Topic: Would you participate in new project if it is not listed in ICO rating websites? - page 6. (Read 6881 times)
September 15, 2019, 03:02:53 AM
As a rule, I select and evaluate projects for joining the ICO signature campaign myself, without taking into account the opinions of rating campaigns. First of all, I’m interested in what this campaign will be engaged in, how useful its activities will be and therefore how much this new token will be in demand. Sometimes I take into account the opinion of such campaigns if the justification for their conclusions is convincing for me. That is, in each case, I act differently.
September 14, 2019, 07:33:51 PM
ICO rating websites have no inside news for investors, the information they use is shared by the devs on the open-source platforms. For choosing the project, some determinants are used in order to get the best ones out of the hundred projects. The data is the power but the known data should be available for all investors in my opinion, asking premium membership is not ethic.
If the investors look for the reliable source of information, asking directly from the experienced traders will be more suitable. ICO rating websites update their database once a 3 day period from my experience, the new projects also can pay for getting the better review from the ICO experts in this case. There are a similar type of the ICO rating sites which share the same ICO with different rating stars. The same project can be five stars on the ICOdrops but it has give a two-star rate on the ICOmarks website.
If the investors look for the reliable source of information, asking directly from the experienced traders will be more suitable. ICO rating websites update their database once a 3 day period from my experience, the new projects also can pay for getting the better review from the ICO experts in this case. There are a similar type of the ICO rating sites which share the same ICO with different rating stars. The same project can be five stars on the ICOdrops but it has give a two-star rate on the ICOmarks website.
September 14, 2019, 07:18:34 PM
Your very participation should have nothing in common with ico rating websites because most of thes ico rating websites are corrupt and are found of promoting scam projects by rating them higher on the ico rating scale which is very bad for the industry but this has thought me a lesson that my participation in a crypto project should never be based on an ico rating.
September 12, 2019, 05:09:32 PM
On my behalf, participating in a new project has nothing do with whether it is being listed on these so called ICO rating websites or not. So far as the project seem promising with a great idea behind it, backed by a great team with good profile and the whitepaper makes sense, that is all. Many of these ICO rating websites have a part in promoting scam projects so I still will participate in a new project if it is not listed on these ICO rating websites.
September 04, 2019, 05:33:00 PM
It's true that some ICO rating sites like ICOBENCH and ICODROPS give more info about a new startup project, but I don't entirely rely on their ratings. Hence I can participate in a token sale even if the project is not rated on ICO rating sites, if I think the project is great and has huge future potentials.
September 04, 2019, 05:17:23 PM
Well, i would consider that as a factor in finding the type of project that I'll like to invest in but would not consider it as the sole factor in making my decision. Actually, there are many other things one need ti check for before investing in any project. The ICo review sites do their own thing so the investor also has to his or her own thing.
August 31, 2019, 02:27:06 PM
I probably will depending on the project and the team behind it. It's true that there are several listing sites that will give you good rating with a certain amount of fee. But there are also legit and trusted listing websites which provide all honesty to the crypto community and helps us verify their team through KYC. That's one of the most vital roles that listing sites do, if you see that the team is not verified, then you'll have doubts that they're not legit at all.
August 31, 2019, 02:21:30 PM
Icon rating website don't determine what project will be successful or not, all they do is say what they believe could be a successful project but it is left for investors to make their own decisions base on what they have read, do their own research, most serious project don't pay attention to ico rating sites.
August 30, 2019, 05:00:02 PM
Personally, participating in new projects has got nothing to do with whether this new project is being listed on ico rating website. What matters most to me is the idea behind the project entering into the crypto industry. These websites are not trustworthy and provided my research on the project is positive, I just participate in it without considering whether it is listed or not on these fake ico rating websites.
August 30, 2019, 01:15:21 AM
Ofcourse I would join new project if the team has prior experience of ICOs even I don't believe in ICO rating websites it can be manipulated I feel so, so it does not matter to me. There are some other factors also to participate in new project I will check those if find all good then I will definitely join the project.
August 28, 2019, 07:48:28 PM
My participation in new projects has got nothing to do with whether it has been listed on any ico rating websites or not. These ICO rating sites are not trustworthy in the sense that some even rate scam projects higher on the rating scale and these projects at last are revealed or considered scam projects. I do my own research and take a decision to whether participate or not but not considering whether listed or not on these ico rating websites.
August 28, 2019, 07:41:20 PM
I used only a reliable crypto rating site and i never try to believe any other crap rating site just like icobench and icorating and both are total bullshit. I will participate in ico which was listed in my reliable ico rating site based on how much successful project that already listed in in that site.
Only a few sites that can be marked as good sites and so far more than 90% ico rating sites are craps and can't be trusted.
Only a few sites that can be marked as good sites and so far more than 90% ico rating sites are craps and can't be trusted.
August 28, 2019, 07:29:08 PM
This will only depend on the basic purpose of this new project in the crypto ecosystem and how relevant the project will be to the entire world's ecosystem. Once this project has these characteristics, I will surely invest in even though it is not listed on any ICO rating website. With these characteristics, it will definitely make it on an ICO rating website. With such projects, you are definitely assured of them having a mass adoption in no time.
August 28, 2019, 06:51:35 PM
I do not make ICO rating website as a reference to join IEO / ICO even bounty. I have had a bad experience with ICO rating, I was stuck with a scam even though the project has an almost perfect rating since then I ignored the ICO rating. I am more interested if the advertisement of the project appears on several large influential websites such as coinmarketcap. I also joined one of the trusted channels that provide reviews on IEO and ICO for investment, I think that's better.
August 28, 2019, 01:14:09 PM
One of the first actions that I take after making a decision about investing is checking the project on all rating sites.Then I make my own analysis.Maybe someone is either deceiving or adding an estimate to the project, but they can’t lie absolutely everything.Right? The average denominator still exists.
August 23, 2019, 01:49:15 PM
I will not invest in a project, if the project has some discrepancies both from the team, Roadmap, website or their social media, we know that investing in an ico or ieo has a high enough risk, so, we really need some references about how the project.
And currently many sites are indeed reviewing an ongoing ico or ieo, but it all depends on ourselves in determining the choice to invest or not in an ico or ieo project.
And currently many sites are indeed reviewing an ongoing ico or ieo, but it all depends on ourselves in determining the choice to invest or not in an ico or ieo project.
August 23, 2019, 09:49:51 AM
Nowadays there are many projects, it is not easy to judge on new project, good or not, some people think the ico rating websites may help to take your decision, others think this ICO rating websites provide fake rating due to new project can pay fees to this ICO websites and get high rating.
SO, If you find good project, is it important to you this new good project should be listed in ICO rating websites?
SO, If you find good project, is it important to you this new good project should be listed in ICO rating websites?
Appreciate your participation
Not all ICO and IEO projects present at ICO ranking sites can be successful. I often check the ICO rankings, in the ranking list of those projects getting good grades. After I checked directly into the project site does not correspond to that in the ICO rankings. We should directly review the project and do some research and so we can certainly get great results.
August 23, 2019, 09:36:34 AM
Many have participated in several projects that were not listed in ico rating websites but yet benefited from promotion the project since the project succeeded. The success of any project is not limited to the rate it gets from these ico rating websites and this makes up my decision to participate in any project even if it is not listed on any ICO rating website.
August 22, 2019, 06:49:32 PM
I do not need ICO rating sites to approve and list a project, most especially these days that so many of them cannot be trusted. They are just there to make publicity, which I now feel that is what they are meant for.
I have seen a lot of such projects, that succeeded tremendously, without listing on such sites.
I have seen a lot of such projects, that succeeded tremendously, without listing on such sites.
August 22, 2019, 03:27:58 PM
After analyzed the project, I always make the decision myself. Even if these are unsuccessful investments, I will answer for this myself without blaming others for this.
Jump to: