This just reinforces the fact that it's important to get varying perspectives in code reviews 
.
Does XC have an idea of who will be performing its pre-launch reviews?
.Does XC have an idea of who will be performing its pre-launch reviews?
Yup ;-)
Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 207. (Read 1484218 times)
October 08, 2014, 10:47:39 AM
Yup ;-)
October 08, 2014, 10:45:58 AM
This just reinforces the fact that it's important to get varying perspectives in code reviews .
Does XC have an idea of who will be performing its pre-launch reviews?
.Does XC have an idea of who will be performing its pre-launch reviews?
October 08, 2014, 10:44:55 AM
Good Riddance
October 08, 2014, 10:44:39 AM
The only logic I see, is the fact that XC's tech is cutting in edge in both anonymous transactions and secured communications (XCHAT)...
That is like asking microsoft to release its source code.....
That is like asking microsoft to release its source code.....
There's a reason people don't use microsoft products when they want to be anonymous though.
Also, Security through obscurity
Yeah, we're not aiming at security through obscurity.
October 08, 2014, 10:43:02 AM
Now that the air is clearer, who's up for a bit of Group XChat testing?
Woohoo!
Updated Wallet for Multi-Party XChat
* http://downloads.xc-official.com/release/windows/XCurrency_2.49.08e.exe
Dan
Sure, my address is in my signature. Woohoo!
Updated Wallet for Multi-Party XChat
* http://downloads.xc-official.com/release/windows/XCurrency_2.49.08e.exe
Dan
October 08, 2014, 10:41:25 AM
The only logic I see, is the fact that XC's tech is cutting in edge in both anonymous transactions and secured communications (XCHAT)...
That is like asking microsoft to release its source code.....
That is like asking microsoft to release its source code.....
There's a reason people don't use microsoft products when they want to be anonymous though.
Also, Security through obscurity
October 08, 2014, 10:41:02 AM
Now that the air is clearer, who's up for a bit of Group XChat testing?
Woohoo!
Updated Wallet for Multi-Party XChat
* http://downloads.xc-official.com/release/windows/XCurrency_2.49.08e.exe
Dan
Woohoo!
Updated Wallet for Multi-Party XChat
* http://downloads.xc-official.com/release/windows/XCurrency_2.49.08e.exe
Dan
October 08, 2014, 10:39:37 AM
ehhh don't worry about my feelings. i think if you'll all pay attention to my logic you'll see the ironies from someone looking from the outside (i'm the only "outsider" in this thread).
Robinwilliams, your logic is plain to see and I do get it.
However I also get your tone, and I get the types of topics you bring up.
You:
- almost always - if not always - post negatively about XC
- harp on about issues that have been resolved and that you've already discussed here previously
- try to find reasons to put a negative spin on news
- patently ignore facts central to the topics you discuss that invalidate your cases against XC.
This is trolling. You are *not* "just kinda letting [your] thought process all hang out;" you are wilfully ignoring facts contrary to your negative view of XC.
As you well know, trolling is not allowed on Bitcointalk.
As such, this is to notify you that you are banned. Do not post here anymore.
This statement is correct and you are officially banned. Also trolling is against the forum rules.
Alrighty - got it! Goodluck to you guys
October 08, 2014, 10:38:55 AM
that source talk bores me. teka hit us with another preview please.
October 08, 2014, 10:38:12 AM
ehhh don't worry about my feelings. i think if you'll all pay attention to my logic you'll see the ironies from someone looking from the outside (i'm the only "outsider" in this thread).
Robinwilliams, your logic is plain to see and I do get it.
However I also get your tone, and I get the types of topics you bring up.
You:
- almost always - if not always - post negatively about XC
- harp on about issues that have been resolved and that you've already discussed here previously
- try to find reasons to put a negative spin on news
- patently ignore facts central to the topics you discuss that invalidate your cases against XC.
This is trolling. You are *not* "just kinda letting [your] thought process all hang out;" you are wilfully ignoring facts contrary to your negative view of XC.
As you well know, trolling is not allowed on Bitcointalk.
As such, this is to notify you that you are banned. Do not post here anymore.
This statement is correct and you are officially banned. Also trolling is against the forum rules.
October 08, 2014, 10:34:53 AM
ehhh don't worry about my feelings. i think if you'll all pay attention to my logic you'll see the ironies from someone looking from the outside (i'm the only "outsider" in this thread).
Robinwilliams, your logic is plain to see and I do get it.
However I also get your tone, and I get the types of topics you bring up.
You:
- almost always - if not always - post negatively about XC
- harp on about issues that have been resolved and that you've already discussed here previously
- try to find reasons to put a negative spin on news
- patently ignore facts central to the topics you discuss that invalidate your cases against XC.
This is trolling. You are *not* "just kinda letting [your] thought process all hang out;" you are wilfully ignoring facts contrary to your negative view of XC.
As you well know, trolling is not allowed on Bitcointalk.
As such, this is to notify you that you are banned. Do not post here anymore.
October 08, 2014, 10:34:42 AM
Quote
is not open source wine wine wine wine when you open source??? wine wine wine wine...ho so you will not open source before the ito cry cry cry cry. I want it open source ...wine wine wine wine.
that is the only argument you have left to FUD pretty pathethic.
that is the only argument you have left to FUD pretty pathethic.
Lol! look dudes i'm trying to point out the irony.
darkcoin open sources and the list of found exploits have only begun to be found (i'm sure).
XC has still not open sourced and they are about to raise money for a company (in addition to the coin) and you're shitting on darkcoin.
I'm just TRYING to point out the irony of anonymity trusted to a non open sourced platform. and the irony of throwing stones at an open sourced project (I'm sure vulnerabilities will be found when you guys open source).
I get it, I get it. . .I'll leave you in peace with your mountaingoat mascot
Quote
Let's treat even trolls with politeness.
ehhh don't worry about my feelings. i think if you'll all pay attention to my logic you'll see the ironies from someone looking from the outside (i'm the only "outsider" in this thread).
The only logic I see, is the fact that XC's tech is cutting in edge in both anonymous transactions and secured communications (XCHAT)...
That is like asking microsoft to release its source code.....
October 08, 2014, 10:32:44 AM
I have already reported you twice your account will be shut down. please every one report him as well to the moderator. thanks.
October 08, 2014, 10:31:37 AM
Every outsider can see that you are just trolling if the average IQ of an outsider is 15
lol i'm not trying to convince outsiders. if i was i would be going about it differently.
i'm just kinda letting my thought process all hang out. if you guys don't see the irony of a closed source privacy platform starting their own company in addition to their coin while throwing stones at the open source privacy platform then ... ok.
I do kinda let it all hang out and be honest - but i'm not sure i've accused anyone in here of an iq of 15
you don't really engage in my logic - just personal assessments of my intelligence rather than the issues at hand.
XC proper did not "throw stones," a community member did. Quit using the jokes / jabs of random community members and saying XC proper is attacking an open source platform. I do not represent XC in any official capacity.
Engage that logic.
October 08, 2014, 10:28:46 AM
Every outsider can see that you are just trolling if the average IQ of an outsider is 15
lol i'm not trying to convince outsiders. if i was i would be going about it differently.
i'm just kinda letting my thought process all hang out. if you guys don't see the irony of a closed source privacy platform starting their own company in addition to their coin while throwing stones at the open source privacy platform then ... ok.
I do kinda let it all hang out and be honest - but i'm not sure i've accused anyone in here of an iq of 15
you don't really engage in my logic - just personal assessments of my intelligence rather than the issues at hand.
do you guys have any idea how rough it's gonna be on you when you get out of your little circle? and you just accuse naysayers of having a low iq?
October 08, 2014, 10:25:58 AM
Every outsider can see that you are just trolling if the average IQ of an outsider is 15
October 08, 2014, 10:24:39 AM
people are different. from an investors pov i wouldn't want it to go open source before the ito. yes i would have to trust them on the basis of their last actions and my own investigation but this will result in a higher reward. I would prefer the added risk here since its no risk to me in regards to the anonymity to work. If one doesn't prefer that risk, no one is forced to buy shares later, or now XC to get shares for free.
in a free market where noone is forced to buy anything all those complaints are laughable actually. just buy your favorite by your own standards and shut up.
October 08, 2014, 10:23:09 AM
Quote
is not open source wine wine wine wine when you open source??? wine wine wine wine...ho so you will not open source before the ito cry cry cry cry. I want it open source ...wine wine wine wine.
that is the only argument you have left to FUD pretty pathethic.
that is the only argument you have left to FUD pretty pathethic.
Lol! look dudes i'm trying to point out the irony.
darkcoin open sources and the list of found exploits have only begun to be found (i'm sure).
XC has still not open sourced and they are about to raise money for a company (in addition to the coin) and you're shitting on darkcoin.
I'm just TRYING to point out the irony of anonymity trusted to a non open sourced platform. and the irony of throwing stones at an open sourced project (I'm sure vulnerabilities will be found when you guys open source).
I get it, I get it. . .I'll leave you in peace with your mountaingoat mascot
Quote
Let's treat even trolls with politeness.
ehhh don't worry about my feelings. i think if you'll all pay attention to my logic you'll see the ironies from someone looking from the outside (i'm the only "outsider" in this thread).
October 08, 2014, 10:23:04 AM
Let's treat even trolls with politeness.
October 08, 2014, 10:20:15 AM
Quote
This same cryptographer said DRK's code looks terrible --> priceless.
your a closed source project throwing stones at an open sourced project -> priceless
Quote
No it will not be open sourced before then
thank you for the direct answer.
None is throwing stones in this thread to anyone fuking troll!!
Jump to: