-to-date progress, causing investors to lose confidence and sell off tokens, causing prices to fall.
Its so sad when we have been made to believe its bounty hunters who dump their bounty tokens immediately after ICO and so devalue the coins on the market. Because of this notion, project managers these days try to delay bounty rewards while some even go ahead to give small rewards so that the actions of bounty hunters will not affect the price of their coins. Now I participated in this bounty and we were paid late as usual. We went to the market and realized the price was already down, even below the ICO price. So who caused it ? I think we should have a second look at this issue. Don't you think its the investors who get bonuses during the ICO who try to dump their bonuses for profit and not the bounty hunters as we have been made to believe?. Let me hear your opinions guys
Not all ICOs that launched bounty campaigns are dumped as they went to the exchange. Some altcoins are going up after ICO despite the selling of bounty tokens. So noone can stop the good altcoin.
In my view early investors with high bonuses and also bounty hunters dump their coins after listing on exchanges. But it depends on the bounty pool and how high the bonuses was for the investors.
Its so sad when we have been made to believe its bounty hunters who dump their bounty tokens immediately after ICO and so devalue the coins on the market. Because of this notion, project managers these days try to delay bounty rewards while some even go ahead to give small rewards so that the actions of bounty hunters will not affect the price of their coins. Now I participated in this bounty and we were paid late as usual. We went to the market and realized the price was already down, even below the ICO price. So who caused it ? I think we should have a second look at this issue. Don't you think its the investors who get bonuses during the ICO who try to dump their bonuses for profit and not the bounty hunters as we have been made to believe?. Let me hear your opinions guys
I believe that project managers totally know the amount of tokens which they distribute for bounty hunters will not be enough to affect their price but this is just the reason that they give for explaination of delaying
I think that who will have the opportunity to sell first, he will sell, as quite often first get investors and sell almost immediately, although I do not understand why, since they do not get more money than invest (in the last year), but still drain.
Jump to: