Some more CONFIRMED FACTS:
According to this
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6227903And this
5 blades would be 520 / 3 *5 866 GH
6 blades 1040 GH
To all customers - you are scammed and fucked. If you got 5 blades for 1.2 Miner that means you will get 866GH instead
if you got 6 blades by accident
it would be 1040 GH
And the above would be true only if you have the mell luck to receive some crap that works
I am not mentioning the power consumption though
And of course the desert late delivery
Ask for your money people! Immediate refund!
if your going to quote something please include the reply. especially if you pulling it from another thread. the 3 cards we have would do over 750ghs in turbo mode. in nominal mode they should be doing around 6-650 as i said before i believe we are under running the card due to heat issues like with an eruptor it nonces when too hot and the "kits" get hot hot. this is from a kit its not a full amt finished product that has the cooling they have in the finished kit. its a work in progress. it works its in hand. just not running optimally. this is why i wouldnt of posted it as i knew it would get ripped. your 1.2 machines will do 1.2 +/-10% which gets it as low as 1080 and at a minimum..... keep an eye on the "official thread" for our updates. and losh will no doubt post it here with his spin. :-p no offence losh
Dude there is no reply from mell
Is that true?
Honestly speaking I missed your reply ...anyway
I will speak from my experience
1. Eight chips are capable 270 GH. That is what I have archived with Technobit boards stable for a week. Then I decided that it is too dangerous and slowed down
Back to amt
This guys still do not know how much power they need. So in terms of turbo kit option is what you would go for.
I can assure you that so called turbo mod in a PC box with such a small heatsinks and two crappy fans is madness complete suicide what you will get would be smoke only
Besides for turbo mode you have to able to mod both chip clock and voltage via software. Do you have such option yes/no?
About your famous 200 GH in nominal mode
The above graph clearly shows what I exactly said 520 on AVARAGE for 3 modules.
Is that true?
And again the reason for this is:
1. Some of the chips are crappy with dead cores. Not amt fault so it is a pure luck how many healthy chips with 100% working cores you will get in your modules. On AVARAGE you are loosing about 5-10 % percent just because of that
2. You need good cooling so that it can work. Have you seen the pictures of do it kits with melted and us soldered chips? I have seen the you can look at amt thread if you wih. Why this happens because amt wer not applied a thermal paste or because there was something wrong and contact was bad. Amt dolling sucks the need bigger radiators for sure with much better airflow
And so on and on
Stop taking pink pills dude
Ask again mell what is the AVARAGE performance and do the math
Have in mind that mell got lucky and received the best of the best amongst their crap