Topic: Women are more economical than men. - page 2. (Read 1873 times)

I agree with you, in my opinion it is also natural for women to be more frugal. men who have more responsibilities than women of course he works hard to get a high income to support his family and of course himself, especially if men are adults and have a family, of course they will think about everything regarding basic needs and for their daily lives because it is impossible for them not to shop for themselves, of course men also have their own needs that they must fulfill, the responsibility of men when they are married is very large he must work hard to support his small family even if it is wasteful in my opinion it is normal.

There is nothing wrong in any of this, but I think it all comes back to ourselves. Will we be able to manage our finances better so that we don't waste money later, by reducing our current lifestyle is one way. But what I know at the moment is that people will buy what they want, even if it's just for the sake of buying it.

Men are designed to solve problems which will always make them to spend money, as a men people are expecting support from you that is why will always work to have money in their pockets because their are lot of things to be spent on money. Growing up as a man family members are looking up to you bring the little you can support.  It is normal that women are more economical than men, it is not possible for a man to save his money and not spend it on anything.

Yes, it's true, the majority of women are more economical than men, men are used to being money earners for the family while women are actually the managers of family finances, but lately i've seen there are women whose lives are out of control, so hedonistic that it makes their finances a mess.  social media continues to grow and there are many influencers who show off their luxurious lives, which makes both women and men unable to control their desire to spend the money they have.

In facts the system you are talking about is the ancient imperialist system that still existed today for unknown reason. What to get tired about something archaic culture. Unnatural? Sure you are not animals and living like wild animals. Natural is always wild and barbaric, which freak out the royal.

That is the grave mistake to make, chromosome xx are nothing more than a tool to identify a gender based on a specimen, nothing about which is dormant btw

Yada yada, so many add up and become totally unrelatable.

Seem clear they would behave in a cycle, like a cult, their biological clock decide which cycle they should be, the cycle currently is exactly the menopause phase, there would be plenty of blood. Also the jealousy cycle would be coming soon, it is all unavoidable biological cycle!

I totally disagree with you, not every successful man get riced with the help a woman, there are many men out there that get rich because there are women in their side, I have seen some successful gentle men that has enough money and still they are not married or even a fiancee.

Yes, it's true, it all depends on the character of the person, either the woman or the man. If a man grows up in a home where he doesn't know how to manage things, then the man also can not get addicted to low spending. He also does sometimes, if the man is trying hard to minimize his expenses, it will be like his suffering, the same thing applicable to some women.

Agree, the debate on this issue will not be finished if we still have different opinions, women are considered more economical if they already have children because women will prioritize finances for children and family needs compared to their own needs, this statement can be justified and realistic.

If the situation is for unmarried people, then men are more economical than women because men have to save their money for future finances, including wedding costs and savings funds for family responsibilities. On the women's side, they are not very economical, they work hard to buy expensive goods and branded brands, they do anything to earn a lot of money without considering the risks. That's my view and other people may not agree, but I'm sure the difference depends on the situation, economic status and married status.

I think that more often than not, yes, and it depends on the conditions in which the woman grew up and the maintenance of her children. It often happens that a husband can leave the family and a woman is forced to raise a small child alone and, taking care of his future, sharply changes spending in his favor. She is thinking about future expenses for food, clothing and rent. If the woman doesn't do this, then the child may have a bad future. Let's add to this the statistics that women usually earn less than men, although nowadays they are trying to fight this. I think so, but of course there are women who treat their economic part simply terribly, but in my opinion there are fewer of them.

I think it's not best bringing top 10 richest in the world here, besides behind every successful man there's a woman. So we should not go to that area, reasons may be attributed why woman are more economical than men but in some cases men are also economical than women it all  depends on what you trying to say
In nature women are met to be economical why?
They learn how to manage everything they have, when it comes to business, money, their home etc, secondly women avoid spending  lavishly

Its situational on which we cant really make out some conclusion on whose the provider yet both could really be on that role but most of the time which men is really that something that more rampant when it comes to this role.Therefore, if the husband is really that doing the work then the wife would really be doing the budgeting on which it would really be just that normal on which this had been always the system on which men would really be just doing his job and earn money but the ones who do make out allocations on which things those would really be that applied or whatever that in connection with spending.Then women is really that capable on doing things, although men could do that but i could really say that when it comes to budgeting and allocation then our wives is really that good at that.

Being economical doesnt really need up on what gender you would are but since we are really that doing the hard job then it would really be that so understandable that we cant really think
off that well if we are the husband but not all since ive consider myself to really be that strict when it comes to budgeting and expenses on which i could really
say that this is somewhat not true though.

I do think women being more economical than men is not entirely true and is arguable.
In most cultures around the earth, Men has over the years, assumed and had the role of the provider in the relationship and despite having gradual societal changes, a lot of men would still feel the responsibility to provide. And personally, I don’t think it’s much of a big deal. Everybody is free to do whatever with their funds even if it means giving someone who don’t reciprocate.

In a lot of marriages today, the man would seem to be the one who provides while in reality, it’s the woman doing more or all of the providing.

This happens a lot nowadays. But in essence, women and men are equal, so women should be able to be financially independent even though providing for them is a husband's obligation as head of the family.

But sometimes if women work, they will be more appreciated by men and the surrounding environment. Many women are victims of verbal and mental domestic violence and are not appreciated because they are too dependent on men. Maybe men feel they have control over their women because they have given them money. Finally, what I want to convey is that women are more economical than men, don't you think, there are also many men who are more economical than women, it all depends on the individual.

We all know that the xx chromosomes are more active than the xy chromosomes. When we determining sex, the genes on the y why chromosome is what determines whether the baby is going to be a male or female. We can't change this differences because on a norms, women are more stronger than the men in certain perspectives that we don't need to mention.

 Women are child bearer and they know how to make things happen even though the possibility is not there. They are strong and have good taste relating to management. Since I'm most families, woman are the ones that take care of house chores and the children while the men would have to tend for the family, they are more equipped with intelligence on how to manage resources to satisfy the present need of the family.

 Sometimes when I go to th meall to get food items, I could spend more money to buy the same things that we need to prepare breakfast or dinner compare to what my woman would spend. I think women maybe not all have that inbuilt management spirit in them. Some men just feel like they are not needed in the kitchen so they don't have the time to learn how to economize even though there is enough funds available to spend at any time. It is always good to learn from women on how to do some certain things rather than flying ego.

And that swap has not been easy to do because it is not a natural process like either revolution where people get tired of a particular system and want a change, no there is no change here. The woman is the woman and the man is nothing less than the man.

Moreover, the patriarchy system is still dominate in most of the countries and that is a mechanism of tracing descent through the father who is always ascribed as the head whether ceremoniously or otherwise.

Do you not discover gender swap magic yet? Swap the gender and the role would be reversed too? But nope, even after the gender swap, you can't change the biological self, every single building block of the body is genetically encode with xx chromosome, you have to change the complete body to even make consideration!

You corrected your idea in the last sentence after admitting that you were talking about the situation in your country, meaning that the angle of your analysis cannot be generalized to all women in any country.  Like you, I am from a country with a conservative society. Despite this, women enjoy rights that make them equal to men in rights and duties as well.  This means, for example, in determining responsibilities within the family, both of them are required to spend and provide care, one for the other, and both for the children.  From this basis, women began to be liberated from the prevailing culture, such as the one in your country, and supported by many laws that make women’s aspirations equal to men, without harming either party to the other.

This is right because men usually engage themselves with their friends outside the home where they spend a lot. Also, they have some home burdens and they provide each and everything a woman should need. So, he has left with less money. In the case of women, she didn't engage in these activities outside the home, especially in our country it is not done in any way and they didn't have that much responsibility in the home.

Also, there are 20% of women who have home responsibilities through which they are going in a way where they spend a lot. In the end, they have less money left which turned out to be no economic I think  . So it's all about the responsibilities someone is facing or someone has to deal with.

The point is even when they depend on another person usually a man whichever way it is whether the husband, boyfriends or brothers, she is more prudent with the money by her spending on like men. After all she got the money from the man meaning the man is already spending on her while she is saving 

Most times those men who give her especially the husband could come back to her to borrow same money he gifted to her in loan. That is the point but it is unfortunate that men will always be giving while women receive despite her things have changed, this aspect is yet to change.

Agree only when she can stop depending on another person for MONIES! May be? But it is too amusing I don't even know how to make them listen, they are totally unhinged!

I think you vision is considered only from food shopping or buying household stuff. Indeed women are more experienced in such things than men. They do more planning in that than men. But consider buying clothes. How can they be more long-term thinkers, if they buy high heel shoes or dress only for 1 night out or party with colleagues in the office? Men are more practical. If they buy jeans or suit, they will wear it for years Men will never buy shoes because there were a discount from 199 to 169, even though they dont match their other clothes and they have nothing to wear it with. Women will.

I think this simply depends of a person or individual as I personally don’t fancy generalization as I’ve seen and also know women who live very lavish lifestyle and are very poor with management and I’ve also seen men who are very economical and also manage their lives and homes very perfectly. I’m not trying to defend men here but I’m just standing on a neutral ground to correct a point that, this things isn’t just about a particular gender but varies  from one individual to another but on the long run, women are truly good with managing their homes than men and that’s one indisputable fact.