[XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency - page 1731.

Jcw188

hero member

Activity: 546

Merit: 500

Carpe Diem

I believe in the CN technology and will invest money in all of its coins. But it seems better to not get involved with XMR until the situation with it stablizes.

I mean with all the price fluctuations after each of such trolling escapades one starts wondering if all of the other coins' algorithms but Monero's have BS-proof properties, along with ASIC-proof.

Quote from: hitbtc on June 26, 2014, 04:30:29 PM

Hah! Can you believe this guy? Whatever the reason for trolls to love this coin so much and produce all the FUD, just ignore this bait and he'll get bored.

Also, one good way to make these guys shut up once and for all is to get rid of all the uncertainty and doubt by making certain the coin gets added to as much exchanges as possible. Look alive, guys! Only about 30 registered users gave their voice for Monero in our voting so far. That's not so much for a tread of this massive size. We don't want whomever owns this guy overtaking Monero do we? Let's push forward and get Monero integrated into Hitbtc as soon as possible!

Our exchange supports up to 1 000 000 operations per second and SEPA & Swift transactions. From Monero - straight to USD or EUR.

Hitbtc coin voting: prove you're not a bot! Grin

https://hitbtc.com/vote

Man, does one of your managers have a good stake in XMR? Why are you trying so hard? Wink

hitbtc

sr. member

Activity: 525

Merit: 250

Hah! Can you believe this guy? Whatever the reason for trolls to love this coin so much and produce all the FUD, just ignore this bait and he'll get bored.

Also, one good way to make these guys shut up once and for all is to get rid of all the uncertainty and doubt by making certain the coin gets added to as much exchanges as possible. Look alive, guys! Only about 30 registered users gave their voice for Monero in our voting so far. That's not so much for a tread of this massive size. We don't want whomever owns this guy overtaking Monero do we? Let's push forward and get Monero integrated into Hitbtc as soon as possible!

Our exchange supports up to 1 000 000 operations per second and SEPA & Swift transactions. From Monero - straight to USD or EUR.

Hitbtc coin voting: prove you're not a bot! Grin

https://hitbtc.com/vote

tacotime

legendary

Activity: 1484

Merit: 1005

New commit pushed that limits max block size to 196.6 kb.

Block propagation @ 1 min is dubious past that block size even with SHA256D, so we should be careful to build blocks large than that.

We also have other stuff that needs testing if you're adventurous:

Transaction splitting (no more "tx too big errors")
https://github.com/tewinget/bitmonero

Wallet operates without RPC presence and new RPC semantics:

Code:

wallet RPC converted to use new transaction semantics

wallet RPC now uses wallet2::create_transactions and wallet2::commit_tx instead
of wallet2::transfer.  This made it possible to add the RPC call /transfer_split, which
will split transactions automatically if they are too large.  The old call to
/transfer will return an error stating to use /transfer_split if multiple
transactions are needed to fulfill the request.

https://github.com/tewinget/bitmonero/commits/rpcwallet

Massive amount of fixes for RPC and wallet stability and serialization:
https://github.com/mikezackles/bitmonero/tree/daemonize

Wrapper for wallet functions
https://github.com/Neozaru/bitmonero/tree/wallet_wrapper

Lots more in the pipeline that's soon to be merged to master, stay tuned.

HashInvest

full member

Activity: 143

Merit: 100

Pools: XMR.HashInvest.net

People. join my pool http://hashinvest.net. I take care of this pool all the day and while you are asleep. HashInvest is pretty stable all the time. Low 0.75% fee. Instant online support and payouts. Low 0.75% FEE

btell

member

Activity: 119

Merit: 10

Quote from: Brilliantrocket on June 26, 2014, 03:15:38 PM

I'd rather pay .01 once I know the bloat is fixed, than .001 when it's still unknown whether it can be solved.
Anonymint said it cannot, but I'll keep watching. Either way, once it drops I'll reassess the situation. I'm not just referring to the pool bloat, but the denomination bloat. Refer to Anonymint's post history.

Bloat is the price for anonimity in terms of cryptonote algorithm. Itself, is not so a big problem, I believe devs reduce it to reasonable level. The most problem is I have to restart bitmonerod time to time, it still buggy & uses 'boost'. Devs are working on replacing it by 'leveldb'. With leveldb terabytes are not a problem. Also, terabyte SSDs are coming to the market.

So I think, the only issue is for Monero devs to work on bugs, work accurately and subsequently, like a fluffy pony

JohnArcher512

newbie

Activity: 4

Merit: 0

Quote from: Quanttek on June 26, 2014, 03:19:28 PM

Quote from: JohnArcher512 on June 26, 2014, 02:21:18 PM

Quote from: surfer43 on June 26, 2014, 11:14:50 AM

Quote from: JohnArcher512 on June 26, 2014, 10:20:56 AM

Between abysmal English writing skills and blind fanaticism I doubt it isn’t obvious to anyone what these guys are trying to achieve so hard. All in all, I don’t believe this abjection is worth the $500 those greedy bastards paid me, so here I submit to your court a list of the serfs who were under my submission, trying to impose a genuine interest in a lousy fork under my vigilant eye:

surfer43

Are you saying I am your sock puppet? Huh

Did the same pumpers who hired you the first time pay you to write this because they're now dumping?

Oh hi there, Dave! Or is it Carol who's posting today? How's your payment this month?

yor sir, failed miserabely

smooth is one of the core devs of this project, pretty sure code won't get coded by some sort of PR company stuff and surfer43 operated for a long time the biggest pool. And a pool doesn't get maintained alone.

Just a lesson, if you want to troll in the future, you sholdn't use a new sockpuppet account and also you should, maybe, just maybe, inform yourself

So it's Dave, after all. Couldn't possibly mix you up with anyone else. Do you mind answering my previous question? Did they finally raise your rate? I'm just wondering what keeps you doing this.

Brilliantrocket

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 500

Quote from: cAPSLOCK on June 26, 2014, 03:21:37 PM

Perhaps I am too new to the altcoin universe but the level of actual FUD recently is fascinating to me. There seems to be a few folks intent on damaging this projects reputation as much as possible and through some of the most outlandish means I could imagine. The twitter account was fairly left field for example.

Do other alts get similar attention?

FUD increases with market cap, I've found. More value means more envy.

GreekBitcoin

legendary

Activity: 1428

Merit: 1001

getmonero.org

Quote from: cAPSLOCK on June 26, 2014, 03:21:37 PM

Perhaps I am too new to the altcoin universe but the level of actual FUD recently is fascinating to me. There seems to be a few folks intent on damaging this projects reputation as much as possible and through some of the most outlandish means I could imagine. The twitter account was fairly left field for example.

Do other alts get similar attention?

Its actually the thread with the least fud. Well until now anyway... :p

HardwarePal

hero member

Activity: 565

Merit: 500

Quote from: cAPSLOCK on June 26, 2014, 03:21:37 PM

Perhaps I am too new to the altcoin universe but the level of actual FUD recently is fascinating to me. There seems to be a few folks intent on damaging this projects reputation as much as possible and through some of the most outlandish means I could imagine. The twitter account was fairly left field for example.

Do other alts get similar attention?

This is soft FUD in the altcoin world Grin

bigj

full member

Activity: 198

Merit: 100

AWS Info: cryptonight-ccminer

K520GPU #0: GRID K520, 80.57 H/s
Ubuntu 12.04 + CUDA 5.5

cAPSLOCK

legendary

Activity: 3766

Merit: 5146

Note the unconventional cAPITALIZATION!

Perhaps I am too new to the altcoin universe but the level of actual FUD recently is fascinating to me. There seems to be a few folks intent on damaging this projects reputation as much as possible and through some of the most outlandish means I could imagine. The twitter account was fairly left field for example.

Do other alts get similar attention?

Quanttek

member

Activity: 93

Merit: 10

Quote from: JohnArcher512 on June 26, 2014, 02:21:18 PM

Quote from: surfer43 on June 26, 2014, 11:14:50 AM

Quote from: JohnArcher512 on June 26, 2014, 10:20:56 AM

Between abysmal English writing skills and blind fanaticism I doubt it isn’t obvious to anyone what these guys are trying to achieve so hard. All in all, I don’t believe this abjection is worth the $500 those greedy bastards paid me, so here I submit to your court a list of the serfs who were under my submission, trying to impose a genuine interest in a lousy fork under my vigilant eye:

surfer43

Are you saying I am your sock puppet? Huh

Did the same pumpers who hired you the first time pay you to write this because they're now dumping?

Oh hi there, Dave! Or is it Carol who's posting today? How's your payment this month?

yor sir, failed miserabely

smooth is one of the core devs of this project, pretty sure code won't get coded by some sort of PR company stuff and surfer43 operated for a long time the biggest pool. And a pool doesn't get maintained alone.

Just a lesson, if you want to troll in the future, you sholdn't use a new sockpuppet account and also you should, maybe, just maybe, inform yourself

Brilliantrocket

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 500

I'd rather pay .01 once I know the bloat is fixed, than .001 when it's still unknown whether it can be solved.
Anonymint said it cannot, but I'll keep watching. Either way, once it drops I'll reassess the situation. I'm not just referring to the pool bloat, but the denomination bloat. Refer to Anonymint's post history.

uvt9

sr. member

Activity: 300

Merit: 250

Quote from: Brilliantrocket on June 26, 2014, 02:33:47 PM

Quote from: uvt9 on June 26, 2014, 02:31:13 PM

Quote from: Brilliantrocket on June 26, 2014, 11:10:55 AM

I'll buy in when it hits .002 or lower. That's pretty much inevitable with this inflation.

Hey Darkcoin bag holder, how about your Monero buy order at 0.001 Grin

Quote from: Brilliantrocket on June 08, 2014, 01:41:09 PM

I'd consider a few BTC worth at .001. It'll be there soon with this inflation.

I said or lower. Monero has a few fundamental problems, but it's still (a distant) second best. According to Anonymint CN coins are DOA, but like I said, it's a hedge.

You do realize that the price was 0.002 when you said you'll buy at 0.001, right ?

mickey_miner

sr. member

Activity: 910

Merit: 250

Proof-of-Stake Blockchain Network

Quote from: JohnArcher512 on June 26, 2014, 10:20:56 AM

Between abysmal English writing skills and blind fanaticism I doubt it isn’t obvious to anyone what these guys are trying to achieve so hard. All in all, I don’t believe this abjection is worth the $500 those greedy bastards paid me, so here I submit to your court a list of the serfs who were under my submission, trying to impose a genuine interest in a lousy fork under my vigilant eye:

surfer43
smooth
mickey_miner
novag

I not really understand what you say but why do you include me? I make few posts. So what? You seem to have problem. Maybe you need seek some treatment.

Brilliantrocket

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 500

Quote from: uvt9 on June 26, 2014, 02:31:13 PM

Quote from: Brilliantrocket on June 26, 2014, 11:10:55 AM

I'll buy in when it hits .002 or lower. That's pretty much inevitable with this inflation.

Hey Darkcoin bag holder, how about your Monero buy order at 0.001 Grin

Quote from: Brilliantrocket on June 08, 2014, 01:41:09 PM

I'd consider a few BTC worth at .001. It'll be there soon with this inflation.

I said or lower. Monero has a few fundamental problems, but it's still (a distant) second best. According to Anonymint CN coins are DOA, but like I said, it's a hedge.

pooltobe

member

Activity: 73

Merit: 10

Quote from: pooltobe on June 15, 2014, 01:42:58 PM

Searching a place to mine Monero? Grin

Spread the hashes ! Cheesy

XMR MINING POOL >> http://xmr.poolto.be

use : stratum+tcp://xmr.poolto.be:3001

Join us on iRC: #poolto.be @ irc.freenode.net

http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=%23poolto.be

Happy Mining !

Upgraded to 0.98.2 !
Enjoy very low fee : 0.25% Cheesy

uvt9

sr. member

Activity: 300

Merit: 250

Quote from: Brilliantrocket on June 26, 2014, 11:10:55 AM

I'll buy in when it hits .002 or lower. That's pretty much inevitable with this inflation.

Hey Darkcoin bag holder, how about your Monero buy order at 0.001 Grin

Quote from: Brilliantrocket on June 08, 2014, 01:41:09 PM

I'd consider a few BTC worth at .001. It'll be there soon with this inflation.

JohnArcher512

newbie

Activity: 4

Merit: 0

Quote from: surfer43 on June 26, 2014, 11:14:50 AM

Quote from: JohnArcher512 on June 26, 2014, 10:20:56 AM

Between abysmal English writing skills and blind fanaticism I doubt it isn’t obvious to anyone what these guys are trying to achieve so hard. All in all, I don’t believe this abjection is worth the $500 those greedy bastards paid me, so here I submit to your court a list of the serfs who were under my submission, trying to impose a genuine interest in a lousy fork under my vigilant eye:

surfer43

Are you saying I am your sock puppet? Huh

Did the same pumpers who hired you the first time pay you to write this because they're now dumping?

Oh hi there, Dave! Or is it Carol who's posting today? How's your payment this month?

restless

legendary

Activity: 1151

Merit: 1001

my daemon can't sync...
latest version, but ...
what should I do?

Quote

2014-Jun-26 22:18:18.979272 [P2P9][46.4.87.243:18080 OUT]Block received at sync
phase was marked as orphaned, dropping connection
2014-Jun-26 22:18:19.272279 [P2P2][46.4.87.243:18080 OUT]Sync data returned unkn
own top block: 99737 -> 102842 [3105 blocks (2 days) behind]
SYNCHRONIZATION started
2014-Jun-26 22:18:20.117285 [P2P4][71.251.220.233:18080 OUT]Sync data returned u
nknown top block: 99737 -> 102842 [3105 blocks (2 days) behind]
SYNCHRONIZATION started
2014-Jun-26 22:18:23.575579 [P2P1]Block recognized as orphaned and rejected, id
= <600fd18f5e2f947bb5a7df9d36b66288cf2835d808bb1431713e6ece586b5d5f>
2014-Jun-26 22:18:23.581579 [P2P1][46.4.87.243:18080 OUT]Block received at sync
phase was marked as orphaned, dropping connection
2014-Jun-26 22:18:27.869861 [P2P4]Block recognized as orphaned and rejected, id
= <600fd18f5e2f947bb5a7df9d36b66288cf2835d808bb1431713e6ece586b5d5f>
2014-Jun-26 22:18:27.876861 [P2P4][71.251.220.233:18080 OUT]Block received at sy
nc phase was marked as orphaned, dropping connection
2014-Jun-26 22:18:30.721046 [P2P1][145.255.5.202:18080 OUT]Sync data returned un
known top block: 99737 -> 102842 [3105 blocks (2 days) behind]
SYNCHRONIZATION started

and so on and so on

Topic: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency - page 1731. (Read 4670972 times)