It's not that the Quran hasn't been proven wrong. It's simply that Muslims don't know or don't care that it is wrong.
So your just speculating (or hoping) it's wrong, yet your talking like it is fact.
And a good morning to you, Fluffer Overblow.
Yet
another fallacy. A daily occurance.
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/ad-hominemJust prove me only one verse of the Quran that is wrong or that you think its wrong. Quran is only the book in the world that is right and no one can change only one word in this book. Because ALLAH has taken the charge to safeguard this book.
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/quran/023-violence.htm Quite a lot of them actually
"...their feet should be cut off on opposite sides..." Wow. How peaceful
This is because"In these days people people steal something and they were caught they had been punishment few $ and then they were free and can leave, but again they do the same thing and again they were caught and again are free."
What Islam says?"“[As for] the thief, the male and the female, amputate their hands in recompense for what they earned [i.e. committed] as a deterrent [punishment] from Allaah. And Allaah is Exalted in Might and Wise.” [Quran 5:38] "
Why it is said:Very often the opponents of Islam and even some of the less knowledgeable Muslims have levelled this objection that this Islamic penalty appears to be intensely harsh, and if this ruling were to be implemented in today's world, there would be numerous hands which would have to be cut. In addition, enforcement of this ruling would entail that a person, in addition to losing an important part of his body, would become infamous and notorious all throughout his life.
In answering this objection, attention ought to be paid to this reality that:Firstly: Just as we had mentioned in the conditions of this ruling that not every thief shall become encompassed by this law, rather, there shall be only one group of dangerous thieves, who shall be formally subjected to this punishment.
Secondly: In view of the fact that in Islam there are several requirements and conditions that need to be met in order to prove a crime, the occurrence of this punishment further diminishes.
Thirdly: Many of the objections which people, possessing less knowledge, have propounded against the Islamic laws is simply because they have sought to examine its one ruling, independently and without taking into account its other rulings; in other words, they attempt to envisage that ruling in a completely non-Islamic society.
Fourthly: If we observe theft to be rampant today, it is because such rulings are not being enforced; and hence, in environments in which this Islamic ruling is enforced (like Saudi Arabia, in which until very recently this ruling had been in force), extraordinary safety is observed to prevail over them with regards money and property.