Topic: Would you participate in new project if it is not listed in ICO rating websites? (Read 6897 times)
July 21, 2020, 03:38:59 PM
As your survey speaks, checking the project's rating on ICO rating website is one of the criteria or point in the checklist to judge the project. However, this is not mandatory to have the information and rating about the project on that rating website. Even though we see that some good rating projects also not doing well or turned out to be a scam, we can not trust that information. Based on our own research, MVP, team contacts, product development, and the concept should be part of our judgment of that project.
July 21, 2020, 10:49:17 AM
Never waste my time and money on projects like that. I only care and invest in new projects if they implement IEO in big exchanges like MXC, Gate, Hoo.com, Binance ...
If I am convinced with the idea of the project and do see that it will have a good future based on my understating and the interactions with the team then I would like to invest in that projects. Not necessary would be depended on the ICO rating for that, but it just acts as a guide or say one of the parameters.
July 21, 2020, 10:45:19 AM
Never waste my time and money on projects like that. I only care and invest in new projects if they implement IEO in big exchanges like MXC, Gate, Hoo.com, Binance ...
July 21, 2020, 09:02:49 AM
ICO rating websites aren't all true on their jobs ,they sometimes get paid for rating from developers ,I won't rely on them if I were you , project listing in ICO rating websites or not doesn't state the fact that its not a scam project, there are some good signs that good projects used to have.
yup, most of them are paid expert user on that website to make fake rating about thier project to increase the star, for example look at KryptoRedeem project that launch their ICO and getting about 4 / 5 rating on ICObench but look at them now, the project website cant be access and admin on telegram has been inactive about month , the project is totally dead right now.
so we cant really trust ICO project that having big rating on ICO rating website like this, we need to do our own research about the project like who's the people behind the project & how the project work.
July 20, 2020, 02:47:19 PM
If I'll find good project then of course i wanna participate IEO & bounty. There are many good projects that do not think about all these rating sites and I agree with their plan. At this time, investors are more cautious about themselves, so it will not be possible to stretch the IEO / ICO rating site.
July 19, 2020, 03:09:21 PM
in my opinion is not all the best projects are listed on the ICO rate website ... because what you say is that the founders of ICO can pay the website for a high rating to attract the attention of cryptocurency enthusiasts to invest in their projects ... so I don't trust the website rate to make it as a success factor or not a project that is being launched
December 28, 2019, 08:06:16 AM
I think a good project needs to be exposed and more people pay attention to it in order to have a chance of success. If the website does not list this project, I will not participate.
November 25, 2019, 05:02:09 AM
For me new projects that are not listed on the website wabsite are very doubtful because the wabsite in a bounty is very influential, many new projects appear that we do not know well and don't, I will see who has a clear vision, especially rating and further information of a project if it is clear means I will participate in it
November 23, 2019, 09:17:50 PM
I will not participate in the ICO project that is not listed on the ICO rating website, because it is prone to fraud, the ICO project listed in the Web ICO rating can at least be accessed by us and can be traced to their data, such as developers and Team working on the project. In addition those listed on the ICO website rating is at least a project that is already ripe and ready, so that they have already submitted their project proposals to be registered on the ICO rating website.
The good thing with ico rating is to have the exposures from investors who loves reviewing the project, those who are not listed to any kind of rating website have a lesser chance being noticed by many investors around. It's a good idea to any developers to enroll and participate to extend their popularities and have more people to influence and potential investors to join the project. 
November 23, 2019, 09:10:18 PM
I will not participate in the ICO project that is not listed on the ICO rating website, because it is prone to fraud, the ICO project listed in the Web ICO rating can at least be accessed by us and can be traced to their data, such as developers and Team working on the project. In addition those listed on the ICO website rating is at least a project that is already ripe and ready, so that they have already submitted their project proposals to be registered on the ICO rating website.
November 18, 2019, 08:07:45 AM
Yes off course. To start with ICO rating website prediction and rating of ICO project are now reliable and influential to the success of crypto project. Reason because most Ico rating site collect funds from project to give them high rating not minding if the project its top notch or not. So the judgment of the present Ico rating sites are not to be taken seriously when investing in an IEO or ICO. Ad an investor take out time to research on your own and see if the ICO or IEO meets your standards and requirement before investing in it.
November 17, 2019, 11:46:50 AM
if i find a good project then i will definitely join it because a good project will give a big profit.. the ICO web rating does indeed influence the judgment to determine whether a project is good or not, and even if the project that I see is good is not listed on the ICO rate website then I will still join it .. because the ICO rating website cannot guarantee the success of a project will be successful or not..
November 07, 2019, 06:39:24 PM
We don't need to depend in rating reviews site because not all reviews is fair much better to make your own review and research. Maybe ratings of review site is helpful but not all will give exact details about the project. There's some project is good and not listed in review site but look at them they growing and proving their project/product is good, we as a community will be decide in the end.
October 31, 2019, 06:54:28 PM
yes why not ? if i sense that they are legit i wont hesitate to jump imediately before its too late and start regretting at the end . ico rating websites are not the basis of the success or the failure of the ico and also there are lots of them so not all will list every project . other have a requirements before listing .but whats obvious is that every ico project will always have thier own ann thread on this forum , if not then they are considered shady and i wont trust them
October 29, 2019, 12:02:29 AM
I would not recommend participating on project that is listed on ICO websites since some of them are scam and promoting just to make money and those are paid listing.
And it would be much better to check and analyze it by yourself and if its legit. Some of the whitepaper, technical paper, overview and token/coin code are just a copy-cat from another project and also creating a fake linkedIn account for the team.
And it would be much better to check and analyze it by yourself and if its legit. Some of the whitepaper, technical paper, overview and token/coin code are just a copy-cat from another project and also creating a fake linkedIn account for the team.
October 27, 2019, 10:23:57 AM
If the project that conducting and ICO was legitimate then why not? At first when i use to invest in some ICO's before in 2018 precisely! I'm not consider to look on any ICO rating site, Since those ICO rating sites are just after the money thats why its not reliable at all. I was remember when one of the project that i was invested turn into a scam despite the truth that it has earned a good rating on the most ICO listing site how ironic!
October 27, 2019, 08:17:07 AM
Nowadays there are many projects, it is not easy to judge on new project, good or not, some people think the ico rating websites may help to take your decision, others think this ICO rating websites provide fake rating due to new project can pay fees to this ICO websites and get high rating.
SO, If you find good project, is it important to you this new good project should be listed in ICO rating websites?
SO, If you find good project, is it important to you this new good project should be listed in ICO rating websites?
Appreciate your participation
Such ICOs today are beyond credible and this is probably a scam! These are fake and they only provide fake ratings to get people to invest in their ICO. It is now unbelievable so we better know what a legit ICO is and let's not rely on such fake websites.
October 27, 2019, 05:39:53 AM
Nowadays there are many projects, it is not easy to judge on new project, good or not, some people think the ico rating websites may help to take your decision, others think this ICO rating websites provide fake rating due to new project can pay fees to this ICO websites and get high rating.
SO, If you find good project, is it important to you this new good project should be listed in ICO rating websites?
SO, If you find good project, is it important to you this new good project should be listed in ICO rating websites?
Appreciate your participation
I would if.. the hype of the project is high. The telegram group has high participant and all of them are active. Also if the team members are experienced so they don't have to pay ICO rating websites to list them because they're famous enough to advertise theirself.
October 27, 2019, 05:35:52 AM
In my experience, ICO rating does not affect anything even if a project gets a good rate there. Because they only judge in terms of time, I mean, the assessment is done only at that time and not for the future. Many ICOs that I followed through the advice of the ICO rating but the fact that when the coin was launched and entered the exchange, it did not give me an advantage for the purchase of their coins at ICO. In fact, if I Hold the coin, a big loss instead. I'm done with ICOs.
Ico reviews coming from such sites are not liable anymore, most of the time they are just getting paid to promote a project which we cant guarantee to be legit. Its actually better to make a research by yourself and use the site only if we need some basement when choosing a project. But I cant consider to follow everything what they said.I guess that is a smart decision after all the hullabaloo in ICOs and IEOs. You can't really trust people in cyberspace. You will find that only few people have their genuine intentions. And most of these projects listed in ICO rating websites are paid. So how can you trust a paid service?
October 27, 2019, 05:32:28 AM
In my experience, ICO rating does not affect anything even if a project gets a good rate there. Because they only judge in terms of time, I mean, the assessment is done only at that time and not for the future. Many ICOs that I followed through the advice of the ICO rating but the fact that when the coin was launched and entered the exchange, it did not give me an advantage for the purchase of their coins at ICO. In fact, if I Hold the coin, a big loss instead. I'm done with ICOs.
Ico reviews coming from such sites are not liable anymore, most of the time they are just getting paid to promote a project which we cant guarantee to be legit. Its actually better to make a research by yourself and use the site only if we need some basement when choosing a project. But I cant consider to follow everything what they said.Jump to: