an atheist who claims he would be foolish for atheists, because atheists believe that theis is a liar, the circumstances of this theis is a belief about the absolute spirit, while atheists believe that the absolute spirit was not there, but how do atheists talk about ideas? atheistic idea is also an absolute spirit she did not appear to be material but he think? then atheists believe that theis is a liar? try to look in the mirror for the atheists how that idea in your head with a spirit of absolute spirit
How do atheists talk about that idea? Simple, have you seen/heard or had any contact or evidence of that spirit or anything divine for that matter? Why not? Because a religion and it's teachings, no matter how big, are all an illusion.
It's pretty simple when you think about it, just science wasn't that developed hundreds of years ago so people quite easily adopted religion as it had answers to the unexplainable. Give me any question you have and I can give you a logical answer on why is it wrong.
you know Descartes ? he talk " cogito Ergu sum or I think ,therefore I am" . then how does an atheist say that god does not exist? and the spirit of the absolute spirit was an illusion? whereas when we think the spirit of the absolute spirit was playing naughty in the brain?, when atheists think like this then he has the answers that the neurons of the brain are working? But how can that be? Do you memperintahkan brain neurons work? it therefore "I said that the idea is the absolute spirit." have regarding the absolute spirit of God and theis, while atheists are also included in theis because they are not robots or computers, theis also have an idea
There is no such thing as spirits or souls. I am an animal, just like you. We got here because of billions of years of evolution.
Unknowns are just that: unknowns. Religious people equate unknowns with 'God' and stop investigating/thinking.
For us unknowns, are things to be discovered and understood.
That is the difference between us.
then you know that it also theis atheist? If not then I would laugh out loud, I did not say that theis not always about religion? theis is a trust? If atheists do not believe in anything? then the atheist is an alien? , about evolution, and you say that man is an animal? how can you say that man is an animal? , Which category man is an animal is a foolish mistake to think, what difference does an atheist who does not believe in God but believe in evolution, and the human is an animal category terraced the Buddhist and Hindu religious teachings
And then I very very like if atheis talk " God is death, And left his body ." , and I hope no one is proud to be an atheist but does not have a stake in science
I don't even know where to start. First of all, try reading a biology book, or you've failed that class? Second, atheism isn't based on any religious teachings, duh, it's based on science and research... Human is an animal just as any other animal you see, but rather us having tail and claws and fur all over our bodies, we've adapted to the different surroundings and we've evolved intelligent, unlike most of other animals.
no atheist would ever say that. where did u even get that from? But believing in something a sand human wrote a couple thousands of years ago is to be proud of?
If atheism is not a religion, why read a biology book? The info in the biology book is part of the atheism dogma. The idea that a human is just a different kind of animal is another dogma of atheism. Atheism is simply a religion wherein its believers use their religious dogma to attempt to prove that atheism isn't a religion.
Because a biology book contains the basic of animal evolution through time? I can't tell you to read a book for electro-engineering... What's wrong with you?
ya like egg or chicken question first? I will answer the chicken because there is no( egg chicken )in question. if the atheist is not dogma, if the atheist is not about religion, why do atheists always spread his teachings? When karl marx said "religion is the opium." He possessed a strong reason to make argumemt it, he explained that people who are being oppressed in ninabobokan by religion, he is destined poor because the test of gods, but not in such a way, he's poor and oppressed because there is a large sucking. Atheists, too, the atheists speak as much as possible, and make a lot of people are frustrated, and most people are atheists only talk about no god, without understanding the importance of science and stomach because hungry
Is this a riddle? Just write in your native language. We can help you translate your post into English. I speak 5 European languages, I am sure there are other people here who can translate into non-European languages.
Did you say atheists don't understand science?
yes, I questioned it! Most atheists argue not only important, they dnot donate their understanding and just argue without coachman, had too many thoughts of philosophers tetatapi nothing can merebuh better world
I am sory , because shortage language
I cannot speak for other atheists, but I can assure you I do understand science. I have a masters degree in electrical engineering so you can throw any string theory at me and it will stick.
Science is making the world a better place. Progress has its side effects (pollution, overpopulation) but overall our lives are more comfortable than say 100 or 2000 years ago.
Religious thinking hinders scientific progress.
Science is based on Math and Logic. Religion is based on Literature.
You cannot build new cell phones, computers, cars, airplanes using Religion. Religion is useless in the modern world.
BTW, as science progresses the gap between philosophy/religion and science will widen.
