Pages:
Author

Topic: Why do you believe God exists? (Read 7969 times)

legendary
Activity: 2702
Merit: 1468
December 12, 2018, 09:59:27 PM
Like I said before, we differ in a way we perceive the reality around us.

I am looking at what it is.

You are looking at what it could be.

Here is a video I think you might enjoy af_newbie.
Its an old paper of CS Lewis the author of the Chronicles of Narnia and other works narrated and put in a video.

I think does a good job of highlighting the differences in the way we look at the world. 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X9fR1vSxNEQ&list=PL1mr9ZTZb3TXLlFRLu7mffDdfpUWo6Vl5

Hmm, so according to him, I am making an honest mistake. LOL.

Except, I know that Christianity cannot be possibly true.

Pregnant women are not virgins.  Nobody can come back from the dead.  And countless stories in the Bible that are just too stupid even for the children's fairy tales.  Talking snakes, global flood, followed up by the ground zero incest party, living in the whale stomach, etc. etc.  Not to mention slavery, killing, and more killing.  6 days creation, 6000-year-old, flat Earth, nonsense upon nonsense.

BTW, whom did Cain marry?  Never mind, there no point of discussing Christianity or any other religion.

If you want to shoot the breeze about how the life started on Earth, how the universe is so complex, what will happen in the end, what is Black Energy or Black Matter, I am all ears.  But discussing religion loses its luster.

It was fun to make jokes about you guys, but I have to be honest with you.  It is not fair to you guys to make fun of you. 
You guys need medical help, I truly believe so.  I feel sorry for you so I will stop making my usual jabs at religious nonsense that is obvious to anyone with half a brain.

legendary
Activity: 2702
Merit: 1468
December 12, 2018, 06:16:00 PM
...
The Truth of God can indeed be tested. To do so requires extrapolating and determining the effects the belief has on every other belief one holds and then testing that entire complex against the alternative complex centered on around a disbelief in God.

...

LOL.  The same can be said about "The Truth of no God".

Looks like a lot of hand waving, nothing tangible.

Like I said before, we differ in a way we perceive the reality around us.

I am looking at what it is.

You are looking at what it could be.
legendary
Activity: 2702
Merit: 1468
December 12, 2018, 04:16:26 PM
...
Given this reality no one will ever be able to prove God to you. However, that inability does not mean God does not exist. Thus instead of approaching the question from the perspective of looking for proof to reject disbelief I recommend instead trying to look at the world holistically from the perspective that God does exist examine how that changes your perspective on things. Then compare that worldview to your current one in its entirety.
...

Well, that is true.  I cannot prove that Zeus does exist nor that he does not exist.  However, there are probabilities, and those are not in favor of Zeus or any other Gods, including your personal, pet God.

As for assuming that God does exist and looking at the world, of course, you can delude yourself into believing that God created snowflakes, bees, and all the complexity we see in nature.  Just like notbatman is convinced that Earth is flat because he looks out of his window and sees a flat horizon, he steps outside his parents' house, and he sees flat horizon all around 360 deg.  He deluded himself that the Earth is flat.  The Bible confirms that.  What other proof does he need?  He is deluded, any rational observer will come to the same conclusion.

That is why it is important to validate what your senses are telling you.  The scientific method is the best objective tool we have to discover the true nature of our universe.  Other than that, it is a guessing game.  He said, she said.

From where I am standing, I don't see any fundamental difference in your reasoning and notbatman's.  You both are mistaken.

If you care about the truth, you follow the scientific method.  You seek validation through observation and objective measurements.
If you don't care if what you believe is true, then it does not matter.

In the end, it is all about an emotional need that you have to believe in something greater no matter the evidence or lack thereof.  Another reason could be that you (and people like you) are afraid of death and think that somehow (with some supernatural help) you will live in the afterlife somewhere in deep space (or wherever your imagination takes you).

I am not afraid of death, and I am in full control of my life.  My mistakes are mine and mine only.  So are my successes.
Not your God's, Zeus's, Allah's, Devil's, or any other fictional or non-fictional characters.

PS. God cannot be even considered as a subject of scientific studies, so this idea of God should not even cross your mind.  There is nothing to consider.  You cannot build a hypothesis, never mind prove it.

PPS.  What is frustrating to see people like you come and proclaim that there is God somewhere.  You cannot describe him, you have no proof, but you claim that your version (Judeo-Christian) God exists. Where is your Nobel prize?

legendary
Activity: 2702
Merit: 1468
December 12, 2018, 12:15:18 PM

This argument is what atheists use for God.

Atheists believe that God is not worthy of worship


Yes they do usually with illogical emotionally laden arguments that typically fall into one of three categories.

1) Nature is cruel thus I decry God.
2) Humans are cruel thus I decry God.
3) I enjoy (insert vice here) and God forbids it thus I decry God.


The arguments are flawed, but to fully appreciate this you must first answer the question of what makes something worthy of worship. Then you can apply that assessment to God. Ultimately each individual needs to decide for themselves.

I found the following book an interesting read. It addresses the common arguments above and others and does so with a very logical approach and structure.

https://www.amazon.com/Rational-Bible-Exodus-Dennis-Prager/dp/1621577724


Where the FUCK did you get this from?  I cannot believe what I am reading.

People don't believe in your God (or ANY OTHER GODS) because there is not a shred of evidence of your God's existence.

You not only make shit up in your own delusion, but you don't even understand why others see you as delusional and don't believe what you believe.

In the end, there will always be intellectually strong people and an intellectually weak who will need this extra supernatural help to get them through their day.

It actually has nothing to do with evidence, science, logic or any of that sort.  It is a psychological defect that leads people into this delusion.

Some are affected more, some are affected less.  That is why we see such a spectrum of various religions, denominations, and interpretations of the scriptures.  It is a disease of the mind.

Religion is a virus that spreads from grandparents to parents to children.  

Ps. You like Hasidic Jews, maybe you should join them? Ask your wife if she would join. LOL  Watch this on Netflix.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uBPn5oQNutI

PPS. You can end this right now, ask your God to post here or on youtube. Let's go!
legendary
Activity: 2702
Merit: 1468
December 12, 2018, 11:22:56 AM
1. Again, why don't you worship Zeus?

Because Zeus is not worthy of worship.


I am not going to even ask how did you determine that.  Too tired to deconstruct your delusion in full glory.

Are you sure Zeus is not worthy?  I have a book that says otherwise.

Now you know how I feel about YOUR God.  The same way you feel about Zeus.
legendary
Activity: 2702
Merit: 1468
December 12, 2018, 05:20:49 AM

So what you are saying is human beings need Bronze Age God-given moral rules to have maintain a 'properly' free and functioning society.  Anything else will fail in your personal assessment?

Yes this is my position.

Would this work with any God, or only with your God?

I am unaware of any other organizing framework that appears capable of sustaining the necessary cooperation over time without collapsing into tyranny. Certainly if our goal is only maintaining order there are lots of dystopian options available. Absolute tyranny is good at order.

So I am guessing Saudi Arabia picked the wrong God, even though it is Judeo-Christian God 2.0.  How about Osiris, Zeus, Ra?  Would they work?
...
Why are you rejecting all these other Gods?  Why?

Provide proof that these other Gods are false Gods...

If you understand the a priori of God you understand that God is infinite. Thus it logically follows that the God of Islam, Judaism, Christianity, and any other branches of monotheism are the same God. Infinite by definition means all encompassing.

The differences between these religions represent different understandings of the optimal human relationship with regards to God not different Gods. The three faiths by and large all acknowledge this.

Similarly if an infinite God exists it follows logically that any possible polytheistic entity must either not exist or exist as a dependent of God a creation of God if you will. This again is simple logical deduction derived from the first axiom that an infinite God exists.

As for Saudi Arabia that is a sad state of affairs. The Quran has numerous verses that emphasize belief in the one universal God who judges people according to their behavior. The Quran also states explicitly that in matters of faith there shall be no coercion. Sadly we know that other interpretations and xenophobic elements often predominant.

Borrowing the words of Dennis Prager:
"Muslims need what most Christians and Jews have experienced - separation of church and state; interaction with other faiths and with modernity; and reform. Islam needs to compete with secularism, not outlaw it, and to allow competing ideologies within Islam. In religion, as in politics, when there is no competition, there is corruption and intolerance."

You are full of it and you don't even know it.

It's no surprise you feel this way. I have accepted a first axiom that you have rejected. I believe in an infinite creator and you do not.

You therefore feel that I am "full of it" and I in turn feel you are blind.

1. Again, why don't you worship Zeus?

2. Saudi Arabia is a very good example of what the Judeo-Christian state would look like.  Have you seen what Hasidic Jewish communities look like?

3. Just because your carefully constructed delusion provides you with some psychological comfort, it does not mean it is the right thing to do.  Illicit drugs or alcohol have the same effect yet we warn people not to use them as they are addictive and cause long-term harm, just like your delusion,  BTW.
legendary
Activity: 2702
Merit: 1468
December 11, 2018, 07:53:51 PM

Democratic rule does not prevent tyranny it is not exempt from injustice and immorally. Review the history of Athens if you want to understand this better.


Even far from it!

There is no way to prevent tyranny in a group of different individuals in my experience. Whatever the group and its members, whatever the system, there will always a time where a large majority will say "we do this" ignoring de facto a minority who will get imposed something they don't want.

Democracy is a beautiful word but hiding a complex submissive/dominant reality. People are uprising when you say that democracy isn't perfect and isn't morally good, that it's just an organization system that has its flaws...

I would say that democracy is a bit better over complete dictatorship but there must be even better forms of organization keeping more freedom directly in the hands of the people.

At the end the day the character of the government is dependent on the character of the people. If a population is greedy, lustful, envious, and slothful they will favor leaders and support causes that pander to these vices. Quality of life and governance in general will worsen and the best a systems of checks and balances can do is slow the decay. Similarly if a population is prudent, just, courageous, and charitable then they will elect leaders and support causes promote these virtues.

The real challenge of improving governance over the long term is how do we improve the moral character and virtue of human beings?  This is no small task. Indeed it is the most important aspect of progress. Technological advancement is secondary.  

There is where the Atheist go wrong. Their solutions here always fail. They sometimes go totally nuts and assume humans are some kind of perfect creature if only the environment was adjusted. Thus leads them to crazy ideas like communism which if you read the actual ideology might work ok for a population of perfect selfless sinless angels but predictably collapses into contradiction, horror, and tyranny when applied to actual human beings.

Or they go the other way and embrace total relativism. They deny the existence of good and evil altogether everything is just preference. There is no value in anything. Anything socially accepted is "good" anything not is "bad". This leads to a willful self-annihilation as I noted a few posts back. It also lead many atheist leaders to favor drastic population reductions as a way of maintaining control. They grow fearful of an unruly population and their dependence on an unsustainable debt bubble to keep that population happy thus they start to desire the extermination of said population. This is a time honored strategy of tyrants and well documented. It is even described in the Bible as widespread at the time of Moses birth.

The answer to the challenge of good governance is that every generation must prioritize the moral improvement of each individual citizen. This is the necessary prerequisite to ensure future generations will be better off then current generations. God is necessary to this process for without God we are lost in a sea of moral relativism. Without God we can't even define objective good and evil let alone moral improvement.
 
How Do We Make Society Better?

So what you are saying is human beings need Bronze Age God-given moral rules to have a 'properly' functioning society. 
Anything else will fail in your personal assessment?

Would this work with any God, or only with your God?

So I am guessing Saudi Arabia picked the wrong God, even though it is Judeo-Christian God 2.0.  How about Osiris, Zeus, Ra?  Would they work?

You are full of it and you don't even know it.

Why are you rejecting all these other Gods?  Why?

Provide proof that these other Gods are false Gods, and you'll have a proof why your God is a false God.
legendary
Activity: 2702
Merit: 1468
December 11, 2018, 07:39:32 PM

Unfortunately, religious organizations don't know the answers in a logical way. Their faith is logical (because we all live by faith; nobody can see an instant into the future), but they don't use it to logically find out the answers. And they take it out on people who use logic.

The closer we get to micro machines, the more we find out that operations in the universe (and especially life) are super micro machines in the extreme. We use them as such. We are applying DNA to computers to make them "think" better. We are using DNA natural machines with man made machines: https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/synthetic-biology-building-machines-from-dna/ and https://www.cell.com/chem/pdf/S2451-9294(16)30111-5.pdf and many more if you search for them.

The question we seem to be ignoring is, who or what made these natural machines and the machine of nature? Evolution and Big Bang are nice ideas, but they are sadly lacking in real life application. The thing we see in machines is, machine makers. So, who or what made the machines of nature and the universe?

Forget the word "God." Forget, also, the silly notion that stuff simply springs into being all by itself. We don't have any example of real spontaneity happening anywhere. Rather, look at science and see the machines, and then apply this kind of thinking to the idea of machine making. Who or what made the machines of the universe. Whoever or whatever made the machines of nature had super-great ability.

If you ignore the machine maker(s) of nature, or that there could be any such thing(s), you are turning away from science and what science is discovering and using... that nature is made up of machines, and is collectively a gigantic machine. In addition, you are turning away from the kind of logic that made you question the nuns.

Cool

I am an engineer, I would never design nature the way it is.  No engineer would. - No engineer is smart enough to even begin to seriously think about how to design something like nature.

Nature is more like a wild, self-evolving energy monster, that eats everything in its path, releasing matter and energy that forms other monsters. There is absolutely no design in it. Energy conversion, that is about it. - All of nature operates through the laws of physics, by cause and effect. Therre is no evolution beyond the change that C&E provides.

There is an appearance of design to an untrained eye because one looks through a very small time window without understanding what came before and why.  Thanks to Biology we have a pretty good handle on how life evolved over time. - Microscopic C&E is a rather large window. Adaptation, like-begets-like and simple change fit life way better and easier than evolution does.

We are on an energy yo-yo cycle that started with the Big Bang and will most likely end with the Big Crunch, and the cycle will repeat itself with a different set of physical constants.  The process will repeat itself until a new, stable universe will be formed with physical constants suitable to sustain observers. - Big Band and Big Crunch are fun science fiction. Neither takes into account more than a particle of the reality that exists.

Nature is cruel, unforgiving, but pretty cool in its own way. - Like when a doctor doesn't have any control over broken bones mending, and skin growing back together, but nature does it?

There are a lot of unknowns in nature.  Science uncovers and solves them one by one. - And there are so many that a thousand years won't give modern science enough time to solve more than a smattering of them.

So don't jump to the "magician did it" answer when you don't know what the unknown is, never mind how it came about. - But that's essentially what some scientists do when they believe Big Bang and Evolution are real without any proof for them.

And for fuck's sake stop the "Judeo-Christain ideology is the answer to everything" BS.  If we stuck following it, we would still be hungry and wet in some caves, wiping our asses with leaves, waiting for the Sun to come up. - Thank Goodness for the Judeo-Christian ideology. It's the only thing that keeps you from being "hungry and wet in some" cave, "wiping" your ass "with leaves, waiting for the Sun to come up." Christianity is based on Judaism, and together they are the way to eternal life.

Religion does not solve anything, it just takes away your money and your time.  It makes you emotionally dependent on it and blinds you so that you cannot see the world the way it really is.

Since you know this about religion, get away from you faith-based science that has nothing to back it up other than speculation... before you turn it into a religion any more than you have already.

Cool

As always, you leave me speechless. 

The education system has failed you.
legendary
Activity: 2702
Merit: 1468
December 11, 2018, 03:59:51 PM

I was born into a Catholic family.  That was not my choice.  I did not choose God to later reject him.

I ignored stories about God the same way other kids ignored stories about Santa Claus.  

Then my critical thinking skills did the rest when I turned about 12.  I started asking questions for which I got a wholesome beating from a holy nun.  Nasty, old, big nosed bitch she was.  It became a routine, I asked a question, class laughed, I got a beating, back to drawing Jesus feeding the hungry and raising some schmucks from dead.

I rejected God the same you reject Santa Claus.  The same reason:  fictional character.

BTW, why did you reject Santa Claus?  Please do tell.  


Unfortunately, religious organizations don't know the answers in a logical way. Their faith is logical (because we all live by faith; nobody can see an instant into the future), but they don't use it to logically find out the answers. And they take it out on people who use logic.

The closer we get to micro machines, the more we find out that operations in the universe (and especially life) are super micro machines in the extreme. We use them as such. We are applying DNA to computers to make them "think" better. We are using DNA natural machines with man made machines: https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/synthetic-biology-building-machines-from-dna/ and https://www.cell.com/chem/pdf/S2451-9294(16)30111-5.pdf and many more if you search for them.

The question we seem to be ignoring is, who or what made these natural machines and the machine of nature? Evolution and Big Bang are nice ideas, but they are sadly lacking in real life application. The thing we see in machines is, machine makers. So, who or what made the machines of nature and the universe?

Forget the word "God." Forget, also, the silly notion that stuff simply springs into being all by itself. We don't have any example of real spontaneity happening anywhere. Rather, look at science and see the machines, and then apply this kind of thinking to the idea of machine making. Who or what made the machines of the universe. Whoever or whatever made the machines of nature had super-great ability.

If you ignore the machine maker(s) of nature, or that there could be any such thing(s), you are turning away from science and what science is discovering and using... that nature is made up of machines, and is collectively a gigantic machine. In addition, you are turning away from the kind of logic that made you question the nuns.

Cool

I am an engineer, I would never design nature the way it is.  No engineer would.

Nature is more like a wild, self-evolving energy monster, that eats everything in its path, releasing matter and energy that forms other monsters. There is absolutely no design in it. Energy conversion, that is about it.

There is an appearance of design to an untrained eye because one looks through a very small time window without understanding what came before and why.  Thanks to Biology we have a pretty good handle on how life evolved over time.

We are on an energy yo-yo cycle that started with the Big Bang and will most likely end with the Big Crunch, and the cycle will repeat itself with a different set of physical constants.  The process will repeat itself until a new, stable universe will be formed with physical constants suitable to sustain observers.

Nature is cruel, unforgiving, but pretty cool in its own way.

There are a lot of unknowns in nature.  Science uncovers and solves them one by one.

So don't jump to the "magician did it" answer when you don't know what the unknown is, never mind how it came about.

And for fuck's sake stop the "Judeo-Christain ideology is the answer to everything" BS.  If we stuck following it, we would still be hungry and wet in some caves, wiping our asses with leaves, waiting for the Sun to come up.

Religion does not solve anything, it just takes away your money and your time.  It makes you emotionally dependent on it and blinds you so that you cannot see the world the way it really is.
legendary
Activity: 2702
Merit: 1468
December 11, 2018, 07:18:55 AM

Dictatorial regimes don't follow moral codes.  Are you new here on Earth?  Your Bible did not save Christians or Jews who were killed in Auschwitz, nor it prevented Christians from killing other Christians or Jews.


Every society follows some kind of moral code.

Sometimes that code can be as simple as the strongest rule and the weak are slaves.  Usually it's more complex.

Democratic rule does not prevent tyranny it is not exempt from injustice and immorally. Review the history of Athens if you want to understand this better.

Tyranny of the majority was one of the greatest concerns of the US founding fathers. It the reasons they took such great effort to limit the power of direct democracy. Everything from the selection of Senators by state representatives, the selection of the president via the Electoral College, and the limits of voting to land owners were all attempts to lower the risk of a tyrannical mob rule.

Your stated standard is "you are automatically a good person if you are following the moral code that your society accepts." This is a very problematic code that highlights the profound detachment from reality your philosophy and atheism leads into.

I noticed you did not really refute my examples above. Via your standard any horror if accepted by a society becomes "good" and the perpetrators of said horror are "good people". With this standard you are lost in a morass of relativism a natural consequence of rejecting the divine.



You think the Bible will save you from a dictatorship?  You are confusing your delusional religious beliefs with political systems.
...
Judeo-Christian ideology is no different than other inhumane ideologies.  Nazism and Communism included.


You lack an understanding of the pivotal role of the Judeo-Christian tradition in facilitating coordination and driving progress over time.

I discussed this topic in some depth here:
Religion and Progress

I did not reject God.  There is nothing to reject.  Why can't you get this through your head is beyond me?

You were raised religious and brought up to accept and worship God. You and later rejected both that tradition and God. We have real issues of dispute we should not waste our time on word games.

I came from a highly religious family, went through Catholic school system, both primary and secondary, I was an altar boy
...
What I saw, was corruption, abuse on pretty much every level imaginable.


I was born into a Catholic family.  That was not my choice.  I did not choose God to later reject him.

I ignored stories about God the same way other kids ignored stories about Santa Claus.  

Then my critical thinking skills did the rest when I turned about 12.  I started asking questions for which I got a wholesome beating from a holy nun.  Nasty, old, big nosed bitch she was.  It became a routine, I asked a question, class laughed, I got a beating, back to drawing Jesus feeding the hungry and raising some schmucks from dead.

I rejected God the same you reject Santa Claus.  The same reason:  fictional character.

BTW, why did you reject Santa Claus?  Please do tell.  


legendary
Activity: 2702
Merit: 1468
December 10, 2018, 07:07:03 PM

You are a good person if you follow the moral code that your society accepts.  

You don't need a Bronze Age boogeyman.


Let's see so according to your logic:

The Soviet Gestapo who forceably resettled presents to collective farms in 1932 leading to the starvation of 8 million were swell folks because they were following the Soviet code.

The Nazi's guards who starved and gassed millions were great guys too because Hitler was elected and widely admired and supported by the German People.

According to you these folks were paragons of virtue following the moral code their societies accepted at the time.

Similarly if you can get a majority to support your desired re-education camps and book burnings that will be great too. I think I understand you better now.


Here is a short video that describes your fundamental problem. You have rejected God, and without God one can no longer properly define good and evil.
Can You Be Good Without God
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxiAikEk2vU

Dictatorial regimes don't follow moral codes.  Are you new here on Earth?  Your Bible did not save Christians or Jews who were killed in Auschwitz, nor it prevented Christians from killing other Christians or Jews.

Are you sure you thought your examples through?

I am all for progress, for what is best for all people and society as a whole.  That includes gays, lesbians, women, unlike your Bronze Age God.

You think the Bible will save you from a dictatorship?  You are confusing your delusional religious beliefs with political systems.

You can have a secular, democratic system with check and balances to prevent the sort of brutal regimes you are thinking about.

Trust me, you don't want to go down the route of a moral system driving a political system based on a Bronze Age scripture. 
You'll be killing gays and adulterers sooner rather than later.

Judeo-Christian ideology is no different than other inhumane ideologies.  Nazism and Communism included.
Any political system lead by people who believe in supernatural magic is a recipe for disaster.  Delusional people should not be near the nuclear codes.

I did not reject God.  There is nothing to reject.  Why can't you get this through your head is beyond me?
legendary
Activity: 2702
Merit: 1468
December 10, 2018, 04:40:29 PM

Quantum Physics Debunks Materialism
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4C5pq7W5yRM


You should use objective observations to make your reality, not some philosophical ramblings.


Empirical results from quantum mechanics are objective observations. The fact that you choose to dismiss the logical implications of the those observations highlights your bias.

...

You really don't know me.  Who says I dismiss the results of quantum mechanics?

You are full of yourself, IMHO.

You jump to whatever supernatural conclusions you need to validate your delusion.

As for humans being bad, well, most of us are.  We use our moral standard established by the societies we live in. Good people innately know the moral rules and help establish the rules.

Ahh and who gets to decide who the innately good people are?

Who gets to decide who to sent to those re-education camps you want and what books need burning. You because of your innate goodness?

You are a good person if you follow the moral code that your society accepts.  

You don't need a Bronze Age boogeyman.
legendary
Activity: 2702
Merit: 1468
December 10, 2018, 11:05:34 AM

Materialism is false.

Philosophy can be great but far from a good ''science'' to find the ''truth''. That's your problem, you base most of your beliefs on philosophical arguments.

The falseness of materialism is not just a philosophical argument it is the most logical interpretation of multiple and repeated scientific experiments.

Modern science provides powerful evidence against the materialist worldview. This summary of recent scientific studies highlights this and is worth watching if you were not aware of this.

Quantum Physics Debunks Materialism
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4C5pq7W5yRM

Materialist cling to false notions of an independent physical reality. They do this because once you realizes that materialism is false a theistic view of world logically follows.

You should use objective observations to make your reality, not some philosophical ramblings.

As for materialism, you have heard of E=mc2, haven't you?  So stop clinging to your 19th-century definition of materialism. The rest of the world moved on, it is time you do that as well.

Actually, the Bible is the most printed, sold, and distributed book out there. Why have you moved on, away from the truth?

Cool

You should work on your epistemology.  Being popular does not make it true.

You have no tools to discover what is true or false. You are like a blind and deaf newborn.  That is your problem.

Unfortunately for you, you don't even know why you are deluded.

legendary
Activity: 2702
Merit: 1468
December 10, 2018, 07:40:18 AM

Materialism is false.

Philosophy can be great but far from a good ''science'' to find the ''truth''. That's your problem, you base most of your beliefs on philosophical arguments.

The falseness of materialism is not just a philosophical argument it is the most logical interpretation of multiple and repeated scientific experiments.

Modern science provides powerful evidence against the materialist worldview. This summary of recent scientific studies highlights this and is worth watching if you were not aware of this.

Quantum Physics Debunks Materialism
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4C5pq7W5yRM

Materialist cling to false notions of an independent physical reality. They do this because once you realizes that materialism is false a theistic view of world logically follows.

You should use objective observations to make your reality, not some philosophical ramblings.

As for materialism, you have heard of E=mc2, haven't you?  So stop clinging to your 19th-century definition of materialism. The rest of the world moved on, it is time you do that as well.
legendary
Activity: 2702
Merit: 1468
December 10, 2018, 07:31:03 AM

Why are to misdirecting the conversation?  Who said anything about materialism?  I said objective facts.  It is not my problem that our reality is material.

I am simply highlighting your self-imposed miosis. You base your determination of objective facts on your materialism yet refuse to consider challenges to that materialist foundation.

Your concerns about religious tyranny in a theocratic state are of course valid. Humans corrupt every institution we partake in and vesting ultimate state power in any centralized church run by man can lead to no outcome other then eventual corruption of said church and tyranny. The founders of the US understood this well which is why they both guaranteed religious freedom and prohibited an official state religion in the first amendment of the constitution.


Our morality should come from the humanity that is within us.  We should burn ALL scriptures and move on as critical thinking human beings.

Religion is evil at its core.

You appear to have bought into the progressive delusion that humans are basically good and if we all just embrace our inner humanity we can all sing songs together in harmony.

The reality is that humans are not inherently good. We are innately infused with great evil. That ultimately is part of the message of the Old Testament you so misunderstand. It tells us that all humans even the best of us are inherently flawed and capable of great evil. It also lays out a framework via which said evils can be mitigated and perhaps someday rectified.

You are already on record as in favor of forcibly removing children from the homes of religious parents and placing them in re-education camps. Now you want book burnings too? You will make a good foot soldier when the next tyranny rises its head.


The year is 2018.  Earth is not flat, it is billions of years old, nobody created the universe or life on Earth that we know of, life evolved and continues to evolve.  Anyone who denies these facts is delusional or simply ignorant.

You sound like one of the scientists who loudly proclaimed space was full of Luminiferous Aether or the confident proponent of Phrenology standing tall with his tape measure.

The reality is that your firm foundation of facts are not nearly as certain as you proclaim.

1. Earth is not flat.

The entire universe including the Earth might be flat.
Study reveals substantial evidence of holographic universe
https://m.phys.org/news/2017-01-reveals-substantial-evidence-holographic-universe.html

2. Earth is billions of years old.

Time itself may be an illusion and the age of the earth depends on your frame of reference.
TIME is an ILLUSION
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=VYZQxMowBsw

3. Nobody created the universe or life on Earth.

This is your religion and your conclusion has not been proven by science nor does it have anything to do with science.



The difference between you and I is the way we view reality.

To me, the reality is based on objective observations confirmed by carbon and silicon-based observers.  In my world, fictional characters do not exist or exhibit any influence or power.  The unknown remains unknown and is not part of my reality.  I don't lose sleep over the unknowns.

In your world, the reality consists of what is observable and the unknown which you make it known and part of your physical reality.  In your world, fictional characters are alive and well, the supermen exhibit their might, influence every action and thought you make.  Pregnant virgins remain virgins, the dead can become alive again, winged horses exist and can fly to space, and people are alive after they die.    In your world there are no unknowns, everything has an answer, the whole world is coherent and understood by you.

Your worldview is the basis for your delusion.  You need this delusion to function in this world as it provides a psychological comfort for you.  You cannot bare an idea that something is not known and you invent answers to feed your insecurities.


You call me a materialist, I would say I am an objective observationalist.  

As for humans being bad, well, most of us are.  We use our moral standard established by the societies we live in.  Good people innately know the moral rules and help establish the rules for the rest of their societies to follow.  Some of us are born without that moral compass and need guidance from our society or community.  Some of us break those rules anyway and become outlaws. Adopting rules established for the Bronze Age societies is as bad as having no moral rules.  The leaders who wrote those moral rules would not last a day in our society.  They would be arrested and thrown in jail for life.

Our morals evolve over time, what was considered moral few centuries ago is not moral any more.
newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 5
December 16, 2018, 07:37:08 PM
Semantics might help here. Forget Supreme Being - what about Supreme Intelligence? Do you believe each of our brains represents the pinnacle of universal intelligence?

I am not sure what the difference is between supreme being and supreme intelligence.

Does supreme intelligence have self-awareness?

The difference is in freeing you from having to think of God as an anthropomorphic entity, while acknowledging that an individual's brain is not the highest order of intelligence, but more likely a small part of universal awareness. Then the "self" part of "self-awareness" becomes moot.
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 12
December 15, 2018, 12:02:15 PM
first week this should be practiced to create a cocoon, believers call it "the sacred place", after you will begin to experience bliss, not to move the bed and a chair, otherwise you'll have to create a new cocoon for another week. Well and negative emotions can not be allowed on the place of the cocoon, they destroy the cocoon. Imagine how you filled with happiness on the inhale and on the exhale direct it to create a cocoon

Thank you for the tip!
hero member
Activity: 1988
Merit: 593
December 15, 2018, 11:43:33 AM
first week this should be practiced to create a cocoon, believers call it "the sacred place", after you will begin to experience bliss, not to move the bed and a chair, otherwise you'll have to create a new cocoon for another week. Well and negative emotions can not be allowed on the place of the cocoon, they destroy the cocoon. Imagine how you filled with happiness on the inhale and on the exhale direct it to create a cocoon
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 12
December 15, 2018, 10:51:48 AM
It is hard (and boring) to focus on breathe in and breathe out

But it must be mastered for peace and happiness

Yes, our mind and body are made of chemicals so we do not actually need to abuse any external substance to achieve happiness.
legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 1385
December 15, 2018, 07:57:43 AM

Drugs are also attractive, but they cause addiction and withdrawal in case of stopping

Maya comes in all shapes and forms from the most addictive drugs, alcohol, and delicious food to the greed for power and money, lust for sex, personal pride; ie everything that grabs attention and causes us to forget about the most important thing in life

The body is naturally full of all kinds of chemicals that would be considered drugs if taken out of the body. Don't look without for drugs. Look within.

Cool
Pages:
Jump to: