You're mistaken Atheism by some sort of "belief in science".
Not at all. I am simply using science as an example. Whatever anyone does in life, he does because he believes that it is the correct way to live. It is his religion, be it science or anything else.
And there's no such thing as "Big Bang law", it's a theory.
Exactly what I was hoping you would understand that I was saying.
Atheism is the lack of belief in deities, just that, nothing else, doesn't imply a shred of belief on anything, scientific or otherwise, and has absolutely no doctrine.
However, that is not what the dictionary definition is.
You could look at it from an animal's point of view. A more intelligent animal holds the general understanding that mankind is greater than it is. Mankind is a deity in the eyes of animals, even though they don't express it that way. Atheists try to become less than the animals by attempting to say that there is no supreme being. Since animals can't think like that, it becomes self-evident that mankind (if not Something even greater) is the supreme being.
Doctrines are irrational actions based upon political views or religion, regardless if the conditions when those actions can be considered good or not.
Exactly the thing that I am saying regarding atheism and atheists.
However, many scientists hold to certain scientific fact in such a way that everything they do is based on such fact. It is part of their doctrine to do things like this. Some fact is doctrine to those who use it regularly.
For an instance, the Communist doctrine aims a lot at a sort of factory worker that doesn't exist anymore, yet because they take Marx and Lenin as doctrine they don't change.
Likewise, in the Middle Eastern religions there's a doctrine against eating pork, this makes perfect sense as hogs takes too much a water, a scarce good at the region. The same idea at mid-Europe would be senseless.
The fact that some doctrine is based on falsehood (like atheism), doesn't mean that all doctrine is based on falsehood.
Atheists are more akin to think rationally and try to analyze the decision/consequences factor to determine the course of action.
If atheists could think rationally, they would look up the definition of "atheism," apply it to themselves, and see that atheism is a complete lie. As it is, they would rather believe the lie, making atheism a religion just like many of the other religions around the world that hang onto falsehood.
