Topic: AI will put an end to work, says Elon Musk - page 3. (Read 2071 times)

If AI was developed to liberate humanity in the first place, then by replacing our jobs, it can free us to pursue whatever we want to try. Of course, this is based on the premise that society develops in a positive direction.

Undoubtedly, AI is developing at a very fast pace and in a few years it will be able to do many jobs, but there will be some jobs that AI will not be able to do. I don't think any robot will be good enough to do professions that require complex manual skills. I mean, they might be that good, they might be equipped to do the most complex manual dexterity jobs, but they won't be able to do them cheaper than humans. As a result, in some professions, humans are still the cheapest robot... :)

There will be work for people at any level of robotization of production. People still know very little about the structure of the Earth's interior, the depths of the world's oceans, and even the nature of man himself, not to mention the secrets of space. People for the most part were engaged in the methods of destroying their own kind than in understanding themselves and the world around them. Therefore, there will be enough work for each person for many centuries and millennia, if there is a desire.
In addition, there are and will always exist certain industries where AI cannot be allowed to manage, since this will threaten the safety of the person himself. We are talking primarily about the management of military systems, where abuse or even an accidental mistake can bring humanity to the brink of destruction.

If you want to do work that is similar to a hobby, you can take up a job. But instead, AI and robots will provide whatever goods and services are desired, and when computers and robots can do everything better than humans, does life have any meaning? I think there may still be a role for humans in this so that it can give meaning to AI.

Ai can never fully displace human beings, there are solutions that determine the level of critical thinking and flexibility to achieve it and AI cannot really be handed totally the task of solving problems without proper guidance and inspection to ascertain its efficiency at every critical point.

It would surely reduce the workforce like its doing already, leaving only specialists in the field to maximize the robots potentials and solve complex problems at a faster pace.

The presence of AI encourages us to upgrade ourselves in our skills so we can outgrow being replaced by the AI and be in a position that the AI serves as a tool and not a  threat to us.

At first I really think that it was impossible as an IT i have a little knowledge about code etc. and I mean this AI thing was just compose of a code right program something like that, if your going to think about it we are the onr that needed to create that code in order for the AI to work so its impossible for AI to replace us.

But as we progress we already seeing how the AI is getting develop overtime and it was really mind blowing, ive seen some AI generated videos that was really perfect, and I think that was going to be a thing probably could be a problem if you are a videographer because that might probably replace you or worst, that just going to change the game when in comes to film making.

So I think it is going to happened in the future AI is going to replace us all, it was really possible as our technology grow, If this AI able to adopt easily or learn it is just going to be a everything, it can be like human as well. But I think this is going to be more than 100 or 200 years, I mean developing this is not going to be easy it is going to take a very long time for sure so i think no need to worry for now.

This has advantage and disadvantage,.the disadvantage of this is that it fill the space of job that is supposed to be occupied by human. When it comes the military I think the al will be very good because it will help in occupying the space of human in war where human can't handle well. I think the Al should be more in the military,  it has a very good advantage over there.

have you seen the latest laptops that have integrated ai features? this feature allows users to ask many questions and get answers in real time even without using an internet connection. so ai is not limited to an internet connection, it only requires a processor that supports ai capabilities, the intel and nvidia brands provide that, and that allows ai technology to be able to do many things that are given to it.

Why's the debate active when it's known human will lose some job to AI just like we're aware AI can't do some jobs only human can do them.

AI can only replace most jobs that requires internet connection but not those jobs that still require human intervention. For me it will still take time to fully adopt his speculation that is for me very futuristic but that is still valid for me because technological advancement is inevitable so better to prepare than just doing nothing. We can acquire special skills right now just like welding, plumbing, carpentry and many others because I know these jobs are not affected when AI really is taking over.

This seemingly big problem can also be looked at from a more global perspective. In general, if AI robots can replace people and do almost all the work for them, this will be very good. A person will get rid of the need to spend eight hours, or even more, doing the same work and earning a living from it. In this case, the state will be forced to either redirect the physical or creative efforts of people to some other type of activity, or provide material goods absolutely free of charge, due to the fact that robots with AI will create these material goods in the required quantity so that any person could use them at his own discretion and desire without any restrictions. This is something like communism, which the communists previously strived for. The right to enjoy material goods in sufficient quantity will simply be due to the fact that a certain individual will be identified as a person. In this case, there will simply be no need for work as such.

True, after all human will always be needed to tell AI what to do (or give the rough idea about what needs to be done) at the very least, not to mention that currently AI can only do all the things it could do because they learn from human. But it's also true if this emerging and growth of AI is not followed by good regulation by the government, AI will definitely make a lot of people unemployed. I am not saying limiting AI's ability in doing job, just enforcing copyright infringement to AI developer so people's work that is used to train their AI will be credited the creator will get some benefit from it.

I absolutely agree with your opinion. AI cannot completely replace human labor. In some cases it won't even be cost-effective. The costs of producing and maintaining AI robots in some cases will be much higher than regular human labor.

In addition, such a robot with AI will not be able to be used everywhere, since it will not have human emotions, which are necessary for certain types of work.

It should also be taken into account that humanity will need to limit the use of robots with AI in places where, if sometimes there are failures in programs, AI can cause irreparable and significant harm to both humans and our planet as a whole. AI cannot be fully trusted in solving those problems where abuse or even simple error on the part of AI can be turned against a person.

though google replaced the need for people to buy the encyclopaedia..
google+youtube did not replace the education system(though many people do learn more efficiently from google+youtube compared to teachers sometimes)

fast forward to AI. and some things will save people money, some things will save people time. but thats evolution. thats civilisation

AI can also help create new jobs no one has had or thought about before
for instance, imagine if AI formulated a new method of doing something complex that no one was able to do before but now able to do thanks to AI. that can start a whole new industry of employment

EG imagine AI found a way to cheaply detect cancers via.. for instance resonance images of minute frequency knowledge of particle patterns. making a cheap reliable way to scan for cancers at a higher success rate. allowing people to get safely scanned quickly. would lead to more medical staff trained to see more patients efficiently so more people get regular scans as part of their annual healthchecks. rather then only scanned when they reach certain ages or start displaying symptoms.

having AI solve tasks that can make tests/checks be done so cheap and quick that people can get it done more regularly and more precisely would start increasing the demand for more regularity of checks which then increase the medical staff numbers to aid in the checks

I respectfully disagree with the statement that AI will entirely replace human workers. While it's true that AI might automate some repetitive physical tasks, I believe it will mostly complement human workers in complex jobs. AI could act as an assistant, but it won't fully replace these positions. Instead, job responsibilities might shift as AI takes on some tasks, demanding higher-level skills and adaptation from workers. As AI becomes more prominent, it's crucial for us to continuously learn new skills and embrace change to thrive in this evolving era.

This thing will happen in a very, very long time. AI really has the capability to replace humans. You will notice how people's inventions are becoming more and more advanced. It says to make people lives easier, but in reality, yes, it will make people lives easier, but it can also make people lives miserable because they will have no more work, or the work force that will require humans will vanish. I like the futuristic idea, but let's remember that every good invention or advancement will also have a bad effect on people. But before that happens, we should secure our future. I personally inline myself into the technology profession so that no matter what happens, I can still survive in the industry and will not be laid off. It's all about surviving and striving. No one would help you but yourself, so take precautions and start grinding. Don't let yourself get behind.

It wont end work, it will alter the dynamics of demand and supply just like industry before now.   Theres never an end to what humans can do instead of menial tasks done previously, anything where its the same question answer or task repeated the AI should be doing that task because it is a waste of a human.  It was a waste decades ago and its a waste now, the negative is not AI finding a way to do the empty task but enabling the human to do the more useful work instead its absolutely a positive.
  Musk instead of phrasing it this way should be saying we will enable twice the work to be done, the AI only needs guidance once to start then perform the task and is able to correct itself slightly but also the human can now do far more then the AI ever could and the amount of work performed overall  in the economy by the greater revenue of both is far more productive.   There is no negative, society will gain from AI where it is a success in allowing more work to be done overall the smaller detail is its not immediately a positive with zero lead time it'll take some development imo.

He can't predict the future. It doesn't mean it's going to happen because Elon's saying it. We know he's famous because he's the richest person in the world but believing everything he's saying isn't rational. How AI's going to affect ppl isn't known.

Elon is a futuristic and you must acknowledge his accomplished a lot of them from space exploration to Ai development, So I’m definitely not surprised by his comments on said interview he like any other futuristics would have to make comments like this mostly to create a buzz around them which is why he appears on such interviews and makes such comments.
I on the other would like to bring to our notice the great disadvantage in his comments, If it eventually happens that Ai does put an end to work, How do we make a living will life needs become free will poverty be totally eradicated from human existence you see most people like Elon do not think about the effect their comments and life choices have on the public.

https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL1N348243/
There was an incident in a Japanese Ai lab that is currently being swept under by whoever click the link above to read more, We’ve seen too many movies about human creation being the end of humans I hope we can thread carefully cause there’s a thin like between playing god and being god the end result justifies it all.

Elon Musk expresses a lot of his forecasts and opinions about various events taking place in the world. But not all of them are correct and not all come true. Robots with artificial intelligence will be able to provide very good assistance to humans, especially where it is necessary to very quickly analyze and compare a lot of different information. But robots will never be able to replace humans. In addition, if some ordinary work is performed by a person, then replacing it with a robot will certainly cost much more than the cost of this mechanical work by the robot itself. Therefore, there is still enough work for people. In addition, in my opinion, not all types of activities will allow robots with artificial intelligence. I don’t think that they will be allowed in areas of decision-making on which the very existence of a person will depend.