Topic: Who dump coins early; Bounty hunters or ICO investors? - page 6. (Read 2756 times)
I don't think anyone knows who dump coins early whether bounty hunters or ICO investors. Because there are a lot of factors that could affect the dumping of coins in the early stage. Like if the person who joined bounties or ICO investors really need money right now, I think they will just dump it because it is unnecessary to think about the future anymore.
In 2018 this has been proven that the myth about bounty hunters are lie that they dump tokens on exchange with plenty of projects like fiiicoin, mevu, seal, gamestar, hyperquant etc. This projects delaying payment of hunters or distribution late payments to hunter & the price are these token are down too hard. Actually still now a days project fear of mass dumping of their token & some projects give excuses like we developing Website for bounty hunters KYC & after successful verification blah blah to hold tokens of hunters. The sad realty is most of the pre sale buyers dump token on the exchange as they get huge discounts at the time of token sale & hunters get the blame but the truth is out already.
If FBG Capital or Ian Balina are in than yes! They will dump before bounty hunters 
Be careful with loud shillers and funds
Be careful with loud shillers and funds
Most likely you think correctly and bounty hunters have nothing to do with discharges!
In my opinion, to avoid a decrease in the price of the coin, it is necessary to freeze them for some time after the distribution. I don't think bounty hunters are in a hurry to sell their coins right away because promising projects have a chance to beat the price of a coin on an ICO. So many of the bounty hunters stick to the HODL strategy. At that time, investors are trying to get rid of bonus coins to protect themselves and cover part of the costs in case the project is not successful.
In my opinion most of the dumpers are ICO investors.
There are different situations, there will always be bounty hunters who will sell tokens for pennies and thus will kill the price of the token, many investors also do this for various reasons, and many companies do it too, it has all been tested many times and proven.
the first one to throw a token might be an ico investor, because he first got the token and after that a bounty hunter.
bounty hunter, they don't buy but get rewards from ico tokens, then they sell everything right away.
I think dump and the first and second because whoever first will sells that will earn more. For the first and the second only interested in money only. If you say who more collapses the course then I think it's investors because they have more coins in their hands and bounty hunters do not have that much
Bounty hunters for sure. It makes absolutely no sense for the ICO investors to dump their coins, because they have actually invested their own money to gain profit. Bounty hunters invested their time and effort but no real money.
Its so sad when we have been made to believe its bounty hunters who dump their bounty tokens immediately after ICO and so devalue the coins on the market. Because of this notion, project managers these days try to delay bounty rewards while some even go ahead to give small rewards so that the actions of bounty hunters will not affect the price of their coins. Now I participated in this bounty and we were paid late as usual. We went to the market and realized the price was already down, even below the ICO price. So who caused it ? I think we should have a second look at this issue. Don't you think its the investors who get bonuses during the ICO who try to dump their bonuses for profit and not the bounty hunters as we have been made to believe?. Let me hear your opinions guys
In my opinion, bounty awards are not distributed enough to affect the price. But the bonus rates set for ICO investors are very unfair. Some projects deliver 100% or more bonuses. In this environment, the price of that coin will be reduced by at least half.
Moreover, these ICO investors sell their coins instantly with the bonus they receive for every USD. I think the token that is distributed at least as bonuses should be locked.
I strongly agree with your opinion. Even the prizes earned by bounty hunter are not worth the bonus earned by investors. but that's where the victory for those who have a lot of money. Those who have a lot of money are always treated in a special way. I think ICO will always stay like this. Dump and more dump again
Its partly the bounty hunters and partly the investors. Inability of many ICO to reach hard cap is what makes huge dump by hunters to drastically affect the price of the token. Most ico allocate averagely 1% of the token sale for the bounty hunters, if this is so then 1% of hardcap is relatively small amount but due to the fact that most ICO struggle to even reach softcap then amount allocated to hunters influence the price of the token. many ico also given more than 50% discount to investors. such huge discount can also affect the token when it hit exchange
to be honest, given the same conditions, it's more likely that the bounty hunters dumped, rather than investors. however, in ur case, the token price was alrdy down even before distribution to bounty hunters. in this case, it's just ico investors or maybe even early-stage contributors (some projects were funded partially even before ico) who sold, taking the sentiments in the market into account.
Bounty hunter now recieve their tokens very late.
I dont understand how investors can buy high and sell low.
So there is devs left, they claim some part of selling on ico tokens and dump it
I dont understand how investors can buy high and sell low.
So there is devs left, they claim some part of selling on ico tokens and dump it
Lower the price of new tokens and investors, and bounty hunters. However, the influence of investors on this process is much greater than the influence of bounty hunters. Many investors buy new tokens in the course of ICO with big discounts only to immediately sell them on the exchange at the price of ICO and have almost double the benefits. Bounty hunters have a significantly smaller amount of tokens and, as you have noticed correctly, they receive these tokens in their wallets, as a rule, when this token has already fallen in price on the exchange. So it makes no sense to blame bounty hunters. In general, if the project is very promising, then it is unlikely that everyone will so massively throw off their new tokens, if there is a chance that these tokens will grow in value.
In fact, the amount of tokens that Bounty hunters dump when this coin is listed on market is not so much, just be a very small number per total tokens supply in market. So, if say that because of bounty hunters make the price go down seem like not right
Its so sad when we have been made to believe its bounty hunters who dump their bounty tokens immediately after ICO and so devalue the coins on the market. Because of this notion, project managers these days try to delay bounty rewards while some even go ahead to give small rewards so that the actions of bounty hunters will not affect the price of their coins. Now I participated in this bounty and we were paid late as usual. We went to the market and realized the price was already down, even below the ICO price. So who caused it ? I think we should have a second look at this issue. Don't you think its the investors who get bonuses during the ICO who try to dump their bonuses for profit and not the bounty hunters as we have been made to believe?. Let me hear your opinions guys
I realize you have a good point asking this type of speculations between hunters and investors. Bounty hunters get only a portion of the allocated amount of token while investors can get as many to invest and dump for even more profit. So it's the investors who make the price of the coin or token down because they hold more than the bounty hunters token which are limited.
U believe that this is a result of both parties contributing to this price shift downwards of coins/token in the market after the bounty periods. We have noticed that in some projects, bounties are delayed to be paid to hunters so as not to go "DUMP" as usually associated with the bounty hunters and even in some cases, coins/tokens from bounties are locked for some periods even after given to you, however, this doesn't really keep the price upwards as we've have seem in past ICOs. So I don't really think it's only the hunters that usually dump, investors dump too especially immediately after the ICOs basically from all the bonuses to recoup some of their investment, so I believe both parties are responsible for this.
Jump to: