Topic: [ANN] ION [ION] | POS 3.0 | Mobile Gaming | Join the ionomy today! - page 110. (Read 473123 times)

Of course not, why would "the tax man" do such a thing? However "the tax man" (or woman) can make you pay capital gains tax, which you seem to imply hasn't started yet.

Unless you didn't have any gains. Maybe your paycoining lets you carry forward the $3k loss allowance for the next 100 years while at the same time bragging about your "profits".

I have high confidence that the tax man is not going to make me "refund my ICO coins" on one of my foreign investments... lol

No, my next prediction is that your charming ignorance won't work on the IRS agent. "This is from Seychelles" won't work either.

I'm guessing your next prediction will be that the Governments of the world will start taxing the coins.. It only a matter of time before they would want a piece of the action!!!

My guess is that most developed countries will try to impose some sort of control over this nonsense. One of the easiest ways to do this is by going after the exchanges. Places like Bittrex may be forced to drop ICO tokens if trading those tokens would require them to become a regulated securities exchange.

To be fair though and im not sure of china and usa's cross laws but i dont think ion being us citizens can be forced sued whatever by a chinese law/requirement. might prevent you from visiting china though in the future. The bigger concern is what happens if sec follows and bans icos with legal implications. Past icos will be targetted and incorporating in another country wont save them when they are us citizens. I avoid all ico based coins for this reason as honestly they are disasters waiting to happen legality wise. Better to stick with pure mining coins without masternodes asthey themselves could be an issue too.

renaming a sale from ico to crowdfund or swap ot anything also wont change the fact.

Looks like China is cracking down on ICOs:

https://www.coindesk.com/china-outlaws-icos-financial-regulators-order-halt-token-trading/

Luckily for ionomy they are so small that they probably don't have any bagholders in China. On the other hand, they don't do KYC, so technically anybody who wants a refund could ask for one.

"persons or organizations who have completed ICOs shall refund the investors, protect the investors' rights, and deal with the risks properly. [...] people who refuse to cease ICO activities or refuse to refund investors will be investigated and severely punished according to the law"

Ok then useless coin..

It was supposed to be used in games (indirectly - Apple/Google won't allow direct use of alternative payment methods). It's not happening though. They barely got one half-baked game done and they have to pay people to play it, players are cheating, etc.

What does "Mobile Gaming" mean? does ION used as a coin inside games like GameCredit?

Can any one explain?

The Ionomy Vision is just starting to grow. Many of it concepts are in the infancy stage and are finally getting a bite into the crypto and gaming world!!! I expect there to be major growth of the Ionomy Vision during the next two years...

Yes I understand. I mean, sometimes when there are trolls and you attracted them once, you cannot get rid of them no matter what you do or say or present on this thread.

They'll only tell you about the cake and ice cream, not the nuts and bolts. And if you are looking for a transparent operation, you best keep looking as this isn't it.

Pretty interesting idea perhaps, Im just wondering if something like this would actually be successful in a year or so. Anyway to prove this? Or is the burden of research on me? Thanks!

I'm away on a business trip for the next couple of days will respond when I get back

Have a nice day

 

one concerning point is full time employees bug they arent designing content thats released more spending a lot of paid time on making adverts and we are going to do this. its also misleading as many things arent built from ground up. the crypto pay swap thing is shapeshift skeleton service so they didnt credit it in their announcement of the feature and had it sound like its something they created. did they integrate ? yes nothing wrong with that but i feel they are trying to give investors the perception they arent using tools and are innovating.

many of those powergrid tools will be open sourced tools and apis they skin. the ad network for one i suspect will definitely be. apple have pulled out of iads as its hard to manage prevent gaming and maintain code for multi browser/app support. ionomy couldnt lock a scoreboard down... ads and faucet gaming are way worse.

my biggest concern atm ties in with transparency. there is none.. now where di all that cash go? how was it spent. im willing to bet it was pure wages to them. ive speculated for a while this might be the case. this recent media blitz smells like funds running short. they either get day jobs or get more free money from people to pay themselves. token sales are the usual way so they are going with that. electrons should fund all their systems but now they add dark matter to force more cash injections.

i suspect when funds dry and get low they will start making ads or plans and pay themselves the ion bounty premine to justify. they'll then slow sell to market.

so far still half a game and no public api yet. 18 months later and devs cant go to site and download to integrate. concerning...

Given the hype with the power grid storm thingy (they even splurged on a press release, so that's like a once-a-year event) you'd think we would have more shit to discuss instead of having to listen to korvas' incessant whining about his personal struggles.

Except there is no follow-up to all that hype. They haven't even announced the details of the ICO (or whatever they call the dark matter thing). What was the point of having a week of daily announcements followed by nothing? Tried to pump the price? Kinda went in the opposite direction. The 5+ full-time employees are slacking bigly.

its only when it suits them as a response. in the days of garza they never denounced trolls on hashtalk and other places they thought it was ok and funny because they considered them trolls. korvas also calls accusations that are baseless bad. he accused me of doxing him with other legendaries. i have never been involved in a dox. ive commented on doxes others have provided with info but never done one. so again korvas makes an accusation of me doxing but had no proof. by his words thats shameful.

end fact is hes a liar until he answers like he said he would. hes focus on dox being bad to deflect from ionomy questions.

if korvas wants to make accusations he should provide proof himself or stop making out others are baseless.

You're lying - and that seems to be the only trick in your book - it wasn't "always" that way. "ionomy" was answering questions in the beginning:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/ionomy-828120


You keep repeating that as if you just came up with this idea. Wasn't a big concern to you while it was other people being doxed. In fact you were encouraging it.


That's still against the rules.


Those are not accusations. Those are your statements that had been proven to be false. Like the one above about this thread.