so I was being pulled away and talking to everyone all day everyday I was here. Any updates I post are brief due to time constraints. 
Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 1154. (Read 1484203 times)
June 22, 2014, 10:31:06 PM
No one is hated and I accept the apology. Keep in mind we were the main sponsor of this event, thus why I could get xc their own table in addition to ours so I was being pulled away and talking to everyone all day everyday I was here. Any updates I post are brief due to time constraints.
so I was being pulled away and talking to everyone all day everyday I was here. Any updates I post are brief due to time constraints. June 22, 2014, 10:13:32 PM
June 22, 2014, 10:04:09 PM
kawaiiiii!!!
June 22, 2014, 09:43:26 PM
Hi folks
We'll publish something soon that clarifies several aspects of PBoC, XC, Cache, and our plans for the future.
For the time being, here's a little bit of information:
- In distinction from PoS, which secures a blockchain, roughly speaking PoBC allows blockchains to talk to each other.
- PBoC is such new tech that (a) no-one except people at XC understand it (it's Jasinlee's invention), (b) it's not coded yet.
- PBoC is not going to be implemented in the near future because it will take an enormous amount of work and there are more immediate goals, like real staking Android wallets.
- XC and Cache will not share features
- XC and Cache will not have the same function, therefore there is no question of XC's money supply doubling. Why would any team want to do that to their coin? It's suicide. So why would it be reasonable to suppose that we'd do that?
- The team working on Cache is a completely different one to the one developing XC. There's no dilution of time or attention. Cache's development will have no effect on the pace or direction of XC or on ATCsecure's focus on it.
- Cache is not new to the XC project - it's been a facet in the project for a while - and yet you've seen the same reliability when it comes to release dates, and the same consistently rapid pace of development all along. So there's nothing that suggests a change or that anything is amiss.
- The XC devs have extensive business experience and know full well how to develop a technology. So when new technologies, partnerships, or functions are introduced into XC, it is done by capable hands. We know when a small, focussed team is best. We also know when and how to form partnerships. We're going to do both, because it'll create the brightest future for XC.
Now you can either doubt this information or run with it. I ask you to consider it in the light of XC's past developments, especially their reliability and professionalism. To my mind it's obvious: today the community became aware of an incredibly powerful facet of the XC project, and one that will be a game-changer in its mid-term future.
We'll publish something soon that clarifies several aspects of PBoC, XC, Cache, and our plans for the future.
For the time being, here's a little bit of information:
- In distinction from PoS, which secures a blockchain, roughly speaking PoBC allows blockchains to talk to each other.
- PBoC is such new tech that (a) no-one except people at XC understand it (it's Jasinlee's invention), (b) it's not coded yet.
- PBoC is not going to be implemented in the near future because it will take an enormous amount of work and there are more immediate goals, like real staking Android wallets.
- XC and Cache will not share features
- XC and Cache will not have the same function, therefore there is no question of XC's money supply doubling. Why would any team want to do that to their coin? It's suicide. So why would it be reasonable to suppose that we'd do that?
- The team working on Cache is a completely different one to the one developing XC. There's no dilution of time or attention. Cache's development will have no effect on the pace or direction of XC or on ATCsecure's focus on it.
- Cache is not new to the XC project - it's been a facet in the project for a while - and yet you've seen the same reliability when it comes to release dates, and the same consistently rapid pace of development all along. So there's nothing that suggests a change or that anything is amiss.
- The XC devs have extensive business experience and know full well how to develop a technology. So when new technologies, partnerships, or functions are introduced into XC, it is done by capable hands. We know when a small, focussed team is best. We also know when and how to form partnerships. We're going to do both, because it'll create the brightest future for XC.
Now you can either doubt this information or run with it. I ask you to consider it in the light of XC's past developments, especially their reliability and professionalism. To my mind it's obvious: today the community became aware of an incredibly powerful facet of the XC project, and one that will be a game-changer in its mid-term future.
Thanks.
Yes thanks for clarifying this synechist. I can see good things to come. Time to buy more XC!
Just remember, most of people won't buy good&cheap things until price rockets. High price makes them know the value.
June 22, 2014, 09:16:32 PM
Hi folks
We'll publish something soon that clarifies several aspects of PBoC, XC, Cache, and our plans for the future.
For the time being, here's a little bit of information:
- In distinction from PoS, which secures a blockchain, roughly speaking PoBC allows blockchains to talk to each other.
- PBoC is such new tech that (a) no-one except people at XC understand it (it's Jasinlee's invention), (b) it's not coded yet.
- PBoC is not going to be implemented in the near future because it will take an enormous amount of work and there are more immediate goals, like real staking Android wallets.
- XC and Cache will not share features
- XC and Cache will not have the same function, therefore there is no question of XC's money supply doubling. Why would any team want to do that to their coin? It's suicide. So why would it be reasonable to suppose that we'd do that?
- The team working on Cache is a completely different one to the one developing XC. There's no dilution of time or attention. Cache's development will have no effect on the pace or direction of XC or on ATCsecure's focus on it.
- Cache is not new to the XC project - it's been a facet in the project for a while - and yet you've seen the same reliability when it comes to release dates, and the same consistently rapid pace of development all along. So there's nothing that suggests a change or that anything is amiss.
- The XC devs have extensive business experience and know full well how to develop a technology. So when new technologies, partnerships, or functions are introduced into XC, it is done by capable hands. We know when a small, focussed team is best. We also know when and how to form partnerships. We're going to do both, because it'll create the brightest future for XC.
Now you can either doubt this information or run with it. I ask you to consider it in the light of XC's past developments, especially their reliability and professionalism. To my mind it's obvious: today the community became aware of an incredibly powerful facet of the XC project, and one that will be a game-changer in its mid-term future.
We'll publish something soon that clarifies several aspects of PBoC, XC, Cache, and our plans for the future.
For the time being, here's a little bit of information:
- In distinction from PoS, which secures a blockchain, roughly speaking PoBC allows blockchains to talk to each other.
- PBoC is such new tech that (a) no-one except people at XC understand it (it's Jasinlee's invention), (b) it's not coded yet.
- PBoC is not going to be implemented in the near future because it will take an enormous amount of work and there are more immediate goals, like real staking Android wallets.
- XC and Cache will not share features
- XC and Cache will not have the same function, therefore there is no question of XC's money supply doubling. Why would any team want to do that to their coin? It's suicide. So why would it be reasonable to suppose that we'd do that?
- The team working on Cache is a completely different one to the one developing XC. There's no dilution of time or attention. Cache's development will have no effect on the pace or direction of XC or on ATCsecure's focus on it.
- Cache is not new to the XC project - it's been a facet in the project for a while - and yet you've seen the same reliability when it comes to release dates, and the same consistently rapid pace of development all along. So there's nothing that suggests a change or that anything is amiss.
- The XC devs have extensive business experience and know full well how to develop a technology. So when new technologies, partnerships, or functions are introduced into XC, it is done by capable hands. We know when a small, focussed team is best. We also know when and how to form partnerships. We're going to do both, because it'll create the brightest future for XC.
Now you can either doubt this information or run with it. I ask you to consider it in the light of XC's past developments, especially their reliability and professionalism. To my mind it's obvious: today the community became aware of an incredibly powerful facet of the XC project, and one that will be a game-changer in its mid-term future.
Thanks.
Yes thanks for clarifying this synechist. I can see good things to come. Time to buy more XC!
June 22, 2014, 09:14:22 PM
XC TEAM AT CONFERENCE!
Hurray for this!!! and hurray for change of subject... lol.. I had to go take a nap because everyone here was bitching at eachother it was getting annoying.
also all you non believers who wanted pics and proof they are there... well here is your pudding.
Fine looking group I must say.. to the moon!
It looks like that guy with the glasses is the same person as with the BC team.
If that is the case, that is NOT good.
Just a leach that is only in for profits and any turn possible.
the second guy from the left in second photo looks like the 2nd guy from the left in the first photo, and the 4th guy from the left in the 2nd photo looks like the 4th guy from the left in the first, is the 2nd photo BC team? if so they are the same team as XC without Dan and his son, if i'm wrong they must be all twins or something, not trying to spread fud, i strongly support XC and have done since almost day 1, but this is very strange to me.
Bro... they look the same because they ARE the same people... just in front of a different sign... "coin telegraph" prob some journalist shot.
we will move.
move head.
Excited to see the team. Keep up the great work guys!
June 22, 2014, 08:52:56 PM
Hi folks
We'll publish something soon that clarifies several aspects of PBoC, XC, Cache, and our plans for the future.
For the time being, here's a little bit of information:
- In distinction from PoS, which secures a blockchain, roughly speaking PoBC allows blockchains to talk to each other.
- PBoC is such new tech that (a) no-one except people at XC understand it (it's Jasinlee's invention), (b) it's not coded yet.
- PBoC is not going to be implemented in the near future because it will take an enormous amount of work and there are more immediate goals, like real staking Android wallets.
- XC and Cache will not share features
- XC and Cache will not have the same function, therefore there is no question of XC's money supply doubling. Why would any team want to do that to their coin? It's suicide. So why would it be reasonable to suppose that we'd do that?
- The team working on Cache is a completely different one to the one developing XC. There's no dilution of time or attention. Cache's development will have no effect on the pace or direction of XC or on ATCsecure's focus on it.
- Cache is not new to the XC project - it's been a facet in the project for a while - and yet you've seen the same reliability when it comes to release dates, and the same consistently rapid pace of development all along. So there's nothing that suggests a change or that anything is amiss.
- The XC devs have extensive business experience and know full well how to develop a technology. So when new technologies, partnerships, or functions are introduced into XC, it is done by capable hands. We know when a small, focussed team is best. We also know when and how to form partnerships. We're going to do both, because it'll create the brightest future for XC.
Now you can either doubt this information or run with it. I ask you to consider it in the light of XC's past developments, especially their reliability and professionalism. To my mind it's obvious: today the community became aware of an incredibly powerful facet of the XC project, and one that will be a game-changer in its mid-term future.
We'll publish something soon that clarifies several aspects of PBoC, XC, Cache, and our plans for the future.
For the time being, here's a little bit of information:
- In distinction from PoS, which secures a blockchain, roughly speaking PoBC allows blockchains to talk to each other.
- PBoC is such new tech that (a) no-one except people at XC understand it (it's Jasinlee's invention), (b) it's not coded yet.
- PBoC is not going to be implemented in the near future because it will take an enormous amount of work and there are more immediate goals, like real staking Android wallets.
- XC and Cache will not share features
- XC and Cache will not have the same function, therefore there is no question of XC's money supply doubling. Why would any team want to do that to their coin? It's suicide. So why would it be reasonable to suppose that we'd do that?
- The team working on Cache is a completely different one to the one developing XC. There's no dilution of time or attention. Cache's development will have no effect on the pace or direction of XC or on ATCsecure's focus on it.
- Cache is not new to the XC project - it's been a facet in the project for a while - and yet you've seen the same reliability when it comes to release dates, and the same consistently rapid pace of development all along. So there's nothing that suggests a change or that anything is amiss.
- The XC devs have extensive business experience and know full well how to develop a technology. So when new technologies, partnerships, or functions are introduced into XC, it is done by capable hands. We know when a small, focussed team is best. We also know when and how to form partnerships. We're going to do both, because it'll create the brightest future for XC.
Now you can either doubt this information or run with it. I ask you to consider it in the light of XC's past developments, especially their reliability and professionalism. To my mind it's obvious: today the community became aware of an incredibly powerful facet of the XC project, and one that will be a game-changer in its mid-term future.
Thanks.
June 22, 2014, 08:43:05 PM
XC TEAM AT CONFERENCE!
Hurray for this!!! and hurray for change of subject... lol.. I had to go take a nap because everyone here was bitching at eachother it was getting annoying.
also all you non believers who wanted pics and proof they are there... well here is your pudding.
Fine looking group I must say.. to the moon!
It looks like that guy with the glasses is the same person as with the BC team.
If that is the case, that is NOT good.
Just a leach that is only in for profits and any turn possible.
the second guy from the left in second photo looks like the 2nd guy from the left in the first photo, and the 4th guy from the left in the 2nd photo looks like the 4th guy from the left in the first, is the 2nd photo BC team? if so they are the same team as XC without Dan and his son, if i'm wrong they must be all twins or something, not trying to spread fud, i strongly support XC and have done since almost day 1, but this is very strange to me.
Bro... they look the same because they ARE the same people... just in front of a different sign... "coin telegraph" prob some journalist shot.
we will move.
move head.
June 22, 2014, 08:28:15 PM
Blows my mind how many people love gambling away their btc savings on other coins when we have a winner right here!
Well, based on today's news I went out and bought some CACHE before it spiked. That's the advantage of waking up early on a Sunday morning and having major anger management issues.
I don't think Jasinlee accepted my apologies. Now I feel hated. 
June 22, 2014, 08:08:24 PM
[snip]
Nice summary mate, really hoping this is the week we start taking the sell walls down on the back of all of this great work and getting the coin priced more realistically... Carry on with the good work..
Nice summary mate, really hoping this is the week we start taking the sell walls down on the back of all of this great work and getting the coin priced more realistically... Carry on with the good work..
Thanks! - and yes, I can't wait till the price becomes a truer reflection of XC's value. Less paranoid community members comes a close second.
thanks for your summary and happy Birthday by the way, but i wouldn't call us paranoid in this case. jasins first posts sounded like there would be some swap of features which took the team members till one hour ago to clearly denie. Its all good now.
June 22, 2014, 08:07:36 PM
Hi folks
We'll publish something soon that clarifies several aspects of PBoC, XC, Cache, and our plans for the future.
For the time being, here's a little bit of information:
- In distinction from PoS, which secures a blockchain, roughly speaking PoBC allows blockchains to talk to each other.
- PBoC is such new tech that (a) no-one except people at XC understand it (it's Jasinlee's invention), (b) it's not coded yet.
- PBoC is not going to be implemented in the near future because it will take an enormous amount of work and there are more immediate goals, like real staking Android wallets.
- XC and Cache will not share features
- XC and Cache will not have the same function, therefore there is no question of XC's money supply doubling. Why would any team want to do that to their coin? It's suicide. So why would it be reasonable to suppose that we'd do that?
- The team working on Cache is a completely different one to the one developing XC. There's no dilution of time or attention. Cache's development will have no effect on the pace or direction of XC or on ATCsecure's focus on it.
- Cache is not new to the XC project - it's been a facet in the project for a while - and yet you've seen the same reliability when it comes to release dates, and the same consistently rapid pace of development all along. So there's nothing that suggests a change or that anything is amiss.
- The XC devs have extensive business experience and know full well how to develop a technology. So when new technologies, partnerships, or functions are introduced into XC, it is done by capable hands. We know when a small, focussed team is best. We also know when and how to form partnerships. We're going to do both, because it'll create the brightest future for XC.
Now you can either doubt this information or run with it. I ask you to consider it in the light of XC's past developments, especially their reliability and professionalism. To my mind it's obvious: today the community became aware of an incredibly powerful facet of the XC project, and one that will be a game-changer in its mid-term future.
We'll publish something soon that clarifies several aspects of PBoC, XC, Cache, and our plans for the future.
For the time being, here's a little bit of information:
- In distinction from PoS, which secures a blockchain, roughly speaking PoBC allows blockchains to talk to each other.
- PBoC is such new tech that (a) no-one except people at XC understand it (it's Jasinlee's invention), (b) it's not coded yet.
- PBoC is not going to be implemented in the near future because it will take an enormous amount of work and there are more immediate goals, like real staking Android wallets.
- XC and Cache will not share features
- XC and Cache will not have the same function, therefore there is no question of XC's money supply doubling. Why would any team want to do that to their coin? It's suicide. So why would it be reasonable to suppose that we'd do that?
- The team working on Cache is a completely different one to the one developing XC. There's no dilution of time or attention. Cache's development will have no effect on the pace or direction of XC or on ATCsecure's focus on it.
- Cache is not new to the XC project - it's been a facet in the project for a while - and yet you've seen the same reliability when it comes to release dates, and the same consistently rapid pace of development all along. So there's nothing that suggests a change or that anything is amiss.
- The XC devs have extensive business experience and know full well how to develop a technology. So when new technologies, partnerships, or functions are introduced into XC, it is done by capable hands. We know when a small, focussed team is best. We also know when and how to form partnerships. We're going to do both, because it'll create the brightest future for XC.
Now you can either doubt this information or run with it. I ask you to consider it in the light of XC's past developments, especially their reliability and professionalism. To my mind it's obvious: today the community became aware of an incredibly powerful facet of the XC project, and one that will be a game-changer in its mid-term future.
thank you so much for this--- this was needed for those in doubt. We dont need weak hands, but its good not to be agitated by their dumps. Hopefully now we can put our dear battbot's mind at ease(not to say his concerns were not legit ofc)!
edit: oh its ur birthday?? happy bday then! I wish you an XCiting journey to the top
June 22, 2014, 07:48:01 PM
XC TEAM AT CONFERENCE!
Hurray for this!!! and hurray for change of subject... lol.. I had to go take a nap because everyone here was bitching at eachother it was getting annoying.
also all you non believers who wanted pics and proof they are there... well here is your pudding.
Fine looking group I must say.. to the moon!
It looks like that guy with the glasses is the same person as with the BC team.
If that is the case, that is NOT good.
Just a leach that is only in for profits and any turn possible.
the second guy from the left in second photo looks like the 2nd guy from the left in the first photo, and the 4th guy from the left in the 2nd photo looks like the 4th guy from the left in the first, is the 2nd photo BC team? if so they are the same team as XC without Dan and his son, if i'm wrong they must be all twins or something, not trying to spread fud, i strongly support XC and have done since almost day 1, but this is very strange to me.
Bro... they look the same because they ARE the same people... just in front of a different sign... "coin telegraph" prob some journalist shot.
June 22, 2014, 07:46:10 PM
in the 2nd photo the first guy from the left looks like the last guy from the left in the first picture with a different shirt on.
the second guy from the left in second photo looks like the 2nd guy from the left in the first photo, and the 4th guy from the left in the 2nd photo looks like the 4th guy from the left in the first, is the 2nd photo BC team? if so they are the same team as XC without Dan and his son, if i'm wrong they must be all twins or something, not trying to spread fud, i strongly support XC and have done since almost day 1, but this is very strange to me.
Bro... they look the same because they ARE the same people... just in front of a different sign... "coin telegraph" prob some journalist shot.
Our recent press release stated that two members of the XC team, Dan and Jasinlee, would attend the conference. Bear this in mind when people publish non-annotated photos of groups of people.
And when the paranoia rises, consider the following methodology for determining the likelihood of a hypothesis:
- grounds for it being true
- grounds for it being false, considered independently of grounds for it being true.
Then do the same for your background assumptions. A well-scrutinised mind is a healthy one.
June 22, 2014, 07:42:24 PM
they will prob be featured here:
http://cointelegraph.com/
http://cointelegraph.com/
June 22, 2014, 07:41:08 PM
XC TEAM AT CONFERENCE!
Hurray for this!!! and hurray for change of subject... lol.. I had to go take a nap because everyone here was bitching at eachother it was getting annoying.
also all you non believers who wanted pics and proof they are there... well here is your pudding.
Fine looking group I must say.. to the moon!
It looks like that guy with the glasses is the same person as with the BC team.
If that is the case, that is NOT good.
Just a leach that is only in for profits and any turn possible.
the second guy from the left in second photo looks like the 2nd guy from the left in the first photo, and the 4th guy from the left in the 2nd photo looks like the 4th guy from the left in the first, is the 2nd photo BC team? if so they are the same team as XC without Dan and his son, if i'm wrong they must be all twins or something, not trying to spread fud, i strongly support XC and have done since almost day 1, but this is very strange to me.
Bro... they look the same because they ARE the same people... just in front of a different sign... "coin telegraph" prob some journalist shot.
June 22, 2014, 07:32:41 PM
Blows my mind how many people love gambling away their btc savings on other coins when we have a winner right here!
June 22, 2014, 07:29:35 PM
XC TEAM AT CONFERENCE!
Hurray for this!!! and hurray for change of subject... lol.. I had to go take a nap because everyone here was bitching at eachother it was getting annoying.
also all you non believers who wanted pics and proof they are there... well here is your pudding.
Fine looking group I must say.. to the moon!
It looks like that guy with the glasses is the same person as with the BC team.
If that is the case, that is NOT good.
Just a leach that is only in for profits and any turn possible.
the second guy from the left in second photo looks like the 2nd guy from the left in the first photo, and the 4th guy from the left in the 2nd photo looks like the 4th guy from the left in the first, is the 2nd photo BC team? if so they are the same team as XC without Dan and his son, if i'm wrong they must be all twins or something, not trying to spread fud, i strongly support XC and have done since almost day 1, but this is very strange to me.
June 22, 2014, 07:26:09 PM
[snip]
Nice summary mate, really hoping this is the week we start taking the sell walls down on the back of all of this great work and getting the coin priced more realistically... Carry on with the good work..
Nice summary mate, really hoping this is the week we start taking the sell walls down on the back of all of this great work and getting the coin priced more realistically... Carry on with the good work..
Thanks! - and yes, I can't wait till the price becomes a truer reflection of XC's value. Less paranoid community members comes a close second.
June 22, 2014, 07:24:00 PM
Hi folks
We'll publish something soon that clarifies several aspects of PBoC, XC, Cache, and our plans for the future.
For the time being, here's a little bit of information:
- In distinction from PoS, which secures a blockchain, roughly speaking PoBC allows blockchains to talk to each other.
- PBoC is such new tech that (a) no-one except people at XC understand it (it's Jasinlee's invention), (b) it's not coded yet.
- PBoC is not going to be implemented in the near future because it will take an enormous amount of work and there are more immediate goals, like real staking Android wallets.
- XC and Cache will not share features
- XC and Cache will not have the same function, therefore there is no question of XC's money supply doubling. Why would any team want to do that to their coin? It's suicide. So why would it be reasonable to suppose that we'd do that?
- The team working on Cache is a completely different one to the one developing XC. There's no dilution of time or attention. Cache's development will have no effect on the pace or direction of XC or on ATCsecure's focus on it.
- Cache is not new to the XC project - it's been a facet in the project for a while - and yet you've seen the same reliability when it comes to release dates, and the same consistently rapid pace of development all along. So there's nothing that suggests a change or that anything is amiss.
- The XC devs have extensive business experience and know full well how to develop a technology. So when new technologies, partnerships, or functions are introduced into XC, it is done by capable hands. We know when a small, focussed team is best. We also know when and how to form partnerships. We're going to do both, because it'll create the brightest future for XC.
Now you can either doubt this information or run with it. I ask you to consider it in the light of XC's past developments, especially their reliability and professionalism. To my mind it's obvious: today the community became aware of an incredibly powerful facet of the XC project, and one that will be a game-changer in its mid-term future.
We'll publish something soon that clarifies several aspects of PBoC, XC, Cache, and our plans for the future.
For the time being, here's a little bit of information:
- In distinction from PoS, which secures a blockchain, roughly speaking PoBC allows blockchains to talk to each other.
- PBoC is such new tech that (a) no-one except people at XC understand it (it's Jasinlee's invention), (b) it's not coded yet.
- PBoC is not going to be implemented in the near future because it will take an enormous amount of work and there are more immediate goals, like real staking Android wallets.
- XC and Cache will not share features
- XC and Cache will not have the same function, therefore there is no question of XC's money supply doubling. Why would any team want to do that to their coin? It's suicide. So why would it be reasonable to suppose that we'd do that?
- The team working on Cache is a completely different one to the one developing XC. There's no dilution of time or attention. Cache's development will have no effect on the pace or direction of XC or on ATCsecure's focus on it.
- Cache is not new to the XC project - it's been a facet in the project for a while - and yet you've seen the same reliability when it comes to release dates, and the same consistently rapid pace of development all along. So there's nothing that suggests a change or that anything is amiss.
- The XC devs have extensive business experience and know full well how to develop a technology. So when new technologies, partnerships, or functions are introduced into XC, it is done by capable hands. We know when a small, focussed team is best. We also know when and how to form partnerships. We're going to do both, because it'll create the brightest future for XC.
Now you can either doubt this information or run with it. I ask you to consider it in the light of XC's past developments, especially their reliability and professionalism. To my mind it's obvious: today the community became aware of an incredibly powerful facet of the XC project, and one that will be a game-changer in its mid-term future.
Nice summary mate, really hoping this is the week we start taking the sell walls down on the back of all of this great work and getting the coin priced more realistically... Carry on with the good work..
June 22, 2014, 07:20:21 PM
Hi folks
We'll publish something soon that clarifies several aspects of PBoC, XC, Cache, and our plans for the future.
For the time being, here's a little bit of information:
- In distinction from PoS, which secures a blockchain, roughly speaking PoBC allows blockchains to talk to each other.
- PBoC is such new tech that (a) no-one except people at XC understand it (it's Jasinlee's invention), (b) it's not coded yet.
- PBoC is not going to be implemented in the near future because it will take an enormous amount of work and there are more immediate goals, like real staking Android wallets.
- XC and Cache will not share features
- XC and Cache will not have the same function, therefore there is no question of XC's money supply doubling. Why would any team want to do that to their coin? It's suicide. So why would it be reasonable to suppose that we'd do that?
- The team working on Cache is a completely different one to the one developing XC. There's no dilution of time or attention. Cache's development will have no effect on the pace or direction of XC or on ATCsecure's focus on it.
- Cache is not new to the XC project - it's been a facet in the project for a while - and yet you've seen the same reliability when it comes to release dates, and the same consistently rapid pace of development all along. So there's nothing that suggests a change or that anything is amiss.
- The XC devs have extensive business experience and know full well how to develop a technology. So when new technologies, partnerships, or functions are introduced into XC, it is done by capable hands. We know when a small, focussed team is best. We also know when and how to form partnerships. We're going to do both, because it'll create the brightest future for XC.
Now you can either doubt this information or run with it. I ask you to consider it in the light of XC's past developments, especially their reliability and professionalism. To my mind it's obvious: today the community became aware of an incredibly powerful facet of the XC project, and one that will be a game-changer in its mid-term future.
We'll publish something soon that clarifies several aspects of PBoC, XC, Cache, and our plans for the future.
For the time being, here's a little bit of information:
- In distinction from PoS, which secures a blockchain, roughly speaking PoBC allows blockchains to talk to each other.
- PBoC is such new tech that (a) no-one except people at XC understand it (it's Jasinlee's invention), (b) it's not coded yet.
- PBoC is not going to be implemented in the near future because it will take an enormous amount of work and there are more immediate goals, like real staking Android wallets.
- XC and Cache will not share features
- XC and Cache will not have the same function, therefore there is no question of XC's money supply doubling. Why would any team want to do that to their coin? It's suicide. So why would it be reasonable to suppose that we'd do that?
- The team working on Cache is a completely different one to the one developing XC. There's no dilution of time or attention. Cache's development will have no effect on the pace or direction of XC or on ATCsecure's focus on it.
- Cache is not new to the XC project - it's been a facet in the project for a while - and yet you've seen the same reliability when it comes to release dates, and the same consistently rapid pace of development all along. So there's nothing that suggests a change or that anything is amiss.
- The XC devs have extensive business experience and know full well how to develop a technology. So when new technologies, partnerships, or functions are introduced into XC, it is done by capable hands. We know when a small, focussed team is best. We also know when and how to form partnerships. We're going to do both, because it'll create the brightest future for XC.
Now you can either doubt this information or run with it. I ask you to consider it in the light of XC's past developments, especially their reliability and professionalism. To my mind it's obvious: today the community became aware of an incredibly powerful facet of the XC project, and one that will be a game-changer in its mid-term future.
Welp, I'm buying some more at this very moment
Jump to: