did we just lost polo?
The site is extremely slow. Everyone wants those Moneros it seems
Topic: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency - page 1482. (Read 4670622 times)
September 04, 2014, 04:35:01 PM
The site is extremely slow. Everyone wants those Moneros it seems
September 04, 2014, 04:33:52 PM
XMR is the future.
September 04, 2014, 04:32:38 PM
Code:
bash: ./simplewallet: No such file or directory
Code:
cd ~/bitmonero/build/release/src && ls -l
And look if you have a simplewallet file. If you don't, it probably means the compilation went wrong. Thus start compiling again and post the errors (or pastebin the whole text).If you do have a simplewallet file, something is very wrong here.
I guess the source code was bugged earlier because I did exactly the same this time:
Code:
cd ~ && rm -f install_monero.sh && wget http://monero.cc/downloads/install_monero.sh && bash install_monero.sh
Thanks for the help anyway
September 04, 2014, 04:30:33 PM
not 50% mined within a year
I'm thinking this newbie puppet just outed himself.
Harder game than it looks.
September 04, 2014, 04:19:54 PM
lol, i dont think were going lower than .0033.
This just in: 0.0035
New Risto Buy Wall.
Hehe, and that is the dude (edit: this is a wild speculation) who is offering options on xmr .... whale options for the little fishes.
September 04, 2014, 04:16:44 PM
...
Not surprising XMR gets attacked and will continue to be a target with such vitriol towards their own father, that made their birth possible.. constantly referring to them as scamdevs and acting as if XMR is the immaculate conception
Not surprising XMR gets attacked and will continue to be a target with such vitriol towards their own father, that made their birth possible.. constantly referring to them as scamdevs and acting as if XMR is the immaculate conception
Are you implying you are aware of specific motivations behind the terrorist attack just less than 12 hours ago?
Or are you setting up a strawman?
September 04, 2014, 04:13:22 PM
lol, i dont think were going lower than .0033.
This just in: 0.0035
New Risto Buy Wall.
September 04, 2014, 04:12:10 PM
I have no doubt that Monero be stronger after all
September 04, 2014, 04:04:18 PM
W h a t a g r o s s i r o n y that the most legitimate and economic initial distribution of any cryptocoin existing
Not surprising XMR gets attacked and will continue to be a target with such vitriol towards their own father that made their birth possible..
constantly referring to them as scamdevs and acting as if XMR is the immaculate conception
September 04, 2014, 04:02:57 PM
Boolberry is now freaking suspicious, not only it has been pumped to top of polonix volume but the attack coincided with this.
No. No fucking way. Let's stop those insinuations right here!
There is no evidence that BBR has anything to do this, and you're doing XMR a huge disservice by implying this.
In addition, you completely lose the right to complain about anti-Monero FUD if you spread FUD yourself.
If you have any hard evidence, present it. If you don't, stop spreading FUD. It's really that simple.
While I agree with you, you must admit that the trolls and hacks have created an environment of suspicion, and it is natural that the anonymous dev, for whom there is in fact a fair body of circumstantial evidence of participation in the original cryptonote implementation, should attract that suspicion. I'm hoping that CZ will dispell some of the FUD around BBR. If people frankly voice their concerns, they may be dispelled more promptly. You help by rightly observing there is a lack of material evidence for this specific suspicion, but the factors which allow suspicion to fester in the background remain, and getting them aired out may disinfect.
> but the factors which allow suspicion to fester in the background remain
Seems to be a CN thing then... It's not as if, to the outside observer, XMR looks immaculate (de-optimized initial mining, rather unintuitive emission curve if the goal is a broad adoption).
So, splinters, brother's eyes, etc. ... I'd rather we don't go there. If there's a valid question about the competition, let's raise it (and we do so plenty enough in here). But speculative accusations serve no purpose other than to create bad blood in something that could be, in the longer term, a collaborative effort.
September 04, 2014, 03:50:12 PM
W h a t a g r o s s i r o n y that the most legitimate and economic initial distribution of any cryptocoin existing (and therefore the most potential #2 coin in the months and years to come) happens to be a coin with an unbelievably messy codebase, intentionally made scammy, buggy, unoptimized, crippled and obfuscated by the (B)CN scamdevs.
XMR is not the most legitimate and economic initial distribution of any cryptocoin existing. There are other people(myself included) who have gone to great lengths to attempt to create the fairest possible initial distribution for a cryptocurrency.
Hah, contradiction already in the second line. Sorry to say but your logic has been going down since last year.
There have been other currencies that have been launched with no premine, no instamine, no IPO, with development entirely funded by donations. And that didn't have a crippled hash function at launch.
Monero has had a relatively fair launch. But to make a claim as grand as you just did is quite strong. There are many other positive aspects of Monero that are based in fact and can be proudly trumped instead. One of which is the solid dev team that takes an honest approach to communication and doesn't sugar coat the issues. This is rare and exceptional in my opinion.
I think what he probably meant was not only no premine, etc. but also a relatively huge amount of trading that redistributed the coins to people willing to pay a market price for them. And it is true. For a young altcoin the volume has been huge. So much so that the trolls accuse it of being "fake."
Yes, if the volume is any indication of the quantity of individuals who trade XMR then I agree that the post-launch liquidity and availability has been excellent.
But if we evaluate distribution of a currency on the percent of the total supply held by individuals, I would be a bit more skeptical. (But wouldn't make any claims either way with no evidence)
September 04, 2014, 03:49:17 PM
bter confirms they are unfreezing the XMR
not sure of how long it will take
not sure of how long it will take
September 04, 2014, 03:43:06 PM
W h a t a g r o s s i r o n y that the most legitimate and economic initial distribution of any cryptocoin existing (and therefore the most potential #2 coin in the months and years to come) happens to be a coin with an unbelievably messy codebase, intentionally made scammy, buggy, unoptimized, crippled and obfuscated by the (B)CN scamdevs.
XMR is not the most legitimate and economic initial distribution of any cryptocoin existing. There are other people(myself included) who have gone to great lengths to attempt to create the fairest possible initial distribution for a cryptocurrency.
Hah, contradiction already in the second line. Sorry to say but your logic has been going down since last year.
There have been other currencies that have been launched with no premine, no instamine, no IPO, with development entirely funded by donations. And that didn't have a crippled hash function at launch.
Monero has had a relatively fair launch. But to make a claim as grand as you just did is quite strong. There are many other positive aspects of Monero that are based in fact and can be proudly trumped instead. One of which is the solid dev team that takes an honest approach to communication and doesn't sugar coat the issues. This is rare and exceptional in my opinion.
I think what he probably meant was not only no premine, etc. but also a relatively huge amount of trading that redistributed the coins to people willing to pay a market price for them. And it is true. For a young altcoin the volume has been huge. So much so that the trolls accuse it of being "fake."
September 04, 2014, 03:39:26 PM
lol, i dont think were going lower than .0033.
September 04, 2014, 03:38:10 PM
W h a t a g r o s s i r o n y that the most legitimate and economic initial distribution of any cryptocoin existing (and therefore the most potential #2 coin in the months and years to come) happens to be a coin with an unbelievably messy codebase, intentionally made scammy, buggy, unoptimized, crippled and obfuscated by the (B)CN scamdevs.
XMR is not the most legitimate and economic initial distribution of any cryptocoin existing. There are other people(myself included) who have gone to great lengths to attempt to create the fairest possible initial distribution for a cryptocurrency.
Hah, contradiction already in the second line. Sorry to say but your logic has been going down since last year.
There have been other currencies that have been launched with no premine, no instamine, no IPO, with development entirely funded by donations. And that didn't have a crippled hash function at launch.
Monero has had a relatively fair launch. But to make a claim as grand as you just did is quite strong. There are many other positive aspects of Monero that are based in fact and can be proudly trumped instead. One of which is the solid dev team that takes an honest approach to communication and doesn't sugar coat the issues. This is rare and exceptional in my opinion.
edit: attempt and succeed btw.
September 04, 2014, 03:37:42 PM
Rather hope the fee issue gets sorted out soon.
September 04, 2014, 03:36:18 PM
XMR is the future.
September 04, 2014, 03:34:21 PM
Is there any plan or info when are we going to have decent gui wallet for windows?
I really can't believe in 21st century I'm forced to use ms-dos.
I really can't believe in 21st century I'm forced to use ms-dos.
September 04, 2014, 03:27:24 PM
Wheeee bargain time.
Where is it? 
September 04, 2014, 03:26:03 PM
Wheeee bargain time.
Jump to: