However , a true christian is forgiven if he reads the right bible i mean not the edited one . The original one . Governments made changes in bible just about their rules there are many hundreads of changes madden in bible.
Bilble is not in its original position
You are right except one. Government did made changes but IMHO priests twisted it a lot than government did. Many priests twisted the meaning instead of changing it.
I always liked and believed in Zakir Naik's these words: "We(Muslims) are more Christian than the Christians themselves!"
Guide me Zakir bhi if i am wrong .
I am afraid I don't have enough knowledge to do it.
You guys have one hell of a role model there in Mister Naik. Suddenly it is very clear "Why Islam hates." These are the kinds of people you guys listen to and look up to.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zakir_NaikQuoting from him directly:
Naik has said that not all Muslims who convert from Islam should necessarily receive death sentences, but that those who leave Islam and then "propagate the non-Islamic faith and speak against Islam"
should be put to death in an Islamic rule.
"If bin Laden is fighting enemies of Islam, I am for him," and that "If he is terrorizing America – the terrorist, biggest terrorist – I am with him.
Every Muslim should be a terrorist. The thing is that if he is terrorizing the terrorist, he is following Islam. Whether he is or not, I don’t know, but you as Muslims know that, without checking up, laying allegations is also wrong."[33]
When Time hinted that this remark could have inspired Najibullah Zazi's terrorist activities, Naik insisted: "
I have always condemned terrorism, because according to the glorious Koran, if you kill one innocent person, then you have killed the whole of humanity".
"As far as terrorist is concerned," he said, "I tell the Muslims that
every Muslim should be a terrorist. ... What is the meaning of the word terrorist? Terrorist by definition means a person who terrorises. So in this context every Muslim should be a terrorist to each and every anti-social element. I’m aware that terrorist is more commonly used for a person who terrorises innocent human beings. So in this context no Muslim should ever terrorise a single innocent human being."
Let me say this regarding your revered Naik. The American Indians had simple words to describe this kind of double talk double speak, that some thought was clever and would confuse them, or which enabled any to read into it what they wished. It went like this.
"That white man speak with forked tongue."