In the recent reports and in news it was revealed that women's are not much interested in cryptocurrencies compared to men
Women don’t have interest because they are not well aware of working of bitcoin and when they will come to know about the bitcoin then they will invest into bitcoin like men do and now after seeing the recent price rise women in my regions are now eagerly asking for how they get into the bitcoin because they also want to earn profit and that day will be no far when the whole community will use bitcoin and earn.
Topic: Women in the cryptocurrency industry - page 16. (Read 2601 times)
In the recent reports and in news it was revealed that women's are not much interested in cryptocurrencies compared to men
Women don’t have interest because they are not well aware of working of bitcoin and when they will come to know about the bitcoin then they will invest into bitcoin like men do and now after seeing the recent price rise women in my regions are now eagerly asking for how they get into the bitcoin because they also want to earn profit and that day will be no far when the whole community will use bitcoin and earn.
there may be many, but not just published by them, so we do not know what he is a woman or a man
because it is very rare to discuss gender in the cryptocurrency industry
well his ordinary men dominate in the cryptocurrency industry, but many women though not as many men
because it is very rare to discuss gender in the cryptocurrency industry
well his ordinary men dominate in the cryptocurrency industry, but many women though not as many men
Women coin ftw that is where it is at!
Yesterday I attended a blockchain summit, and you couldn't be more right- out of about 1000 people, only like 20-30 were women. Plus, all speakers were guys. I even heard someone saying that we will not trust a crypto advice given by a woman. Amazing.
In the recent reports and in news it was revealed that women's are not much interested in cryptocurrencies compared to men
Women don’t have interest because they are not well aware of working of bitcoin and when they will come to know about the bitcoin then they will invest into bitcoin like men do and now after seeing the recent price rise women in my regions are now eagerly asking for how they get into the bitcoin because they also want to earn profit and that day will be no far when the whole community will use bitcoin and earn. 
Not only woman but also teenagers are involved in bitcoin tremendously,but they like to hide themselves as to get priority for every valuable projects.
That is true. I have encountered a few teenagers in this space. Very intelligent ones. In some cases I assumed they were adult and only found out after some positive interactions how young they were.
Not only woman but also teenagers are involved in bitcoin tremendously,but they like to hide themselves as to get priority for every valuable projects.
Every so often I run into an article that talks about how few women are involved in this industry compared to men. My suspicion is that there are more women involved than anyone realizes; they're just not putting their gender front and center.
What do you all think?
https://moneyish.com/ish/all-the-reasons-why-women-can-be-the-future-of-cryptocurrency/
What do you all think?
https://moneyish.com/ish/all-the-reasons-why-women-can-be-the-future-of-cryptocurrency/
In this business there are absolutely mo discrimination because our identity can be secured if we wanted to. Buy the lack of women in this business doesn't mean that they are not that capable of doing this kind of stuffs. They can actually there are no boundaries in this thing. The thing is women tend to not to trust thus bitcoins because they are much more emotional that us so that i think affect the reasons why women are much fewer than men when it comes to cryptos but i am looking forward that more women will be involved next year in this thing.
The way it is. Recently I read that most of China's crypto-currency traders are women. I can not even explain the reason for this phenomenon. Do Chinese housewives spend their free time at home using a computer? Very versatile Chinese women.
I agree that there are more women involved than people realize; They simply do not put their gender forward and centered, though not visible.
Women are less likely to take risks. This may be a good thing though. Read this journal "Gender Differences in Risk Assessment: Why do Women Take
Fewer Risks than Men?" http://journal.sjdm.org/jdm06016.pdf. If you don't want to, here's the abstract
"Across many real-world domains, men engage in more risky behaviors than do women. To examine some of the
beliefs and preferences that underlie this difference, 657 participants assessed their likelihood of engaging in various
risky activities relating to four different domains (gambling, health, recreation, and social), and reported their perceptions
of (1) probability of negative outcomes, (2) severity of potential negative outcomes, and (3) enjoyment expected from
the risky activities. Women’s greater perceived likelihood of negative outcomes and lesser expectation of enjoyment
partially mediated their lower propensity toward risky choices in gambling, recreation, and health domains. Perceptions
of severity of potential outcomes was a partial mediator in the gambling and health domains. The genders did not differ
in their propensity towards taking social risks. A fifth domain of activities associated with high potential payoffs and
fixed minor costs was also assessed. In contrast to other domains, women reported being more likely to engage in
behaviors in this domain. This gender difference was partially mediated by women’s more optimistic judgments of the
probability of good outcomes and of outcomes being more intensely positive."
Fewer Risks than Men?" http://journal.sjdm.org/jdm06016.pdf. If you don't want to, here's the abstract
"Across many real-world domains, men engage in more risky behaviors than do women. To examine some of the
beliefs and preferences that underlie this difference, 657 participants assessed their likelihood of engaging in various
risky activities relating to four different domains (gambling, health, recreation, and social), and reported their perceptions
of (1) probability of negative outcomes, (2) severity of potential negative outcomes, and (3) enjoyment expected from
the risky activities. Women’s greater perceived likelihood of negative outcomes and lesser expectation of enjoyment
partially mediated their lower propensity toward risky choices in gambling, recreation, and health domains. Perceptions
of severity of potential outcomes was a partial mediator in the gambling and health domains. The genders did not differ
in their propensity towards taking social risks. A fifth domain of activities associated with high potential payoffs and
fixed minor costs was also assessed. In contrast to other domains, women reported being more likely to engage in
behaviors in this domain. This gender difference was partially mediated by women’s more optimistic judgments of the
probability of good outcomes and of outcomes being more intensely positive."
I found this interesting. I'm one of those women who are more adventurous and I do tend to take more risks, although not so much on the subjects mentioned. I don't gamble on purpose, for example. But I guess I'm more risk-tolerant when it comes to finances, and for that reason was willing to take a risk on cryptos. I will say, though, that the way I went about it was that I found ways to earn cryptos and then I traded those for other cryptos, etc. I actually put very little of my own fiat money into it (except for one period when I tried out mining but I quit when the electric bills got too high compared to what I was earning).
With that said, since the beginning of the year I have been on the lookout for ways to move some of my crypto wealth into vehicles that are more stable and less risk prone. For example, I started a sa770 life insurance policy with cash proceeds from the crypto side. I wanted to take at least some of what I'd earned in crypto and turn it into something that has a track record of pretty much always being profitable. I also cashed out some cryptos at the beginning of the year and paid off consumer debt. After I did that, it was like this huge relief for my husband and me. And now if everything I own in crypto were to suddenly go down to zero, at least I have the debts paid off. So in that sense, I'm not as risk averse as it would at first seem.
My theory is that there are approaches and techniques that are peculiar to women that work really well in this space. Actually, crypto is one place where women should absolutely not try to act like men. I think we do far better being ourselves because we see things and make connections that don't come naturally to men. If anything, this industry in some ways is biased towards women. It's just that so far relatively few women have figured this out
But more are coming on board every day.
Women are now involving in crypto world.it's good.They are changing and online work compet with man.In my country there are a lot of house wife's are using bitcoin.They have good analytical computer skills. Actually it is very comfortable job.There are no requirements that only men are allowed for this job.
Women in the cryptocurrency industry. Defenitely yes! Because the world of cryptocurrency there is no gender gap either boy or girl as long as you are interested on cryptos you are welcome to this business. I am proud to say that I'm one of those many women whose benefited from this opportunity given by bitcoin.
Every so often I run into an article that talks about how few women are involved in this industry compared to men. My suspicion is that there are more women involved than anyone realizes; they're just not putting their gender front and center.
What do you all think?
https://moneyish.com/ish/all-the-reasons-why-women-can-be-the-future-of-cryptocurrency/
What do you all think?
https://moneyish.com/ish/all-the-reasons-why-women-can-be-the-future-of-cryptocurrency/
Most of crytocurrency industry dominant of men is involved here. But then again I believe that no matter what gender preference do you have as long as you are willing to enter the bitcoin world then you will be part of this industry. And I think why women is few in this industry is that because they are busy taking good care of there children.
I think it's wrong when people are separated by gender. I have seen many women who are hundreds of times smarter than men and Vice versa. A person should be judged by his abilities. This applies not only to crypto-currencies. Some women show in politics the best results. For example, Margaret Thatcher or Angela Merkel.
yes, that's true, but I think it's because women do not have much enthusiasm and emotion than men. so it is natural that the front is a man.
Many women just joined and played in cryptocurrency world, but I think they just don't show their gender or not show-off to public.
Look at ICO core team, there are many women working together, especially in influence/advice.
And women are very good in economy, but we can't see people whether as women or men. all is the same in cryptocurrency.
The one who can earn max profit or minimize loss percentage is great or in the top.
Look at ICO core team, there are many women working together, especially in influence/advice.
And women are very good in economy, but we can't see people whether as women or men. all is the same in cryptocurrency.
The one who can earn max profit or minimize loss percentage is great or in the top.
crypto currency is not considering gender while working but crypto world is for everyone whatever they are like male , female , small , younger. everyone have a right to work with crypto and can earn profit there is no such issue in crypto that can differentiate anything between gender, everyone have gain this opportunity if they want to work and i think all type of people with a great percentage are working with crypto.
I agree with you completely in this case. Gender, race, religion etc do not matter when it comes to the crypto world since anonymity is what bitcoin and the crypto world mainly stands for and there is no place for such biased stuff in this field if you ask me. I observe some people discriminating on the basis of ranking level in bitcointalk, gender, religion etc sometimes and I feel such people are simply pathetic and I simply ignore such people. On a happy note, it is good to see more and more women getting involved with the crypto world these days. 
Women are less likely to take risks. This may be a good thing though. Read this journal "Gender Differences in Risk Assessment: Why do Women Take
Fewer Risks than Men?" http://journal.sjdm.org/jdm06016.pdf. If you don't want to, here's the abstract
"Across many real-world domains, men engage in more risky behaviors than do women. To examine some of the
beliefs and preferences that underlie this difference, 657 participants assessed their likelihood of engaging in various
risky activities relating to four different domains (gambling, health, recreation, and social), and reported their perceptions
of (1) probability of negative outcomes, (2) severity of potential negative outcomes, and (3) enjoyment expected from
the risky activities. Women’s greater perceived likelihood of negative outcomes and lesser expectation of enjoyment
partially mediated their lower propensity toward risky choices in gambling, recreation, and health domains. Perceptions
of severity of potential outcomes was a partial mediator in the gambling and health domains. The genders did not differ
in their propensity towards taking social risks. A fifth domain of activities associated with high potential payoffs and
fixed minor costs was also assessed. In contrast to other domains, women reported being more likely to engage in
behaviors in this domain. This gender difference was partially mediated by women’s more optimistic judgments of the
probability of good outcomes and of outcomes being more intensely positive."
Fewer Risks than Men?" http://journal.sjdm.org/jdm06016.pdf. If you don't want to, here's the abstract
"Across many real-world domains, men engage in more risky behaviors than do women. To examine some of the
beliefs and preferences that underlie this difference, 657 participants assessed their likelihood of engaging in various
risky activities relating to four different domains (gambling, health, recreation, and social), and reported their perceptions
of (1) probability of negative outcomes, (2) severity of potential negative outcomes, and (3) enjoyment expected from
the risky activities. Women’s greater perceived likelihood of negative outcomes and lesser expectation of enjoyment
partially mediated their lower propensity toward risky choices in gambling, recreation, and health domains. Perceptions
of severity of potential outcomes was a partial mediator in the gambling and health domains. The genders did not differ
in their propensity towards taking social risks. A fifth domain of activities associated with high potential payoffs and
fixed minor costs was also assessed. In contrast to other domains, women reported being more likely to engage in
behaviors in this domain. This gender difference was partially mediated by women’s more optimistic judgments of the
probability of good outcomes and of outcomes being more intensely positive."
Yeah. I know it's considered highly politically incorrect these days to differentiate gender influences in business, but the science of physiology, chemistry and psychology cannot be ignored. This risk has been recognised for many years, with even insurance policies now tailored towards the lower risk behvaiours associated with women (they pay less than men for health and life covers, for example).
This year's Nobel Prize for Economics was also awarded to the recognition of human propensity for risk taking in markets as the key reason for why market predictions and analysis (often based on rational models derived from AI).
Combining these two acknowledgments, it would make some sense to involve women in higher decision-making levels, not simply delegate them to communication roles (which, incidentally, they happen to be good at?).
Jump to: