I'm interested in this coin but I was looking over the codebase, is there any reason you decided to remove the git history?
Obviously this was forked from another coin and for some reason the entire git history was removed and the codebase was pushed in one commit.
It is hard to follow what is going on and where it is coming from.
Obviously this was forked from another coin and for some reason the entire git history was removed and the codebase was pushed in one commit.
It is hard to follow what is going on and where it is coming from.
If you are feeling reluctant to invest its ok. You could probably try a new fresh p&d coin with anonymosu features. You know, anonymous developer, anonymous team, anonymous PR, anonymous block explorer, anonymous premine, etc
This isn't about investing, this is about software development. And there is an expected way you participate in a open source community. Using git correctly is not that difficult, there is no reason to remove the git history.
There is a reason to remove the git history: not wanting it to get cloned.
This is an old conversation. Why bring it up now? It's a non-issue: the repository was created as a one-off. It was never an ongoing thing there. That's why you don't see a history. It was purely done so that people could review the code. End
Removing the git history does not prevent you from getting cloned. That makes no sense.
So this is a closed source coin with no open development? Why are basic questions about the code base being met with such antagonism? Why does everything have to be about money, fud and other bullshit? I thought this community was trying to test new ideas and and improve crypto currency.
We are. But quoting FUD back from May won't help. If you are really interested, I suggest you search this, the previous unmoderated topic, as well as the unmoderated XC topic(now deserted I think). You will find your answers there.
If you like open source coins so much there's always the next p&d coin which will most certainly help the scene with its trustful open source adoption.
The code has been peer reviewed by prominent members of the community, which you can find in topic as well.
and he has a lot of political followers with influence and money 
)