Islamist Terrorism From 1945 to the Rise of ISISDespite Islamic teachings against suicide and killing innocent people in battle, terrorist groups like Al Qaeda and the Islamic State, or “ISIS,” have used a political form of Islam known as “Islamism” to justify an unholy war of terrorism. In 1988, Osama bin Laden founded Al Qaeda. Even after his death in 2011, Al Qaeda persists, and the more recently formed group ISIS has attempted to provoke an apocalyptic war with the United States and the West.http://www.crf-usa.org/america-responds-to-terrorism/islamist-terrorism-from-1945-to-the-death-of-osama-bin-laden.html---------------------------
Sounds like they've been busy bees for a long, long time... Also when a population is too lazy or not smart enough to be creative, that culture always find a way to blame everything and the universe for their lack of progress as a positive for the world.
I understand camel milk is very good for your body, etc. Why not create a network that would compete with cow milk as an example. Billions. You exploit what you have, not complain about what you lack and blame others.
How come the big, rich nations can't afford to create their own weapon factory, instead of buying their gear from nations they hate. It is not as if they lack the capital or brain power. Or maybe they do.
All those groups are made in usa or kgb during cold war to recruit in muslim population to serve their own interest through violence and brainwashing. .
All dictator in middle have been installed by usa against communism.
They dont even have to buy them, usa psychopath give them for free lol
The first jihadis in Afghanistan aka al Qaeda were all armed, trained and brainwashed by usa/cia .. for free of course ..
Same with free syrian army ..
Anytime they make a factory of their own it get blown by usa or Israel lol
http://proliberty.com/observer/911synth.htmThey did same with "red groups" before ..
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=fr&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=https%3A%2F%2Fbouddhanar.blogspot.fr%2F2013%2F04%2Flintegrisme-islamique-une-creation-de.html&edit-text=Islamic Fundamentalism: A Creation of US Foreign Policy
We must insist that international terrorism must never be seen as a sociological phenomenon spontaneously and directly arising from oppression and misery. International terrorism and national liberation movements are still relayed by a certain level of clandestine organization where secret service agencies play a decisive role. Many international terrorist groups are originally activists under a false banner. Others take on such status as a result of coordinated arrests, assassinations or cores by the secret services. Even when there is a genuine national liberation organization, the secret services never fail to create false banner operations, assign them to the organization, or commit atrocities on its behalf to isolate it and discredit. Again, deceit and concealment are the rule.
1. The reactionary monarchies : this variant was that favored by the British originally when they occupied various Arab States under mandate of the League of Nations after 1918. In conjunction with the Saud dynasty and the Hashemites, the British established the monarchy Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Syria and Jordan. These regimes, like that of King Farouk of Egypt, were in fact the corrupt puppets of the imperialists who did not wish to advance their country but rather amass personal wealth. In Saudi Arabia, for example, slavery remained legal until 1965 and was still widely practiced after that date, especially in households.
2. Nationalist regimes in the process of modernization : these may be democratic republics, but rather military governments that may evolve into a plebiscitary form of democracy. They can denominate themselves Arab socialists, like Nasser. The Arabs' best hope of catching up with the most advanced regions of the world in terms of scientific and technological progress is offered by the nationalist regimes whose program includes economic development and modernization. The best example is that of Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, who created the first permanent republic in Asia, the Turkish Republic of 1923. Rejecting the sultanate and the caliphate for the benefit of the Turkish nation, Kemal introduced the separation of religion and state , Thus making Turkey a modern and secular republic. He replaced Arabic script with the Latin alphabet, banned the veil for women and fez for men, and encouraged the wearing of the European hat as a "civilized headgear." He discouraged the existence of harems and gave women the right to vote and to hold public office. Atatürk adopted the Gregorian calendar, the metric system, and the surnames. A five-year dirigiste plan for economic development was introduced in 1933. Public law was based on European civil and criminal codes and no longer on Sharia. Atatürk considered religion to be a strictly personal and private matter; He tolerated all religions. Atatürk should be at the top of the list of creators of nations and modernizers of the twentieth century (or at least among the first). Among other things, he helped Turkey to be the only defeated power of the First World War to escape from a fascist regime.
3. The hereditary dictatorships : These appeared following the fall of the monarchies; Sometimes they also take the degenerate form of a nationalist and modernizing state. Typical examples are the regime of Hafez al-Assad and his son in Syria after 1963 and, no doubt, that of Saddam Hussein in Iraq, the first being by far the most odious. Hafez al-Assad led a murderous and invasive police state, where the Algerian minority dominated an unhappy majority. Yet he has always been the darling of New York and London: Kissinger once said he hoped God would forgive him but that there would always be a small place in his heart for Hafez al-Assad. The regimes of Hosni Mubarak in Egypt and the inconstant Gaddafi in Libya are to be classified in this category.
4. The fundamentalist theocracies : The best example is Iran, which is enough to show that this kind of regime can not be effective in ensuring national development in the hostile climate of globalization. In 1978, Carter National Security Director Zbigniew Brzezinski, desirous of avenging Soviet support in North Vietnam, was convinced by British Arabs and Orientalists that Islamic fundamentalism could be used to destabilize the five major republics Central Asia with a Muslim majority in the USSR: Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Khirguizie and Turkmenistan. This strategy could also be used to shatter the ethnic labyrinth of the Caucasus and Trans-Caucasia, especially in Chechnya. In this way, claimed Brzezinski, Islamic fundamentalism could become the "ultimate bulwark against communism. In order to have a powerful center from which to radiate this new ideology, Brzezinski and Carter fomented a pseudo-revolution typical of the CIA, in the style of "the people in power", this time with nuances of Islamic fundamentalism, Overthrowing the Shah of Iran in 1979. On a personal level, the Shah was a monster in several respects; The Savak had nothing to envy the most deadly secret police in the world. However, the Shah was bringing European construction companies to create entirely new infrastructure and cities. An example is the massive construction project in Bandar Abbas (today Bandar Khomeini) by the civil engineering firm Condotte d'Acqua under Loris Corbi. But since the Shah did not tolerate any free political activity, he had no popular party behind him. The instrument chosen to overthrow it was Ayatollah Khomeini, an ignorant personage of ineffable blackness, worse than Savonarola. Let's not delude ourselves: Brzezinski did everything to overthrow the Shah and then ensure that no secular politician, such as Shapur Bakhtiar, took power. US Air Force General Robert Huyser of Haig's NATO Staff was sent to Iran with the message that only Khomeini would be accepted by the United States ( Dreyfus and La Levée , Pp. 50-53). The ascent of Khomeini represented an innovation in the recent history of the Middle East: Iran became a theocracy of religious and mullahs, financed by rich merchants of the bazaar and their interests. The advent of Khomeini meant the freezing, and even the regression, of Iran's economic and cultural development for more than twenty years. But Khomeini's Iran became a center of propagation of Islamic fundamentalist ideology, exactly as Brzezinski had wished, even if those who paid the price were not only the Soviets. Soon, the Anglo-American secret services were able to mount Iraq against Iran in the 1980s war that lasted 8 long years and further ruined the two countries. The Israelis were so satisfied with this war (where the Iranian mullahs launched suicide bombings of children against the fortified Iraqi positions) that they would have preferred never to end.
Iran : Following the Second World War, the first attempt to establish progressive nationalism in Mustafa Kemal came about as Prime Minister Mossadegh ascended to Iran. Mossadegh's program focused on the 1951 nationalization of the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, now known as BP. With the end of the British protectorate in Iran, the young CIA of Allen Dulles and Kermit Roosevelt organized a coup against Mossadegh followed by the restoration of the imperialist seizure of Iranian oil and a reactionary era under the Shah.
Egypt : In 1952, a group of nationalist officers dethroned King Farouk, notoriously inept and corrupt. A coup d'etat of young officers brought Colonel Gamal Abdel Nasser to power . Nasser's progressive nationalist program began with the expulsion of the British and continued with the nationalization of the Suez Canal, with the sums raised by the rights of way to finance the construction of the Aswan Dam on the Nile. The Aswan project was essential for flood control and for hydroelectric power, along the lines of Franklin D. Roosevelt's Tennessee Valley Authority. After the departure of the British, Nasser seized the channel and became a national hero. He immediately clashed with Prime Minister Sir Anthony Eden and the Dulles brothers and soon became the target of an Anglo-French-Israeli intrigue: Israel would launch a surprise attack in Sinai and the Anglo-French intervention forces would resume the channel Under the pretext of restoring order. This gross conspiracy led to the crisis of October / November 1956 and was regarded by President Eisenhower as a personal affront.
Iraq : When the British took control of Iraq in 1919, they established the reactionary monarchy of the Hashemites. In 1958, the puppet monarch Faisal was assassinated. General Kassem became Prime Minister and launched a program of reforms that included the progressive constitution of 1959. This constitution and the other laws of the Kassem era imposed literacy, abolished slavery and guaranteed women equal rights . The impact of these reforms was sustainable. To cite just one example, in the mid-1970s, Iraq was represented in Rome by Ambassador Selima Bakir, an extremely intelligent woman. Like any good nationalist, Kassem decided that Kuwait was an integral part of Iraq. He was right on this point because Kuwait had been illegally detached from the Ottoman Empire by the British in 1899 to prevent the German-financed Berlin-Baghdad Railway from reaching the Gulf end. In 1962, the British fomented a revolt of the Kurds of the Barzani clan and Kassem was assassinated in 1963 by the CIA. When Kassem was replaced by Saddam Hussein, at the time of the CIA, the chances of development of Iraq were greatly restricted. The positive aspects of Iraq under Saddam Hussein were to a large extent the legacy of Kassem.
Pakistan : Pakistan's great opportunity for modernization came under Ali Bhutto in the mid-1970s. Bhutto was determined to put his country at the forefront of modern technology with a peaceful nuclear program in the Eisenhower tradition and " For peace. He soon found Kissinger on his way, who threatened to make a terrible example if he did not abandon his ambitious plans. Soon after, Bhutto was overthrown by the coup d'état of General Zia ul Haq, backed by the United States. Bhutto, under various charges, was hanged by the new regime, in accordance with Kissinger's threats. Later, his wife and children took refuge in West Germany. Fundamentalist tendencies have proliferated since his death.
Kosovo : When the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia began to disintegrate in 1991, the Muslim Albanian population of Kosovo, under the leadership of the nationalist LDK party, responded with an effective, non-violent self-administration that allowed it to challenge the occupiers Kosovars created their own parallel government, with their own school system, their separate elections, their public health system and their parallel network of enterprises.
Afghanistan : In the 1950s, during the reign of King Mohammed Zahir Shah, who had ascended the throne in 1933, the country was gradually moving towards modernization. The development of Afghanistan has always depended on the construction, never completed, of a vast hydroelectric complex in the center of the country. The king was deposed in 1973. Around 1978, the progressive regime of Noor Mohammed Taraki , pro-Marxist poet and novelist emerged with very special talents. Taraki legalized the unions, introduced a minimum wage, supported housing, and public health and sanitation services. He encouraged improvements in the status of women and tried to eradicate the poppy cultivation that made her country the world's largest producer of heroin. He also erased the debts of the farmers, including sharecroppers, and began agrarian reforms to break the hold of the absent owners and the latifundists
Palestine: Following Israeli occupation of the West Bank, the Gaza Strip and the Sinai Peninsula in June 1967, the Israelis found themselves with some 2 million Palestinians to rule. The United Nations system forbids the annexation of territories conquered militarily without the endorsement of the Security Council, which was denied in this case. On the contrary, the Security Council voted Resolution 242 calling for Israel to withdraw to the internationally recognized borders of June 1967. During the Iraq war, Bush's spokesmen accused Iraq of violating Some 17 resolutions of the UN Security Council, forgetting very appropriately that Israel was the champion in the matter since since 1967, this country regularly violates no less than 30 resolutions on the occupied territories. But the United States has never threatened to apply force to force Israel to implement them. In Palestine, the Israeli occupation was oppressive and humiliating; Soon the resistance was organized with the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO). Its leader was Yasser Arafat , a secular nationalist more or less of Nasserite mobility. Since the PLO had almost no weapons and the presence of the Israeli army was dominant, the Palestinians began to do what the Jews had done between 1945 and 1948 against the British occupation in the same territory: They launched a guerrilla warfare, once called the terrorism by the occupiers. Israel still refused to recognize the existence of the Palestinian people.
The few facts from history they forget to mention on Reuters. ..
Islamist and terrorism is american culture of violence, deceit, brainwashing, manipulation and imperialism. Very busy bee indeed.
..You must be to smart for me 
..
..