[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 1153.

benthach

legendary

Activity: 1764

Merit: 1000

Quote from: suppersz on June 23, 2014, 04:06:55 AM

Quote from: GameStarter on June 23, 2014, 03:35:15 AM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 11, 2014, 05:00:39 PM

Quote from: bardacuda on June 11, 2014, 04:58:39 PM

Quote from: bardacuda on June 11, 2014, 04:50:14 PM

ATC what's the timeline for REV 2 roughly? I think about 2 weeks ago you said it would be 3 to 4 weeks? Does that mean you are expecting to release REV 2 in 1 - 2 weeks from now?

bump.

Yes I'm expecting about 2 weeks...

So REV 2 could be ready next 48H.

Hope atcsecure will tell us today

if everything work as promised we should see REV2 sometime this week. if we have working REV2 with anonomous sending option and perhaps status of xnode in wallet then MOON and MAR is the limit for XC

benthach

legendary

Activity: 1764

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Mwalshe89 on June 23, 2014, 03:45:11 AM

Quote from: kewlya on June 23, 2014, 03:36:05 AM

Quote from: Mwalshe89 on June 23, 2014, 03:32:25 AM

Quote from: kewlya on June 23, 2014, 03:30:35 AM

Quote from: Mwalshe89 on June 23, 2014, 03:29:30 AM

Quote from: adhitthana on June 23, 2014, 02:45:40 AM

I notice Vericoin have followed the team's lead. Publicising their team
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7462147
VRC had some interesting news today too.

Looks like one decent Dev and two tag alongs.

Apart from the SMS system I don't really see what they have to offer.

you are blind then.

Please elaborate. They seem to just be checking every possible feature without any actual conviction

Veribit and Verisend. go read a bit on the forum. i hold XC but also VRC.

A centralised mixing service and VRC-BTC-Payee option in the wallet?

Sorry if I'm not jumping over walls in excitement

too many promised, none exist. just hope they can even get 1 part working out of many promised.

suppersz

sr. member

Activity: 336

Merit: 250

There is a day to be born, and another to die

Quote from: GameStarter on June 23, 2014, 03:35:15 AM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 11, 2014, 05:00:39 PM

Quote from: bardacuda on June 11, 2014, 04:58:39 PM

Quote from: bardacuda on June 11, 2014, 04:50:14 PM

ATC what's the timeline for REV 2 roughly? I think about 2 weeks ago you said it would be 3 to 4 weeks? Does that mean you are expecting to release REV 2 in 1 - 2 weeks from now?

bump.

Yes I'm expecting about 2 weeks...

So REV 2 could be ready next 48H.

Hope atcsecure will tell us today

Mwalshe89

full member

Activity: 233

Merit: 100

Quote from: kewlya on June 23, 2014, 03:36:05 AM

Quote from: Mwalshe89 on June 23, 2014, 03:32:25 AM

Quote from: kewlya on June 23, 2014, 03:30:35 AM

Quote from: Mwalshe89 on June 23, 2014, 03:29:30 AM

Quote from: adhitthana on June 23, 2014, 02:45:40 AM

I notice Vericoin have followed the team's lead. Publicising their team
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7462147
VRC had some interesting news today too.

Looks like one decent Dev and two tag alongs.

Apart from the SMS system I don't really see what they have to offer.

you are blind then.

Please elaborate. They seem to just be checking every possible feature without any actual conviction

Veribit and Verisend. go read a bit on the forum. i hold XC but also VRC.

A centralised mixing service and VRC-BTC-Payee option in the wallet?

Sorry if I'm not jumping over walls in excitement

kewlya

full member

Activity: 150

Merit: 100

Quote from: Mwalshe89 on June 23, 2014, 03:32:25 AM

Quote from: kewlya on June 23, 2014, 03:30:35 AM

Quote from: Mwalshe89 on June 23, 2014, 03:29:30 AM

Quote from: adhitthana on June 23, 2014, 02:45:40 AM

I notice Vericoin have followed the team's lead. Publicising their team
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7462147
VRC had some interesting news today too.

Looks like one decent Dev and two tag alongs.

Apart from the SMS system I don't really see what they have to offer.

you are blind then.

Please elaborate. They seem to just be checking every possible feature without any actual conviction

Veribit and Verisend. go read a bit on the forum. i hold XC but also VRC.

GameStarter

full member

Activity: 214

Merit: 100

Quote from: atcsecure on June 11, 2014, 05:00:39 PM

Quote from: bardacuda on June 11, 2014, 04:58:39 PM

Quote from: bardacuda on June 11, 2014, 04:50:14 PM

ATC what's the timeline for REV 2 roughly? I think about 2 weeks ago you said it would be 3 to 4 weeks? Does that mean you are expecting to release REV 2 in 1 - 2 weeks from now?

bump.

Yes I'm expecting about 2 weeks...

So REV 2 could be ready next 48H.

Mwalshe89

full member

Activity: 233

Merit: 100

Quote from: kewlya on June 23, 2014, 03:30:35 AM

Quote from: Mwalshe89 on June 23, 2014, 03:29:30 AM

Quote from: adhitthana on June 23, 2014, 02:45:40 AM

I notice Vericoin have followed the team's lead. Publicising their team
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7462147
VRC had some interesting news today too.

Looks like one decent Dev and two tag alongs.

Apart from the SMS system I don't really see what they have to offer.

you are blind then.

Please elaborate. They seem to just be checking every possible feature without any actual conviction

kewlya

full member

Activity: 150

Merit: 100

Quote from: Mwalshe89 on June 23, 2014, 03:29:30 AM

Quote from: adhitthana on June 23, 2014, 02:45:40 AM

I notice Vericoin have followed the team's lead. Publicising their team
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7462147
VRC had some interesting news today too.

Looks like one decent Dev and two tag alongs.

Apart from the SMS system I don't really see what they have to offer.

you are blind then.

Mwalshe89

full member

Activity: 233

Merit: 100

Quote from: adhitthana on June 23, 2014, 02:45:40 AM

I notice Vericoin have followed the team's lead. Publicising their team
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7462147
VRC had some interesting news today too.

Looks like one decent Dev and two tag alongs.

Apart from the SMS system I don't really see what they have to offer.

CrazyLeoW

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

XC

Quote from: adhitthana on June 23, 2014, 02:45:40 AM

I notice Vericoin have followed the team's lead. Publicising their team
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7462147
VRC had some interesting news today too.

You Are Idiot. Fuck Off.

adhitthana

legendary

Activity: 1190

Merit: 1000

I notice Vericoin have followed the team's lead. Publicising their team
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7462147
VRC had some interesting news today too.

provenceday

legendary

Activity: 1148

Merit: 1000

nice to see the real team.

great!

philipvdlinde

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 1000

Quote from: dadon on June 22, 2014, 07:29:35 PM

Quote from: Astroxjr on June 22, 2014, 07:04:39 PM

Quote from: philipvdlinde on June 22, 2014, 02:18:39 PM

Quote from: bitcad4u on June 22, 2014, 02:12:00 PM

Quote from: cyberhacker on June 22, 2014, 01:52:51 PM

XC TEAM AT CONFERENCE!

Hurray for this!!! and hurray for change of subject... lol.. I had to go take a nap because everyone here was bitching at eachother it was getting annoying.

also all you non believers who wanted pics and proof they are there... well here is your pudding.

Fine looking group I must say.. to the moon!

It looks like that guy with the glasses is the same person as with the BC team.

If that is the case, that is NOT good.

Just a leach that is only in for profits and any turn possible.

in the 2nd photo the first guy from the left looks like the last guy from the left in the first picture with a different shirt on.
the second guy from the left in second photo looks like the 2nd guy from the left in the first photo, and the 4th guy from the left in the 2nd photo looks like the 4th guy from the left in the first, is the 2nd photo BC team? if so they are the same team as XC without Dan and his son, if i'm wrong they must be all twins or something, not trying to spread fud, i strongly support XC and have done since almost day 1, but this is very strange to me.

This was a photo of the BC team visiting the XC team, the blackcoin official tweet account also confirmed this.

shakesbear

member

Activity: 684

Merit: 10

Quote from: synechist on June 22, 2014, 07:15:38 PM

Hi folks

We'll publish something soon that clarifies several aspects of PBoC, XC, Cache, and our plans for the future.

For the time being, here's a little bit of information:

- In distinction from PoS, which secures a blockchain, roughly speaking PoBC allows blockchains to talk to each other.

- PBoC is such new tech that (a) no-one except people at XC understand it (it's Jasinlee's invention), (b) it's not coded yet.

- PBoC is not going to be implemented in the near future because it will take an enormous amount of work and there are more immediate goals, like real staking Android wallets.

- XC and Cache will not share features

- XC and Cache will not have the same function, therefore there is no question of XC's money supply doubling. Why would any team want to do that to their coin? It's suicide. So why would it be reasonable to suppose that we'd do that?

- The team working on Cache is a completely different one to the one developing XC. There's no dilution of time or attention. Cache's development will have no effect on the pace or direction of XC or on ATCsecure's focus on it.

- Cache is not new to the XC project - it's been a facet in the project for a while - and yet you've seen the same reliability when it comes to release dates, and the same consistently rapid pace of development all along. So there's nothing that suggests a change or that anything is amiss.

- The XC devs have extensive business experience and know full well how to develop a technology. So when new technologies, partnerships, or functions are introduced into XC, it is done by capable hands. We know when a small, focussed team is best. We also know when and how to form partnerships. We're going to do both, because it'll create the brightest future for XC.

Now you can either doubt this information or run with it. I ask you to consider it in the light of XC's past developments, especially their reliability and professionalism. To my mind it's obvious: today the community became aware of an incredibly powerful facet of the XC project, and one that will be a game-changer in its mid-term future.

Thanks a lot for the update.

And more importantly I want to say Happy Birthday man !!!

hellraven

newbie

Activity: 5

Merit: 0

Quote from: R4v37 on June 22, 2014, 11:12:17 PM

Quote from: flashbit on June 22, 2014, 09:16:32 PM

Quote from: jly77 on June 22, 2014, 08:52:56 PM

Quote from: synechist on June 22, 2014, 07:15:38 PM

Hi folks

We'll publish something soon that clarifies several aspects of PBoC, XC, Cache, and our plans for the future.

For the time being, here's a little bit of information:

- In distinction from PoS, which secures a blockchain, roughly speaking PoBC allows blockchains to talk to each other.

- PBoC is such new tech that (a) no-one except people at XC understand it (it's Jasinlee's invention), (b) it's not coded yet.

- PBoC is not going to be implemented in the near future because it will take an enormous amount of work and there are more immediate goals, like real staking Android wallets.

- XC and Cache will not share features

- XC and Cache will not have the same function, therefore there is no question of XC's money supply doubling. Why would any team want to do that to their coin? It's suicide. So why would it be reasonable to suppose that we'd do that?

- The team working on Cache is a completely different one to the one developing XC. There's no dilution of time or attention. Cache's development will have no effect on the pace or direction of XC or on ATCsecure's focus on it.

- Cache is not new to the XC project - it's been a facet in the project for a while - and yet you've seen the same reliability when it comes to release dates, and the same consistently rapid pace of development all along. So there's nothing that suggests a change or that anything is amiss.

- The XC devs have extensive business experience and know full well how to develop a technology. So when new technologies, partnerships, or functions are introduced into XC, it is done by capable hands. We know when a small, focussed team is best. We also know when and how to form partnerships. We're going to do both, because it'll create the brightest future for XC.

Now you can either doubt this information or run with it. I ask you to consider it in the light of XC's past developments, especially their reliability and professionalism. To my mind it's obvious: today the community became aware of an incredibly powerful facet of the XC project, and one that will be a game-changer in its mid-term future.

Thanks.

Yes thanks for clarifying this synechist. I can see good things to come. Time to buy more XC!

panic buy panic buy panic buy
PANIC BUY!!! Cheesy

nahh, better stick with this coin

good choice for now...
WOHOOOOOOO

R4v37

sr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 250

Quote from: flashbit on June 22, 2014, 09:16:32 PM

Quote from: jly77 on June 22, 2014, 08:52:56 PM

Quote from: synechist on June 22, 2014, 07:15:38 PM

Hi folks

We'll publish something soon that clarifies several aspects of PBoC, XC, Cache, and our plans for the future.

For the time being, here's a little bit of information:

- In distinction from PoS, which secures a blockchain, roughly speaking PoBC allows blockchains to talk to each other.

- PBoC is such new tech that (a) no-one except people at XC understand it (it's Jasinlee's invention), (b) it's not coded yet.

- PBoC is not going to be implemented in the near future because it will take an enormous amount of work and there are more immediate goals, like real staking Android wallets.

- XC and Cache will not share features

- XC and Cache will not have the same function, therefore there is no question of XC's money supply doubling. Why would any team want to do that to their coin? It's suicide. So why would it be reasonable to suppose that we'd do that?

- The team working on Cache is a completely different one to the one developing XC. There's no dilution of time or attention. Cache's development will have no effect on the pace or direction of XC or on ATCsecure's focus on it.

- Cache is not new to the XC project - it's been a facet in the project for a while - and yet you've seen the same reliability when it comes to release dates, and the same consistently rapid pace of development all along. So there's nothing that suggests a change or that anything is amiss.

- The XC devs have extensive business experience and know full well how to develop a technology. So when new technologies, partnerships, or functions are introduced into XC, it is done by capable hands. We know when a small, focussed team is best. We also know when and how to form partnerships. We're going to do both, because it'll create the brightest future for XC.

Now you can either doubt this information or run with it. I ask you to consider it in the light of XC's past developments, especially their reliability and professionalism. To my mind it's obvious: today the community became aware of an incredibly powerful facet of the XC project, and one that will be a game-changer in its mid-term future.

Thanks.

Yes thanks for clarifying this synechist. I can see good things to come. Time to buy more XC!

panic buy panic buy panic buy
PANIC BUY!!! Cheesy

nahh, better stick with this coin

520Bit

sr. member

Activity: 602

Merit: 252

Quote from: flashbit on June 22, 2014, 09:14:22 PM

Quote from: guowenxuan on June 22, 2014, 08:43:05 PM

Quote from: dadon on June 22, 2014, 07:48:01 PM

Quote from: bitcad4u on June 22, 2014, 07:41:08 PM

Quote from: dadon on June 22, 2014, 07:29:35 PM

Quote from: Astroxjr on June 22, 2014, 07:04:39 PM

Quote from: philipvdlinde on June 22, 2014, 02:18:39 PM

Quote from: bitcad4u on June 22, 2014, 02:12:00 PM

Quote from: cyberhacker on June 22, 2014, 01:52:51 PM

XC TEAM AT CONFERENCE!

Hurray for this!!! and hurray for change of subject... lol.. I had to go take a nap because everyone here was bitching at eachother it was getting annoying.

also all you non believers who wanted pics and proof they are there... well here is your pudding.

Fine looking group I must say.. to the moon!

It looks like that guy with the glasses is the same person as with the BC team.

If that is the case, that is NOT good.

Just a leach that is only in for profits and any turn possible.

in the 2nd photo the first guy from the left looks like the last guy from the left in the first picture with a different shirt on.
the second guy from the left in second photo looks like the 2nd guy from the left in the first photo, and the 4th guy from the left in the 2nd photo looks like the 4th guy from the left in the first, is the 2nd photo BC team? if so they are the same team as XC without Dan and his son, if i'm wrong they must be all twins or something, not trying to spread fud, i strongly support XC and have done since almost day 1, but this is very strange to me.

Bro... they look the same because they ARE the same people... just in front of a different sign... "coin telegraph" prob some journalist shot.

ok great i misinterpreted what the person who posted the 2nd photo meant and thought he was saying the 2nd photo was of the BC team, as i said i wasn't trying to spread FUD my mistake and appoligise for that.

great to see the update from dev.
we will move.
move head.

Excited to see the team. Keep up the great work guys!

Really cool, man.

amadoflimd

newbie

Activity: 3

Merit: 0

Please i need some help.
Can someone helpme to understand 3 things of this.

Hello, i have been reading alot with this COIN.
Almost read every single page, and in every single forum.

I have been purchased 1k coins.
I download the wallet, im using the latest one XCv0.9.1.50x11-coin-1.0
i transfer all those coins from mintpal to my XC11address.

http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c327/agustinrudas/XCCOIN_zpsea486985.png

I want to run an XNODE.

So i read the guides in the official website, they say i need to create new address called MIXER and put 550 coins on there, you can put more but it need to be in reservebalance.

1. i was confused in this part because, if i actually have 1k coins on my account with label MAIN, and create new adress labeled MIXER. this adresss share the same coins? dosen't?.

I send 1k coins using sendcoins tab to the MIXER account, who is is the same wallet.

The Transaction history shows "Payment to Yourself" with a fee. So i think this was unnecesary.

I create the X11Coin.conf file with this

xmixer=1
server=1
listen=1
dnsseed=1
rpcuser=MyUser
rpcpassword=HiddenPass
rpcport=32347
rpcallowip=127.0.0.1
reservebalance=1000
addnode=162.243.109.24
addnode=west01.xcnode.xc-official.com
addnode=east01.xcnode.xc-official.com
addnode=west02.xcnode.xc-official.com

My Weight is 5238, Network Weight is 32242

2. Is minting for a long time, more than 10 days, if i want to run a XNODE the minting need to be finish?.

3. The other thing, i am worry about in the blockchain the balance of my address is different it says i only have 0.0XC and in the other 9.2 XC, and im worry if i lost the coin or something. Can someone check the address in the blockchain http://cryptexplorer.com/ and say if all is ok?. Because in my wallet says i have 1009.570195 XC as you see in the image. So the wallet or the blockchain is wrong?.

MAIN = XNueTb55jzHpnSWYrvZvAGfkd8YuPKtZR8
MIXER = XVKwLkAjc1UoLBYejv4B6n8ELHkkbYtw53

bitcad4u

sr. member

Activity: 602

Merit: 255

Quote from: evtrmm on June 22, 2014, 10:13:32 PM

Quote from: policymaker on June 22, 2014, 10:04:09 PM

kawaiiiii!!!

Beat me to it Wink

There is a giant psychedelic vagina on the floor within the carpet. can not unsee.

Mwalshe89

full member

Activity: 233

Merit: 100

Quote from: jasinlee on June 22, 2014, 10:31:06 PM

No one is hated and I accept the apology. Keep in mind we were the main sponsor of this event, thus why I could get xc their own table in addition to ours Wink

so I was being pulled away and talking to everyone all day everyday I was here. Any updates I post are brief due to time constraints.

Legend.

Cheers for the hardwork dude.

Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 1153. (Read 1484203 times)