[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 627.

KimmyF

sr. member

Activity: 978

Merit: 250

Quote from: laredo7mm on August 07, 2014, 10:24:58 AM

Quote from: LD2164 on August 07, 2014, 10:17:19 AM

Quote from: URSAY on August 07, 2014, 10:13:48 AM

Quote from: infinitechaos on August 07, 2014, 10:12:52 AM

Quote from: URSAY on August 07, 2014, 10:08:26 AM

If an address starts with 500 XC (POS sweet spot 50-500) and then stakes so the balance is over 500 XC, is it no longer in the POS sweet spot for future staking at that same address?

I am not sure if it's the same with XC, but I've noticed in other PoS coins that when coins at an address stake they are split evenly into two new addresses after staking. So 500 XC after staking might become 251.5 XC at two different addresses.

This is not the case with XC. Thanks anyhow.

I'm pretty sure that is how my staking has been working... so I start with a 500 it turns into two 250's, then 4 125's, 8 62.5's, so on until I coin control it back into a 500 chunk...

If that were the case, how can I track my addresses through the block explorer API and still see the number of coins in each address increasing?

In your first statement you said that they are split into new addresses. So you have 8 new addresses with 62.5 in each addy?

This is not the case for me, but I am not using the most recent wallet version either. Maybe something changed, but it would seem like a lot of extra addresses would be generated if what you are saying is true.

They are split between two new inputs, under the same address.

flashbit

hero member

Activity: 1008

Merit: 505

Quote from: ssmc2 on August 07, 2014, 09:55:20 AM

I have a question, and maybe the answer is obvious, but could it be that alot of the sell orders are people selling their staked coins for some short term profit? Is it possible to have large surpluses of staked coins at this stage in our development?

Interesting point. I also often wonder if the Exchanges themselves are staking with client's XCs and selling them? Quite possible.

laredo7mm

hero member

Activity: 1498

Merit: 537

Quote from: LD2164 on August 07, 2014, 10:17:19 AM

Quote from: URSAY on August 07, 2014, 10:13:48 AM

Quote from: infinitechaos on August 07, 2014, 10:12:52 AM

Quote from: URSAY on August 07, 2014, 10:08:26 AM

If an address starts with 500 XC (POS sweet spot 50-500) and then stakes so the balance is over 500 XC, is it no longer in the POS sweet spot for future staking at that same address?

I am not sure if it's the same with XC, but I've noticed in other PoS coins that when coins at an address stake they are split evenly into two new addresses after staking. So 500 XC after staking might become 251.5 XC at two different addresses.

This is not the case with XC. Thanks anyhow.

I'm pretty sure that is how my staking has been working... so I start with a 500 it turns into two 250's, then 4 125's, 8 62.5's, so on until I coin control it back into a 500 chunk...

If that were the case, how can I track my addresses through the block explorer API and still see the number of coins in each address increasing?

In your first statement you said that they are split into new addresses. So you have 8 new addresses with 62.5 in each addy?

This is not the case for me, but I am not using the most recent wallet version either. Maybe something changed, but it would seem like a lot of extra addresses would be generated if what you are saying is true.

Edited to add: One of my addresses has 6432 transactions of which 6400 are probably from staking. There are only 4880 XC addresses with balances/transactions known in the block chain.

laredo7mm

hero member

Activity: 1498

Merit: 537

Quote from: URSAY on August 07, 2014, 10:13:48 AM

Quote from: infinitechaos on August 07, 2014, 10:12:52 AM

Quote from: URSAY on August 07, 2014, 10:08:26 AM

If an address starts with 500 XC (POS sweet spot 50-500) and then stakes so the balance is over 500 XC, is it no longer in the POS sweet spot for future staking at that same address?

I am not sure if it's the same with XC, but I've noticed in other PoS coins that when coins at an address stake they are split evenly into two new addresses after staking. So 500 XC after staking might become 251.5 XC at two different addresses.

This is not the case with XC. Thanks anyhow.

Correct, it is not the case with XC. I have more than one address in my wallet, all have more than 500 XC in them, and I don't have any issues staking.

I guess I am not a true believer that each address in the wallet should have 500 XC, but rather that the transactions in the address be 500 XC or less. I guess the only way to tell is for me to generate hundreds of addresses in a new wallet and then send each one 500 XC and see if my rate of stake increases. That really isn't an exercise that I want to do though. Sounds like too much work.

LD2164

member

Activity: 95

Merit: 10

+ of course the x amount staked..

LD2164

member

Activity: 95

Merit: 10

Quote from: URSAY on August 07, 2014, 10:13:48 AM

Quote from: infinitechaos on August 07, 2014, 10:12:52 AM

Quote from: URSAY on August 07, 2014, 10:08:26 AM

If an address starts with 500 XC (POS sweet spot 50-500) and then stakes so the balance is over 500 XC, is it no longer in the POS sweet spot for future staking at that same address?

I am not sure if it's the same with XC, but I've noticed in other PoS coins that when coins at an address stake they are split evenly into two new addresses after staking. So 500 XC after staking might become 251.5 XC at two different addresses.

This is not the case with XC. Thanks anyhow.

I'm pretty sure that is how my staking has been working... so I start with a 500 it turns into two 250's, then 4 125's, 8 62.5's, so on until I coin control it back into a 500 chunk...

URSAY

legendary

Activity: 1974

Merit: 1010

Quote from: infinitechaos on August 07, 2014, 10:12:52 AM

Quote from: URSAY on August 07, 2014, 10:08:26 AM

If an address starts with 500 XC (POS sweet spot 50-500) and then stakes so the balance is over 500 XC, is it no longer in the POS sweet spot for future staking at that same address?

I am not sure if it's the same with XC, but I've noticed in other PoS coins that when coins at an address stake they are split evenly into two new addresses after staking. So 500 XC after staking might become 251.5 XC at two different addresses.

This is not the case with XC. Thanks anyhow.

infinitechaos

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

Quote from: URSAY on August 07, 2014, 10:08:26 AM

If an address starts with 500 XC (POS sweet spot 50-500) and then stakes so the balance is over 500 XC, is it no longer in the POS sweet spot for future staking at that same address?

I am not sure if it's the same with XC, but I've noticed in other PoS coins that when coins at an address stake they are split evenly into two new addresses after staking. So 500 XC after staking might become 251.5 XC at two different addresses.

URSAY

legendary

Activity: 1974

Merit: 1010

If an address starts with 500 XC (POS sweet spot 50-500) and then stakes so the balance is over 500 XC, is it no longer in the POS sweet spot for future staking at that same address?

SushiChef

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

Quote from: oblox on August 07, 2014, 09:54:07 AM

Not a fan either.

and its gone...

shanuu

full member

Activity: 131

Merit: 100

New Beginning!

Quote from: ssmc2 on August 07, 2014, 09:55:20 AM

I have a question, and maybe the answer is obvious, but could it be that alot of the sell orders are people selling their staked coins for some short term profit? Is it possible to have large surpluses of staked coins at this stage in our development?

Ofc is posible if they mined from begining. Imagine that XC wass once 1000 sat.
I can't explain why a coin like XC is so undervalue. I am going to hold my coins and see what happends.

ssmc2

legendary

Activity: 2002

Merit: 1040

I have a question, and maybe the answer is obvious, but could it be that alot of the sell orders are people selling their staked coins for some short term profit? Is it possible to have large surpluses of staked coins at this stage in our development?

oblox

legendary

Activity: 1442

Merit: 1018

Not a fan either.

mxxxxxx

legendary

Activity: 2310

Merit: 1000

Quote from: synechist on August 07, 2014, 05:05:57 AM

Morning all

We're gonna have quite a day today. I hope you're all ready.

For now, a refresher on yesterday night's surprise news:

Quote from: atcsecure on August 06, 2014, 07:05:32 PM

Quote from: MKAxe11 on August 06, 2014, 07:02:11 PM

Quote from: synechist on August 06, 2014, 06:43:32 PM

Thus far we've got:

- XChat

- The TOR Stick

Well we now have...

XChat that connects to TOR nodes!

This is the new version of XChat (2.47g), downloadable now:

- Windows

- Ubuntu

How to connect to TOR:

When you install it, you'll find "xcurrency.conf" in the installation folder that you selected during the installation.

Copy "xcurrency.conf" to %appdata%/roaming/xcurrency and you're good to go!

About how it connects to TOR:

XChat over TOR works just fine with other nodes, whether these are on TOR or not.

XChat over TOR is not as secure as XChat in the TOR Stick, which has its own node built-in. Instead it connects to external TOR nodes. But it's pretty intensely private anyway.

See you all tomorrow for the TOR Stick release...

so Dan just secretly sneaked in TOR functionality in today's update? Shocked

do we have to look for hidden features in future updates too? Cheesy

You still need the tor-browser bundle, I just included a TOR seed node.

At this time, TOR will be kept outside of the wallet, so that TOR can be updated separately outside of the wallet... So moving forward we will keep those 2 software stacks separate.

This update just enables Windows or Linux users to download the TOR Browser bundle and quickly enable XC to use TOR

if you want ONLY TOR connections, use onlynet=TOR, if your okay with also reaching IPV4 nodes OVER TOR, you can leave that out

XCHat has been extensively tested over TOR and you can communicate with NON-TOR users and TOR users at the same time.

Dan

Waiting as always

Thanks for explanation Dan Wink

Driv3n

sr. member

Activity: 364

Merit: 250

Quote from: policymaker on August 07, 2014, 06:36:12 AM

Quote from: adhitthana on August 07, 2014, 06:13:53 AM

Does anyone like the idea here? https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/xmr-monero-community-faq-721045

Excellent idea, I would love to see it in the forum but maybe a BTC talk topic is better for now.

Can't wait for today's release and surprises! XC development has been excellent so far. I am also eager to know about the next PR stuff, I just can't w8 till the world knows about everything we have been experiecing till now.

+1 This is a great idea and I cant wait to hear what the news is today. Excited about the TORstick ISO being released later I'll get a thread going on the official forum where we can all put our XC address in.

anujjain

sr. member

Activity: 434

Merit: 250

Quote from: adhitthana on August 07, 2014, 06:13:53 AM

Does anyone like the idea here? https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/xmr-monero-community-faq-721045

Great Idea, guys we can do this too for XC. We just need someone to take step for this.

policymaker

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

Crypto Currency Supporter

Quote from: adhitthana on August 07, 2014, 06:13:53 AM

Does anyone like the idea here? https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/xmr-monero-community-faq-721045

Excellent idea, I would love to see it in the forum but maybe a BTC talk topic is better for now.

Can't wait for today's release and surprises! XC development has been excellent so far. I am also eager to know about the next PR stuff, I just can't w8 till the world knows about everything we have been experiecing till now.

movingblocks

newbie

Activity: 11

Merit: 0

Quote from: adhitthana on August 07, 2014, 06:13:53 AM

Does anyone like the idea here? https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/xmr-monero-community-faq-721045

excellent idea, that and the fud-list.

synechist

legendary

Activity: 1190

Merit: 1000

To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market

Quote from: G-Bert on August 07, 2014, 06:21:46 AM

Quote from: adhitthana on August 07, 2014, 06:13:53 AM

Does anyone like the idea here? https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/xmr-monero-community-faq-721045

yeah, good idea.

Love it.

KimmyF

sr. member

Activity: 978

Merit: 250

Quote from: synechist on August 07, 2014, 05:54:02 AM

Quote from: KimmyF on August 07, 2014, 05:45:18 AM

Quote from: synechist on August 07, 2014, 05:42:00 AM

Quote from: KimmyF on August 07, 2014, 05:34:04 AM

Quote from: mig5000 on August 06, 2014, 06:07:20 PM

What I mean is that coins like BC/NXT/XC/DRK who are/used to be super stable with steady innovation that is ALL known in the roadmap are going to have a lot of people "selling" at some point because of the lack of surprise. You don't think you have to be in the coin 100% of the time as it's steady and incoming innovation is known.

When I'm short in BTC to invest in some other coin, what coin do you think I sell first to get some liquidity ? Well these 4 for SURE... I know they are not going to move a lot, I know the roadmap, there usually isn't anything that is going to make the price change much in the short term. If there were more ninja launch stuff I would keep these instead as I wouldn't want to miss the boat.

make sense ?

This is the first explanation about the price development that actually makes sense to me

Hmm... I wonder what we're going to announce today.

(Yes there are surprises in store.)

Again .... Phhhhhhh, still sleepy from yesterdays testing & reading, ok well ... who needs a day job:)

I'm not sure what you mean there.

Stayed up till around 04:20 reading about TOR Exit nodes & staring at wireshark logs

So a little groggy after just 3 hours sleep.

Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 627. (Read 1484248 times)