Pages:
Author

Topic: Would you participate in new project if it is not listed in ICO rating websites? - page 7. (Read 6881 times)

sr. member
Activity: 1036
Merit: 250
Either now no good projects are conducting their ICO, or rating sites do not notice any good projects. There is absolutely nothing to choose.
hero member
Activity: 2128
Merit: 530
PredX - AI-Powered Prediction Market
With the recent SEC release about ICO rating, this just shows that most if not all these rating websites can't give one an objective analysis. Ho many projects on these rating websites that has high rating ended being a scam, many. This is my advice to you, do you own research, I don't know what would be given to BTC in 2009 by these rating websites because nobody would give them money
hero member
Activity: 1666
Merit: 453
2016 and 2017 ICO rating website is a big deal to any project doing an ICO!
But these years? who cares about that RATING SITE? it is a PAID ICO RATING WEBSITE now!
The bigger the amount you will pay the better the rate you will get, and it is not new! many people already know that!
sr. member
Activity: 1092
Merit: 256
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
More websites were into usage to give ratings and review the ICO'S and new projects that are getting added to the cryptocurrency network. Same as that of the paid service to list tokens and altcoins to the exchanges now ico rating websites have paid services to rate the projects. This way there are more and more possibilities for low grade projects get good ratings. Better is to analyze and do the investment.
member
Activity: 536
Merit: 15
I participate in projects based on my own opinion and research about the project and don't really consider the opinion of ico rating websites.
And this is because most of these ICOs website are not that trustworthy and their rating are often influenced by money.
member
Activity: 238
Merit: 12
send & receive money instantly,with no hidden cost
Participation in a new project on my side has got nothing to do with listing on Ico rating websites with reasons been that, there are a lot of projects that these Ico rating sites rated high and at the end of it all came out as scam projects. Why would you then trust such a rating website if they come out again with ratings on new projects. Do your own research and decide whether to promote the project or not.
member
Activity: 464
Merit: 10
ico rating not fully true about their analisys to some projects.we know they could be paid if we want to get high rating in their site.the projects successfull depend on their own team,if they could deliver and build good product to market ofcourse investors will happy to hold their token / coin and even could add their stock again.personally ico rate didn't give significant influence to me.i am prefer to use my own analisys and feeling.
member
Activity: 686
Merit: 35
ico rating sites has no influence on the overall success of a project, i know some people place much value to ratings and that gives them a bit of assurance to support the project,
i have personally ask this question on a project i found interesting in their telegram and the admin told me only their work will speak not some fake review and ratings, and true to his words the project did exceptionally well.
newbie
Activity: 76
Merit: 0
You won't see ICOs not being listed in any of these ICO review sites as long as they have ANN here. These rating sites will "review" them for free and give them low to average scores. They then go to these ICO telegrams and post something like "Hello, your ICO has been listed at xxxxxxx.com". With that being said, I would not really much on these rates when planning to invest.
member
Activity: 600
Merit: 10
in my opinion, I will invest in the ICO project that I am taking part in, because they are also provided in a good exchange, so I think that is also a good way to hold it in the long run.
full member
Activity: 896
Merit: 108
Registered on ICO rating websites is not a guarantee that ICO will succeed but of course, it would be better if the project was listed on ICO rating websites. But for me, it all depends on their vision and mission, if their vision and mission are good then I will participate.
Because ICO website rating is not the main parameter of project success. I used to believe in ICO rating, but after several failures due to being fooled by high ratings but it turned out to be a scam, like Hashcards, Myriads, etc., finally, I decided to not stick to ICO rating website again. I prioritize independent analysis and consult with more experienced friends.
newbie
Activity: 76
Merit: 0
I always check projects on such sites, for me it is very important! but not to all sites need to believe, I dissapointed in ICObench
full member
Activity: 938
Merit: 137
I very rarely visit ICO rating sites because I don’t really trust them. I look through new projects myself and decide whether or not to participate in their ICO bounty campaigns. I developed my own criteria for participation, according to which I work. Rating sites are sometimes worth reading for a general idea of projects, but I am not completely guided by their opinions. They do not reflect the real situation in this market.
sr. member
Activity: 743
Merit: 250
I can't rely only on ICO rating sites to judge the project, I check these ranking websites, but I first do my own careful research about the project before making the decision of participating in its bounty campaigns (or even investing in the ICO/IEO). The ICO rating sites are only a helpful factor, after you make your own research.
sr. member
Activity: 2254
Merit: 258
Nowadays there are many projects, it is not easy to judge on new project, good or not, some people think the ico rating websites may help to take your decision, others think this ICO rating websites provide fake rating due to new project can pay fees to this ICO websites and get high rating.
SO, If you find good project, is it important to you this new good project should be listed in ICO rating websites?

Appreciate your participation


I don't even recommend ICO to list their coin in ICO rating, they should just concentrate on bounty hunting and building their community, it's costly to list in ICO rating sites, but building your community and communicating with them is not.

After reading about one report on ICOBENCH I stopped looking on ICObench.
sr. member
Activity: 980
Merit: 250
We cannot fully rely on ICO rating websites as some ratings are manipulated as these are given by taking money from ICO companies. We have to do our own research before joining any ICO as listing on ICO rating site is not a guarantee of  any type.
member
Activity: 700
Merit: 10
Nowadays there are many projects, it is not easy to judge on new project, good or not, some people think the ico rating websites may help to take your decision, others think this ICO rating websites provide fake rating due to new project can pay fees to this ICO websites and get high rating.
SO, If you find good project, is it important to you this new good project should be listed in ICO rating websites?

Appreciate your participation


Even though a project is reviewed by a rating website, in the end we will still do our own research. Projects that are not listed on the website do not mean that they are not good, they may not be known by reviewers. As good as any rating on a website, it only becomes our second opinion and not a reference for us to invest
full member
Activity: 504
Merit: 100
Nowadays there are many projects, it is not easy to judge on new project, good or not, some people think the ico rating websites may help to take your decision, others think this ICO rating websites provide fake rating due to new project can pay fees to this ICO websites and get high rating.
SO, If you find good project, is it important to you this new good project should be listed in ICO rating websites?

To be honest,for me it is absolutely not important,when choosing a project, I try to look at other things that characterize the project.
legendary
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1102
I have invested in some projects that are not listed in any ICO websites this is basically because some of those projects do not even have an ICO website to begin with, these doesn't mean that they are not cool... Just do your due diligence on every investment opportunity.
There are so many great projects that has been performing well ever since they were invented and never for once listed on these ICO rating sites that I don’t trust that much, iCO rating site too does not have any special technique that they use other than the research they make like you and I while we have some other sites that will take money from projects for them to be listed.

The success of our project investment is in our hands, we are the one to decide if we want a very good project or not and not rating sites, we just have to do like every one of them does, like Binance does too in selecting their IEO projects, they make a very solid research first on the project and the team before accepting to promote whatever is of them if we can also do this, then we are good to go.
copper member
Activity: 154
Merit: 0
IMO Exchange - Customer First.
I have invested in some projects that are not listed in any ICO websites this is basically because some of those projects do not even have an ICO website to begin with, these doesn't mean that they are not cool... Just do your due diligence on every investment opportunity.
Pages:
Jump to: