The wallets for BCC will only show your BCC. I'm probably going to ignore BCC unless there is an easy way to use my Trezor. I'm hoping their Electrum product will interact with my Trezor, just like my Electrum wallet does now. I hope that I don't have to go through a bunch of confusing steps to ensure that I'm not replaying the transactions. Since I only own 1.8 BTC, I'll see how the market is doing on August 1st to see if it is worth my time. I am assuming that I have the option to claim my BCC at a later date, if by some miracle, this coin succeeds in its coup of Bitcoin. BTW, I can't just import my Trezor private keys into a wallet.(At least I cannot figure out a way to get it to reveal the private keys to me. That's probably a good thing.) I'm also not going to give my 20 word seed to the BCC Electrum product either.
Based on
his tweets, I believe Thomas Voegtlin will provide users with a secure way of splitting their coins in the upcoming release 2.9 "Independence".
This page declared such an intent regarding Bitcoin Unlimited and there are strong parallels here.
It's definitely a good idea to avoid any versions of Electrum not signed by Thomas.
I don't forsee any problems specifically relating to using Trezor with Electrum.
I thought that their ultimate goal is to claim that their chain is the rightful chain. To make this claim, I think they would probably want to stick to a name that is not very distinctive at all.
I agree. Certainly those spearheading this effort hold the view that Bitcoin Cash is the real Bitcoin, just as many people hold that Bitcoin Core's branch is the real Bitcoin. We can see this minimal brand sidestep in the logo too (a slight rotation) and the fact that they're holding fast to the
BTC symbol (I assume with the understanding that many different currencies share the $ symbol successfully).
The only problem I have is with the ticker BCC because it conflicts with BitConnect Coin. As has been suggested, perhaps BTCC is better.
