Would it be overkill to have more than one BC multipool? I kinda want stake holders to have a choice of which pool they want to use. I have a pool setup with coin switching and auto payout.. but I didn't want to launch it if the community felt more than one multipool was too much.
Any thoughts on this?
We have multiple BTC multipools now. Why shouldn't we have multiple BC multipools too?
Some pros as far as I can see:
1) I guess you might have another strategy which coin to mine so we could have a competition here and it would lead to more profit for everyone!
2) It's always nice to have a choice (UI, server locations and so on)
3) Diversification is also a huge advantage I think. So in case one pool would have problems another one can "catch falling flag" and keep pushing BC up!
I don't know how everyone else feels, but for me one of the principle gains we made over the weekend through the multipool beta was the strengthening of the community. It had a powerful unifying effect, and that is hugely important. While I think it would be nice to have a failover option, for the time being I think the singular 'official' multipool is the way to go, for the unifying force it generates. Just my two cents.
Spot on mate. I sold off my stash of MINT today and went all in on BC at 2100 - looking like a much better coin to be honest. The low has been tested, positive upward trend forming, stable and supportive community. This thing is just gonna explode when more and more people sell off their MINT, DOGE, other coins that are generally not going anywhere by down for the forseeable future.
mint seems to be steadily dropping as BC is steadily rising .