Pages:
Author

Topic: ◣XBB◥ Boolberry - attempt at grassroots development movement [Bittrex] - page 16. (Read 418980 times)

sr. member
Activity: 505
Merit: 250
Activist Investor
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
sr. member
Activity: 505
Merit: 250
Activist Investor
Boolberry Network Address January 4, 2017

This is more of a summary of events and what is happening, as there has not been much software development over the holidays.

Poloniex and Seed nodes
Poloniex's Boolberry daemon was down and I messaged them about how to start the daemon with seed nodes. There was information to suggest that Poloniex migrated some daemons to new computational environments last week, and as such their Boolberry daemon likely lacked the ability to connect to peers with its built in seed nodes being offline. The problem is fixed on Poloniex's end now, and this reiterates why the updates I am pursuing to the Boolberry client's seed node resolving is important.

GUI
Monero officially released their GUI and it is written in the QT framework. A few contributors to the Boolberry project have offered designs for a Boolberry wallet that could possibly be reskinned over the Monero GUI, or separate QT GUI project.

Additional C++ Dev
I've been working on getting an additional C++ dev to contribute to the project. We will see soon if the project is right for them.

Market
The Boolberry market has had a low and steady amount of order depth and volume over the last month. Although not rising with the bitcoin rally, the last matched prices remain the same, ultimately increasing the value of BBR supply as it is priced in bitcoin. At some points in time the market seems to have an inverse relationship, but not at this point in time, likely coupled with the confidence that Monero's own rally inspires.

I routinely get messages from people that want to contribute in various capacities, the Boolberry project is getting more and more attention as people see the technology here.

The blockchain is going to soon be too prohibitive for 32-bit systems, and getting that into the database out of RAM is also an ongoing effort.
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
need more than one dev. xmr have tons of top flight devs working with them.
CZ (guy was hailed as a genius by many on this board)  sad he dumped us....should return by now to help.
full member
Activity: 193
Merit: 100
legendary
Activity: 1169
Merit: 1000
bi-weekly update today?
sr. member
Activity: 812
Merit: 256
Many coin increases with Bitcoin, XMR also rose well, this Coin keeping prices!  Angry
Hope will be better the next time
full member
Activity: 193
Merit: 100
Boolberry ended as 15th best "Crypto investment"  (in "" because only 46 Coins was included.) in 2016. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/crypto-profit-of-the-2016-final-version-1732516

Since i monitor tiny bit Boolberry i wonder if this was deserved by developers. I am sure 2017 result will be solely dependant on developers. If they wil nto show significant progress fast I am afraid, Boolberry will follow DNote path and be delisted from Poloniex. That will be huge nightmare. Please be really careful.

Poloniex does have decent liquidity but in that scenario you have to remember that in early 2014 Cryptsy was the dominant alt-coin exchange. It would be a mistake to count on Poloniex for liquidity just because the last two years have been good.


right now Boolberry being on Poloniex is huge advantage. Many coins cant get there. And would do anything to get there.

you're right, even AEON rises and falls on extremely low volume, I would say due to being on small exchanges.

AENON cant get on Poloneix and might take years to get there.

Aeon was on Poloniex and has since been de-listed, I can't see it being brought back anytime soon. Boolberry will soon be the only other CN coin on Poloniex with Monero. I'm expecting big things for Boolberry in 2017 for numerous reasons, watch this space.... BUY LOW
sr. member
Activity: 505
Merit: 250
Activist Investor

Could someone tell me what command I used to add seed nodes please?

I've just built boolbd on Ubuntu 16.04 from the Rune github repository, but it won't sync.

I have a list of working nodes from an old boolberry client that still syncs, but I don't know how to configure those seeds in the newly built boolbd.

Code:
2016-Dec-28 12:17:50.454445 [P2P0]Connecting to 1.24.247.119:10101(white=1, last_seen: d501.h14.m7.s36)...
2016-Dec-28 12:17:50.454663 [P2P1]Tx <95f59a7fb0395095ecc1ccd937d50281c9cc27211c605a48f17536a9540d032d> removed from tx pool due to outdated, age: 1188145
2016-Dec-28 12:17:55.455421 [P2P0]Connect failed to 1.24.247.119:10101
2016-Dec-28 12:29:36.791425
Peerlist white:
d8205b596235f1ba 1.24.247.119:10101 last_seen: d501.h14.m19.s22

Peerlist gray:

2016-Dec-28 12:29:53.601706
Connections:
Remote Host                  Peer id             Recv/Sent (idle,sec)     State                    Livetime(seconds)   


Thanks folks.
I had same problem


This is likely occurring because the daemon only has two seed nodes to connect to by default. If these nodes are not online then your node doesn't know who to connect to the first time you run the daemon. Therefore a long term solution to this will be to change the hard-coded seed nodes in the code repository.

A short term solution for you and others would be to specify a seed node manually. This can be done by doing the following:

boolbd --seed-node 5.9.44.154:10101

This command tells your daemon to treat the bbr.mbkpool.info node as a seed node. As a result, your node will connect to it and download its list of active peers. I got this to overcome the error on my end so I hope it works for others as well.

This seems like something that could easily be coded into javajareds most recent daemon builds. How are they coming along?
[/quote]

We are implementing a more robust solution than hardcoded IP addresses
legendary
Activity: 2730
Merit: 1288
Boolberry ended as 15th best "Crypto investment"  (in "" because only 46 Coins was included.) in 2016. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/crypto-profit-of-the-2016-final-version-1732516

Since i monitor tiny bit Boolberry i wonder if this was deserved by developers. I am sure 2017 result will be solely dependant on developers. If they wil nto show significant progress fast I am afraid, Boolberry will follow DNote path and be delisted from Poloniex. That will be huge nightmare. Please be really careful.

Poloniex does have decent liquidity but in that scenario you have to remember that in early 2014 Cryptsy was the dominant alt-coin exchange. It would be a mistake to count on Poloniex for liquidity just because the last two years have been good.


right now Boolberry being on Poloniex is huge advantage. Many coins cant get there. And would do anything to get there.

you're right, even AEON rises and falls on extremely low volume, I would say due to being on small exchanges.

AENON cant get on Poloneix and might take years to get there.
sr. member
Activity: 505
Merit: 250
Activist Investor
Boolberry ended as 15th best "Crypto investment"  (in "" because only 46 Coins was included.) in 2016. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/crypto-profit-of-the-2016-final-version-1732516

Since i monitor tiny bit Boolberry i wonder if this was deserved by developers. I am sure 2017 result will be solely dependant on developers. If they wil nto show significant progress fast I am afraid, Boolberry will follow DNote path and be delisted from Poloniex. That will be huge nightmare. Please be really careful.

Poloniex does have decent liquidity but in that scenario you have to remember that in early 2014 Cryptsy was the dominant alt-coin exchange. It would be a mistake to count on Poloniex for liquidity just because the last two years have been good.


right now Boolberry being on Poloniex is huge advantage. Many coins cant get there. And would do anything to get there.

you're right, even AEON rises and falls on extremely low volume, I would say due to being on small exchanges.
legendary
Activity: 2730
Merit: 1288
Boolberry ended as 15th best "Crypto investment"  (in "" because only 46 Coins was included.) in 2016. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/crypto-profit-of-the-2016-final-version-1732516

Since i monitor tiny bit Boolberry i wonder if this was deserved by developers. I am sure 2017 result will be solely dependant on developers. If they wil nto show significant progress fast I am afraid, Boolberry will follow DNote path and be delisted from Poloniex. That will be huge nightmare. Please be really careful.

Poloniex does have decent liquidity but in that scenario you have to remember that in early 2014 Cryptsy was the dominant alt-coin exchange. It would be a mistake to count on Poloniex for liquidity just because the last two years have been good.


right now Boolberry being on Poloniex is huge advantage. Many coins cant get there. And would do anything to get there. It is way easier to stay on Poloniex then to get listed on Poloniex. a huge difference.  2 years ago Poloniex listed many coins, since was growing. Now is fully grown and is picky who gets in. Dont take being on Poloniex as sure thing and dont think it dont matter if Booolberry gets delisted, since it matters a lot.
sr. member
Activity: 505
Merit: 250
Activist Investor
Boolberry ended as 15th best "Crypto investment"  (in "" because only 46 Coins was included.) in 2016. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/crypto-profit-of-the-2016-final-version-1732516

Since i monitor tiny bit Boolberry i wonder if this was deserved by developers. I am sure 2017 result will be solely dependant on developers. If they wil nto show significant progress fast I am afraid, Boolberry will follow DNote path and be delisted from Poloniex. That will be huge nightmare. Please be really careful.

Poloniex does have the primary liquidity but in that scenario you have to remember that in early 2014 Cryptsy was the dominant alt-coin exchange. It would be a mistake to count on Poloniex for liquidity just because the last two years have been good.

But yes, indeed, a lot of people have coins parked on Poloniex and can make quick reactions because of this.
legendary
Activity: 2730
Merit: 1288
Boolberry ended as 15th best "Crypto investment"  (in "" because only 46 Coins was included.) in 2016. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/crypto-profit-of-the-2016-final-version-1732516

Since i monitor tiny bit Boolberry i wonder if this was deserved by developers. I am sure 2017 result will be solely dependant on developers. If they wil nto show significant progress fast I am afraid, Boolberry will follow DNote path and be delisted from Poloniex. That will be huge nightmare. Please be really careful.
sr. member
Activity: 450
Merit: 250
boolbd --seed-node 5.9.44.154:10101

Perfect! Thanks dude.

I hadn't seen the "--seed-node" option when I used "boolbd --help"

I had built boolbd from the RUNE edition source. Could I have edited a file in the source before building the daemon in order to add(/hard code) this node?
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100

Could someone tell me what command I used to add seed nodes please?

I've just built boolbd on Ubuntu 16.04 from the Rune github repository, but it won't sync.

I have a list of working nodes from an old boolberry client that still syncs, but I don't know how to configure those seeds in the newly built boolbd.

Code:
2016-Dec-28 12:17:50.454445 [P2P0]Connecting to 1.24.247.119:10101(white=1, last_seen: d501.h14.m7.s36)...
2016-Dec-28 12:17:50.454663 [P2P1]Tx <95f59a7fb0395095ecc1ccd937d50281c9cc27211c605a48f17536a9540d032d> removed from tx pool due to outdated, age: 1188145
2016-Dec-28 12:17:55.455421 [P2P0]Connect failed to 1.24.247.119:10101
2016-Dec-28 12:29:36.791425
Peerlist white:
d8205b596235f1ba 1.24.247.119:10101 last_seen: d501.h14.m19.s22

Peerlist gray:

2016-Dec-28 12:29:53.601706
Connections:
Remote Host                  Peer id             Recv/Sent (idle,sec)     State                    Livetime(seconds)   


Thanks folks.
I had same problem


This is likely occurring because the daemon only has two seed nodes to connect to by default. If these nodes are not online then your node doesn't know who to connect to the first time you run the daemon. Therefore a long term solution to this will be to change the hard-coded seed nodes in the code repository.

A short term solution for you and others would be to specify a seed node manually. This can be done by doing the following:

boolbd --seed-node 5.9.44.154:10101

This command tells your daemon to treat the bbr.mbkpool.info node as a seed node. As a result, your node will connect to it and download its list of active peers. I got this to overcome the error on my end so I hope it works for others as well.
[/quote]

This seems like something that could easily be coded into javajareds most recent daemon builds. How are they coming along?
full member
Activity: 193
Merit: 100

Could someone tell me what command I used to add seed nodes please?

I've just built boolbd on Ubuntu 16.04 from the Rune github repository, but it won't sync.

I have a list of working nodes from an old boolberry client that still syncs, but I don't know how to configure those seeds in the newly built boolbd.

Code:
2016-Dec-28 12:17:50.454445 [P2P0]Connecting to 1.24.247.119:10101(white=1, last_seen: d501.h14.m7.s36)...
2016-Dec-28 12:17:50.454663 [P2P1]Tx <95f59a7fb0395095ecc1ccd937d50281c9cc27211c605a48f17536a9540d032d> removed from tx pool due to outdated, age: 1188145
2016-Dec-28 12:17:55.455421 [P2P0]Connect failed to 1.24.247.119:10101
2016-Dec-28 12:29:36.791425
Peerlist white:
d8205b596235f1ba 1.24.247.119:10101 last_seen: d501.h14.m19.s22

Peerlist gray:

2016-Dec-28 12:29:53.601706
Connections:
Remote Host                  Peer id             Recv/Sent (idle,sec)     State                    Livetime(seconds)   


Thanks folks.
I had same problem

[/quote]

This is likely occurring because the daemon only has two seed nodes to connect to by default. If these nodes are not online then your node doesn't know who to connect to the first time you run the daemon. Therefore a long term solution to this will be to change the hard-coded seed nodes in the code repository.

A short term solution for you and others would be to specify a seed node manually. This can be done by doing the following:

boolbd --seed-node 5.9.44.154:10101

This command tells your daemon to treat the bbr.mbkpool.info node as a seed node. As a result, your node will connect to it and download its list of active peers. I got this to overcome the error on my end so I hope it works for others as well.
sr. member
Activity: 686
Merit: 250

Could someone tell me what command I used to add seed nodes please?

I've just built boolbd on Ubuntu 16.04 from the Rune github repository, but it won't sync.

I have a list of working nodes from an old boolberry client that still syncs, but I don't know how to configure those seeds in the newly built boolbd.

Code:
2016-Dec-28 12:17:50.454445 [P2P0]Connecting to 1.24.247.119:10101(white=1, last_seen: d501.h14.m7.s36)...
2016-Dec-28 12:17:50.454663 [P2P1]Tx <95f59a7fb0395095ecc1ccd937d50281c9cc27211c605a48f17536a9540d032d> removed from tx pool due to outdated, age: 1188145
2016-Dec-28 12:17:55.455421 [P2P0]Connect failed to 1.24.247.119:10101
2016-Dec-28 12:29:36.791425
Peerlist white:
d8205b596235f1ba 1.24.247.119:10101 last_seen: d501.h14.m19.s22

Peerlist gray:

2016-Dec-28 12:29:53.601706
Connections:
Remote Host                  Peer id             Recv/Sent (idle,sec)     State                    Livetime(seconds)   


Thanks folks.
I had same problem
sr. member
Activity: 450
Merit: 250

Could someone tell me what command I used to add seed nodes please?

I've just built boolbd on Ubuntu 16.04 from the Rune github repository, but it won't sync.

I have a list of working nodes from an old boolberry client that still syncs, but I don't know how to configure those seeds in the newly built boolbd.

Code:
2016-Dec-28 12:17:50.454445 [P2P0]Connecting to 1.24.247.119:10101(white=1, last_seen: d501.h14.m7.s36)...
2016-Dec-28 12:17:50.454663 [P2P1]Tx <95f59a7fb0395095ecc1ccd937d50281c9cc27211c605a48f17536a9540d032d> removed from tx pool due to outdated, age: 1188145
2016-Dec-28 12:17:55.455421 [P2P0]Connect failed to 1.24.247.119:10101
2016-Dec-28 12:29:36.791425
Peerlist white:
d8205b596235f1ba 1.24.247.119:10101 last_seen: d501.h14.m19.s22

Peerlist gray:

2016-Dec-28 12:29:53.601706
Connections:
Remote Host                  Peer id             Recv/Sent (idle,sec)     State                    Livetime(seconds)   


Thanks folks.
sr. member
Activity: 505
Merit: 250
Activist Investor
Pages:
Jump to: