I'm runing Americancoin version v0.6.4.0-g3aaa7ba-beta
Never looked on my old wallet to see what version the other one was ( or if it was a different version ). Just know that when I downloaded this one I could open it.
Topic: [ANN] AMERICAN COIN - AMC - Now About To Start - pool available already.. - page 17. (Read 75541 times)
June 03, 2013, 02:37:39 PM
June 03, 2013, 02:32:29 PM
I had to redownload the wallet.
June 03, 2013, 02:19:12 PM
Same difficulty. See for yourself.
09:37:52

{
"blocks" : 13652,
"currentblocksize" : 0,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.75972039,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 14571728,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}
10:01:11

{
"blocks" : 13677,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.75972039,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 18786014,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}
11:00:23

{
"blocks" : 13708,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.75972039,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 27297609,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}
11:22:17

getmininginfo
11:22:17

{
"blocks" : 13717,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.75972039,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 26526448,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}
09:37:52

{
"blocks" : 13652,
"currentblocksize" : 0,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.75972039,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 14571728,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}
10:01:11

{
"blocks" : 13677,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.75972039,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 18786014,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}
11:00:23

{
"blocks" : 13708,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.75972039,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 27297609,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}
11:22:17

getmininginfo
11:22:17

{
"blocks" : 13717,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.75972039,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 26526448,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}
in that case im not sure then.
i cant even get the wallet to sync up now, good job there is a pool although the blocks are going so slowly again it could take another day at this rate.
June 03, 2013, 01:29:53 PM
Same difficulty. See for yourself.
09:37:52

{
"blocks" : 13652,
"currentblocksize" : 0,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.75972039,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 14571728,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}
10:01:11

{
"blocks" : 13677,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.75972039,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 18786014,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}
11:00:23

{
"blocks" : 13708,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.75972039,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 27297609,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}
11:22:17

getmininginfo
11:22:17

{
"blocks" : 13717,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.75972039,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 26526448,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}
09:37:52

{
"blocks" : 13652,
"currentblocksize" : 0,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.75972039,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 14571728,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}
10:01:11

{
"blocks" : 13677,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.75972039,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 18786014,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}
11:00:23

{
"blocks" : 13708,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.75972039,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 27297609,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}
11:22:17

getmininginfo
11:22:17

{
"blocks" : 13717,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.75972039,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 26526448,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}
June 03, 2013, 01:27:20 PM
Why does the block coundown slow down when there's more hash thrown at it? It's like 1 block every 2 minutes now with twice the network hash from 3 hours ago. 3 hours ago it was 1 block a minute..
whats going on
whats going on
did the diff rise or is it the same as before?
June 03, 2013, 01:27:04 PM
blocks up to 6500 had coins , i think that was meant for the dev only, but somehow others found out before he mined it all right? and they started mining away and some have 5-10k already.
If it has not been leaked may have been a good release since diff would be reasonable and there are some working pools on release to help with a fairer distribution. However it's not really cool that others have coins other than the dev. I like the name and will try to mine a few k and see what happens. Don't like that it's another ltc clone after seeing what happened to ftc and cnc. Perhaps they have changed the diff retarget though.
If it has not been leaked may have been a good release since diff would be reasonable and there are some working pools on release to help with a fairer distribution. However it's not really cool that others have coins other than the dev. I like the name and will try to mine a few k and see what happens. Don't like that it's another ltc clone after seeing what happened to ftc and cnc. Perhaps they have changed the diff retarget though.
That could be true, however there have also been plenty of blocks after 6500 that have generated 150 coins. These are the ones I'm talking about above. Whether people's balances are strictly from those, or also from pre-6500 who knows.
really? i heard those coins were from fee's although that amount for fees does sound unlikely for sure.
I think we are saying the same thing
yes i think so
June 03, 2013, 01:23:15 PM
Why does the block coundown slow down when there's more hash thrown at it? It's like 1 block every 2 minutes now with twice the network hash from 3 hours ago. 3 hours ago it was 1 block a minute..
whats going on
whats going on
June 03, 2013, 12:50:41 PM
blocks up to 6500 had coins , i think that was meant for the dev only, but somehow others found out before he mined it all right? and they started mining away and some have 5-10k already.
If it has not been leaked may have been a good release since diff would be reasonable and there are some working pools on release to help with a fairer distribution. However it's not really cool that others have coins other than the dev. I like the name and will try to mine a few k and see what happens. Don't like that it's another ltc clone after seeing what happened to ftc and cnc. Perhaps they have changed the diff retarget though.
If it has not been leaked may have been a good release since diff would be reasonable and there are some working pools on release to help with a fairer distribution. However it's not really cool that others have coins other than the dev. I like the name and will try to mine a few k and see what happens. Don't like that it's another ltc clone after seeing what happened to ftc and cnc. Perhaps they have changed the diff retarget though.
That could be true, however there have also been plenty of blocks after 6500 that have generated 150 coins. These are the ones I'm talking about above. Whether people's balances are strictly from those, or also from pre-6500 who knows.
really? i heard those coins were from fee's although that amount for fees does sound unlikely for sure.
I think we are saying the same thing
June 03, 2013, 12:46:56 PM
blocks up to 6500 had coins , i think that was meant for the dev only, but somehow others found out before he mined it all right? and they started mining away and some have 5-10k already.
If it has not been leaked may have been a good release since diff would be reasonable and there are some working pools on release to help with a fairer distribution. However it's not really cool that others have coins other than the dev. I like the name and will try to mine a few k and see what happens. Don't like that it's another ltc clone after seeing what happened to ftc and cnc. Perhaps they have changed the diff retarget though.
If it has not been leaked may have been a good release since diff would be reasonable and there are some working pools on release to help with a fairer distribution. However it's not really cool that others have coins other than the dev. I like the name and will try to mine a few k and see what happens. Don't like that it's another ltc clone after seeing what happened to ftc and cnc. Perhaps they have changed the diff retarget though.
That could be true, however there have also been plenty of blocks after 6500 that have generated 150 coins. These are the ones I'm talking about above. Whether people's balances are strictly from those, or also from pre-6500 who knows.
really? i heard those coins were from fee's although that amount for fees does sound unlikely for sure.
June 03, 2013, 12:26:26 PM
blocks up to 6500 had coins , i think that was meant for the dev only, but somehow others found out before he mined it all right? and they started mining away and some have 5-10k already.
If it has not been leaked may have been a good release since diff would be reasonable and there are some working pools on release to help with a fairer distribution. However it's not really cool that others have coins other than the dev. I like the name and will try to mine a few k and see what happens. Don't like that it's another ltc clone after seeing what happened to ftc and cnc. Perhaps they have changed the diff retarget though.
If it has not been leaked may have been a good release since diff would be reasonable and there are some working pools on release to help with a fairer distribution. However it's not really cool that others have coins other than the dev. I like the name and will try to mine a few k and see what happens. Don't like that it's another ltc clone after seeing what happened to ftc and cnc. Perhaps they have changed the diff retarget though.
That could be true, however there have also been plenty of blocks after 6500 that have generated 150 coins. These are the ones I'm talking about above. Whether people's balances are strictly from those, or also from pre-6500 who knows.
June 03, 2013, 12:23:08 PM
blocks up to 6500 had coins , i think that was meant for the dev only, but somehow others found out before he mined it all right? and they started mining away and some have 5-10k already.
If it has not been leaked may have been a good release since diff would be reasonable and there are some working pools on release to help with a fairer distribution. However it's not really cool that others have coins other than the dev. I like the name and will try to mine a few k and see what happens. Don't like that it's another ltc clone after seeing what happened to ftc and cnc. Perhaps they have changed the diff retarget though.
If it has not been leaked may have been a good release since diff would be reasonable and there are some working pools on release to help with a fairer distribution. However it's not really cool that others have coins other than the dev. I like the name and will try to mine a few k and see what happens. Don't like that it's another ltc clone after seeing what happened to ftc and cnc. Perhaps they have changed the diff retarget though.
June 03, 2013, 12:19:08 PM
so the people that already have thousands of it... is it due to defective code or something else?
Apparently from fees (perhaps those holding the pre-mined coins set high tx fees and shifted some coins around, as a bonus to those continuing to mine for 0 reward), or so the theory goes. I'm not sure yet.
well that's just crappy, it's a mutated version of premine
The pre-mine is crappy...but presumably anyone hopping on this thread saw there was one, its all over the place. As for the 150 potential tx fee's...its probably the least they could do for the debacle this whole thing has been.
June 03, 2013, 12:17:55 PM
so the people that already have thousands of it... is it due to defective code or something else?
Apparently from fees (perhaps those holding the pre-mined coins set high tx fees and shifted some coins around, as a bonus to those continuing to mine for 0 reward), or so the theory goes. I'm not sure yet.
well that's just crappy, it's a mutated version of premine
June 03, 2013, 12:15:54 PM
so the people that already have thousands of it... is it due to defective code or something else?
Apparently from fees (perhaps those holding the pre-mined coins set high tx fees and shifted some coins around, as a bonus to those continuing to mine for 0 reward), or so the theory goes. I'm not sure yet.
June 03, 2013, 12:14:01 PM
so the people that already have thousands of it... is it due to defective code or something else?
June 03, 2013, 12:06:43 PM
did it always say this
"lite version of Bitcoin optimized for CPU mining using scrypt" is this cpu mining only or gpu will work too, is this another yac or just a simple ltc clone?
"lite version of Bitcoin optimized for CPU mining using scrypt" is this cpu mining only or gpu will work too, is this another yac or just a simple ltc clone?
ltc clone
June 03, 2013, 12:04:54 PM
did it always say this
"lite version of Bitcoin optimized for CPU mining using scrypt" is this cpu mining only or gpu will work too, is this another yac or just a simple ltc clone?
"lite version of Bitcoin optimized for CPU mining using scrypt" is this cpu mining only or gpu will work too, is this another yac or just a simple ltc clone?
June 03, 2013, 12:00:35 PM
Blockcount unchanged in the last 100 minutes. Time to take a nap...
June 03, 2013, 11:53:29 AM
Wow...who's this guy:
June 03, 2013, 11:44:46 AM
Ohhh, they have an "official mining pool". 
Jump to: