Topic: Why do members switch campaigns always? - page 5. (Read 1396 times)

Nope, it's the third this year and the fourth in total.
I keep track here now. Maybe you saw the redesign.

This is still correct though:

I think members also switch campaigns, because they follow specific bounty managers. There are managers who a more strict than others, when we speak about post evaluation, and these managers also have more light or preferable campaign rules. For example some managers allow local posting, some just count few posts. Some members, instead of struggling to post 15 posts in English each week, would rather make 25 posts on their native language.

Correct me if I'm wrong, isn't your current campaign the fourth this year? In many posts, I recognize certain users more easily by their signatures. I'm not used to your changes, good thing, you didn't change your avatar.

Why do people change jobs?

• For a better pay
• For job security

The above two works together and it is hard for someone to choose, especially when loyalty is not attached. Jump to a higher paying campaign that might end next month or remain in your present campaign that may stay till next year.
Other reasons include;

• Number of posts required to be made
• Permitted areas to make post
• The leniency or strictness of the campaign manager
• The promptness of pay  

Among others.

Better pay, and the reputation of the project post counts but you can only do this if you're confident enough and you believe that you are a good poster.
The only people who can do this campaign switching are those reputable members of this forum and have a good contribution and trust rating, if you're an average poster better be content to your current campaign or improve the quality of your posts.

It's also one of the worst spam creators.

Everyone has their own reasons why they switch campaigns For me after being in so many campaigns since my days in the bounty campaign I prefer stability and reputation more than anything else. My current campaign happens to be the number one casino in the industry and they are one of the longest campaigns in the forum, The payment rate is good and it depends on how active you are.
I hope I can keep up with the campaign, so far Stake is one of the campaigns with the largest number of active participants.
When it comes to joining its important that you consider reputation and stability so many signature campaigns come and go and the competition among posters is very stiff. 

Correct. Back then, my payrate increased significantly after my first signature campaign ended.

I never tried to switch. That doesn't mean I wouldn't do that now if I'd find a better paying deal that I also like, but it has to be something I like.

There are still people without paid signature.

What can I say, I like this one. I like it so much I wear the same avatar on 3 accounts (Mobile and Bot), while the offer was only for LoyceV.

You mean if you had the opportunity to switch to one for 50 weekly paid posts for the same payrate or higher you wouldn't have switched? Or that you had that opportunity and didn't do it? I think you would be the only one in the whole forum. The exception that proves the rule, which is that if you get paid more, especially considerably more for spending the same amount of time on the forum, people will switch. As discussed in the thread, there are obviously other factors as well.

By the way, while you're at it you might add that you haven't changed your avatar until the deal has ended. 

My first campaign (Rollin) paid a maximum of 50 posts per month, and the pay rate wasn't that high, but I liked the site and stayed with it until it closed.
It helps to be selective which campaign you join.

Well, that's easier to do if you've been to the best ones. For those who haven't, and you suddenly get the opportunity to get paid double or more, it doesn't make much sense to stay in the current campaign for supposedly owed loyalty, when you don't know if next week it's going to end, get paused, or you're simplt going to be kicked out. As I commented in my previous post in this thread on the subject:

Yeah, i forgot this one, this is more like a risk to change campaign because of these reason, unless it's stated that the campaign escrow fund is around for 1 month or 2. But usually it only takes 2-3 weeks. That's why i considered it as a risk.

Recently, I started keeping track of signature changes for selected users. This shows that some of them often switch campaigns.
I think one of the reasons is because the new campaign manager doesn't know about it. "Job hopping" means you're less likely to stick around long in your new job. I'm now thinking I should expand my signature tracking, so that campaign managers can consider this information before accepting someone into a campaign.
When I managed campaigns I always hated it when someone left shortly after being accepted. It's just extra work for the campaign manager.

I've never left a campaign before it ended. How many users can say that?

I will add points that may not have been mentioned

1) Campaign manager: There are some sensitivities among members, and we notice that some of them avoid joining the campaign because of its manager or because of the nature of its management. Many do not want a manager who always deletes members or constantly changes the rules.
2) The nature of the project: Some projects force people to be active in certain boards, or prevent certain boards, such as altcoin or local, or the number of posts like Min 10 or Max 25.
3) Project continuity: Joining a project that pays $70 and lasts for several years is better than $100 for two months.

I remember leaving one campaign because of a reputation issue, Other than that money is not my consideration not even the number of posts I exceed my post quota sometimes, I just want to be in a campaign where the project I'm promoting is reputable the manager managing the campaign is easy to deal with and the campaign has the potential to last long and so far the current campaign I'm in has all the criteria I'm looking for a campaign.
It's a case-to-case basis for every participant and could be money, number of posts, and reputation. but if you're going to switch from one campaign to the other you better be a good poster and someone who can get into the campaign easily.

You may not notice much since your campaign arrangement is more of an affiliation. People can decide to join a campaign, stay short or longer and leave the high-paying ones for the low-paying ones and vice versa for reasons.

But without mincing words, most people join campaigns for the money and this is evident in how they rush to the highest paying campaigns. But for those who left the high-paying campaign for the lower-paying ones, I could say that it could be two things, either the campaign doesn't align with the value of the person, I do this and I'd avoided applying to some campaigns due to this. The second category might be that the campaign management is making internal adjustments mainly due to money constraints, and at times poor performance of the campaigner. You might not know because some will not announce it publicly but via the PM. The campaigner will not have a choice but to find another one even if they pay less.

But some people are the opposite of this, they might want to taste different campaign sectors (mixing, gambling, exchange etc.) and campaign managers' experiences.

Finally, those who stay in a campaign for long might enjoy the conditions, value and pay, while some might not have the time to be switching campaigns when they didn't tell them to leave.

1. People change campaign because they noticed a change about the campaign they are which may not be favourable again for them to continue.

2. Some change the campaign they work for because of the payment rate which could have been lower to their expectations or after they discovered a new high paying rate campaign

3. lastly, people change campaigns because they have discovered something new about to come from a newly launched campaign which stands as a major attraction for them to leave where they are to another one, this may be in form of the incentives, bonuses, requirements, rules and the duration at which the new campaign promise to last.

This reasoning makes sense for those who have limited spare time each day, particularly those who work for companies that require them to commute early in the morning and return late in the evening. I believe their time at home is rightfully a period for rest. Thus, it's entirely reasonable for employees to allocate their time primarily to meet the requirements of signature campaigns.

However, the freedom to post on any board of your choice is unrestricted. It's up to you where you want to make your posts within this forum, but it's crucial to adhere to the forum's rules and stay on topic.

I prefer a mindset that values an individual's creativity. So, it doesn't matter where someone posts, and they shouldn't be concerned about whether their posts are counted by campaign managers or not. When they consider the benefit of their contributions, they already possess a higher level of engagement, and the recognition they deserve should naturally follow.

Just demonstrate that we bring value to this forum, and that goodness will eventually come back to us. 

For me, I would rather work with a less strict manager with lower pay than a strict manager with higher pay.

You cannot get one answer because the answer differs according to the nature and way of thinking of each person. It is like a job in normal life where you try to look for a new job if you do not like your salary or if your manager is strict or the working conditions are not suitable.

In addition, many members have other work in life outside the forum, so they prefer campaigns that have less stringent conditions in order to avoid being pressured.

I'm almost sure that the managers are not thrilled with the additional work of transferring participants from one campaign to another. Judging by everything so far, stable campaigns with the least fluctuations and changes have the best rating. (for example ex CM or Bestchange).

And maybe the frequent changes and applications for the campaign are considered part of the promotion due to the constant bump through app posts. As I said earlier, managers can give the most precise answer to this.