Topic: WinMiner v1.126a - auto switch windows app for multi miner optimization - page 35. (Read 101126 times)
December 06, 2017, 10:53:49 PM
What about a reply regarding if you guys gonna implement claymore cryptonote 10.2 or not. I lose 470 hashes with RX 580 cards on cryptonote 9.7 cause it doesnt go further than 2800 total h/s per rig but with 10.2 stark support i get 3270. just add it fast if you wanna keep people here. I like the project but i dont like to lose hashpower for a simple miner software update.
December 06, 2017, 10:21:55 PM
Hi Guys! Like the project, but I've got a bit of an odd issue I'm hoping you can help with.
On my multi-card rig, some sort of error occurred during benchmarking. This has resulted in the UI perpetually showing "Benchmarking - Target: (value)/day (ETN+PIRL)" despite the fact that it's not benchmarking anything. Instead, it completely benchmarked the one Nvidia card, but all 4 AMD cards have been on ZEN and ZEN only since I started. Checking the Benchmark history, it just didn't even try to bench anything else for the AMD cards.
Interestingly, I tried uninstalling and reinstalling, thinking this would force it to re-benchmark everything, but it seems that once again the AMD cards are straight to mining zen while the Nvidia goes through a series of benchmarks.
Am I nuts? On my other rig, a single AMD card, it benchmarked as expected and has switched here and there as profits moved around.
Is there any way to ensure I have truly knocked out all previous benchmarks and really start from a clean slate on the multi-card rig?
Welcome aboard!On my multi-card rig, some sort of error occurred during benchmarking. This has resulted in the UI perpetually showing "Benchmarking - Target: (value)/day (ETN+PIRL)" despite the fact that it's not benchmarking anything. Instead, it completely benchmarked the one Nvidia card, but all 4 AMD cards have been on ZEN and ZEN only since I started. Checking the Benchmark history, it just didn't even try to bench anything else for the AMD cards.
Interestingly, I tried uninstalling and reinstalling, thinking this would force it to re-benchmark everything, but it seems that once again the AMD cards are straight to mining zen while the Nvidia goes through a series of benchmarks.
Am I nuts? On my other rig, a single AMD card, it benchmarked as expected and has switched here and there as profits moved around.
Is there any way to ensure I have truly knocked out all previous benchmarks and really start from a clean slate on the multi-card rig?
Here is a quick explanation about benchmarking on WinMiner -
(1) Benchmarking - Target - This metric shows up before benchmarking takes place, and it is based on crowd wisdom logic - it analyzes the performance of very similar hardware by other users on WinMiner and gives out an expected target metric. The idea is that users will have an estimate of what realistically they can expect before the full cycle of benchmarking is completed.
(2) Benchmark modes -
(a) Express (default) - in this mode the benchmarking will commence with the combination most likely to provide the best performance for the specific hardware, and then once in a while attempt a different combination to make sure the best combination is indeed the one being mined. This mode gets a user up and running with max performance asap.
(b) Regular Benchmark - in this mode all combinations will be tried out, one by one until the most profitable combination is chosen
In addition, once every 24 hours hardware will be examined per each algo for hash poer performance.
Hope this clarifies :-)
December 06, 2017, 09:44:47 PM
Hi Guys! Like the project, but I've got a bit of an odd issue I'm hoping you can help with.
On my multi-card rig, some sort of error occurred during benchmarking. This has resulted in the UI perpetually showing "Benchmarking - Target: (value)/day (ETN+PIRL)" despite the fact that it's not benchmarking anything. Instead, it completely benchmarked the one Nvidia card, but all 4 AMD cards have been on ZEN and ZEN only since I started. Checking the Benchmark history, it just didn't even try to bench anything else for the AMD cards.
Interestingly, I tried uninstalling and reinstalling, thinking this would force it to re-benchmark everything, but it seems that once again the AMD cards are straight to mining zen while the Nvidia goes through a series of benchmarks.
Am I nuts? On my other rig, a single AMD card, it benchmarked as expected and has switched here and there as profits moved around.
Is there any way to ensure I have truly knocked out all previous benchmarks and really start from a clean slate on the multi-card rig?
On my multi-card rig, some sort of error occurred during benchmarking. This has resulted in the UI perpetually showing "Benchmarking - Target: (value)/day (ETN+PIRL)" despite the fact that it's not benchmarking anything. Instead, it completely benchmarked the one Nvidia card, but all 4 AMD cards have been on ZEN and ZEN only since I started. Checking the Benchmark history, it just didn't even try to bench anything else for the AMD cards.
Interestingly, I tried uninstalling and reinstalling, thinking this would force it to re-benchmark everything, but it seems that once again the AMD cards are straight to mining zen while the Nvidia goes through a series of benchmarks.
Am I nuts? On my other rig, a single AMD card, it benchmarked as expected and has switched here and there as profits moved around.
Is there any way to ensure I have truly knocked out all previous benchmarks and really start from a clean slate on the multi-card rig?
December 06, 2017, 08:57:22 PM
Just dont store all users BTC in a hot wallet like nicehash and it'll be ALOT Safer, smdh 
They don't have BTC. We get paid in USD. You can withdraw in BTC, but this means they exchange USD for it. I just don't know if this is safer or not. Any feedback on this?
Well they have the BTC somewhere to back the USD they are sending users. Which they are profiting off of at that point cause they are HODLing BTC and paying users out at current USD rate, with BTC skyrocketing they are making $$
But that BTC better be offline unlike nicehash or everything could be gone in seconds.
December 06, 2017, 08:45:05 PM
Just dont store all users BTC in a hot wallet like nicehash and it'll be ALOT Safer, smdh
They don't have BTC. We get paid in USD. You can withdraw in BTC, but this means they exchange USD for it. I just don't know if this is safer or not. Any feedback on this?
Well they have the BTC somewhere to back the USD they are sending users. Which they are profiting off of at that point cause they are HODLing BTC and paying users out at current USD rate, with BTC skyrocketing they are making $$
But that BTC better be offline unlike nicehash or everything could be gone in seconds.
December 06, 2017, 08:14:34 PM
It appears the calculated balance is still off and not updating properly. How often should it update? The live page would be nice if it were fixed but it's crucial that the total balance counter is accurate.
I've got 10 rigs that aren't totaling high enough. I'll give it another day but that's about it before back to straight mining.
I've got 10 rigs that aren't totaling high enough. I'll give it another day but that's about it before back to straight mining.
December 06, 2017, 08:12:47 PM
@winminer why we still dont have xmr-stak or claymore 10.2 wasnt that supose to be already implemented on previous versions? its a huge diference in
hashrate with claymore 10.2 i get 3270h/s with 9.7 i get 2770 h/s
hashrate with claymore 10.2 i get 3270h/s with 9.7 i get 2770 h/s
December 06, 2017, 08:12:06 PM
Just dont store all users BTC in a hot wallet like nicehash and it'll be ALOT Safer, smdh
They don't have BTC. We get paid in USD. You can withdraw in BTC, but this means they exchange USD for it. I just don't know if this is safer or not. Any feedback on this?
December 06, 2017, 08:06:23 PM
Just dont store all users BTC in a hot wallet like nicehash and it'll be ALOT Safer, smdh
December 06, 2017, 08:02:00 PM
@WinMiner how are we protected in case of a hack?
No one can guarantee a bullet proof hack protection on any system.Your ultimate protection, beyond the measures we take, is the low minimum withdrawals and fully flexible withdrawal times - this way you can always withdraw and protect your funds using the protection measures that meet your expectations.
We of course recommend using your own wallet (paper or hardware)
December 06, 2017, 07:52:57 PM
i have stopped mining.Its like the server is unable to register in real time the mining which is taking place and i doubt this will be replaced even after the scaling up is done.
Please send logs (Help > Send Error Report) and mention your nickname We will gladly take a look and get back to you.
December 06, 2017, 07:49:34 PM
@WinMiner how are we protected in case of a hack?
December 06, 2017, 07:30:31 PM
Yep looks like I will plant my rigs here until the Nicehash debacle plays out...
December 06, 2017, 06:58:41 PM
Yeah I have the same feeling. We'll see tomorrow I guess..
December 06, 2017, 06:52:56 PM
i have stopped mining.Its like the server is unable to register in real time the mining which is taking place and i doubt this will be replaced even after the scaling up is done.
December 06, 2017, 06:51:06 PM
Exactly "many Nicehash users" and you know what they want.... autoconvert to BTC.
December 06, 2017, 06:47:49 PM
Amount currently reported appears to be wrong, probably because of the scalability issue (many new users from Nice Hash?).
For those who are experiencing locked up GUI, try this - try right-clicking (repeatedly) on the service icon for the WinMiner near the bottom right of the screen without exiting the app. For some reason, this "pushes" GUI update events and allow the app to "catch up". Only then the WinMiner GUI is responsive. For now, I've disabled CPU mining (Ryzen 1700) and that seems to help too...
For those who are experiencing locked up GUI, try this - try right-clicking (repeatedly) on the service icon for the WinMiner near the bottom right of the screen without exiting the app. For some reason, this "pushes" GUI update events and allow the app to "catch up". Only then the WinMiner GUI is responsive. For now, I've disabled CPU mining (Ryzen 1700) and that seems to help too...
Hi,
would you mind taking a screenshot? In the bottom right of my WinMiner v1.94.6550 i see only an "Updated:xx seconds ago"
December 06, 2017, 06:42:24 PM
Amount currently reported appears to be wrong, probably because of the scalability issue (many new users from Nice Hash?).
For those who are experiencing locked up GUI, try this - try right-clicking (repeatedly) on the service icon for the WinMiner near the bottom right of the screen without exiting the app. For some reason, this "pushes" GUI update events and allow the app to "catch up". Only then the WinMiner GUI is responsive. For now, I've disabled CPU mining (Ryzen 1700) and that seems to help too...
For those who are experiencing locked up GUI, try this - try right-clicking (repeatedly) on the service icon for the WinMiner near the bottom right of the screen without exiting the app. For some reason, this "pushes" GUI update events and allow the app to "catch up". Only then the WinMiner GUI is responsive. For now, I've disabled CPU mining (Ryzen 1700) and that seems to help too...
December 06, 2017, 06:34:15 PM
Something is very wrong with the mining calculations at the moment, hopefully it gets sorted.
I have various cards mining at a reported combined rate of approx $35/day and in the last 6 hours they have clocked up only $0.66 which has not moved for hours....
I have various cards mining at a reported combined rate of approx $35/day and in the last 6 hours they have clocked up only $0.66 which has not moved for hours....
December 06, 2017, 06:32:24 PM
I'm running version 1.94 but the main winminer window is locked up. I've tried restarting but it still locks up while mining. The command window is flying by, so I know it's actually doing something, but the statistics website and the main window don't show any change in balance. Are all versions experiencing the frozen window or is there one to downgrade to that doesn't have the issue?
Jump to: