Topic: Why do members switch campaigns always? - page 6. (Read 1394 times)

Those people directly involved in this discussion would had been in the best position to give you a direct answer because all we'll be doing here is speculating on what the reasons are without actually knowing the main reason. People can move from one campaign to another campaign for various reasons. Since you have already ruled out the reason of better pay rate lets move on to the managers involved with those campaigns and also the weekdays of the campaign. Some people prefer campaigns that ends during the weekends while others love campaign that ends during the weekdays. As for the managers, people have their favorites and they'll always love to work with them because of their fast payment and on time receiving of payment without having to wait hours before the coins gets to your wallet due to poor network fees or other managerial behaviors.


This particular situation has higher pay reason all over it and there's nothing wrong in that, there's a new campaign that'll pay you more for your contributions on the forum, it's only normal for him to want to partake in such campaign. Getting paid more for the value you bring has a better feeling so there's nothing wrong in anymore moving to experience that feeling. Being in a campaign for so long could be as a result of the piece of mind that the campaign gives you, knowing it's a long lasting campaign and you won't have to bother about applying for a new campaign often. Looking at the Campaigns that have escrow addresses you can easily predict how long the campaign would last and determine if it's worth moving to the campaign or not.

But we can not say managers do not like the constant movement because we often see times where managers accept members who are in their own other campaigns into another of their campaigns. I hope you understand what am trying to say here. If this managers hate it they will not be accepting the same members to cross over, is it not? That is my view of the situation.

The answers to the question posed by the OP are very simple, all possible or at least most of the answers have already been written, so I won't repeat myself.

I am more surprised with the frequent changes in the conditions within the campaign, along with the change in the number of participants. Well, for example, it happens that vacancies are opened in a campaign, and after a week there is a restructuring and the participants are removed. I assume that just as managers don't like constant transfers of participants, this other side also wants some long-term stability.
But I guess that's a question for managers

Lot of things were said already, but I will share my point of view. I understand reasons why other people are jumping between campaigns, but personally, I don't like switching campaigns. For other people higher pay is main factor, but for me extra $10 isn't life changing money. I prefer stability and longevity, usually I spend few years on average in one campaign and I leave it only when campaign ends.
But there is other conditions which may be a factor to switch campaign for some people. Like paying for posts made in local boards or how many posts per week campaign requires.

But some of the members who do this move from one campaign to another also managed by the same manager. How do we judge that? It is clear from the comments I got here that alot of members move because of better payment but the one confusing me is when they do that to another campaign with the same rules and managed by the same member. Sometimes they move and the new campaign they moved to ends while the one they left continues to run.

Well almost everybody have the same points, and that means what is been said is correct and I believe now you have gotten the reason why people moves from one signature champagne to another.
I believe if you see any signature champagne that pays $300 to $500 per week you will apply and never go out from it unless you see the one that has a bigger pay roll, basically money is what makes people to learn about Bitcoin and other new things because we are already given a chance to take it so is just better for us to make the right choice, thats all.

Basically, campaigns have (Rules and Requirements) that must be carried out and must be fulfilled by every participant employed in the campaign, the motives and reasons vary, depending on the situation and conditions as long as they are able to comply with the provisions set.

The facts on the ground that I have seen are members who move to other campaigns for different reasons.
For example:
* minimum and maximum required posts or certain board sections, is also one of the factors that can influence users to move, other reasons for example: boredom, wanting to find new experiences etc.
* The campaign manager can also be their motive for switching campaigns, whether it's assertiveness, tension, etc., it can also trigger them to switch.
* Payment is also something to consider, but it's only a few percentages.

The point: the campaign manager has a big influence on campaign participants, comfort and calm regarding the actions they take, moving or staying, a high percentage is caused by the campaign manager.

I will respond with my personal experience. It's not that members always change campaigns, sometimes we also get kicked out or the campaign ends and you have to make a living. You can be kicked out for poor performance, for example, or for other reasons.

In my case I spent about a year in the Livecasino.io campaign. I was quite happy there but the company decided to cut the budget for the campaign by half, so the managers had to get rid of half of the staff and I was one of them.

From there I moved on to the [banned mixer] campaign, which was paused after a while. Then the vBetFTN campaign started, I applied and I was one of the chosen ones, I was in the campaign for 15 weeks and then I joined [banned mixer] again when it was relaunched.

So we can see that in my recent history, out of 4 campaigns I was in there were 3 changes and only 1 was because I decided to change, in 1 I was made redundant and the other the campaign was paused.

My particular story doesn't have to be what usually happens. As far as I can see the main reason for change is usually economic, but we can't ignore the other causes of change.

So your statement, as categorically as you express it, is false.

Usually it goes down to trying to get a better pay rate when the opportunity presents itself and just for the record it's not against the rules  !

But back in the day, some managers would not entertain  such users as it meant more work for the campaign manager in recruiting new members whenever an opening is made available..and to avoid such campaign jumpers a soft ban was made to discourage this habit

It can be any of the following reasons:

• freedom of which boards one's post will count
• better pay per post obviously
• bonus system for best poster
• likelihood for a campaign to stick around for a long time etc

I started doing signature bounty campaigns in 2017 but it's very rare for me to switch campaigns I jump out of the campaign if the project is a scam or questionable, the project paused or stopped or I was replaced the most important for me is the longevity and potential of the campaign.

In the olden days of signature campaigns, you could switch from one campaign to another in the altcoin signature bounty campaign because there are so many campaigns to join but now you can hardly find a good bounty in the altcoin bounty campaign, and on casinos and mixing campaigns the competition is tough you have to prove yourself, if you're an average poster you'll have to wait for your turn and you have to improve and be a quality poster.

There are many reasons why members switch campaigns but the prime reason is the reputation of the campaign, the pay rate is secondary and I guess the number of posts is the consideration.

For most, it’s always about the pay rate per post and what level of compromise the manager gives in considering a post valid.

Something am not always overly excited seeing is having to switch campaigns with as little as $5 difference in pay rate and when users where just accepted into a campaign just days before another campaign launched. It almost never sits well with me but hey, it’s a users choice and have got nothing to explain for making those choices except, the work they get to give managers in having to reconsider other applicants which makes a wait list apparently useful.

Thoughts am having is, the promise of how long a campaign would last is key to keeping bound with participants with a standard pay rate, rules to posting and consistency in payment. It bonds participants and campaign together such as we have in the green family of BestChange.

There must be a number of reasons why one moves from one campaign to another. Of course, one is about payment rate. We cannot deny this. This must be the heaviest reason. Another possibly is the number of required posts. Others probably prefer a lower minimum or none at all. Or perhaps some others transfer because of the kind of project being promoted. Or perhaps one doesn't like the rules or the manager or the project team. There are probably more.

As for me, I normally just prefer to stay. There could be an instance or two in the past in which I applied for another campaign that pays better, but in general I have this principle to just stick to my current campaign until it's over. Of course, even a weekly difference of $5 or $10 already matters a lot to somebody who's living in a poor country, but I feel a little uncomfortable abandoning a manager or a project that accepted me, my way of posting, my posting habit, and so on.

It's always the pay rate per, next is the rules, then the management.

Changing campaigns due to pay rates is obvious reasons.
Rules depends, if the payrate is higher yet the post counts needed is  above 25, its a negative for most. Also the required number of post in particular board matters as well. If these two is existing on its rules even it has higher pay rates, i still would not join.
Managers may vary, some are strict some are not.

It was for something good that I mentioned you. Nothing to feel had about. I admire those who stay long and loyal to promote a campaign for a year. Yours was more than that, it is something worthy to be mentioned and admired. I wish your new account success in the coming weeks as you continue to move up in rank.

He mentioned it here

Let's say I'm JR now

I assume that the main incentive for a signature campaign switch is money, no matter how trite it may sound. In my opinion, most of the forum members change signature campaigns because of this. Perhaps some of them don't satisfy the conditions and requirements. I can only speculate, because I myself don't belong to those forum participants that you are talking about and for quite a long time I continue to remain in the ranks of the same signature campaign. Loyalty, in my opinion, also has an impact when choosing a signature campaign. At least in my case, as well as stability. Personally, I'm too lazy to move from one campaign to another every week, even despite the higher payment. I doubt that my post allowed you to get an answer to your question, but maybe it will help to understand the incomprehensible soul of a signature campaign participant.

P.S. I know which signature campaigner with 3 years of experience you are talking about. For me, this was also a big surprise.

  Mostly, it's because of money and convenience. Members do not want to do stay longer in a campaign if they are not comfortable working on it, especially if there are delayed payments most of the time. Joining a signature campaign is like working on your job, you cannot sustain working on it for a longer time if you are not receiving high salary rate, nor enjoying the environment of the campaign. Once members stick on a campaign for 3 years or more, most likely the campaign itself is very productive along with its very responsible and reputable campaign manager.

Each member will have their reasons to change or not change from one campaign to another. Personally, I like the idea of being loyal to a campaign, since they have been being loyal to me as an employer, week after week, for years already, without failing in anyways. I could try swaping to another campaign for superior financial purposes as soon as they open a spot, like many members have already done, but why to seek for a change if the currently situation I find myself in is fine? I think that would be a greedy move from my side, which could end very badly after all, since I would be exchanging a long lasting, solid and loyal campaign for a brand new one which can last for few weeks or one month...

Mostly I can term it to be laziness, some people are not that energetic to work and even as that we shouldn't make posting to look very stressful or something too difficulty to do. When you post to make contribution to forum you find it less difficulty to move from one campaign to another without thinking about the stress or energy to put in making post.

Reasons because some posters do love a campaign that requires local board post at this point it became more easier to complete their weekly quota but, whenever you sees those that posts without having to look at the load or on post count you would understand that this people are naturally posting even though they are paid or not they still keep posting, typical example to know those that post only paid post are the people who gives exact number of post per week..

But those who are freely posting do not minds how much post they had given to the campaign, which I sense it to be a sign of laziness. Although some could be they are extremely occupied with other activities or busy at their working place just trying to add sig as an extra side hustle.

One of the most realistic reasons in my opinion. Move to another campaign because you have ranked up to get higher pay. There are also several other reasons for members moving to a new campaign, initially they want the signature space to be filled regardless of which campaign, after that they will consider moving to another campaign when the opportunity arises.
Kebiasaan memposting juga menjadi bahan pertimbangan, aturan Campaign yang berbeda membuat sebagian pesertanya ingin bergabung karena lebih mudah mencapai kuota mingguan yang ditentukan di Campaign. The real reason is of course very different according to each individual, for me apart from the factor of the weekly salary, the campaign duration is also a consideration.