Topic: Would you participate in new project if it is not listed in ICO rating websites? - page 4. (Read 6881 times)
October 04, 2019, 02:46:54 AM
Coins and tokens that are listed on ICO rating websites are mostly scam or shit projects as well but those projects that aren't listed on ICO Rating websites are far worse, they aren't going to get anywhere close to success ever, ICO rating websites do have their share of creating awareness for new projects
October 04, 2019, 02:18:19 AM
The ICO rating site is only as a reference for me to get information about new projects, not as a determinant for participating in the project. A good project can be identified from a professional team and experience. However, good projects are usually in demand by many investors so that the ICO rating site indirectly also reviews the project.
I would invest in coins on the website if I knew that the coins would be on the market for a long time. 
October 04, 2019, 01:38:09 AM
Nowadays there are many projects, it is not easy to judge on new project, good or not, some people think the ico rating websites may help to take your decision, others think this ICO rating websites provide fake rating due to new project can pay fees to this ICO websites and get high rating.
SO, If you find good project, is it important to you this new good project should be listed in ICO rating websites?
I will definitely not be involved in such projects. Too dangerous for my money SO, If you find good project, is it important to you this new good project should be listed in ICO rating websites?
Appreciate your participation
October 04, 2019, 01:25:08 AM
I will participate but only if the project is legit but, listing in an ICO rating is not a proof or can help to make the project legit, in cryptocurrency investing, you should not buy your reputation that's a big no-no and this is what actually happens to ICO listing, for a good price, you can have a good reputation and a high rating in their platform, and this is corruption.
October 03, 2019, 11:29:00 PM
a good project does not have to be listed in the ico website ranking, because what is written on the ico website is not always true, maybe the website only takes data from the ico / ieo project website without finding out more information about the truth of the ico / ieo project because now there are a lot of ico websites that only chase the target of their website visitors and I think the ico website is no more like a newspaper displaying ad pages and if there is an ico / ieo project that wants to pay to the ico website then surely the ico website will enlarge -great news about the ico / ieo project that, so that it can attract investors to join.
And of course the ico web never cares, whether the ico / ieo project is a scam or not in the end.
And of course the ico web never cares, whether the ico / ieo project is a scam or not in the end.
October 03, 2019, 09:12:09 PM
If I see the project will be helpful to the people then I will invest on it even it is not listed on ICO rating websites. ICO rating websites are just shit for me and the ratings there are being paid by the developers of the project themselves. Maybe you can use them as a basis in investing but don't just base there. Do your own research too before investing in the ICO's. Many ICO's are scams and many knows that.
October 03, 2019, 09:08:45 PM
I will consider invest in project even without third party ratings because as most of us know that ratings can be faked and paid. Well if the specific project is clear and feasible according to my judgement and research the definitely I will go for it.
October 03, 2019, 08:54:14 PM
ICO rating website could be your guide ow to know good or not an ICO for investing, the ICO rating website have analyze which one best ICO for investing and how trust some ICO although not all of ICO rating website have correct, but I will joined based on how trusted an ICO by checking with ICO rating website.
October 03, 2019, 08:24:48 PM
Yes I will
Most of these rating sites don't base their judgement on anything they're also paid to give their ratings which could be biased or baseless. I do my research if a project is good I join their ICO and invest.
Most of these rating sites don't base their judgement on anything they're also paid to give their ratings which could be biased or baseless. I do my research if a project is good I join their ICO and invest.
October 03, 2019, 07:38:44 PM
Depending on the details they provide for the Project If its actually good enough and has some efficient team and backing I really dont see why not Most times things like things can even means the project is so confident on its capabilities to attract Just check it thoroughly and then if its green then Is good for me
October 03, 2019, 07:04:43 PM
If you think ICO rating websites reflects the correct information, you need the change your mind asap. Most well-known ICO rating websites are paid. For example, Icobench is paid platform. You can create a totally shitcoin and give some money to icobench and they can give you 5 stars. I saw a lot of 5 start project on icobench got scam. For example, there was a project called "BrainSpace" and it was reviewed on icobench as 5 star project. And icobench approved this project got already 30.000.000$. And guess what happened? All the team disappeared instantly; the website closed, telegram channel transformed another project's telegram channel so on.
So what I'm trying to say is do not believe ICO rating websites, do your own research ALWAYS!.
So what I'm trying to say is do not believe ICO rating websites, do your own research ALWAYS!.
October 03, 2019, 06:31:49 PM
Nowadays there are many projects, it is not easy to judge on new project, good or not, some people think the ico rating websites may help to take your decision, others think this ICO rating websites provide fake rating due to new project can pay fees to this ICO websites and get high rating.
SO, If you find good project, is it important to you this new good project should be listed in ICO rating websites?
Overtime I have stopped trusting all these projects rating websites or ICO rating websites because in many occasions they have failed to live upto expectations. So, if I see a project and after careful consideration and research proves to be legit and good I would participate whether it is on any rating websites or not. Also, there have been many news that these websites collects money to alter their reports and owing to the outcome of some of projects it has been proven to be true. In my opinion, make your research and invest. SO, If you find good project, is it important to you this new good project should be listed in ICO rating websites?
Appreciate your participation
September 24, 2019, 05:52:59 PM
The ICO rating site is only as a reference for me to get information about new projects, not as a determinant for participating in the project. A good project can be identified from a professional team and experience. However, good projects are usually in demand by many investors so that the ICO rating site indirectly also reviews the project.
September 24, 2019, 05:18:36 PM
ICO rating websites can only give me awareness and information about new projects but will never influence my decision to invest in a project or not. So yes, I can invest in a new project if it's not on ICO rating website. The two ICO websites I usually monitor are ICOBENCH and ICODROPS with fair reviews, although most are paid ratings.
September 24, 2019, 05:10:46 PM
In my opinion I think it is not really a big deal if the project is not listed on ico rating websites because these sites cannot be totally trusted as they are often biased with their ratings.
I have seen projects that were rated low on these ico sites but still did very well. What matters the most is the project itself and your own personal research. If you research the project and found it to be good and legit, then go for it regardless of whether it is on ico rating sites or not.
I have seen projects that were rated low on these ico sites but still did very well. What matters the most is the project itself and your own personal research. If you research the project and found it to be good and legit, then go for it regardless of whether it is on ico rating sites or not.
September 24, 2019, 02:36:28 PM
I consider that it is a bad thing that they are not listed.
All in all the rating sites try to rate all projects especially promising ones because this is what their traffic is looking for and this is is what makes money for them.
All in all the rating sites try to rate all projects especially promising ones because this is what their traffic is looking for and this is is what makes money for them.
September 24, 2019, 02:19:59 PM
For me it doesn't make a difference on the off chance that it is listed or not as long as I probably am aware the project itself and the team as of now have validity in dealing with the said project. You know there are engineers that are as of now known to deal with effective projects before. Additionally, ICO evaluations isn't so dependable, we as a whole know why and regardless of whether the project is listed, having high appraisals doesn't ensure that the project isn't a scam in any case, in any case, I don't perceive any reason why a decent project would decline to be listed in ICO sites. To start with, that will an or more prevalence and not to deny that there are financial specialists that truly believe inclining to be a major ordeal
September 24, 2019, 01:47:56 PM
Yes why not? Rating sites are not a determining factor in the quality of a project, but it is obvious that among all those not on rating sites there will be significantly more scam than among those posted on similar sites.
In view of this, everyone should conduct their own "investigation" of the project and only after they make a decision.
In view of this, everyone should conduct their own "investigation" of the project and only after they make a decision.
September 21, 2019, 08:16:30 PM
Never, because if the project is good, it will get the attention of the people, and it will definitely be listed in the ICO ranking websites. There are so many bullshit projects appearing every day so I will never care about them
September 21, 2019, 07:31:03 PM
In my opinion at this time most of the ICO rating sites are nothing but some fake promotion. So if the project is good I don't care its in a ICO rating site or not. There is one or 2 sites which is good. I always prefer project with great ideas. But sometimes ICO ratingbsites are useful. And I also use some ICO rating sites cause its easy to find technical status of the project. That's it.
And to note that most of these ICO rating sites are paid ones. So the ratings might be biased in favor of their client, right? I have seen projects with high ratings but I personally know the people managing that project and I can say, they are crap. And from that, I surmise that not all high ranking ico projects are really good.
Jump to: