Topic: Why do Atheists Hate Religion? - page 243. (Read 901367 times)

This, if some of the gods is true, and he actually isn't asshole, he should understand that based on the facts available for us there is no way to know which one of them is true.

And if those things that people who are religious believe, like that if you choose to believe in the wrong god, the real god will be mad for you, are true then that makes him asshole because it isn't realistic to expect us to guess who of them is real.

Absolutely not the same if you read what their holy writings say about them.

Words are important: control them

---

Cause that's the same one.


Best regards.

Ok which God should I worship? The Christian one? The Muslim one? The Jewish one?

Cause you're all saying the same thing...

Yes easy; He's a stupid asshole too full of himself to even think about what you're saying.

I accept warning. Why not warn people when they are headed for Hell? You don't want them to burn, do you?

Don't you have any pleasure in life at all?

If you lose an arm in a car accident, where can you get another? Nowhere. God gave you your arms and hands for free. Is this what an asshole does?

You think God is an asshole? If somebody calls you an asshole, do you like that person? Maybe you have trouble in life because you call God an asshole. I mean, He feels hurt when you call Him and asshole just like you do when somebody calls you an asshole.

However, aren't you a little bit scared to set yourself against God? I mean, it is God that holds you alive. Aren't you scared when you try to fight Him... at least a little?

I guess atheists are unconsciously not satisfied by the absence of a strong support religious people have. I mean if you are not sure whether what you are doing is right, you just search for an answer in Quran, Bible or smth else. If you are an atheist - you do your best to ensure yourself you know what is good for you, but you actually don't know that. So when you see smb who has smth to rely on - it ,akes you hate this person and his religion

Maybe because religious people hate them?
Because they say you are bad person and will burn in hell if you don't worship god?
Even if god is real he is selfish asshole because if you don't pray for him everyday he hates you.

Question: Why did you ask me to define "loving" and then "love" for you?
Answer: That's a point. Best regards.

Can anyone decipher this for me?

Atomism was a mere theory, today it's proved.

Again, you're right in the idea, it's just that science and scientific explanations won a lot of ground nowadays. So there are less mysteries left to "prove" the existence of god

That's a point.


Best regards.

Atheist hate religion because they cant understand why would they worship someone who isn't there and hasn't done anything in the world, but the only evidence he have is the word of the people who tends to exaggerate things over the year's. I'm a Christian, but sometime I question his existence.

Coincidences, accidents, etc happen daily and religious people interpret them as acts of god. Many still don't believe in evolution. So hold the variety of life they see as proof of god. Others believe the origin of the universe can never be understood. So more proof of god for them. We know differently. But it's their choice to believe that. It's their faith. Maybe if we go back far enough there were cultures that didn't have any other explanations except gods like you say. So maybe faith wasn't as needed to believe in the supernatural because there weren't competing explanations for most things. But we know religion didn't play a big part in all cultures. Some had almost no rituals. Some no gods. So faith didn't have to play a big role in daily life for everyone. But cultures where religion and faith played a big part in people's lives it was their choice that it did.


From the beginning of the period you said, ancient greece, they already had lots of alternative explanations for what they saw in daily life. Atomism like I said for example. That's back in the 5th century bc. India had something similar to atomism around that time too. Before that there were explanations for natural phenomena like lightning, earthquakes, the sun, etc without gods. Maybe those ideas weren't more talked about because of connections to atheism and the risk of death or exile. Or maybe it was more difficult to spread those ideas because they didn't have the practical applications they have today. So it didn't matter much if gods were doing things or if it was something natural. But choosing to believe the more complicated explanation of gods doing things needs faith.

You can help me by telling me why you asked me to define "loving" and then "love" for you.

That's not a point.



Best regards.

You asked me to define some words. I did that for you. Were you going anywhere with that, or do you just enjoy asking people to define words for you?

What's the point you are trying to make?

Maybe I can help you.


Best regards.

I also defined "love" but you didn't even make a comment about that.

I answered your question. You asked me do define a word and I did. So ...

That was a statement not a question.

There was no question mark ("?"), that means my statement "define Loving" was a statement not a question.


Again: cause we don't have the same God we are not talking the same language.

That explains the misunderstanding.


Best regards.

You wrote:

So I defined "Loving"


Why put a source link? You asked what it meant to *me*, not what the dictionary defines "Love" as. Why does the source matter?


Are you going to make a point sometime soon?