Those days are over now when people invested by seeing high ratings from the Icobench, Icodrop or other ICO rating websites! No one cares about ICO rating anymore. Because Ico ratings all are a lie, the even gave high rating to the scam projects. Icobench gave very negative ratings to the Tokoin and SERO project but they gave one of the highest ROI of the year when Icobench gave 4 ratings to the Neluns, who are claimed 112 million USD in the bear market!
Just do your vigilance, research as much as you can! Verify a project's whitepaper, products, most important partners, media news and community activities! If a project passed these circumstances, you may invest there. Use icobench or other ico rating websites only to find the latest project information.
Topic: Would you participate in new project if it is not listed in ICO rating websites? - page 2. (Read 6881 times)
October 27, 2019, 06:16:13 AM
October 27, 2019, 05:43:43 AM
Only if i can be sure it is good project, or the project is IEO, i think i can participate.
October 27, 2019, 03:29:21 AM
I joined many bounty campaign and always check how trusting the ICO on rating website, have reached good rating ICO or not before join and doing the bounty campaign task, rating website give me other information for an ICO to know good or not about their product and how many respond from investors.
You need to think about it again. Do not rely on ICOrating sites to find out whether the project is good or bad. It is good for information about projects and a safe transition to the site, but their reviews about projects are not real. I even saw that they gave 8 stars to scam project. After someone mocked them, the coin was removed from the list. 
October 27, 2019, 02:29:57 AM
As if investing in an ICO with multiple reviews is not risky enough. 
For the past 1-2 years, I am staying away from the ICOs. The reason is that no matter whatever precautions we take, it is not possible to separate the scam ICOs from the good ones. The scammers have got very innovative now. They are spending a lot of money in building websites, social media channels and white papers. Even if you spend a lot of time in studying the project, the chances are that you will not get any hint to prove that it is a scam project. And if independent third party reviews are not available for the project, then the task becomes even more difficult.
For the past 1-2 years, I am staying away from the ICOs. The reason is that no matter whatever precautions we take, it is not possible to separate the scam ICOs from the good ones. The scammers have got very innovative now. They are spending a lot of money in building websites, social media channels and white papers. Even if you spend a lot of time in studying the project, the chances are that you will not get any hint to prove that it is a scam project. And if independent third party reviews are not available for the project, then the task becomes even more difficult.
October 27, 2019, 01:25:18 AM
Over time, we can do our own analysis for some project (ICO). I will be good on future or not. If some project listed in famous ico rating website can be a good value but for ensuring the future of that project absolutely not. And how about your perspective. Did you really care about project vision and mission? or just taking opportunities for profit. 😊
October 26, 2019, 10:42:41 PM
Yeah, I think it's important for the ICO project should be listed on ICO rating websites.
The concept is simple, if the Project got a high score, then many investors will try to invest in it.
The concept is simple, if the Project got a high score, then many investors will try to invest in it.
October 19, 2019, 09:16:45 PM
I have never followed ICO rating websites yet before joining in a bounty campaign. Every ICO rating website are fake they don't use google ad or ay other ads so how they able to make money? They take money from ico project owner to give high rating on their project.
October 19, 2019, 04:21:13 PM
Of course, have participated in a lot of ICOs that are not listed on any ico rating site, meanwhile most of the ico rating sites are not to be trusted, i usually do my due diligence before I invest in any project I can't even trust those sites anyway.
October 15, 2019, 01:16:05 PM
Not all of those websites deserve your trust, for example the most promoted projects on ICOBench are very likely to fail to meet their soft cap. On the other hand, the most reviews from ICOdrops seem very informative and help to understand the project better. Only my opinion 
October 15, 2019, 06:24:06 AM
Well i would be participate in the new project if the project was trusted and have some good future on it.
As of now ill think it was only few of projects are totally trusted to participate, Because in this year their are to many scam project and the platform are all the same if we look at it.
As of now ill think it was only few of projects are totally trusted to participate, Because in this year their are to many scam project and the platform are all the same if we look at it.
October 15, 2019, 06:01:53 AM
Nowadays there are many projects, it is not easy to judge on new project, good or not, some people think the ico rating websites may help to take your decision, others think this ICO rating websites provide fake rating due to new project can pay fees to this ICO websites and get high rating.
SO, If you find good project, is it important to you this new good project should be listed in ICO rating websites?
I think everyone has their own way of choosing a project before participating in it, some people make the ICO rating a good or bad consideration for the ICO project, but it is true that you say sometimes there is a fake ICO rating. For me personally, this can sometimes be taken into consideration but I also make observations on the project that was brought and the team behind it to make decisions later.SO, If you find good project, is it important to you this new good project should be listed in ICO rating websites?
Appreciate your participation
The legitimacy of the project is still in the hands of its developers, ico ratings are just being paid to advertise the new launch project.
We should not use it as a basement to choose a project whether it is legit or not.
October 15, 2019, 05:50:13 AM
gone were the days that ICO rating websites were found of doing great and amazing but not this current crypto world where these rating websites receive money before they do their work giving out poor rating values to deceive investors and traders. For me, I will definitely participate in a new project if not listed on any ico rating website.
It is common knowledge that rating websites receive payment for good ratings. A new project that is not on the website rating does not mean that the project is bad, maybe because of a small marketing budget that cannot pay the website rating. Many factors of a project are feasible as an investment tool and in my opinion cannot be assessed simply because they are not listed on the website's rating
October 15, 2019, 05:07:11 AM
Nowadays there are many projects, it is not easy to judge on new project, good or not, some people think the ico rating websites may help to take your decision, others think this ICO rating websites provide fake rating due to new project can pay fees to this ICO websites and get high rating.
SO, If you find good project, is it important to you this new good project should be listed in ICO rating websites?
I think everyone has their own way of choosing a project before participating in it, some people make the ICO rating a good or bad consideration for the ICO project, but it is true that you say sometimes there is a fake ICO rating. For me personally, this can sometimes be taken into consideration but I also make observations on the project that was brought and the team behind it to make decisions later.SO, If you find good project, is it important to you this new good project should be listed in ICO rating websites?
Appreciate your participation
October 14, 2019, 06:41:22 PM
gone were the days that ICO rating websites were found of doing great and amazing but not this current crypto world where these rating websites receive money before they do their work giving out poor rating values to deceive investors and traders. For me, I will definitely participate in a new project if not listed on any ico rating website.
October 12, 2019, 03:25:01 PM
If project is good and they have strong and experienced team why not, but so far I didn't see new project which has not been listed there. ICO rating sites and their ratings are only opinions by people who think they are experts and many times money talks. Investor should use ICO rating sites to find new projects, not to use it as investment guidelines.
October 09, 2019, 08:04:34 AM
A listing on ICO rating website, does not guarantee any success. On the contrary, usually the best rated projects are very likely to fail after the token sales. Sharpay ICO was the most rated ICO on ICOBench in their history with over 50 ratings of 4,9 stars. Right now, this coin is dead 
October 09, 2019, 05:51:37 AM
i prioritize participating in projects that I think are potential and trusted. in my opinion project listing site is actually not neutral, not completely honest in making articles, even seen selling spot page,and sell rating,so it cannot be used as a benchmark,
great projects don't require excessive promotion. but their coin sale quickly sold out.
great projects don't require excessive promotion. but their coin sale quickly sold out.
Of course project listing is not neutral, not these days anymore. Back in the old days projects were listed because they were popular and exchanges recognize that they were gaining traction.
Now it is all about bounties and fees. Exchanges are the ultimate bounty hunters now, even bigger than ICO rating websites!
October 09, 2019, 01:36:46 AM
I joined many bounty campaign and always check how trusting the ICO on rating website, have reached good rating ICO or not before join and doing the bounty campaign task, rating website give me other information for an ICO to know good or not about their product and how many respond from investors.
October 08, 2019, 12:39:20 PM
These rating sites mean nothing. The rating there will be such for which they will pay. Therefore, take similar information. for the criterion for investing, I would not. I myself am looking for coins in which I invest my money. The other day I found a new YUSRA GLOBAL coin (https://yusra.global) with a POS-mine. Now mining has just started and you can earn up to 30% per month. Really cool profit!
October 08, 2019, 11:47:58 AM
Yes, sure, if the project looks legitimate and promising I would participate or even invest in the project, even if it is not listed in ICO rating websites. In fact, most of these websites are paid from the devs and their ranking isn't really trustworthy. I use to do my own research about the project before taking the decision of participating or investing.
as bounty participants / investors must have their own research and not just trust a site because it can be detrimental. as you said that some projects pay to get a good rating but experienced people will usually not easily believe the research and rating results of a site Jump to: