Topic: [ANN] ION [ION] | POS 3.0 | Mobile Gaming | Join the ionomy today! - page 112. (Read 473123 times)

pretty much. the fact you'd have to do some work means you have to investigate to find some transparency i.e its not clearly evident.

you pulled the im being a bad man thing to avoid answering the question you said you would. look into your past history korvas, you havent been nice yourself to a lot of people. you can sit back all day and justify why you think they deserve it or they started first but you should lead by example. should someone new and nice here answer any of your questions based on how they see you treat others?

i personally wont be answering any more of your questions until you address the one i asked on transparency like you said you would so you basically cant ask me to validate anything anymore. im pretty sure most others will do the same as well its a two way street and you've commited to only things in your lane.

Ionomy have always said this is an announcement only thread so when you say it's been months since Ionomy posted here you actually mean never so why say it ?  

I post here because Ionomy don't, someone needs to counter all the mis-truth's Anyone can speak to the team they just need to join the slack.

some unintelligible dribble

Not really an apples vs apples comparison more an apples vs a bucket of shit one..... what was it that boki accused you of again ?......

As a paycoiner/GAWtard you also learnt a few lessons. The difference is you've dug yourself one big deep hole of denial. Whereas I took it on the chin and moved on. Since the life changing bitcoin discovery in 2013 I have made many a bad decisions but luckily I've also made a few right ones. Sticking with Ionomy was one of those right decisions.

No I'm one of those my opponent sets the ground rules kind of asshole.

To be clear..



I told OoOo to fuck off because during the attempt to dox me he chimes in with I tried to blackmail eth . To seriously attempt to answer his question would require me to do some work which considering his actions forget it. I did try to ignore it but he was persistent so in the end I told him to fuck off and explained why. What he did was not a very nice

He's just going to have to wait for Ionomy to implement another layer of transparency which they will as they are committed to all things blockchain.

Simple - it's only a problem when others do it 

Paycoiners have learned this lesson from their spiritual leader, who in turn was inspired by the KnC grifters.

And if you do respond to their bullshit they'll call "photoshop" anyway.

Was wondering when you would make an entrance.

Ah yes I remember this. All I was doing then was calling you out. The only agitation I felt at the time was when you created a new thread and fucked off. I thought you'd be gone of at least a month but you didn't go you just created a new thread

Sorry don't shill

Guilt for what ?

"you need to respond and let others make up their minds as no response is a response in itself, one of guilt"

so does this mean no response on transparency is one of guilt?

Big difference with me and Suchmoon's doxing is I read it and did nothing. I don't like suchmoon so didn't care plus it's not my job to moderate.

Suchmoon your quick enough to respond to sharkie but boki 15 has asked you questions made some serious allegations that you first try to discredit and then you ignore. Like I said before your slack explanation didn't stack up and without any evidence is bullshit especially when boki claims your part of the GAWsuit too.

Your right about one thing though, pretty much everything you post I won't believe as to me your a lying condescending bully that has spent 1,000's of hours posting crap on a mission of ill intent.

It's not me though you need to concern yourself with. You need to respond and let other people make up their minds as no response is a response in itself, it's one of guilt.

Before you start bleating on about my post being off topic. It's like I said before you made this ontopic as for the past 7 months you've been trying to link Mattlack/IONOMY to Garza/GAW. If the Mods delete this then to maintain parity they would also need to delete most of your 10,160 posts of crap erasing all your mentions of Garza, GAW & XPY on this thread.

Oh and to finish off the only thing irrelevant in you response to Wild is your FAQ.Your FAQ is totally and utterly irrelevant.

My rational is you recently created a thread called

[ION] [IONOMY] Worthy successor to XPY - 100% premined - Garza would be proud

And then claim the FAQ you put together is a fair unbiased assessment of ION/IONOMY. How long do you think you can get away with your antics before people start to challenge your credibility.... stupid , stupid , stupid