Topic: Who dump coins early; Bounty hunters or ICO investors? - page 5. (Read 2702 times)
It doesn't matter who among the two are dumpers, the sell will be picked up if the project is really that good, dumpers will always dumpers be they investors and bounty hunters as long as the project is good it will eventually get up.
Previously, the ICOs had only one phase, after a while, two phases were constituted, but nowadays, apparently there are several stages and it extends for months! This time extension allows for many advantages or disadvantages over this period, of course, today I see people who bought Phase 1 as a problem, these people usually get tokens from 2x to 4x cheaper when sales "really start." Formerly, the rewards campaigns were generous, today crumbs are paid. Do not blame the bounty hunters. 
hero member
Activity: 752
Merit: 500
Bcnex - The Ultimate Blockchain Trading Platform
Both, but not everyone is dumpers! Some bounty hunter sell their rewards too early without thinking about the real value of their tokens! And some presale investors, who bought a coin with a big bonus! But bounty hunters have only 1-2% of the total coin, so, they can't dump for a long time, the real dumpers are from the ICO investors I assume.
Both groups are dumping . Hunters are dumping as not all of them is connected to project and when getting the
bounty reward dumping their coins on DEX-es for an ice cream. Early investors from private sales and pre sale
with 80% bonuses also dumping their coins. We have projects where the hunters were not paid when the coin
entered the market and it`s price crashed with 90% comparing to ICO price. Sometimes the dev. teams are also
involved into dumping activities.
bounty reward dumping their coins on DEX-es for an ice cream. Early investors from private sales and pre sale
with 80% bonuses also dumping their coins. We have projects where the hunters were not paid when the coin
entered the market and it`s price crashed with 90% comparing to ICO price. Sometimes the dev. teams are also
involved into dumping activities.
Before bounty hunters used to dump coins now times change bounty hunters are holding the coins and some ico companies are paying bounty hunters on time bases after icos listed in exchangers
Its so sad when we have been made to believe its bounty hunters who dump their bounty tokens immediately after ICO and so devalue the coins on the market. Because of this notion, project managers these days try to delay bounty rewards while some even go ahead to give small rewards so that the actions of bounty hunters will not affect the price of their coins. Now I participated in this bounty and we were paid late as usual. We went to the market and realized the price was already down, even below the ICO price. So who caused it ? I think we should have a second look at this issue. Don't you think its the investors who get bonuses during the ICO who try to dump their bonuses for profit and not the bounty hunters as we have been made to believe?. Let me hear your opinions guys
In some sense, bounty hunters, yes. They dump the coins and I directly saying it. Well, we cannot blame bounty hunters on this as they put up their time and effort for the profit. But the investors as well, and that I think the problem is in the team.
Well, I think everybody involved in crypto get their coins all dump. Well, is this normal? Unfortunately, this is the fact that we must face this day. Crypto market is changing, this is collapsing. Every coin from ICO always falls after they are ready on the exchange. The bounty hunters will need more months to receive their rewards. It is absolutely sad.
Its true. Investors gets more than 25% bonus when they buy on presale and they know exactly if the bounties are distributed the bounty hunters are also going to make the market dip which very logical to jsut dump what they profit from the presale and may double their profit right after bounties are dumped too. But this is just something that is happening today because the entire market really is also bleeding since the first months of last year.
I think a large 90%+ of both investors and bounty holders are dumping the moment they can. So, it depends how the distribution is done. Usually, the investors get their tokens first and have advantage of days or weeks to dump, before bounty hunters receive their tokens.
bounty hunter, they don't buy but get rewards from ico tokens, then they sell everything right away.
I do not think so, people that dump early are probably investors in ico because they often receive early token from the developers of the project,especially they buy tokens at relatively low value and buy with a large number, and of course, after tokens are listed and profitable, they often sell early because they know good prices will not be maintained for too long when many other investors will sell their token. While bounty hunters are innocent when they receive tokens very late and often their rewards are locked, they take a long time to sell token, although they contributed to the dump, it was not entirely their fault
Why there are so many people that always blame bounty hunters? If the team has a good strategy, they won't let this happen. Because the token volume from the bounty is very small compared to the amount they sell. Some weak teams even blame the hunter, even though the token has not yet been distributed to the hunter. That's funny 
Well that is the picture they've painted out there that its hunters who dump their coins of which i don't really support since a small percentage is shared among these hunters. I wil side with you since the bonus they get sometimes can compensate their loss they go that low. So hunters always don't dump sometimes investors are the cause.
I agree with you on this, most people have this misconception that it's bounty hunters that dump and devalue most altcoins. What about projects that don't do bounties or airdrop and still dump, is it bounty hunters also?
The reason why most project dump is because of the large amounts of bonus the team have given to investors.
The reason why most project dump is because of the large amounts of bonus the team have given to investors.
Its so sad when we have been made to believe its bounty hunters who dump their bounty tokens immediately after ICO and so devalue the coins on the market. Because of this notion, project managers these days try to delay bounty rewards while some even go ahead to give small rewards so that the actions of bounty hunters will not affect the price of their coins. Now I participated in this bounty and we were paid late as usual. We went to the market and realized the price was already down, even below the ICO price. So who caused it ? I think we should have a second look at this issue. Don't you think its the investors who get bonuses during the ICO who try to dump their bonuses for profit and not the bounty hunters as we have been made to believe?. Let me hear your opinions guys
The issue of reduced token prices is due to two main factors. early sale of tokens by investors and lack of experience in project financial management. projects are always underestimated and their real value is always lower than the ICO price because devs have used the money of investors to use for other purposes. Investors cannot manage their portfolios and that is the only weakness that makes projects fail. Its so sad when we have been made to believe its bounty hunters who dump their bounty tokens immediately after ICO and so devalue the coins on the market. Because of this notion, project managers these days try to delay bounty rewards while some even go ahead to give small rewards so that the actions of bounty hunters will not affect the price of their coins. Now I participated in this bounty and we were paid late as usual. We went to the market and realized the price was already down, even below the ICO price. So who caused it ? I think we should have a second look at this issue. Don't you think its the investors who get bonuses during the ICO who try to dump their bonuses for profit and not the bounty hunters as we have been made to believe?. Let me hear your opinions guys
the current market situation is very volatile because therefore every new token that is exchanged will dump, I think the cause is there are many factors, both investors and bounty hunters are interrelated in decreasing the selling value of the token.
It is very clear that the ICO investors are the one who get the coins first and as they are also getting coins in discount due to investing pattern, so even if they sell on the market price they are still in profit. So their is no doubt that the main cause of the dump is the ICO investors and to escape Bounty Hunters are name as escape Goat. When every one know that bounty hunters are the one who gets the coin in the last when the market is totally gone down and they even sell it as they are getting this coin as free without investment and the group of whales take this benefit and grab the coins in low and then pump the price and sell in high. So this is the pattern of the ICO runs in starting after that as the project is getting success the coin price also climbs.
This is an interesting question. I don't think we can separate ICO investors and bounty hunters about this. I know many people from both sides who sometimes dump or pupm some coins.
Its so sad when we have been made to believe its bounty hunters who dump their bounty tokens immediately after ICO and so devalue the coins on the market. Because of this notion, project managers these days try to delay bounty rewards while some even go ahead to give small rewards so that the actions of bounty hunters will not affect the price of their coins. Now I participated in this bounty and we were paid late as usual. We went to the market and realized the price was already down, even below the ICO price. So who caused it ? I think we should have a second look at this issue. Don't you think its the investors who get bonuses during the ICO who try to dump their bonuses for profit and not the bounty hunters as we have been made to believe?. Let me hear your opinions guys
I think the collapse of the price is the work of all together (investors, advisers and bounty hunters). Most often, the one who first receives tokens, the first to sell these tokens. Only bounty hunters can not affect the price of tokens so much!
Since both are holders of coins, both have the opportunity to dump the coins according to their needs and preferences, some bounty hunters are large holders of a coins and so does investors, but once they both sell their coins at the same time, the price of the coin will surely drop.
Its so sad when we have been made to believe its bounty hunters who dump their bounty tokens immediately after ICO and so devalue the coins on the market. Because of this notion, project managers these days try to delay bounty rewards while some even go ahead to give small rewards so that the actions of bounty hunters will not affect the price of their coins. Now I participated in this bounty and we were paid late as usual. We went to the market and realized the price was already down, even below the ICO price. So who caused it ? I think we should have a second look at this issue. Don't you think its the investors who get bonuses during the ICO who try to dump their bonuses for profit and not the bounty hunters as we have been made to believe?. Let me hear your opinions guys
Bounties are usually just almost from .5-5% of the total supply of a project. So, I guess, it is too small to really affect the price of a coin/token once it is distributed. I don't know why some admins or even investors are blaming or bounty hunters for the decline in price. There are a lot of investors who have a huge chunk of tokens because they bought it at early stage where discount and offers are massive.
Jump to: