Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 232. (Read 1484218 times)

Can't wait!

I'll see how I'm feeling on monday, might 'leak' some desktop ideas.

nope don't think so.. my mood is a bit down as bitcoin is 100 Euro less then 3 weeks ago when I bought it for xc... the rest is fine here

thanks for the clarification. just seen this mentioned as the latest buzz word alot. i like the fact that by XC standards its "no big deal"
Teka you better get those full screens ready  

since xc is no Pump&dump anymore how about we turn this into the first pump&justmorePumpandstillalittlemorePump coin. I'm at home on a saturday evening. I used to be cool   now i'm about to spamm the whole forum if you don't stop me.

See the mood has changed here drastically in the few weeks that I've been gone.

Google changed the YT comments from a chronological list to the ones there AI thinks best matches the readers profile. So basically they f.cked up a good thing. Nobody likes it but as long as there's good money to make on YT no content supplier leaves.
You can not up or down vote, only big g can do that

Yes it will be.

HTML5 is just a way of doing web apps (or skins of other apps). It's not a big deal.

No doubt Teka will leak a few more images as the date approaches.

yes you can thumb up the comment.

the UI update Dan mentioned is the graphic stuff teka been working on right? can anyone clarify this.
Also can someone explain to me what this html5 is ? is that important to have for the wallet ? will XC app be in html5? i wanna see some screenshots more than i wanted to se those lawrence leaks.

No harm no foul, there is a lot of info in this thread and its hard to know everything that has been discussed.  The collaborations have been great so far and I expect that to continue in the future.

In the midst of this did anyone miss that the XC MOBILE APP will be available in ~2 weeks and it will include XChat?  I realize there will be many additional updates and possibly some bugs early on but this is great news and a huge development.

I apologize if this exact issue has already been addressed.  I likely missed some pages here and there, including the ITO announcement which I just saw for the first time last night.

And I'll also be the first to say that I think it was me who drew those points out of you, haha. But I've since then seen the light!

Thank you.  I found this response to be satisfactory.  

Personally, I think XC should encourage people to submit difficult criticisms, if only for the possibility that there are probably other investors holding similar thoughts.  Because now, sufficient answers have been brought forth and may act as a balm to those who are hesitant.

Oh, sorry mate, Im not really with it today. just checked and couldn't see your comment on youtube though.

can you upvote stuff on youtube?

By the way, I've said all this already, several times.

If you'd done your research as I suggested before complaining, you'd have seen that in the three days before our announcing the NHZ collaboration, the points above were elaborately spelled out.

Xander has never purely worked for XC. Before he joined XC he was already involved in the Cypherfunks and several other coins. Why? Because this is how crypto works. Always. Go look up the Ethereum developers and see the other projects they contribute to. They're all over the place. And this is both normal and promotes innovation. It makes Xander's presence in XC enriching and energising.

As for Pizpie, he is a social networking genius. He has incredible connections and this is a major feature of XC's (past and future) success. You know how he has such great connections? By being involved in lots of projects. The very worst thing for XC would be if he wasn't collaborating. But this is the case for everyone in crypto. So we'd all better get used to this. It's the most beneficial way of doing things.

This is partially incorrect: XC has not attempting to accomplish, it has already accomplished two of NHZ's three goals here. And it'll acquire the third due to NHZ having an asset exchange already, because Dan is working on its code.

Are you starting to see the benefits of collaboration?


Now do you see that XC has always, and always will be, "divided"? And contrary to your opinion, this is by far the most beneficial thing for XC and for all crypto.

How do you think we have so much incredible tech, and develop it at such a rate? We collaborate, we gain code, we gain experience, we build relationships. This is what a healthy project looks like. Better get used to it.

Synechist, please address this satisfactorily and I will be done:


"Collaborations with Qibucks, for example, is completely different from the NHZ project.  With NHZ, XC has routed Xander Shepherd (former dev for XC), and Pizpie (Marketing guy) to the NHZ project.  And what do you know, the NHZ project is working to build anon transfers, encrypted messaging, and a decentralized asset exchange.  Look familiar?  It should, because this is in large what XC is attempting to accomplish.

Now, explain to me how dividing the XC team to work on a second coin (which will ONLY divide & dilute investments) will be beneficial to XC?  The coins roadmaps are nearly PARALLEL. But now XC resources are split and working to accomplish the same goals on another coin."

You don't have valid criticisms. You have a lack of information. If you are new to XC, then you really need to research XC's history of collaboration before forming a realistic opinion on it. Go read every single one.

Look up the previous collaborations we've done and see how, in every case, there was at least one frustrating person in this thread making the sorts of complaints you have here. And in every case, these complaints have turned out to be profoundly misplaced, and XC's tech has been strengthened beyond doubt and without cost to the project.

So for heaven's sake, research your investment properly before complaining.

And then think twice before shooting yourself in the foot by casting doubt on a project you have a stake in (!).


P.S. I did attack your points, rather than your person. I said: "do not cast doubt on a project with an unmatched pace of development."

I'll be the first to say that I see where longnecker is coming from, not that I agree with him, but that I understand how he can think this way.  But I don't think it's helping your investment (longnecker) to make speculations. The reality is we do not know the full extent of what XC intends with their collaborative efforts. It really comes down to do you trust the integrity and commitment of the XC team? And do you see the value in XC's tech?

I for one do, so while we do not see all the pieces of the puzzle yet, the potential of this platform far surpasses any other altcoin from a technological standpoint.  And regardless of what direction the XC team chooses to take, there's no denying that the technology will speak for itself.

haha nothing better than seeing a nice guy getting a little gangsta for once.