...
Anyway:
Maybe for him about 12 weeks after they first promised 4-6 weeks?
The question was: "...if you know it's going to be longer than that it is wrong
"
My response was appropriate. They did not know it was going to be wrong.. I believe they offered that date in good faith, and nothing in this or the last thread is evidence to the contrary.
That was a joke because it is QUITE PLAINLY obvious they knew 4-6 weeks was bullshit for a number of reasons:
They knew it from the start when they first said 4-6 weeks coz they didn't even have a device that existed.
(A)They knew it back when they first got to 6 weeks and still had nothing to sell.
Obvious to anyone with half an ounce of intelligence.
They knew it again when they found out that their Rev 1 design was crap due using 4 times the power of the simulation.
(Though I still wonder how they didn't work that out before you plugged it in for them ... they couldn't test their own hardware?)
They knew it again when they decided to work that old lady to death making the boards instead of using a slave labour circuit production shop in somewhere other than China.
Throughout this entire time they keep replying with 4-6 weeks - magic how that number never changes - every project plan they wrote came up with 4-6 weeks ... or did nothing like a project plan ever exist or ever get revised ...
10 years experience ... doing what? Flipping burgers at McDonald's sounds more accurate.
Is it a 10 year experienced business or some guy's garage?
A garage is fine if that's what it is and they had said that, but it's not what they have ever said.
Or ... for me when Sonny's email was posted proving that the reason the first version didn't do what they advertised and accepted money for, was that it didn't exist (it was a simulation) back when they were advertising details and accepting money for it
I fail to see how it has anything to do with shipping times.
...
See the PLAINLY obvious item
(A) above.