[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 233.

cryptico

hero member

Activity: 700

Merit: 500

Quote from: G-Bert on October 04, 2014, 01:09:35 PM

Quote from: cryptico on October 04, 2014, 10:48:09 AM

Quote from: sugarboy321 on October 04, 2014, 10:46:18 AM

Quote from: cryptico on October 04, 2014, 08:39:44 AM

Teka We need to reach them after rev 2.5

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XQ_Cv4wEE-c

they were talking about fire-chat and mesh networks in this one. They said that all the technologies with mesh net do not offer real privacy. for the bloat issue and third party vulnerability.

XC is gonna blow their mind

Edit: I made a comment in reply of their first comment talking about xc bitcoin magazine article about xc meshnet solution for privacy and I wanted to upvote it with different google accounts but when i go out from my profile and enter the other one I cannot see my comment there.

that is my comment:

Hi Guys have a look at Xcurrency fully private anononimous meshnet implemented. First Crypto to do that:

bitcoinmagazine dot com/16436/xcurrencys-new-trustless-ad-hoc-mesh-network/

Watch the entire show, not bad. Some interesting points. Reddit wants it's own coin? Lets push XC

can you see my comment and upvote it?

I think sometimes on reddit they "shadow ban" comments, so only you can see it, no one else. maybe try post it again from different account.

It is on youtube not on reddit. it is a reply to the top first comment from tek syndicate...and im getting notifications as well that people replied on the same thread...

robinwilliams

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

Quote from: Longenecker on October 04, 2014, 01:12:43 PM

Quote from: synechist on October 04, 2014, 01:00:18 PM

Longenecker, the past 3 weeks have seen a continuous stream of developments from XC, and yet you manage to somehow lose faith in the XC team's commitment?

Your perspective is profoundly warped.

The effect of your presence over the past 2 days has been purely negative.

Please stop. You have no idea how bloody annoying it is for me to have to deal with this.

I work 50+ hour weeks on XC ONLY. Not that you need to know, and not that I'm obliged to indulge your conspiracy theorism. Now shut up so I can have a rest this weekend.

Do not cast doubt on a project with an unmatched pace of development. And damn you for having done so already.

1) Let's keep this professional.

2) I feel that I am expressing valid criticisms. As someone who is newer to the XC project (I became aware around a month ago), these are my thoughts and concerns. I express them only out of concern for my investment and the overall benefit of XC. And I think it would be prudent to agree that if even one person is having these concerns, then there is a good chance some outside investors (as well as inside) may be thinking the same thing.

3) Rather than attacking my person, why not attack the points that I make?

The point is - this would be like the CEO of Ford also running GM and I believe that is the point longenecker is making (You aren't the Longenecker from ALERT are you?)

It would be different if Ford Collaborated with SERIUS (something that made them both stronger). But running two companies that compete for the same thing is very similiar to developing two coins that are designed to do the same thing. And ultimately the investors are the ones that get screwed over (regardless of how many hours a week anyone works)

Longenecker

full member

Activity: 226

Merit: 100

Quote from: synechist on October 04, 2014, 01:00:18 PM

Longenecker, the past 3 weeks have seen a continuous stream of developments from XC, and yet you manage to somehow lose faith in the XC team's commitment?

Your perspective is profoundly warped.

The effect of your presence over the past 2 days has been purely negative.

Please stop. You have no idea how bloody annoying it is for me to have to deal with this.

I work 50+ hour weeks on XC ONLY. Not that you need to know, and not that I'm obliged to indulge your conspiracy theorism. Now shut up so I can have a rest this weekend.

Do not cast doubt on a project with an unmatched pace of development. And damn you for having done so already.

1) Let's keep this professional.

2) I feel that I am expressing valid criticisms. As someone who is newer to the XC project (I became aware around a month ago), these are my thoughts and concerns. I express them only out of concern for my investment and the overall benefit of XC. And I think it would be prudent to agree that if even one person is having these concerns, then there is a good chance some outside investors (as well as inside) may be thinking the same thing.

3) Rather than attacking my person, why not attack the points that I make?

G-Bert

sr. member

Activity: 364

Merit: 250

Quote from: cryptico on October 04, 2014, 10:48:09 AM

Quote from: sugarboy321 on October 04, 2014, 10:46:18 AM

Quote from: cryptico on October 04, 2014, 08:39:44 AM

Teka We need to reach them after rev 2.5

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XQ_Cv4wEE-c

they were talking about fire-chat and mesh networks in this one. They said that all the technologies with mesh net do not offer real privacy. for the bloat issue and third party vulnerability.

XC is gonna blow their mind

Edit: I made a comment in reply of their first comment talking about xc bitcoin magazine article about xc meshnet solution for privacy and I wanted to upvote it with different google accounts but when i go out from my profile and enter the other one I cannot see my comment there.

that is my comment:

Hi Guys have a look at Xcurrency fully private anononimous meshnet implemented. First Crypto to do that:

bitcoinmagazine dot com/16436/xcurrencys-new-trustless-ad-hoc-mesh-network/

Watch the entire show, not bad. Some interesting points. Reddit wants it's own coin? Lets push XC

can you see my comment and upvote it?

I think sometimes on reddit they "shadow ban" comments, so only you can see it, no one else. maybe try post it again from different account.

cryptico

hero member

Activity: 700

Merit: 500

Arlyn don't lose your flemme

battbot

hero member

Activity: 616

Merit: 500

Quote from: synechist on October 04, 2014, 01:00:18 PM

Longenecker, the past 3 weeks have seen a continuous stream of developments from XC, and yet you manage to somehow lose faith in the XC team's commitment?

Your perspective is profoundly warped.

The effect of your presence over the past 2 days has been purely negative.

Please stop. You have no idea how bloody annoying it is for me to have to deal with this.

I work 50+ hour weeks on XC ONLY. Not that you need to know, and not that I'm obliged to indulge your conspiracy theorism. Now shut up so I can have a rest this weekend.

Do not cast doubt on a project with an unmatched pace of development. And damn you for having done so already.

synechist

legendary

Activity: 1190

Merit: 1000

To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market

Longenecker, the past 3 weeks have seen a continuous stream of developments from XC, and yet you manage to somehow lose faith in the XC team's commitment?

Your perspective is profoundly warped.

The effect of your presence over the past 2 days has been purely negative.

Please stop. You have no idea how bloody annoying it is for me to have to deal with this.

I work 50+ hour weeks on XC ONLY. Not that you need to know, and not that I'm obliged to indulge your conspiracy theorism. Now shut up so I can have a rest this weekend.

Do not cast doubt on a project with an unmatched pace of development. And damn you for having done so already.

cryptico

hero member

Activity: 700

Merit: 500

Quote from: atcsecure on October 04, 2014, 12:48:04 PM

The mobile app will have XChat in RC1, making it one of the most secure mobile messaging app's available in the marketplace .. :-)

Do you mean full mobile wallet with working meshnet anon and mixers as well will be released with that release?

MemoryShock

hero member

Activity: 728

Merit: 500

Quote from: atcsecure on October 04, 2014, 12:48:04 PM

The mobile app will have XChat in RC1, making it one of the most secure mobile messaging app's available in the marketplace .. :-)

Can't wait to download...been waiting for the mobile app for a bit...

cryptico

hero member

Activity: 700

Merit: 500

Quote from: atcsecure on October 04, 2014, 12:43:01 PM

The updated UI will be released shortly after the mobile app is finished. ETA is about 2 weeks for RC1

Dan

REv 2.5 in two weeks so?

hoertest

hero member

Activity: 882

Merit: 1000

Quote from: atcsecure on October 04, 2014, 12:48:04 PM

The mobile app will have XChat in RC1, making it one of the most secure mobile messaging app's available in the marketplace .. :-)

so we are talking that slick thing teka is working on for UI right?

atcsecure

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 500

The mobile app will have XChat in RC1, making it one of the most secure mobile messaging app's available in the marketplace .. :-)

Longenecker

full member

Activity: 226

Merit: 100

Quote from: hoertest on October 04, 2014, 12:42:37 PM

Quote from: Longenecker on October 04, 2014, 12:38:42 PM

Quote from: hoertest on October 04, 2014, 12:32:49 PM

Quote from: KimmyF on October 04, 2014, 12:16:48 PM

Quote from: Longenecker on October 04, 2014, 12:03:43 PM

Quote from: MemoryShock on October 04, 2014, 11:40:48 AM

Quote from: robinwilliams on October 04, 2014, 11:21:05 AM

lol u guys just now getting it? xc isn't paying off for the devs so they have to bring their technology / focus other places.
...

I feel like this talking point has been run into the ground.

There has been a trend with working with other devs...each coin has a different facet that applies to XC. Qibucks and the distribution of ad content for Web 3.0, Key for the honing of the OS, NHZ for the asset exchange (XC's future decentralized exchange),

... a decentralized asset exchange ...

Really, must have missed that one or is MemoryShock correct

they wanna use the nhz exchange for the ito issuing. for those addidtional shares issued besides the ones for the XC holders. Dan is looking over that thing to work up to standard.
Every coin will have some anon and chat in the future i guess. thats just part of the game and XC is leading that game regarding overall approach.

Still easier to buy XC now to get free shares ratio 10/1. they totally fuck up to spread this news to people interested in ITOs though. I don't get the PR anymore but i'm sold on the Technologie and general direction of this project. The underlying platform to all the applications in development is just the best thought out and most comprehensive design.

that beeing said they better bring some UI screenshots asap and the working thing short after. And what the fuck happened to the daily updates?

Perhaps synechist has be re-routed to the NHZ project as well under a different alias. He has not been as active lately and the daily updates stopped around the same time NHZ stuff went public. Who knows at this point, its all speculation, and that's part of the problem.

OHH fuck of with that conspiracy shit you sneeky bitch. that dude is super dedicated and always responsive. the fact that i don't share his PR philosophy doesn't mean i question his integrity towards this project . i don't wanna be interpreted in this direction. just to make this clear

I don't question synechists past and even current dedication to XC. And I am not intending to paint him in a bad light. I'm just saying what is possible. They did the same with Xander and Pizpie, why not synechist? Synechist is brilliant and would be a great asset to any project.

And the logical conclusion of your response would lead me to understand that you believe we should question the integrity of Xander and Pizpie towards the XC project. See? NHZ project has a negative impact on XC.

atcsecure

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 500

The updated UI will be released shortly after the mobile app is finished. ETA is about 2 weeks for RC1

Dan

hoertest

hero member

Activity: 882

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Longenecker on October 04, 2014, 12:38:42 PM

Quote from: hoertest on October 04, 2014, 12:32:49 PM

Quote from: KimmyF on October 04, 2014, 12:16:48 PM

Quote from: Longenecker on October 04, 2014, 12:03:43 PM

Quote from: MemoryShock on October 04, 2014, 11:40:48 AM

Quote from: robinwilliams on October 04, 2014, 11:21:05 AM

lol u guys just now getting it? xc isn't paying off for the devs so they have to bring their technology / focus other places.
...

I feel like this talking point has been run into the ground.

There has been a trend with working with other devs...each coin has a different facet that applies to XC. Qibucks and the distribution of ad content for Web 3.0, Key for the honing of the OS, NHZ for the asset exchange (XC's future decentralized exchange),

... a decentralized asset exchange ...

Really, must have missed that one or is MemoryShock correct

they wanna use the nhz exchange for the ito issuing. for those addidtional shares issued besides the ones for the XC holders. Dan is looking over that thing to work up to standard.
Every coin will have some anon and chat in the future i guess. thats just part of the game and XC is leading that game regarding overall approach.

Still easier to buy XC now to get free shares ratio 10/1. they totally fuck up to spread this news to people interested in ITOs though. I don't get the PR anymore but i'm sold on the Technologie and general direction of this project. The underlying platform to all the applications in development is just the best thought out and most comprehensive design.

that beeing said they better bring some UI screenshots asap and the working thing short after. And what the fuck happened to the daily updates?

Perhaps synechist has be re-routed to the NHZ project as well under a different alias. He has not been as active lately and the daily updates stopped around the same time NHZ stuff went public. Who knows at this point, its all speculation I guess.

OHH fuck of with that conspiracy shit you sneeky bitch. that dude is super dedicated and always responsive. the fact that i don't share his PR philosophy doesn't mean i question his integrity towards this project . i don't wanna be interpreted in this direction. just to make this clear

MemoryShock

hero member

Activity: 728

Merit: 500

Quote from: KimmyF on October 04, 2014, 12:16:48 PM

Quote from: Longenecker on October 04, 2014, 12:03:43 PM

Quote from: MemoryShock on October 04, 2014, 11:40:48 AM

Quote from: robinwilliams on October 04, 2014, 11:21:05 AM

lol u guys just now getting it? xc isn't paying off for the devs so they have to bring their technology / focus other places.
...

I feel like this talking point has been run into the ground.

There has been a trend with working with other devs...each coin has a different facet that applies to XC. Qibucks and the distribution of ad content for Web 3.0, Key for the honing of the OS, NHZ for the asset exchange (XC's future decentralized exchange),

... a decentralized asset exchange ...

Really, must have missed that one or is MemoryShock correct

Decentralized exchange is on the road map...NHZ I believe will have an asset exchange. Didn't mean to cause confusion; I am merely posting how I interpret the collaborations to be relevant to XC...

Longenecker

full member

Activity: 226

Merit: 100

Quote from: MemoryShock on October 04, 2014, 12:38:27 PM

Quote from: Longenecker on October 04, 2014, 12:03:43 PM

Are you delusional?

Collaborations with Qibucks, for example, is completely different from the NHZ project.

I know. If you had read my post, you would have ascertained that. As for the rest of the post, which seems to be making an attempt to showcase how the XC team is flocking to a different platform, I contend that working solely on ones own project completely autonomous from other people would tend to lead to less ideas and slower development. It's a wide range of application that XC is attempting to put together...not just one. And who works for no money?

Point is, I think collaboration is a good thing and working by alone is not as advantageous as working with others...

You again are missing the point. I agree, collaboration is a good thing and working alone is not as advantageous as working with others. But again, that is completely different than what XC has done with NHZ. XC has divided its resources (Xander & Pizpie). XC has not added "other people" but "divided the people they already had."

Big difference. Do you understand this?

Longenecker

full member

Activity: 226

Merit: 100

Quote from: hoertest on October 04, 2014, 12:32:49 PM

Quote from: KimmyF on October 04, 2014, 12:16:48 PM

Quote from: Longenecker on October 04, 2014, 12:03:43 PM

Quote from: MemoryShock on October 04, 2014, 11:40:48 AM

Quote from: robinwilliams on October 04, 2014, 11:21:05 AM

lol u guys just now getting it? xc isn't paying off for the devs so they have to bring their technology / focus other places.
...

I feel like this talking point has been run into the ground.

There has been a trend with working with other devs...each coin has a different facet that applies to XC. Qibucks and the distribution of ad content for Web 3.0, Key for the honing of the OS, NHZ for the asset exchange (XC's future decentralized exchange),

... a decentralized asset exchange ...

Really, must have missed that one or is MemoryShock correct

they wanna use the nhz exchange for the ito issuing. for those addidtional shares issued besides the ones for the XC holders. Dan is looking over that thing to work up to standard.
Every coin will have some anon and chat in the future i guess. thats just part of the game and XC is leading that game regarding overall approach.

Still easier to buy XC now to get free shares ratio 10/1. they totally fuck up to spread this news to people interested in ITOs though. I don't get the PR anymore but i'm sold on the Technologie and general direction of this project. The underlying platform to all the applications in development is just the best thought out and most comprehensive design.

that beeing said they better bring some UI screenshots asap and the working thing short after. And what the fuck happened to the daily updates?

Perhaps synechist has be re-routed to the NHZ project as well under a different alias. He has not been as active lately and the daily updates stopped around the same time NHZ stuff went public. Who knows at this point, its all speculation, and that's part of the problem.

MemoryShock

hero member

Activity: 728

Merit: 500

Quote from: Longenecker on October 04, 2014, 12:03:43 PM

Are you delusional?

Collaborations with Qibucks, for example, is completely different from the NHZ project.

I know. If you had read my post, you would have ascertained that. As for the rest of the post, which seems to be making an attempt to showcase how the XC team is flocking to a different platform, I contend that working solely on ones own project completely autonomous from other people would tend to lead to less ideas and slower development. It's a wide range of application that XC is attempting to put together...not just one. And who works for no money?

Point is, I think collaboration is a good thing and working by alone is not as advantageous as working with others...

MKAxe11

full member

Activity: 165

Merit: 100

Quote from: sugarboy321 on October 04, 2014, 10:49:17 AM

Quote from: MKAxe11 on October 04, 2014, 10:45:39 AM

Quote from: holyprofit on October 04, 2014, 10:00:37 AM

Quote from: cryptico on October 04, 2014, 09:43:43 AM

mintgox

It may be failure, but at least it's seamless as promised.

Yup.. flawless failure Tongue

This V2 thing better be great when it's done!!
AND they'd better add an XC/USD market to make up for this big... f**kup.

I regret I didn't withdraw all my coins before they went in maintenance mode. Angry

After this you would trust them with your bank info?

If they finally finish their stuff and everything works, yes.

For me this doesn't necessarily make them seem less trustworthy, just a 'little' incompetent.
And for us fellow XC backers adding XC/Fiat would certainly raise faith that they do know their business, right? Roll Eyes

On a different note, don't forget NOT to feed the trolls!

Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 233. (Read 1484218 times)