Hi Folks,
its kinda funny how the mining centers care which bitcoin anyway. they mine to sell for usd. if they didnt thered be like 10 address with most of the coins. i guess they are going to follow the argument of what makes more money... so if asicboost goes i guess thats all the argument is about right?
... well, I am a miner (not since yesterday).
Mining secures the blockchain, if based on POW.
I also read and understood Satoshies withepaper.
I also recognised how Blockstream and the USAF-Trolls harmed Bitcoin and the community.
I did not find anything in Satoshies withepaper which leads to a 1MB limited blocksize (implemented later).
I do not mind second layer Applications (LN and others don´t need SW).
I do mind sending my value over "any can spend instances" !As far, as I understand the process,
BTC with SegWit leads to transforming Bitcoin (BTC)
from a P2P (Peer to Peer) Network to a PMP (Peer to MANY peers) Network.
=> Blockstream Troll Coin (BTC)with centralized second layer instances.
I far as I understand, if I try to do a manual (doing the math on a pice of paper) calculation of a 256sha hash,
I would surely today start with some 000x off the beginning, I´d call this "Mindboost" - [asiscboot on an asic]
- so I don´t mind that at all, except someone really wants to bring down hashing-power back to the root (I ´v got some).
If so,
I got my bitcoin abc node up and running (with some older gear waiting on the sideline).
Please take this as my private Statement.
yours PanneKopp