Author

Topic: Why do islam hates people? - page 179. (Read 437405 times)

hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 509
I prefer Zakir over Muhammed when mentioning me!
March 20, 2015, 08:57:16 PM
The following is from Alan Korwin, the publisher of Gunlaws.com, from his "Page Nine blog," except that the quote, below, may not be posted on the blog yet. Give him a couple of days. Better yet, go there - http://gunlaws.com/PageNineIndex.htm - and look at a lot of other interesting things.

Quote
=snip=

FYI: Some people quote others words out of context. I am not saying what he said is right or wrong because I can't judge on it as I haven't heard it yet.

other words, the various militant parts of Islam, including Islamic nations, want mass Jihad, especially of Israel. Does this sound like a religion of peace to you?

Smiley

I told earlier don't mix people with religion and also the meaning of Jihad. You are obviously trying to spread FUD or you are mistaken. If you what you saying is possible, I can say "US are bad people, do you think this is a country of peace?". I can say this because US has done many such things, one of the worst was on Japan(Hiroshima & Nagasaki). Sad
 
I heard Jesus is named as a prophet in the Quran more than Muhammed, is it true.. Googled fast but it doesn't say anything about Mohammed.

Quote
The most mentioned prophet in the Qur'an is Moses (commonly transliterated as Musa; موسى‎, pronounced “Mūsā”), as he is mentioned 136 times. Jesus, whose name is commonly transliterated as Isa (but also known as Al-Masih, the Messiah;

Not Jesus, Isa. I know you call Isa as Jesus but as there wasn't crucifixion, instead, crucifiction was happened. To call the execution a crucifixion, the victim(here Jesus) must die but Jesus didn't die. So it is crucifiction not crucifixion.

Yes, you are right. There are names of 24 prophets mentioned in Qur'an and Musa and Isa is most mentioned because there is many history in Qur'an about 'em.

Mohammed raped kids and women to left and right, it's a nice prophet eh?

Can you tell me when this happened? Can you give some source? It is either misunderstanding or misinterpretation or slander(spreading lies).
hero member
Activity: 490
Merit: 500
March 20, 2015, 07:08:47 PM
Islam don't hate people, Islam hate west and they have a right to. War torn for over 10 years for money soley, I'd be pissed too, wouldn't you? Hard to put yourself in their situation but imagine your family blown to bits you a 12 yo child - collateral damage sorry!

I heard Jesus is named as a prophet in the Quran more than Muhammed, is it true.. Googled fast but it doesn't say anything about Mohammed.

Quote
The most mentioned prophet in the Qur'an is Moses (commonly transliterated as Musa; موسى‎, pronounced “Mūsā”), as he is mentioned 136 times. Jesus, whose name is commonly transliterated as Isa (but also known as Al-Masih, the Messiah;


Mohammed raped kids and women to left and right, it's a nice prophet eh?
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
March 20, 2015, 07:04:27 PM
you can not say that all islam hates people , not everyone in yhe world is evil dahh Tongue moreover we should not give so much attention to religions and stuff ... as you know in the past religion was coneecting civiliazitions but now every country is for itsself and only this is the sad truth ... i personally was baftized as a christian but know i dont really care  Smiley sorry for bad engilsh Tongue
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
March 17, 2015, 01:35:08 AM
The following is from Alan Korwin, the publisher of Gunlaws.com, from his "Page Nine blog," except that the quote, below, may not be posted on the blog yet. Give him a couple of days. Better yet, go there - http://gunlaws.com/PageNineIndex.htm - and look at a lot of other interesting things.

Quote
Iran Tweets in English: "Israel Must Be Annihilated"

Media fails to cover THAT part of Netanyahu's speech


The "secret" treaty Obama/Kerry want won't stop an Iranian nuke
Netanyahu spells it out -- THAT'S why they hated his appearance



The lamestream media told you:
The lamestream media told you:


Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu gave a highly controversial speech before Congress on March 3, 2015. Many democrats boycotted the speech, people in Israel thought it was a political stunt, and the president made a big deal out of deciding not to watch it. Mr. Obama and Mr. Netanyahu do not get along.



The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that:
The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that:


The crucial parts of Netanyahu's speech were in the beginning.

These were excluded from most U.S. "news" reports, but having watched the whole thing live I heard it. My jaw dropped. A simple web search provides anyone with the transcript.

You heard about the controversy, the fact that the man currently in the White House turned his back on the speech -- from our greatest ally in the Middle East! isolated among endless murderous muslim maniacs in the region.

Here's what the "news" didn't give you -- the news. FACTS about the blood thirsty madmen seeking atom bombs, literally being aided and abetted by our own president and secretary of state -- unimaginably impeachable offenses. These are not minor glitches or problems. These are full-fledged nightmares.

Netanyahu shed light: "Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei spews the oldest hatred, the oldest hatred of anti-Semitism with the newest technology. He tweets that Israel must be annihilated -- he tweets! You know, in Iran, there isn't exactly free Internet. But he tweets in English that Israel must be destroyed."

Have you seen that in the "news"? No of course not. It would upset their narrative. We need a man to come here from the other side of the world to say it, so the man in the White House can turn his back -- and our media can decide it's not important enough to repeat.

He continues: "For those who believe that Iran threatens the Jewish state, but not the Jewish people, listen to Hassan Nasrallah, the leader of Hezbollah, Iran's chief terrorist proxy. He said: 'If all the Jews gather in Israel, it will save us the trouble of chasing them down around the world.'"

I am not making this up. Neither is Netanyahu. Have you seen that in the "news"? No of course not. It would upset their narrative of "controversy." We need a man to come here from the other side of the world to say it, so the person in the White House can turn his back and our media can decide not to dwell on it.

"But Iran's regime is not merely a Jewish problem, any more than the Nazi regime was merely a Jewish problem... The people of Iran are very talented people. They're heirs to one of the world's great civilizations. But in 1979, they were hijacked by religious zealots -- religious zealots who imposed on them immediately a dark and brutal dictatorship. That year, the zealots drafted a constitution, a new one for Iran. It directed the revolutionary guards not only to protect Iran's borders, but also to fulfill the ideological mission of jihad. The regime's founder, Ayatollah Khomeini, exhorted his followers to 'export the revolution throughout the world.'

"America's founding document promises life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Iran's founding document pledges death, tyranny, and the pursuit of jihad. And as states are collapsing across the Middle East, Iran is charging into the void to do just that."

Israel's prime minister goes on to list Iran's "successes" in pursuit of jihad, all familiar to us, but never spelled out one after the other, connecting the dots.

And then Netanyahu warns us carefully:

"Don't be fooled. The battle between Iran and ISIS doesn't turn Iran into a friend of America.

"Iran and ISIS are competing for the crown of militant Islam. One calls itself the Islamic Republic. The other calls itself the Islamic State. Both want to impose a militant Islamic empire first on the region and then on the entire world. They just disagree among themselves who will be the ruler of that empire.

"In this deadly game of thrones, there's no place for America or for Israel, no peace for Christians, Jews or Muslims who don't share the Islamist medieval creed, no rights for women, no freedom for anyone.

"So when it comes to Iran and ISIS, the enemy of your enemy... is your enemy."

And these people want the atom bomb, and are determined to get it. Right now, Secretary of State Kerry is working to give it to them. He is naively negotiating with these savages, agreeing to terms that are unenforceable, conditions that cannot be verified, guarantees that cannot be confirmed, and that doesn't even matter, because in a mere few years, the entire agreement expires, and Iran is totally unrestricted and can do whatever it pleases. It's as if Obama wants Iran to have nuclear weapons.

Netanyahu points out that the only difference between the warring factions, "is that ISIS is armed with butcher knives, captured weapons and YouTube, whereas Iran could soon be armed with intercontinental ballistic missiles and nuclear bombs."

Speaking only of publicly available information (he was scolded for using secret intelligence, but made it clear everything he "revealed" was already on Google), "To defeat ISIS and let Iran get nuclear weapons would be to win the battle, but lose the war... that, my friends, is exactly what could happen, if the deal now being negotiated is accepted by Iran. That deal will not prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons. It would all but guarantee that Iran gets those weapons, lots of them."

And he goes on to detail how all of Iran's nuke plants continue to exist, grow, operate and make enriched uranium. Inspectors can document violations -- but can't stop them. And like North Korea, Iran breaks the locks, takes out the cameras, and plays "hide and cheat," constantly. These aren't Boy Scouts -- they are villains. They've been caught twice with huge secret nuke plants -- not barrels of uranium, that inspectors didn't know existed. The chief IAEA inspector said, "If there's no undeclared installation today in Iran, it will be the first time in 20 years that it doesn't have one."

Netanyahu told us, in front of Congress: "Iran's Supreme Leader says Iran plans to have 190,000 centrifuges, not 6,000 or even the 19,000 that Iran has today, but 10 times that amount -- 190,000 centrifuges enriching uranium. With this massive capacity, Iran could make the fuel for an entire nuclear arsenal and this in a matter of weeks, once it makes that decision."

Did the "news" media report any of this to you? This is the important part of Bibi's speech. And there is nothing controversial about Israel in this. Iran is the controversy here. And our media -- now among our greatest enemies -- is a root problem for us. They are keeping you in the dark. Iran plans to make enough enriched uranium for an arsenal of nukes, not a bomb, they want to annihilate our greatest ally. We're their greatest enemy, and you had to read my report to find out. Hmmm.

Netanyahu's not done: " Now I want you to think about that. The foremost sponsor of global terrorism could be weeks away from having enough enriched uranium for an entire arsenal of nuclear weapons and this with full international legitimacy.

"And by the way, if Iran's Intercontinental Ballistic Missile program is not part of the deal, and so far, Iran refuses to even put it on the negotiating table. Well, Iran could have the means to deliver that nuclear arsenal to the far-reach corners of the Earth, including to every part of the United States... That's why this deal is so bad. It doesn't block Iran's path to the bomb; it paves Iran's path to the bomb."

And Mr. Obama is designing it with Mr. Kerry, who claim ignorance. Who knows, maybe they are. That's why Mr. Netanyahu came here  to speak directly to us.

Then the controversial part (according to our press) -- if Iran wants a good deal, stop behaving so badly, stop exporting terrorism, stop your path to nuclear weapons, stop your brutality at home and abroad, treat your woman like humans, endure sanctions while you behave so badly, Israel will always remain a staunch ally of the U.S., and we know we in Israel can count of you in America, but we cannot and will not allow this to occur no matter what, for the sake of the world. You can read it all online.

In other words, the various militant parts of Islam, including Islamic nations, want mass Jihad, especially of Israel. Does this sound like a religion of peace to you?

Smiley
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
March 16, 2015, 09:32:52 PM

The American nation was founded by people who were Christian in a big way. True, lots of evil people have used the nation over the years for unChristian activity. But the base was Christian. You can find all kinds of Christian sayings and indicators throughout Washington, D.C.

The point is that Christianity will be found in the books and school teachings simply because that's where the nation came from, that is how it was settled originally.



It was settled as a Christian society by England before its Independence. The U.S. inherited that Christian foundation, as many of the architects of the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights (7 years later) were religious, in their public life, but non practicing in their private affairs. (For example, our first elected* President, George Washington. He was a dues paying member of over a dozen churches, even a board member on several, but rarely attended a Sunday service while home in Mt. Vernon, Virginia. Yet, on public trips, made a show to attend church services several times a week.)

*President of the Continental Congress was a largely ceremonial position. Therefore, most (all) historians begin the first presidency, with George Washington, in 1789.




EDIT: In my head, I was mixing up the Bill of Rights with the Treaty of Paris...Bill of Rights was 15 years later, not 7.

You, perhaps, said it better, with additional detail.

The point is, the people of the USA at its beginnings were basically from Christian lands, or lands where Christianity was taught in depth at one time or another. They had the training built into them, if simply because the lands they came from had trained them, automatically, parents to children, just in habit-like living. Because of this, it should be no surprise that at least the "dregs" of Christian teaching are found in all of the schools of the land. It's in the people.

The major difference between Islam and Christianity is teachings that revolve around Jesus, the Christ. Even though Islam may acknowledge the fact of the existence of Jesus, they do not accept that Jesus saves. Islam accredits salvation to the living of a good life. Christianity accredits salvation to faith that Jesus will save the people by the salvation He set in place when He did His work on the cross. In addition, there are many other differences in the way the two religions consider Jesus.

So, there will be differences and controversies between the people of the two religions, especially since the Muslims who are moving into Christian lands are those that are slightly more militant. This can be seen from the fact that they are brave enough to move to strong Christian lands.

Smiley
hero member
Activity: 882
Merit: 500
March 16, 2015, 09:03:41 PM

The American nation was founded by people who were Christian in a big way. True, lots of evil people have used the nation over the years for unChristian activity. But the base was Christian. You can find all kinds of Christian sayings and indicators throughout Washington, D.C.

The point is that Christianity will be found in the books and school teachings simply because that's where the nation came from, that is how it was settled originally.



It was settled as a Christian society by England before its Independence. The U.S. inherited that Christian foundation, as many of the architects of the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights (7 years later) were religious, in their public life, but non practicing in their private affairs. (For example, our first elected* President, George Washington. He was a dues paying member of over a dozen churches, even a board member on several, but rarely attended a Sunday service while home in Mt. Vernon, Virginia. Yet, on public trips, made a show to attend church services several times a week.)

*President of the Continental Congress was a largely ceremonial position. Therefore, most (all) historians begin the first presidency, with George Washington, in 1789.




EDIT: In my head, I was mixing up the Bill of Rights with the Treaty of Paris...Bill of Rights was 15 years later, not 7.
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 509
I prefer Zakir over Muhammed when mentioning me!
March 16, 2015, 12:19:39 PM
=snip=
Do Arab and Islamic countries teach Christianity in schools?

Not all schools. Comparatively few.

Do they teach their kids Islam?

Smiley

Yes, most of them.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
March 15, 2015, 06:06:18 PM



LA Public School Teaching Kids "Allah is the One True God"



image




-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Big deal! I remember getting tested a lot on Yahweh and Haile Selassie I when I was in public school... Just like that!


Not.


 Roll Eyes




The American nation was founded by people who were Christian in a big way. True, lots of evil people have used the nation over the years for unChristian activity. But the base was Christian. You can find all kinds of Christian sayings and indicators throughout Washington, D.C.

The point is that Christianity will be found in the books and school teachings simply because that's where the nation came from, that is how it was settled originally.

Do Arab and Islamic countries teach Christianity in schools? Do they teach their kids Islam?

Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
March 14, 2015, 09:31:29 PM



LA Public School Teaching Kids "Allah is the One True God"







-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Big deal! I remember getting tested a lot on Yahweh and Haile Selassie I when I was in public school... Just like that!


Not.


 Roll Eyes


legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
March 14, 2015, 09:05:21 PM
=snip=
Islamic Holy War front....
 =snip=

Please don't use 'Islamic Holy War'. It isn't a 'Holy War' and they are using 'Jihad' as 'Holy War' but it's meaning is 'to strive; to struggle'. It is used mainly for internal struggle to be a good Islamic believer and the correct word of 'Holy War' is 'Al-Harb'. More info http://islamicsupremecouncil.org/understanding-islam/legal-rulings/5-jihad-a-misunderstood-concept-from-islam.html?start=9.

They ain't doing a "Holy War", it's some activites by psychos. Don't tell all are bad just because of some people's bad activities.

I think I agree with you.  The ISIS may use that phrase, but then if we use it because that's what they call it, it should be "ISIS's alleged Islamic Holy War."  Because yeah it's totally crazy.

Terrorists always self-appropriate all these grandiose terms like "holly war" and in their twisted POV it seems they legitimately believe it so.
Terrorists and evil men, yes.
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 509
March 14, 2015, 10:43:16 AM
=snip=
Islamic Holy War front....
 =snip=

Please don't use 'Islamic Holy War'. It isn't a 'Holy War' and they are using 'Jihad' as 'Holy War' but it's meaning is 'to strive; to struggle'. It is used mainly for internal struggle to be a good Islamic believer and the correct word of 'Holy War' is 'Al-Harb'. More info http://islamicsupremecouncil.org/understanding-islam/legal-rulings/5-jihad-a-misunderstood-concept-from-islam.html?start=9.

They ain't doing a "Holy War", it's some activites by psychos. Don't tell all are bad just because of some people's bad activities.

I think I agree with you.  The ISIS may use that phrase, but then if we use it because that's what they call it, it should be "ISIS's alleged Islamic Holy War."  Because yeah it's totally crazy.

Terrorists always self-appropriate all these grandiose terms like "holly war" and in their twisted POV it seems they legitimately believe it so.
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
March 14, 2015, 07:56:24 AM
=snip=
Islamic Holy War front....
 =snip=

Please don't use 'Islamic Holy War'. It isn't a 'Holy War' and they are using 'Jihad' as 'Holy War' but it's meaning is 'to strive; to struggle'. It is used mainly for internal struggle to be a good Islamic believer and the correct word of 'Holy War' is 'Al-Harb'. More info http://islamicsupremecouncil.org/understanding-islam/legal-rulings/5-jihad-a-misunderstood-concept-from-islam.html?start=9.

They ain't doing a "Holy War", it's some activites by psychos. Don't tell all are bad just because of some people's bad activities.

I think I agree with you.  The ISIS may use that phrase, but then if we use it because that's what they call it, it should be "ISIS's alleged Islamic Holy War."  Because yeah it's totally crazy.
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 509
I prefer Zakir over Muhammed when mentioning me!
March 14, 2015, 06:31:17 AM
=snip=
Islamic Holy War front....
 =snip=

Please don't use 'Islamic Holy War'. It isn't a 'Holy War' and they are using 'Jihad' as 'Holy War' but it's meaning is 'to strive; to struggle'. It is used mainly for internal struggle to be a good Islamic believer and the correct word of 'Holy War' is 'Al-Harb'. More info http://islamicsupremecouncil.org/understanding-islam/legal-rulings/5-jihad-a-misunderstood-concept-from-islam.html?start=9.

They ain't doing a "Holy War", it's some activites by psychos. Don't tell all are bad just because of some people's bad activities.
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
March 13, 2015, 05:44:47 PM
Yet somehow the vast majority of Muslims aren't violent murdering psychopaths. Same as Christians. Same as Jews. They go about their life like anyone else. Trying to put food on the table and take care of their family. Violence isn't normalized the way you're making it out to be just because they are Muslim. They ignore that part of their religion as others do. And if someone is in fact a murdering psychopath he will justify it with the violent parts of their beliefs. Same with other religions.

LAST FOUR DAYS OF ISLAM PEACE
2015.03.11 (Hurriya, Iraq) - A suicide car bomber eliminates nine people along a city street.
2015.03.10 (Tirin Kot, Afghanistan) - Two children are disassembled along with two others by Taliban bombers.
2015.03.10 (Lashkar Gah, Afghanistan) - Seven civilians are exterminated by a Shahid suicide bomber.
2015.03.10 (Maiduguri, Nigeria) - A female suicide bomber slaughters nearly three dozen people at a market.
2015.03.10 (al-Arish, Egypt) - A civilian is killed when a Shahid suicide bomber rams a water tanker.
2015.03.08 (Joypurhat, Bangladesh) - One passenger is killed when Islami Chhatra Shibir bombers target a bus.

LAST FOUR DAYS OF JEWISH PEACE
....

LAST FOUR DAYS OF CHRISTIAN PEACE
....

Time after time in this thread, some person tries to put on the Wise Guy hat and evoke moral equivalency.

The facts simply do not seem to bear it out, though.

Again, Muslims make up what? 20% of the population of the world? I don't think we have a billion and a half murderers running around. Attributing those events to the faith alone without understanding the context in which they happen doesn't help. It's as misguided as saying Christianity is responsible for killing over 6 million Jews at the hands of Hitler (he said it himself that it wasn't based on racial knowledge but on religion). Or blaming Christianity for the IRA. Or for the KKK. Or for Breivik. Or for anti Muslim violence in Central Africa. Or anti Hindu violence in India. Or anti abortion violence in America. Etc. It all happens within context. Why do you expect Muslims to behave differently to every other human being on the planet?

well, we sure don't have a bunch of Christians running around shouting "Holy Jesus" and then hacking peoples' heads off.

But let's see....for February, how many Allah Ackbar attacks?

42.....

But I do agree with a lot of what you are saying, do not get me wrong.  It's just that you have to look long and hard and even go back into history to find the facts to support the position of a "moral equivalency."  Basically the argument of moral equivalency falls short of a reasonable standard.

Sure, it's going to be a popular argument.  I've been trying to show that on examination of the facts, it does not hold water.

Meanwhile, today on the Islamic Holy War front....

2015.03.13 (Mandera, Kenya) - Islamists ambush a car and shoot three occupants to death.
2015.03.13 (Raqqa, Syria) - Eight prisoners are forced to their knees and then beheaded with meat cleavers by the Islamic State.

Oh, you say. It's no different than the KKK, or the Irish, or the anti abortion violence.

REALLY?
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
March 13, 2015, 01:03:22 AM
Islam is mostly a non-religion religion. Why? Because the only Islamic laws that the people follow are a few of the outer, unimportant ones. They don't even know what their laws are.

Smiley

You are right. In this modern world, most of then doesn't know the laws and most of them make their own. But I disagree on one thing, not *all* does this. There are people who do but that doesn't mean all of the persons from that community are wrong. If you are telling "it is", then all people in all countries would be bad people. Roll Eyes

I agree with you in this. There are those who follow Islamic laws reasonably accurately, though they are fewer in number by far than those who don't know or follow their Islamic religion. We see the Muslims who follow Islam accurately in all the statistics that Spendulus and Wilikon present in their posts.

Smiley
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 509
I prefer Zakir over Muhammed when mentioning me!
March 13, 2015, 12:46:08 AM
Islam is mostly a non-religion religion. Why? Because the only Islamic laws that the people follow are a few of the outer, unimportant ones. They don't even know what their laws are.

Smiley

You are right. In this modern world, most of then doesn't know the laws and most of them make their own. But I disagree on one thing, not *all* does this. There are people who do but that doesn't mean all of the persons from that community are wrong. If you are telling "it is", then all people in all countries would be bad people. Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
March 13, 2015, 12:41:21 AM
Yet somehow the vast majority of Muslims aren't violent murdering psychopaths. Same as Christians. Same as Jews. They go about their life like anyone else. Trying to put food on the table and take care of their family. Violence isn't normalized the way you're making it out to be just because they are Muslim. They ignore that part of their religion as others do. And if someone is in fact a murdering psychopath he will justify it with the violent parts of their beliefs. Same with other religions.

LAST FOUR DAYS OF ISLAM PEACE
2015.03.11 (Hurriya, Iraq) - A suicide car bomber eliminates nine people along a city street.
2015.03.10 (Tirin Kot, Afghanistan) - Two children are disassembled along with two others by Taliban bombers.
2015.03.10 (Lashkar Gah, Afghanistan) - Seven civilians are exterminated by a Shahid suicide bomber.
2015.03.10 (Maiduguri, Nigeria) - A female suicide bomber slaughters nearly three dozen people at a market.
2015.03.10 (al-Arish, Egypt) - A civilian is killed when a Shahid suicide bomber rams a water tanker.
2015.03.08 (Joypurhat, Bangladesh) - One passenger is killed when Islami Chhatra Shibir bombers target a bus.

LAST FOUR DAYS OF JEWISH PEACE
....

LAST FOUR DAYS OF CHRISTIAN PEACE
....

Time after time in this thread, some person tries to put on the Wise Guy hat and evoke moral equivalency.

The facts simply do not seem to bear it out, though.

Again, Muslims make up what? 20% of the population of the world? I don't think we have a billion and a half murderers running around. Attributing those events to the faith alone without understanding the context in which they happen doesn't help. It's as misguided as saying Christianity is responsible for killing over 6 million Jews at the hands of Hitler (he said it himself that it wasn't based on racial knowledge but on religion). Or blaming Christianity for the IRA. Or for the KKK. Or for Breivik. Or for anti Muslim violence in Central Africa. Or anti Hindu violence in India. Or anti abortion violence in America. Etc. It all happens within context. Why do you expect Muslims to behave differently to every other human being on the planet?


Islam is mostly a non-religion religion. Why? Because the only Islamic laws that the people follow are a few of the outer, unimportant ones. They don't even know what their laws are.

Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1135
Merit: 1001
March 12, 2015, 04:38:12 PM
Yet somehow the vast majority of Muslims aren't violent murdering psychopaths. Same as Christians. Same as Jews. They go about their life like anyone else. Trying to put food on the table and take care of their family. Violence isn't normalized the way you're making it out to be just because they are Muslim. They ignore that part of their religion as others do. And if someone is in fact a murdering psychopath he will justify it with the violent parts of their beliefs. Same with other religions.

LAST FOUR DAYS OF ISLAM PEACE
2015.03.11 (Hurriya, Iraq) - A suicide car bomber eliminates nine people along a city street.
2015.03.10 (Tirin Kot, Afghanistan) - Two children are disassembled along with two others by Taliban bombers.
2015.03.10 (Lashkar Gah, Afghanistan) - Seven civilians are exterminated by a Shahid suicide bomber.
2015.03.10 (Maiduguri, Nigeria) - A female suicide bomber slaughters nearly three dozen people at a market.
2015.03.10 (al-Arish, Egypt) - A civilian is killed when a Shahid suicide bomber rams a water tanker.
2015.03.08 (Joypurhat, Bangladesh) - One passenger is killed when Islami Chhatra Shibir bombers target a bus.

LAST FOUR DAYS OF JEWISH PEACE
....

LAST FOUR DAYS OF CHRISTIAN PEACE
....

Time after time in this thread, some person tries to put on the Wise Guy hat and evoke moral equivalency.

The facts simply do not seem to bear it out, though.

Again, Muslims make up what? 20% of the population of the world? I don't think we have a billion and a half murderers running around. Attributing those events to the faith alone without understanding the context in which they happen doesn't help. It's as misguided as saying Christianity is responsible for killing over 6 million Jews at the hands of Hitler (he said it himself that it wasn't based on racial knowledge but on religion). Or blaming Christianity for the IRA. Or for the KKK. Or for Breivik. Or for anti Muslim violence in Central Africa. Or anti Hindu violence in India. Or anti abortion violence in America. Etc. It all happens within context. Why do you expect Muslims to behave differently to every other human being on the planet?
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
March 12, 2015, 11:20:40 AM
Yet somehow the vast majority of Muslims aren't violent murdering psychopaths. Same as Christians. Same as Jews. They go about their life like anyone else. Trying to put food on the table and take care of their family. Violence isn't normalized the way you're making it out to be just because they are Muslim. They ignore that part of their religion as others do. And if someone is in fact a murdering psychopath he will justify it with the violent parts of their beliefs. Same with other religions.

LAST FOUR DAYS OF ISLAM PEACE
2015.03.11 (Hurriya, Iraq) - A suicide car bomber eliminates nine people along a city street.
2015.03.10 (Tirin Kot, Afghanistan) - Two children are disassembled along with two others by Taliban bombers.
2015.03.10 (Lashkar Gah, Afghanistan) - Seven civilians are exterminated by a Shahid suicide bomber.
2015.03.10 (Maiduguri, Nigeria) - A female suicide bomber slaughters nearly three dozen people at a market.
2015.03.10 (al-Arish, Egypt) - A civilian is killed when a Shahid suicide bomber rams a water tanker.
2015.03.08 (Joypurhat, Bangladesh) - One passenger is killed when Islami Chhatra Shibir bombers target a bus.

LAST FOUR DAYS OF JEWISH PEACE
....

LAST FOUR DAYS OF CHRISTIAN PEACE
....

Time after time in this thread, some person tries to put on the Wise Guy hat and evoke moral equivalency.

The facts simply do not seem to bear it out, though.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
March 12, 2015, 10:19:03 AM
Posting something like this doesnt help.

We should not hate, or push people to hate other people.

Why not post something that makes sense, or some news?

Not this.


... You are welcome...  Smiley








Jump to: