Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] Biotron.io Announcement - Transparent personal data analytics platform - page 95. (Read 29568 times)

member
Activity: 196
Merit: 10
Why only Ethereum, even if they want to do tokens there are other smart contracts blockchain out there

IT's the easiest most documented blockchain out there to initiate your ICO.... NEO is catching up but has a long way to go.
full member
Activity: 280
Merit: 106
By the way, the developers reported something about the planned exchanges, where will BTRN be traded?

Too early to talk about exchanger I think since the private ITE has just started. Maybe they will announce it after the public ITE.
I'm sure that it will be tradeable at Ether delta and so major exchanges
full member
Activity: 518
Merit: 101
🚀🚀 ATHERO.IO 🚀🚀
By the way, the developers reported something about the planned exchanges, where will BTRN be traded?

Too early to talk about exchanger I think since the private ITE has just started. Maybe they will announce it after the public ITE.
Yes let's wait. At this stage it is unusual to get listed on a exchange. But would be nice to get a prefared exchange.


With their short ITE that only last 9 days they are probably already in negotiations with some  hopefully good exchanges.
newbie
Activity: 90
Merit: 0
By the way, the developers reported something about the planned exchanges, where will BTRN be traded?

Too early to talk about exchanger I think since the private ITE has just started. Maybe they will announce it after the public ITE.
Yes let's wait. At this stage it is unusual to get listed on a exchange. But would be nice to get a prefared exchange.
newbie
Activity: 238
Merit: 0
By the way, the developers reported something about the planned exchanges, where will BTRN be traded?

Too early to talk about exchanger I think since the private ITE has just started. Maybe they will announce it after the public ITE.
full member
Activity: 420
Merit: 136
By the way, the developers reported something about the planned exchanges, where will BTRN be traded?
member
Activity: 490
Merit: 10
www.Zercados.com
Right now Ethereum blockchain isn't just fast enough, many devs will port their dapps into EOS (fast and zero fees), Ark(fast and interoperability) and Waves (fast and exchange built in), mark my words because it's gonna happen

it depends if they are able to improve the situation on the ethereum network, it seems they are working on it
If bitcoin dominance can also be defeated by other better coins, then i can expect that.
But for now, i cant imagine it will happen.
To replace Ethereum have come the Zilliqa, as soon as they launch their blockchain in Q3, all the daps will be transferred to it, this is the first block platform that uses sharding, is scalable and truly decentralized.

I doubt it will get accepted so fast and by the time people will be ready to change to this kind of blockchain, there will be many coins using this technology and who knows which one will be most attractive to use.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 131
yeah better burn all unsold tokens, but when they are distributed among investors its also ok.
hero member
Activity: 1736
Merit: 857
25% all BTRN tokens will be allocated for user acquisition activities, business development, and market expansion.

If not all the ERC-20 based BTRN are generated during the ITE, the remaining tokens will be allocated to the user acquisition pool.


How exactly will this be done? I'm wondering if you plan airdrop to attract users? This would be very displeasing to investors. Or maybe there will be a bounty company?

We plan to have strong referral program during user acquisition campaign. Stay tuned for more info.


Referral program is almost the same as airdrop. The result will be the same. Of course, you will attract a lot of users. At the same time, the price of tokens will fall dramatically. If 35% of tokens will be sold 6/7 (for simplicity of calculation we will take such a very good sales result), then the remaining 5% of unsold tokens will be transferred to the fund for attracting users. Then it will be no longer 25%, but 30% of tokens. Exactly the same amount as will be sold to investors. This already means a fall in the price of tokens by half.

Since you have not yet made a final decision on some issues, I suggest also consider this option: Reduce this fund to attract users to 5% of tokens and hold a bounty company for these funds. Transfer 20% of tokens for sale to investors. Then for sale there will be 55% of tokens. After the end of sales, all unsold tokens are distributed among investors, in proportion to the tokens they bought. Or you just burn the unsold tokens.
full member
Activity: 588
Merit: 100
Why only Ethereum, even if they want to do tokens there are other smart contracts blockchain out there

The number of smart contract blockchains are large. ETH is usually the go-to one because it is well established

because it's the most popular one and that's where the investors are.
full member
Activity: 420
Merit: 136
Right now Ethereum blockchain isn't just fast enough, many devs will port their dapps into EOS (fast and zero fees), Ark(fast and interoperability) and Waves (fast and exchange built in), mark my words because it's gonna happen

it depends if they are able to improve the situation on the ethereum network, it seems they are working on it
If bitcoin dominance can also be defeated by other better coins, then i can expect that.
But for now, i cant imagine it will happen.
To replace Ethereum have come the Zilliqa, as soon as they launch their blockchain in Q3, all the daps will be transferred to it, this is the first block platform that uses sharding, is scalable and truly decentralized.
sr. member
Activity: 798
Merit: 262
If user provided data will be "anonymized - Pseudonymisation" then how would they know what belongs to who or the purpose is to hide it out?
newbie
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
such a good project and words...i support it
full member
Activity: 686
Merit: 100
What this mean “User Acquisition” token pool? How this pool will be used? This will be airdrops for tokens holders or...?

No. This is different. Among investors, these unsold tokens will not be distributed. This is the difference from Sophia. I already asked the same question, although they did not answer it. At the moment, the following conclusions can be drawn from the developers' answers and from whitepaper:
They did not decide whether they will have their own blockchain or they will work on the Ethereum blockchain. I think that there will be a second option, since this is simpler.
The bounty decision has not yet been made, so this "User Acquisition", which is 25%, can be used for bounty or even for airdrop. Since this is the only way to acquire users and expand the client base. Given that all unsold tokens will be shipped there, it will be a very large volume, much more than 25%.
So surely there will be bounty or airdrop? 25% is very big.

Simpler not means better. Own blockchain always better. Everyone can create ERC tokens. And a thousands of project with erc tokens. I prefer own blockhain always. Own coins always growing much better and have much more value. When they will decided about this?  Huh



The question however is do they need their own blockchain? You could argue that the big Ethereum chain is as safe as possible while a new blockchain would have to fear 51% attacks for example.
It's an important point of the project and I think they should define it from the beginning. I think it's better to have their own blockchain, although I imagine that it means more work.

if you make your own blockchain you can optimize it for the particular usage you are going to do. otherwise generally speaking everything described in this project could already happen using smart contract in the ethereum blockchain

Yes, I do understand though why people would prefer them to have their own blockchain. ERC20 tokens kind of have a bad reputation as everyone can create them with a few clicks and there have been many scams as well. So maybe these factors are important too.

I think Time should have thought about the possibility of security problems initially, but this would be normal even to the big networks, I think it is advisable to work on network and own contracts, and always have a team capable of doing a job of security and continuous fixes
full member
Activity: 252
Merit: 100
Why only Ethereum, even if they want to do tokens there are other smart contracts blockchain out there

The number of smart contract blockchains are large. ETH is usually the go-to one because it is well established
member
Activity: 434
Merit: 10
Why only Ethereum, even if they want to do tokens there are other smart contracts blockchain out there
It's much easier to create tokens and project based on ETH than any independent ones. So scammers do not have much of a choice. Contrary, serious organizations are able to create their own unique cryptocurrency based on general blockchain.
sr. member
Activity: 672
Merit: 261
Why only Ethereum, even if they want to do tokens there are other smart contracts blockchain out there
member
Activity: 476
Merit: 10
What this mean “User Acquisition” token pool? How this pool will be used? This will be airdrops for tokens holders or...?

No. This is different. Among investors, these unsold tokens will not be distributed. This is the difference from Sophia. I already asked the same question, although they did not answer it. At the moment, the following conclusions can be drawn from the developers' answers and from whitepaper:
They did not decide whether they will have their own blockchain or they will work on the Ethereum blockchain. I think that there will be a second option, since this is simpler.
The bounty decision has not yet been made, so this "User Acquisition", which is 25%, can be used for bounty or even for airdrop. Since this is the only way to acquire users and expand the client base. Given that all unsold tokens will be shipped there, it will be a very large volume, much more than 25%.
So surely there will be bounty or airdrop? 25% is very big.

Simpler not means better. Own blockchain always better. Everyone can create ERC tokens. And a thousands of project with erc tokens. I prefer own blockhain always. Own coins always growing much better and have much more value. When they will decided about this?  Huh



The question however is do they need their own blockchain? You could argue that the big Ethereum chain is as safe as possible while a new blockchain would have to fear 51% attacks for example.
It's an important point of the project and I think they should define it from the beginning. I think it's better to have their own blockchain, although I imagine that it means more work.

if you make your own blockchain you can optimize it for the particular usage you are going to do. otherwise generally speaking everything described in this project could already happen using smart contract in the ethereum blockchain

Yes, I do understand though why people would prefer them to have their own blockchain. ERC20 tokens kind of have a bad reputation as everyone can create them with a few clicks and there have been many scams as well. So maybe these factors are important too.
jr. member
Activity: 168
Merit: 3
welcome to my world
member
Activity: 686
Merit: 10
it turns out anyone, for example, I as a private person, can use your platform to analyze the available data ?
Pages:
Jump to: